All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Can the PACKERS beat this San Diego team next week at Lambeau?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1426
Posts: 60
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 10368
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson:

Rivers ain't a playoff type QB.  End of story.

he still very young, but I think he will shine one day.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14915
Posted: #27
Maybe, Trinity, but it ain't happening this year.
 
I know it's only 1 game, but the way New England just physically and psychologically beat up on SD tonight was downright hard-core medieval.
 
Beatdowns like that just don't get "forgotten."
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14915
Posted: #28
I watched this entire debacle....lost 100 rocks on SD ML (which I knew was dead when it was 7 nil and they threw their first INT).
 
What I saw was a whipping in every sense of the word.
 
I watched one team just fu--ing run riot for 60 minutes and do whatever they pleased.
 
I watched LT and Rivers and Norv get mentally and psychologically and physically torn apart.
 
I watched L Maroney just flat out run over and through anything in a while jersey.
 
Final was 38-14........wasn't nearly that close.
 
SD has ZERO POINT ZERO chance of realistically competing for the SB this year.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 10368
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson:

Maybe, Trinity, but it ain't happening this year.
 
I know it's only 1 game, but the way New England just physically and psychologically beat up on SD tonight was downright hard-core medieval.
 
Beatdowns like that just don't get "forgotten."

Pats defence looks way bigger and better this year.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 10368
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by claycourtlesson:

I watched this entire debacle....lost 100 rocks on SD ML (which I knew was dead when it was 7 nil and they threw their first INT).
 
What I saw was a whipping in every sense of the word.
 
I watched one team just fu--ing run riot for 60 minutes and do whatever they pleased.
 
I watched LT and Rivers and Norv get mentally and psychologically and physically torn apart.
 
I watched L Maroney just flat out run over and through anything in a while jersey.
 
Final was 38-14........wasn't nearly that close.
 
SD has ZERO POINT ZERO chance of realistically competing for the SB this year.

its still a young season and things can change. SD is a very talented team and can turn things around once LT gets going.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 5567
Posted: #31
Why the hell not? SD looked bad tonight. Unless Norm gives the load to LT, they're done! Rivers sucks without LT controlling the rock! Just my opinion.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 446
Posted: #32
Looking at all the game next week. The one game that stand out most is SD vs Packers. No other game I'm confident most than Chargers beating and covering whatever spread it is vs. the Packers. If you bet the Packers and think they can cover vs the Chargers then you're a fool.Nothing is guaranteed, but I already made up my mind to pick Chargers.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 10368
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by Eluded:

Looking at all the game next week. The one game that stand out most is SD vs Packers. No other game I'm confident most than Chargers beating and covering whatever spread it is vs. the Packers. If you bet the Packers and think they can cover vs the Chargers then you're a fool.Nothing is guaranteed, but I already made up my mind to pick Chargers.

be carefull I lost a dime play on the Saints and the SD vs Packers game has almost the same set-up. if I play SD , it will be small.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #34
Derrick Ward of the Giants had about 160 total yards running and receiving on the Packers today.     Westbrook didn't have a really big game against the Pack.   Probably about the same,  150 or so yards total.
 
 
San Diego probably comes out next week and runs Tomlinson right down Green Bays throat.   30 touches at least.
 
 
If they can stop Tomlinson,  hold him to less than 200 yards total, they have a shot.  
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 10368
Posted: #35
Quote Originally Posted by Greyhound:

Derrick Ward of the Giants had about 160 total yards running and receiving on the Packers today.     Westbrook didn't have a really big game against the Pack.   Probably about the same,  150 or so yards total.
 
 
San Diego probably comes out next week and runs Tomlinson right down Green Bays throat.   30 touches at least.
 
 
If they can stop Tomlinson,  hold him to less than 200 yards total, they have a shot.  
 

looks like your leaning SD?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #36
Quote Originally Posted by Eluded:

Looking at all the game next week. The one game that stand out most is SD vs Packers. No other game I'm confident most than Chargers beating and covering whatever spread it is vs. the Packers. If you bet the Packers and think they can cover vs the Chargers then you're a fool.Nothing is guaranteed, but I already made up my mind to pick Chargers.

 

I bet you were also on the Bengals before the spread came out for their game against the Browns today.    Right?  

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #37
Quote Originally Posted by Trinitiyy:

looks like your leaning SD?

 

I'm not leaning any way.    But like I said if the spread comes out Packers +3,   I think you have to bet the Packers.

 

Cause Vegas would be telling you the Packers have a shot then.   It would be a sign that Vegas thinks they are pretty good. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #38
The line at Pinnacle is Packers +3.5       
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #39
What do you think now boys?     Chargers -3.5   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #40
Public is going to be all over San Diego I can assure you that.   Just like the public was all over San Diego in this thread.  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 30
Posted: #41
Absolutely!! GB "d" is good and the chargers have Norv Turner as its coach..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 2462
Posted: #42
Quote Originally Posted by Greyhound:

Public is going to be all over San Diego I can assure you that.   Just like the public was all over San Diego in this thread.  

I can see 50/50 on this game... San Diego has not looked good at all so far.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 14316
Posted: #43
What is the total?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 38798
Posted: #44
i have the packers to win it all at 60-1.

as long as they even have a sniff at the playoffs i can start buying back and earning profit
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #45
Quote Originally Posted by Canada_Chris:

I can see 50/50 on this game... San Diego has not looked good at all so far.

 

 

I'll be shocked it it's not at least 80% on San Diego.    

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #46
Back to this San Diego - Green Bay game.
 
 
Spread is 3.5   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 23333
Posted: #47
Packers may be worthy of a play here. Can't believe I just typed that.
 
Pack did take out two cupcakes though, so I'm not sold yet.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 612
Posted: #48
Favre is good for 3 picks next week. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 14915
Posted: #49
"San Diego is pissed."
 
That'll be the public statement of the week.
 
The hook makes it tricky.  Makes no math sense, but if line were a straight 3, then GB would be much more the right side.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #50
Quote Originally Posted by 3rd_and_Long:

Packers may be worthy of a play here. Can't believe I just typed that.
 
Pack did take out two cupcakes though, so I'm not sold yet.

 

Same here man.    When I first saw the Packers schedule about 2 months ago,  I thought this was a sure loss for the Packers.    I'm not so sure anymore especially with Norv Turner coaching that Chargers team.    

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.