All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Green Bay Matches up Great vs. Pitt!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10665
Posts: 153
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 242
Posted: #26

ah, its spelled asinine spanky.  and how is pitt losing twice to spread offenses misinformed info?  load up yourself with your $100/week paycheck douchebag!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2300
Posted: #27
the single important factor nobody takes into account w/ Packers is Rodgers ability to run.  He's not Vick but there's nobody else I'd rather have back there I needed 5 yards w/ nothing open downfield it's usually a gimme first for Rodgers.  I completely agree packers are gonna light up the Steeler secondary like a Chirstmas tree there is no way to defend speed especially when you don't have the numbers.  The biggest advantage for Pack is the surface and indoors fast track speed kills Steelers no answers can not compete w/ this kind of team.  And white mice please w/ the QB rating what was Mr. 2 ringsbigrapist yesterday w/ out his running game not bailing him out w/ 170 yards?  Was he not 10-19 for 100 and change w/ 2 ints himself?? 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1220
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:

Rodgers is not Brees. He has a ring. Rodgers is not Brady. He has 3. As good as Rodgers was in Atlanta he sure wasnt yester. 17-30 with 2 ints and QB rating 55. Elite QBs do not go 3-and-out with game on the line in last 4 mins. What did BigBen do with 3rd and 7 in final 2 mins. He made a play. And yes Packers shouldve won game by 20 pts but fact is a 3rd string qb had a shot to beat them with a minute in Game.  And that against #9 Bear D.  Pitt is #2.
And goldilocks if fact that I like Pitt makes you more confident with pick Im glad. Load up on them. I would expect that from someone who made such assine misinformed original statement about this matchup

Misinformation? Where? Oh yeah QB rating? You wanna talk QB rating? Well Big Ben's first RING he won he put up a WHOPPING 33 QB rating! He sure earned that ring! You have been wrong all post season and it will continue in the Super Bowl! You sound like a jackoff.  33 QB RATING. What was Big Bens yesterday? Not higher than Rodgers I can't believe! White Mice

 

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 2087
Posted: #29

 

Go ahead and Write-off Pittsburgh.....The pack were 10-6 in the regular season..They lost to three teams under .500 .  They are playing really well right now but so are the Steelers.  They do like to throw the ball, and have some similiar sets as NE, but PItt will be able to slow down this pack offense, just like Chicago did all 3 times this year.  Don't forget this pack team is in the bottom half of the league in run D...Mendenhall is hot right now..Go ahead and write-off a team that is 6-1 in the Super Bowl...You don't go against a team that knows how to win the big game.  Pitt 25 guys on the team with SB experience...GB 2

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 10787
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by mpp30:

ah, its spelled asinine spanky.  and how is pitt losing twice to spread offenses misinformed info?  load up yourself with your $100/week paycheck douchebag!

OK spanky congrats on winning the spelling bee. Who was your alias last month. APOC? Pitt lost 3 games this year all to playoff teams with combined record of 37-17. BigBen didnt play in one of them.  Packers lost 6 games and 3 to stalwarts Detroit-Wash-Miami combined 18-28 as daveyt mentioned. 48 posts and my youre so pottymouthed. And will gladly compare W-2 with yours anytime alias man.
Goldilock--BigBen yester made every play he needed to. He didnt have a 3-and-out with 4 mins to go. Packers may win Game by 5 TDs who knows. I dont think so maybe you do. But if you or your newfound mpp30 alias buddy think Rodgers lights up Pitt D like "christmas trees" you both prove how ignorant you are of the matchups you talk about.  Isnt that right Apocolpse?  LOL. congrats on being spelling winners. Now figure out X's and O's and maybe you and mpp can play spanky each other
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1220
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by daveyt25:

 

Go ahead and Write-off Pittsburgh.....The pack were 10-6 in the regular season..They lost to three teams under .500 .  They are playing really well right now but so are the Steelers.  They do like to throw the ball, and have some similiar sets as NE, but PItt will be able to slow down this pack offense, just like Chicago did all 3 times this year.  Don't forget this pack team is in the bottom half of the league in run D...Mendenhall is hot right now..Go ahead and write-off a team that is 6-1 in the Super Bowl...You don't go against a team that knows how to win the big game.  Pitt 25 guys on the team with SB experience...GB 2

