Posted:
#51
Remember 2007? We coming for blood next week. 
0
GB must be worried....
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
true. People don't have to click on your threads and they don't have to say what they say to you.
Hey, I made a statement.
Im not the one who throws out insults and big, tough internet words.
People dont have to click my thread.
They choose to read it, they choose to insult.
Not my fault people turn to insults and cheap shots on a sports forum.
However, you start these threads because you want people to do the very thing you are talking about. As soon as you make the thread such as this, and those statements and word choices are made, you then turn right around and say, "Hey it's not my fault, I didn't make them come into this thread. I am not the one who made them talk that way."
And for that you are right, you didn't make them. However you did make the thread with the intent to get people to do the very thing you are calling them out on.
0
Posted:
#53
Quote Originally Posted by moosehunter:
I was gonna give you a pass initially, but now you really need to shut the fuck up...
You turned this into "look at my record betting GB" immediately, so tell me mr. fucking wizard, how is one not to associate the two...
you are the reason sarbanes-oxley is alive and well in our socialistic country - "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS"...but as us to prove your record for you, show me what I said...blah, blah, blah...
you also are the idiot that thinks the total would be over 60 if GB plays NO at the storied and scary Lambeau...now that should tell you that you need to learn to seperate from being a fan and being a gambler (along wioth this initial post)....
good luck to your Pack...
So, when you make a comment calling me a square, and saying that I am going to bet the Packers and the big spread, and I make a comment that I just dont bet the Packers to bet the Packers...you then claim I am throwing a record in your face???
I claim that I only bet 50% of their games this year, and that still means im a square.
Got it
So you think after scoring 76 on opening night, that a NFC championship game wouldnt be over 60 with the same two teams and maybe hottest 2 qbs in the league???
Ok, mr Im a great gambler, what would that total be???
0
Posted:
#56
tune in next Sunday and someone will be wrong-have the nads to showup, I will...and please tell all your friends to build the line up to +8 or 9 so I can take my wife out to a nice holiday weekend, watching the Giants-49ers, but oh, you're probably expecting Saints-Pack...
But you are definitely facing a different Giants Defense than you saw 4 weeks ago, and they have won an important playoff game in Lambeau before-you were old enough to see that, right?
0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
KC didnt really blitz that much, and blitzed much less than NY will.
No Jennings, No starks makes a big difference as well.
Playing in KC and playing in GB will make a difference.
So, because 1 team had success, it means others will???
Last time I checked, GB scored 38 in NY a few weeks ago 
G-Men put up 35 in that game and their defense is playing a lot better than a month ago... Barring any setbacks in today's game, next week's tilt should be entertaining to say the least.
0
Posted:
#58
I've clicked on LETGOPACK1234 threads like he said. For this football season, I have come up for this guy 12 wins, 19 losses, - 23 units.
0
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:
I've clicked on LETGOPACK1234 threads like he said. For this football season, I have come up for this guy 12 wins, 19 losses, - 23 units.
I've clicked on LETGOPACK1234 threads like he said. For this football season, I have come up for this guy 12 wins, 19 losses, - 23 units.
but he does not bet.......
0
Posted:
#62
Quote Originally Posted by Bling:
I've clicked on LETGOPACK1234 threads like he said. For this football season, I have come up for this guy 12 wins, 19 losses, - 23 units.
I've clicked on LETGOPACK1234 threads like he said. For this football season, I have come up for this guy 12 wins, 19 losses, - 23 units.
Ha ha!!!!! Wow, you have good math. If thats what you came up with good job buddy. Not exactly sure what threads you were in
0
Posted:
#64
Quote Originally Posted by moosehunter:
but he does not bet.......
When did I say I didnt bet???
Im 4-1 in college hoops today.
I said I dont bet EVERY PACKERS GAME.
You made a statement I was saying bet the Packers next week.
I responded that I have only bet ATS on 8 packer games this year.
Unlike most gamblers, I dont need action on every game. I try to pick my spots.
Not sure where I said I dont bet????
Still waiting to see what you think the Saints/GB over would be???
0
Posted:
#68
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
When did I say I didnt bet???
Im 4-1 in college hoops today.
I said I dont bet EVERY PACKERS GAME.
You made a statement I was saying bet the Packers next week.
I responded that I have only bet ATS on 8 packer games this year.
Unlike most gamblers, I dont need action on every game. I try to pick my spots.
Not sure where I said I dont bet????
Still waiting to see what you think the Saints/GB over would be???
56 - 57....maybe not above 55.....
0
Posted:
#70
It all started innocent enough (this thread) a homer just being a homer.
I have been winning the last 3 days so I dont care. BUT I need the money I win. I dont do this for fun although this weekend has been. BUT had I be on a losing streak, like others it dosent take much to piss people off and cause another rant filled thread. So becareful when posting that it dosent take much to piss off somebody who just lost a grand on a fumble.
I have been winning the last 3 days so I dont care. BUT I need the money I win. I dont do this for fun although this weekend has been. BUT had I be on a losing streak, like others it dosent take much to piss people off and cause another rant filled thread. So becareful when posting that it dosent take much to piss off somebody who just lost a grand on a fumble.
0
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by kmoney85:
WTF are you talking about??
WTF are you talking about??
It was obviously a joke
If you're not familiar with what I'm talking about then I'll explain...
Favre threw a pick to Webster in OT in GB territory to secure the Tynes FG for the win. Hopefully you know what happened the rest of the post season.
0
Posted:
#73
Quote Originally Posted by jsaptny:
It was obviously a joke
If you're not familiar with what I'm talking about then I'll explain...
Favre threw a pick to Webster in OT in GB territory to secure the Tynes FG for the win. Hopefully you know what happened the rest of the post season.
Yeah, that PICK in OT was just awful.
Field conditions should be great next week, I expect a good game just like their prior meeting.
0
Hot Forum Topics
