How that 1st half was played is completely irrelevant to what happens next week...
As usual, HR is a great unbiased capper and what he said is the gospel...you would be best STFU right now and to love your team is one thing, stating your record (even chimps have been known to be better than 50%) is another with the basis of this statement...fucking hilarious...
If it was as you say, why the fuck play the games next week....I suppose that is what the Bears thought after GB sucked ass against the Chiefs...did you bet HUGE on the Bears because of this stupid logic....
0
Quote Originally Posted by HotRoute:
How that 1st half was played is completely irrelevant to what happens next week...
As usual, HR is a great unbiased capper and what he said is the gospel...you would be best STFU right now and to love your team is one thing, stating your record (even chimps have been known to be better than 50%) is another with the basis of this statement...fucking hilarious...
If it was as you say, why the fuck play the games next week....I suppose that is what the Bears thought after GB sucked ass against the Chiefs...did you bet HUGE on the Bears because of this stupid logic....
I shouldnt be so hard on the kid...it is gamblers like him that make the lines what they are...I hope the G Men barely escape today fueling the fire of EXACTLY what he is thinking to all the squares in the world...this is how LV makes it money and those of us not being clouded by past performance make ours....
good luck kid, nothing against your Packers at all, just think you should brush up on your logic or trying to substantiate your initial post....
0
I shouldnt be so hard on the kid...it is gamblers like him that make the lines what they are...I hope the G Men barely escape today fueling the fire of EXACTLY what he is thinking to all the squares in the world...this is how LV makes it money and those of us not being clouded by past performance make ours....
good luck kid, nothing against your Packers at all, just think you should brush up on your logic or trying to substantiate your initial post....
I shouldnt be so hard on the kid...it is gamblers like him that make the lines what they are...I hope the G Men barely escape today fueling the fire of EXACTLY what he is thinking to all the squares in the world...this is how LV makes it money and those of us not being clouded by past performance make ours....
good luck kid, nothing against your Packers at all, just think you should brush up on your logic or trying to substantiate your initial post....
Once again, please tell me when I said betting the Packers was going to be easy???
Please do???
I NEVER ONCE mentioned anything about betting them, the spread, or anything.
I have no reason to bet the game next week, I went 6-2 ATS with them this year and 7-2 on the over/unders with them this year, including winning all 3 of the 5 they went under this year
I dont bet just to bet. GB advancing would be enough for me.
So, let me know where I said to bet them next week???
0
Quote Originally Posted by moosehunter:
I shouldnt be so hard on the kid...it is gamblers like him that make the lines what they are...I hope the G Men barely escape today fueling the fire of EXACTLY what he is thinking to all the squares in the world...this is how LV makes it money and those of us not being clouded by past performance make ours....
good luck kid, nothing against your Packers at all, just think you should brush up on your logic or trying to substantiate your initial post....
Once again, please tell me when I said betting the Packers was going to be easy???
Please do???
I NEVER ONCE mentioned anything about betting them, the spread, or anything.
I have no reason to bet the game next week, I went 6-2 ATS with them this year and 7-2 on the over/unders with them this year, including winning all 3 of the 5 they went under this year
I dont bet just to bet. GB advancing would be enough for me.
So, let me know where I said to bet them next week???
Bro-your defensive gives up points like a sieve-your OL is shaky right now, matching up against a team with a killer D line. if Rodgers doesn't get time, no passing game...and the Giants on the road in the playoffs is not a good thing-I'd be very concerned and I can't justify taking you...GL though
0
Bro-your defensive gives up points like a sieve-your OL is shaky right now, matching up against a team with a killer D line. if Rodgers doesn't get time, no passing game...and the Giants on the road in the playoffs is not a good thing-I'd be very concerned and I can't justify taking you...GL though
Bro-your defensive gives up points like a sieve-your OL is shaky right now, matching up against a team with a killer D line. if Rodgers doesn't get time, no passing game...and the Giants on the road in the playoffs is not a good thing-I'd be very concerned and I can't justify taking you...GL though
Take away the last game of the year in which the 2nd team played...
