All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Help solve this argument... Who would you rather have as your QB in 2008?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 13596
Posts: 357
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #1
You can help solve a Covers argument.....
 
WHO WOULD YOU RATHER HAVE AS YOUR STARTING QB FOR THE 2008 SEASON?
 
Tony Romo or Donovan McNabb
 
One word answers are fine - ROMO? Or McNABB?
 
Please be objective. Your help is appreciated.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 8856
Posted: #2
I think they are both about the same, but I would go with Romo just for the sole reason McNabb is injury prone at this point of his career.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by jackjaffee:

I think they are both about the same, but I would go with Romo just for the sole reason McNabb is injury prone at this point of his career.

Thank you for your vote.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 116
Posted: #4
I would take Romo......not because I think he is great but because I would pick Rick Mirer before I would take Donavan Mcnabb.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #5
Quote Originally Posted by Sucker_Free:

I would take Romo......not because I think he is great but because I would pick Rick Mirer before I would take Donavan Mcnabb.

Thank you for your participation.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2812
Posted: #6
I would take mcnabb......when healthy he is clearly the better of the two.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by BennyTheJet:

I would take mcnabb......when healthy he is clearly the better of the two.

Thank you for voting.

Remember when voting to consider the players health, proneness to injury, and overall toll his body has taken.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #8
Why not pose it this way?
 
 
 
When healthy and on top of their game, who would you rather have as your QB?
 
 
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #9
Duh,,,,
 
 
 
McNAbb
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by ltbdubz5:

Duh,,,,
 
 
 
McNAbb

Sorry, your vote does not count and neither does mine. This is solving our argument, so we are ineligible.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #11
Again, the key is......for the 2008 season!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #12
Change the parameters. 
 
You are throwing down guidelines within which to vote.
 
Man up bucky, let's pretend they are both 100%.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #13
Lakers, obviously we are on opposite sides, but seriously we have garnered some attention.
 
 
Some of us are frothing @ the mouth for some football!!!!!!!!!
 
 
Thanks to steelcash for getting this crap going in his thread!!!!!!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #14
We know they're not, one is in his prime and one is in the twilight of his career...that's the whole point of the argument. We're talking NOW, not 3 years ago or 5 years ago or 7 years ago.......NOW!
 
Why would we wanna pretend anything? You just proved that you're living in a fantasy world...get in touch with reality!
 
In 5-10 years we'll decide who had the better career. We don't know that at this point. McNabb's career is over while Romo's is just beginning.
 
How about you and I don't discuss this in here and let people vote...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #15
I'll play your little game.
 
My point is this season.  Let's play it like the yare both going to be healthy. 
 
#5 is still 32 and Romo is 20whatever.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 36739
Posted: #16
Even as a hardcore Dallas Cowboys fan, I would take McNabb right now.  Slap Romo on any other team, and he would be booed off the field.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 36739
Posted: #17
Donovan McNabb is 31

Tony Romo is 28
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #18
NFL NEtwork right now has #5 vs Chiefs.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #19
2-2
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 2362
Posted: #20
Romo
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #21
3-2 Romeo
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 881
Posted: #22
Romo no doubt
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 38266
Posted: #23
McNabb - he is 100% this year.
McNabb has proven he can win playoff games take his team to championship games and superbowl.
 
Romo has failed to win a playoff game now twice.
 
Romo has TO to throw to I see what McNabb did with TO. I also have seen Mcnabb win playoff games without any real WR.
 
Until Romo shows you something other then regular season this is a no brainer.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 766
Posted: #24
Another fan that sees the big picture. 
 
thanks Allaboutme.
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2006
Posts: 11382
Posted: #25
Itzdubz - Chill with the posts in this threads dude, let the public speak.
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.