  I'd like to know how many Saints had Super Bowl experience compared to Indy last year? That's nonsense.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1220
Posted: #32
Who did Pitt lose too? New Orleans and New England? Spread passing teams! Green Bay will throw it all over the yard. x' and o's cmmon coach get your telestrator out and draw up a play to the BRIDGE!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 5724
Posted: #33
Just play the OVER fella's......Both teams are going to "light it up"...........
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 5214
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by mpp30:

ah, its spelled asinine spanky.  and how is pitt losing twice to spread offenses misinformed info?  load up yourself with your $100/week paycheck douchebag!

How are you in any position to bad mouth anyone elses picks. Youre the douchebag who claims he's a steelers fan, yet youve bet against them the last two weeks saying youre a fan but you bet smart and both weeks theyve burned you. How did that work out? Betting against your "favorite" team has been doing you wonders, no surprise you do the same for the superbowl

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 2087
Posted: #35

Pitt has one of the best D coordinator's of all time...He is a defensive guru.  Pitt's D speaks for itself, tops in the league.  GB has not seen a Defense like this all year.  The Steeler D had 1 bad game all year, to a team who has their number as of late.  If the Bears can shut down GB, Pittsburgh has a great shot to control this game!! 

Are you telling me teams with a number of players with SB experience have NO edge over teams that have none??  Just because of 1 game last year??  Come on man, use your noodle!

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 10787
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by goaldlocks:

  I'd like to know how many Saints had Super Bowl experience compared to Indy last year? That's nonsense.
i may sound like a jagoff. You are one. As for the Saints--what does that have to do with Steelers.  I had them last year. Because Colts and peyton had no running Game either and those points were a gift. And "nonsense"? read my previous post knucklehead or have your hip-buddy mpp30 read it to you. Steelers 3 losses to teams 37-17 records. Not to Detroit or Washington or Miami. And by the way "been wrong all postseason" better check that. 3-2 last week and split yesterday. Yeah thats shitty. But still keeps me ahead of book. And you.
So like I said you and SAF mpp30 can play telestrator with each other. And talk about Saints last year whatever the heck that has to do with anything in this game??  Lets talk about Jack Lambert and Bret Favre and Cullen Jenkins and Antonio Chatman. They have as much relevance. Stick to lighting up Christmas Trees
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1220
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by daveyt25:

Pitt has one of the best D coordinator's of all time...He is a defensive guru.  Pitt's D speaks for itself, tops in the league.  GB has not seen a Defense like this all year.  The Steeler D had 1 bad game all year, to a team who has their number as of late.  If the Bears can shut down GB, Pittsburgh has a great shot to control this game!!   

Are you telling me teams with a number of players with SB experience have NO edge over teams that have none??  Just because of 1 game last year??  Come on man, use your noodle!

Defensive Guru's don't give up 39 pts at home.And 38 last year to the Pack. As for white mice. G.B did lose to Wash,Miami and Detroit. Wow Pitt really killed Miami themselves winning by 1 in a game if you remember Miami got FUC**D. REMEMBER? I DO. Oh yeah another game I remember was BUFFALO! Do youREMEMBER that Johnson DROPPED A WIDE OPEN TD to WIN it. Stop u jackal!

Oh yeah Pitt beat Cleveland TWICE Cincy TWICE, Buff,Miami (games they got BS) A stout Tennessee,Atlanta,(we saw the real atl didn't we)Don't forget Tampa Tony and Oakland! and Balt in the reg season. Pretty Impressive! nooooooooooooooooot! Not one of those teams Pitt beat have the QB or Recieving Core and run the Spread em out Offense that Green Bay brings to the table!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3420
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by mpp30:

the biggest trap angle steeler bettors have here is that they emphasize too much how 1 dimensional green bay's offense here will be.  that is correct, packers will not run in this game.  BUT, did the saints run on halloween??  no, they spread this D out and brees torched them.  just like brady did 2 weeks later.  pitt has not played a spread offense since that pats game and now face another one. 
Please Brees did not torch them.. They kicked a FG at the gun to put up THREE POINTS at the half..They had 13 points for the game with 6 minutes left and Pitt had the ball with a first down coming on the Saints side of the field before Miller fumbled if he goes down NO probaly scores 15 for the game as it was they scored a TD after the TO even then they only put up 20 at home for the game.. Will give GB 20 and take my chance.. Brady always torches Pitt and Rogers is no Brady  especially in his first SB..
Be careful with the axe Eugene.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 38250
Posted: #39

Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:

Packers are a one-dimensional team. If you think that matchup vs Harrison Woodley Farrior and Troy in theyre favor then youve got the winner. Ask Kurt Warner and Cards how it worked out for them. You take Rodgers I'll take the guy with the rings. GL

I also noticed a defensive stat for GB that I didnt care for:

They give up 4.7 ypc on defense.

MENDONHALL

- The storms will come, the storms will pass -
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 3420
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by mpp30:

ah, its spelled asinine spanky.  and how is pitt losing twice to spread offenses misinformed info?  load up yourself with your $100/week paycheck douchebag!

Actually you are misinformed read the above post they were lucky to put up 20 at home.. 20 aint torched..
Be careful with the axe Eugene.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 8
Posted: #41
Big thing in this game is they are playing indoors. When the Packers spread the field and Rogers is forced out of the pocket, he becomes very dangerous with his ability to run with the ball. I look for Rogers to disect the Steelers secondary and throw at least 3 touchdown passes and run for 1 or 2 more. Take the Pack and the over to the bank!!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by WhiteMice:

i may sound like a jagoff. You are one.


Goald is one of the sharpest mother fuckers around this place, so if he thinks you're a jagoff, you can pretty much take it to the bank!  and based on what you've posted, he seems to have hit the nail on the head, yet again...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 13648
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:

I also noticed a defensive stat for GB that I didnt care for:

They give up 4.7 ypc on defense.

MENDONHALL

cant wait til the prop bets come out on this guy

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 242
Posted: #44
no actually steelwill my big bet last week was the pack and if you look back at the forums 2 weeks ago, my big bet was the pack over the falcons.  i lost medium on the ravens at pitt and won it back that night.  i didnt bet the jets, where did you see me posting that play?  where did you see me claiming to be a steeler fan?  why are you such an ignorant douche?  can you offer any insight into this matchup or do you just want us all to know you are the #1 steeler fan here?  i felt the ravens had a good angle to win and lost.  i did not like the jets last week and layed off.  i like the pack in the matchup here and will bet them.  i liked the steelers week 17 and bet them.  why are you so offended by me picking spots here regardless of where i live?  will you please get of this "betting" site and go to a steeler fan site?   fuckin pathetic
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1220
Posted: #45
We are arguing with 3 Pitt fans and a Jackoff! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 3640
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:

I also noticed a defensive stat for GB that I didnt care for:

They give up 4.7 ypc on defense.

MENDONHALL


Down to 3.5 in the playoffs.  And only allowed one one hundred yard game in the last 5.  They've only gotten on track with rush D recently.  
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 13450
Posted: #47
Mendonhall props will likey be set too high for any value of going over due to the big game last week. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 10787
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:



Goald is one of the sharpest mother fuckers around this place, so if he thinks you're a jagoff, you can pretty much take it to the bank!  and based on what you've posted, he seems to have hit the nail on the head, yet again...
This coming from the guy whose Bowl picks were so embarrassing he silently disappeared before the Big Ones even kicked off. To bad you didnt take any of your picks to the bank Mr. Arrogance. You havent picked a winner since the boys in the PB chastized your arrogant ass. I know--tuff year and tuff breaks. Nice to see youre expanding your MF vocabulary since you cant pull a winner out of your ass  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1220
Posted: #49
Quote Originally Posted by Werker:


Down to 3.5 in the playoffs.  And only allowed one one hundred yard game in the last 5.  They've only gotten on track with rush D recently.  
CULLEN JENKINS is the reason.He CONTROLS whoever he lines up with! Whoever has to block him in the SB has his or their hands full! When was the last D-Lineman to win SB MVP?
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 978
Posted: #50
Jenkins, Raji, Matthews are gonna have a field day with the Pittsburgh O-Line!!!
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.