Did the lineman report?

Rocking a baby to sleep...so no volume...looked like he did and they still threw the flag...I had Dallas ML tho so I'm happy!

@jmak21

 Been There done that congratulations sweet dreams to the little one

He did not report.  They showed the aerial view.  1 lineman did, the other didn't.

Gratz on the ML win

of course he did.....we were taught this shit in junior high. 

It's the number 1 thing he has to do going into that play and he knows that play is drawn up for him, he's not forgetting to report.  

He did

Yes he did.

They showed the replay and it showed him walking up to the referee to report. 

He walks over to the ref...he likely wasn't asking about dinner...crazy ending...glad to be on the winning side of that greasy sh*t!

Absolutely did the announcers even said so and they replayed the clip of the lineman checking in as well

Wait...who caught it?  68 or 70?  I think the 70 was the one who ran out there to report but I thought there was a different lineman that caught it.

I'm too damn tired.  I could have sworn they showed the replay and the wrong lineman reported. 

@Killrus420

  That overhead view shows 2 linemen reporting to the ref.

I'm not sure 68 Decker was one of them.

There is a difference between #68 and #70...watch it again. 

70 reported, but 68 caught the ball...illegal touching penalty, it's really that simple...love covers post game,,,best nightly show going.

@BigMick87

The fact that he SHOULD HAVE reported, is not proof that he DID report!  Is this the level of logic you use in every argument?

That was #70... not #68

@packersbackers

 Right. 70 reported but 68 did not and he caught the ball.

How come no one is talking about if he was covered or not? I watched the replay a couple times and it looks like the wide receiver is on the LoS, covering up the lineman. 

@PeAceMaKer7690

Yea, for all the controversy about whether or not #68 reported... the real story should be that he was uncovered, and whether or not he reported, it should be a penalty for being uncovered... so the reporting issue is moot.

@Duderonomy

 He was not uncovered you buffoon. Look at the video. The wr was clearly off the line next to him. Maybe you should be a ref. You'd fit right in.

@Moneymaker923

 the broadcast video is at an angle from back left of the line, not on the line. He is not standing next to a white hash, nor near the boundry line. Nothing is clear there. Looks pretty even to the lineman to me.

@Duderonomy

 https://x.com/nickbaumgardner/status/1741313943480459723?s=42

Even the official in the booth said he was clearly uncovered, which he was.

Thanks, already saw that.

@Duderonomy

 I guess you turned off espn because they have been breaking this down for the last 45 mins and you couldn't be more wrong 

@Moneymaker923

 Interview with Decker - up next.

A commentor on ESPN said the Lions executed to perfection.

What is #58s role in the play? Why was he the first one talking to the official? It looks like he is partially to blame. While 68 is trying to report, 58 is almost standing in his way? Am I wrong?

Also, brad Allen claims that 70 reported as eligible. By the time 70 got anywhere near the ref, he was already walking away to tell the defense. 70 was the very last one to go near the ref