All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Do you think Romo was fixing mnf?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6215
Posts: 122
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2987
Posted: #1
I find it strange that he was begging to get back in the game after weeden was playing well and now he is a game time decision for Sunday? How and why would you even let him step back onto the field especially when the game was pretty meaningless to the cowboys. Just a thought
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2987
Posted: #2
Yeah nothing is guaranteed but if he could come back and finish the game why can't he play Sunday?  As an Eagles fan I love watching romo get crushed but dunno how a franchise/owner lets him back in the game


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2987
Posted: #3
And at 6-1 losing to a team whose season was over week 1 isn't the end of the world, plus when a team preps all week for romo and weeden comes in that messes up the whole game plan
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 282
Posted: #4
No.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 216
Posted: #5
Lol the guy got shot up! Was probably so numb he didnt feel a thing!  When you have your star QB saying that he is okay and the trainers saying he is okay, you HAVE to play him. His xrays were negative for any fractures, so why not play him? The Cowboys would be facing much more criticism if they sat Romo and lost.  Adrenaline from the heat of the moment was also hiding some pain. I completely agree with Jones and Garrett letting Romo back into the game. No questions asked.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2987
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by JDaws012:

Lol the guy got shot up! Was probably so numb he didnt feel a thing!  When you have your star QB saying that he is okay and the trainers saying he is okay, you HAVE to play him. His xrays were negative for any fractures, so why not play him? The Cowboys would be facing much more criticism if they sat Romo and lost.  Adrenaline from the heat of the moment was also hiding some pain. I completely agree with Jones and Garrett letting Romo back into the game. No questions asked.  


Wow really u put him back into a meaningless game and god forbid he gets hurts again your season is over after having the best start in years? Risk vs reward 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 591
Posted: #7
The play calling by the Cowboys in OT certainly appeared to be favorable to the Redskins.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 6667
Posted: #8
There was too much money on the line to play hero ball. Only Rogers and brady can pull stuff like that. At best romo can fake an injury to make it look like he really cares about his team. You don't think some clowns in this world can act? They have a huge game in London coming up. 

Besides you don't beat a Seattle type of team one week and lose to the redskins. The next time these two teams play. They will pull the voodoo angle on everyone. Probably right before Halloween or some crap. And the public will be wrong again. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 6667
Posted: #9
That's also a lot of fumbles. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #10
             


  This is right up there  as one of the dumbest  post of 2014     
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #11
Couldn't he have just stayed in the game and thrown a pick  rather than this elaborate injury plan 


boy are u wacked out if u believe all this 









 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #12
Not to mention when your hit and do a 360 and 300 pound linemen hits your tail bone  and you have had numerous back operations you just might really be hurt  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2987
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by peter10:

Couldn't he have just stayed in the game and thrown a pick  rather than this elaborate injury plan 


boy are u wacked out if u believe all this 











I guess your not one that thinks outside the box.. Not saying he faked the injury but when he saw that weeden was playing well and actually had a chance to win he forced himself back into the game to make sure they lose
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2014
Posts: 9876
Posted: #14
Romo should have kept his asssss on the bench, He was too easy a target without being hurt and real easy with. Weeden looked good but Romo was a selfish prikk. cost me a bunch. had a huge teaser and Dallas -.2.
I swore Romo off years ago and very rarely bet on him. He's not a winner and neither is his coach. Jerry Jones can't hire winners because they might not kiss his ring. Jimmy Johnson coached the last good Cowboys team. Maybe after that asssshole Jones dies, his son or wife will hire someone like John Gruden and take em back to the bowl. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by Zman55:



I guess your not one that thinks outside the box.. Not saying he faked the injury but when he saw that weeden was playing well and actually had a chance to win he forced himself back into the game to make sure they lose

And what purpose would  a Multi Millionaire QB want to come back in the game injured just to make sure his team loses in a prime time  Nation TV game with the world watching 


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #16
 Seriously How old are u ?  are u over the age of 15  ?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #17
Quote Originally Posted by Zman55:



I guess your not one that thinks outside the box.. Not saying he faked the injury but when he saw that weeden was playing well and actually had a chance to win he forced himself back into the game to make sure they lose

I Think outside the box but i also have some common sense
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 2466
Posted: #18
If he was shaving points, or fixing. Leaving the game would be the last thing he'd want to do. 

You can't shave points from the trainer's table, and you certainly would never leave control of the game out of your own hands. You're the QB, and if you're trying to shave. All you really have to do is stay on the field. No one could do much about it. 


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2038
Posted: #19
You bet Dallas and  lost so you want to come up with some insane Romo conspiracy  reason why it happened .

 in your mind it couldn't be Washington just played better and won
 there has to be a reason why it happened 

, if you think like this you really shouldn't be betting .
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 53
Posted: #20
I could see it from a mile away and I wasn't even watching the game
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 12121
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by richig761:

If he was shaving points, or fixing. Leaving the game would be the last thing he'd want to do. 

You can't shave points from the trainer's table, and you certainly would never leave control of the game out of your own hands. You're the QB, and if you're trying to shave. All you really have to do is stay on the field. No one could do much about it. 




Here's the smartest guy in this thread, don't think there's anything left to see here...........................
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 2987
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by peter10:

You bet Dallas and  lost so you want to come up with some insane Romo conspiracy  reason why it happened .

 in your mind it couldn't be Washington just played better and won
 there has to be a reason why it happened 

, if you think like this you really shouldn't be betting .

Listen bro, I lost plenty of bets and plenty of money so I'm not complaining about a loss 5 days later,  does it really matter if romo is a millionaire? Do you think it's out of the realm of possibility that he was told to lose the game? Do you think sports are 100% legit? Do you believe everything Obama tells you? Do you think the FDA is looking out for your health?  Do you think speed cameras are there for your safety or to make the city money? How old are you? Start thinking outside the box buddy there's a whole world out there and money rules it. Unlike you when I see something I point it out
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 2
Posted: #23
.no doubt in my mind
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 239
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Zman55:

Quote Originally Posted by peter10:

You bet Dallas and  lost so you want to come up with some insane Romo conspiracy  reason why it happened . in your mind it couldn't be Washington just played better and won there has to be a reason why it happened , if you think like this you really shouldn't be betting .
Listen bro, I lost plenty of bets and plenty of money so I'm not complaining about a loss 5 days later,  does it really matter if romo is a millionaire? Do you think it's out of the realm of possibility that he was told to lose the game? Do you think sports are 100% legit? Do you believe everything Obama tells you? Do you think the FDA is looking out for your health?  Do you think speed cameras are there for your safety or to make the city money? How old are you? Start thinking outside the box buddy there's a whole world out there and money rules it. Unlike you when I see something I point it out

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 239
Posted: #25
Had washington and under right after dallas beat giants-i knew there was big chance dallas could lose game.
Was it kinda fixed-probably

The nfl controls dallas how they like
Also had cincy and n.orleans and pits
Thinking for yourself is whats its all about
All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.