GB scores 38 a game at home and allows 19
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hoyasaxa:
Bro-your defensive gives up points like a sieve-your OL is shaky right now, matching up against a team with a killer D line. if Rodgers doesn't get time, no passing game...and the Giants on the road in the playoffs is not a good thing-I'd be very concerned and I can't justify taking you...GL though
Take away the last game of the year in which the 2nd team played...
Love how angry people get by other peoples opinion.
Like seeing all the internet tough guys from behind the keyboard using big words and insults
and you basically just admitted here that you start threads like this to stir shit in the pot. You know what threads like this turn into, yet you do it anyway.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Im bored without my team playing today.
Love the opinions of the covers.com community.
Love how angry people get by other peoples opinion.
Like seeing all the internet tough guys from behind the keyboard using big words and insults
and you basically just admitted here that you start threads like this to stir shit in the pot. You know what threads like this turn into, yet you do it anyway.
Once again, please tell me when I said betting the Packers was going to be easy???
Please do???
I NEVER ONCE mentioned anything about betting them, the spread, or anything.
I have no reason to bet the game next week, I went 6-2 ATS with them this year and 7-2 on the over/unders with them this year, including winning all 3 of the 5 they went under this year
I dont bet just to bet. GB advancing would be enough for me.
So, let me know where I said to bet them next week???
I was gonna give you a pass initially, but now you really need to shut the fuck up...
You turned this into "look at my record betting GB" immediately, so tell me mr. fucking wizard, how is one not to associate the two...
you are the reason sarbanes-oxley is alive and well in our socialistic country - "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS"...but as us to prove your record for you, show me what I said...blah, blah, blah...
you also are the idiot that thinks the total would be over 60 if GB plays NO at the storied and scary Lambeau...now that should tell you that you need to learn to seperate from being a fan and being a gambler (along wioth this initial post)....
good luck to your Pack...
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Once again, please tell me when I said betting the Packers was going to be easy???
Please do???
I NEVER ONCE mentioned anything about betting them, the spread, or anything.
I have no reason to bet the game next week, I went 6-2 ATS with them this year and 7-2 on the over/unders with them this year, including winning all 3 of the 5 they went under this year
I dont bet just to bet. GB advancing would be enough for me.
So, let me know where I said to bet them next week???
I was gonna give you a pass initially, but now you really need to shut the fuck up...
You turned this into "look at my record betting GB" immediately, so tell me mr. fucking wizard, how is one not to associate the two...
you are the reason sarbanes-oxley is alive and well in our socialistic country - "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS"...but as us to prove your record for you, show me what I said...blah, blah, blah...
you also are the idiot that thinks the total would be over 60 if GB plays NO at the storied and scary Lambeau...now that should tell you that you need to learn to seperate from being a fan and being a gambler (along wioth this initial post)....
and you basically just admitted here that you start threads like this to stir shit in the pot. You know what threads like this turn into, yet you do it anyway.
Hey, I made a statement.
Im not the one who throws out insults and big, tough internet words.
People dont have to click my thread.
They choose to read it, they choose to insult.
Not my fault people turn to insults and cheap shots on a sports forum.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
and you basically just admitted here that you start threads like this to stir shit in the pot. You know what threads like this turn into, yet you do it anyway.
Hey, I made a statement.
Im not the one who throws out insults and big, tough internet words.
People dont have to click my thread.
They choose to read it, they choose to insult.
Not my fault people turn to insults and cheap shots on a sports forum.
So because I dont have a posted record means I avoided it
not sure what other conclusion could be drawn. You stated he asked what your posted record was. You failed to deliver an answer to that question. By doing so, one could easily draw the conclusion that by failing to answer, that you were avoiding, or ignoring it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
So because I dont have a posted record means I avoided it
not sure what other conclusion could be drawn. You stated he asked what your posted record was. You failed to deliver an answer to that question. By doing so, one could easily draw the conclusion that by failing to answer, that you were avoiding, or ignoring it.
and you basically just admitted here that you start threads like this to stir shit in the pot. You know what threads like this turn into, yet you do it anyway.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
and you basically just admitted here that you start threads like this to stir shit in the pot. You know what threads like this turn into, yet you do it anyway.
Hot Forum Topics
