Trae Young better than Doncic and better than Curry at the same age! Let the debate begin.

Weird Dude

..yep,its shameful...and he is your buddy on YOUR side of the topic..birds of a feather i guess.

but you did though....over and overv again for 20 pages you called him the "mOsT sKiLlEd OfFeNsIvE pLaYeR eVeR" (cos youre really dumb and have basic,remedial level thinking skills so you can only retain one thought or phrase in your tiny little brain)..THATS the crux of your reasoning for him being better at 22 than trae young...BECAUSE he is the most skilled ever AT 22 years old...so now you have just been fuccing lying this entire time???

or are you saying that at 22 steph was already better than anyone else in history and that he just kept getting more and more skilled and now the gap is the size of the universe??

its just tragic how stupid you are..do you actually seriously think that people reading this tripe are not laughing their ar.ses off at how dumb you are??

i mean you are all alone here on an island.....well,except for good old dave who is WELL KNOWN for just stirring up shi.t and saying whatever the most contrarian thing is to say....so like you he probably aint the brightest if thats the approach he takes to things.

@ThrowDemDarts

hey there,little guy..i just know you are working up the courage to actually answer some of these questions so when you do get round to it add this one to your list please.

IF 22 YEAR OLD STEPH CURRY WAS (ALREADY) THE "MOST SKILLED OFFENSIVE PLAYER OF ALL TIME" THEN WHY WAS HE ONLY ABLE TO AVERAGE 18.6 PTS,5.8 ASSTS,3.1 T/OVERS AT 48%?????????????

decent numbers for sure...the numbers of a solid,quality nba starter.....but in the history of the game hundreds and hundreds of guys have posted far superior all round offensive results for a seasons work...can you please explain why at 22 his skill (the highest amount of skill ever) didnt translate to better results??

i mean,trae has better production this year than what curry had and obviously curry is the MOST skilled and waaaaaaay ahead of young...its very odd how someone so skilled was so unproductive,dont you think??

trae notched 6 points more per game and accounted for about 7 points more offense per game in assists than what curry did with ALL his "skill"....what gives here??what is going on??he shi.ts all over trae in skillset and yet in raw numbers young is responsible for 13 points more PER GAME for his team...man,this is sooooooooo confusing.

@ThrowDemDarts

steph-18.6 ppg   5.8 assts   3.9 rbs   1.5 stls   48% fg   44% 3pt fg   93% ft   PER-19.4

trae-  25.3 ppg   9.4 assts   3.9 rbs   0.8 stls   44% fg   34% 3pt fg   89% ft   PER-23 

NOT

EVEN

CLOSE.

for those playing at home see if you can figure out exactly which guy of the 2  this dope is talking about...look at the numbers and see if you can figure it out...hysterical,hysterical stuff.

in any other fuccing universe where logic and rationale rules this wouldnt be much of a discussion...but only in covers-land do we completely throw results/performances out the window and go with the feelings of a guy who just cannot get steph currys co.ck out of his mouth.

You're obviously a weird dude, so I'm not surprised this has to be said but steph curry is one of the most skilled offensive players of all time. At one point, like most human beings that are in their 30s, he was once 22. Not sure what else you're rambling about. And it takes a real basketball casual to point to bulk stats as a reason someone is better. Embarrassing.

The powers above had selected Steph to be the benefactor of the magnet era. No other ways about it. 

You really think he crushes 40 footers day in day out? It's all about $$. Don't believe it check some of the youtube videos that break down Steph Curry, Kawhi Leonard etc. It's entertainment. Nothing more nothing less.

...mmmm,yep thats right im the "weird dude".....ever since i first pointed out how odd you are for repeating the same 2 phrases over and over again for 20 pages and REFUSING to respond to any points or questions you have decided,like an infant,to call me the odd one..cos thats what creepy,weird man-babies do,right?

so STILL.............STILL..........WE ARE ALL FUCCING WAITING.........for the answer,if he was the most skilled at 22 then where does 27 year old curry rank all-time????...did he not improve at all in those 5 years?

IF 22 YEAR OLD STEPH CURRY WAS (ALREADY) THE "MOST SKILLED OFFENSIVE PLAYER OF ALL TIME" THEN WHY WAS HE ONLY ABLE TO AVERAGE 18.6 PTS,5.8 ASSTS,3.1 T/OVERS AT 48%?????????????

what the fucc are we using then if not stats???

oh wait,we are going to be using the one stat that YOU LIKE,right???the only one in currys favour?.....instead of the overall numbers that everyone else on the planet would take into account.

yikes,youre dumb.

@melossinglet

Never said you couldn’t use stats. Said using bulk stats to prove someone is better is something someone with casual basketball knowledge would do. You’re really struggling with basic things.

you would think that he would have to be the best player on at least ONE nba finals team,like the rest of the top 10 guys,to be considered in that class...i think he is pretty close though but again,being 4" shorter makes all the difference when we are splitting hairs between the best of the best.

basic things??like answering questions?..yeah its a struggle alright.

soooooooooooooooo,we consider the stat that YOU like (that is in curry favour) and ignore the rest then??.......mmmmm,okay then.got it.

this whole experience must be extremely humiliating for you...thousands of random people reading and laughing at how simple you are...surprised you keep coming back to take more beating...kudos for that,a glutton for punishment you are indeed.

IF 22 YEAR OLD STEPH CURRY WAS (ALREADY) THE "MOST SKILLED OFFENSIVE PLAYER OF ALL TIME" THEN WHY WAS HE ONLY ABLE TO AVERAGE 18.6 PTS,5.8 ASSTS,3.1 T/OVERS AT 48%?????????????

@melossinglet

 in no particular order...

jordan

lebron

Russell

Kareem

wilt

kobe

bird

magic

hakeem

shaq/Duncan

with all due respect to curry he is does not make this list, 11-20, yes.

@Eddy_Winslow

Curry’s career is not even done.. has another 3 years solid left.. 

You need to stop listening to the voices in your head because they’re telling you things I haven’t said. Steph at 22 in the nba shot 48/44/93 with 19/6. Game was different when he came in the league which is why they say he changed the game. You thinking some inefficient ball dominant guard that struggles at defense is better than a 22 year old Steph because he’s accumulated more stats makes sense to me. You don’t seem like you have everything working up top if you know what I mean.

finally!!!!..thank god this is over..took you long enough but at least you got there in the end little fella.

hopefully in that time he can be the best guy on a championship team and lead his squad as that dude.

The "most skilled offensive player of all time" couldn't even get to the rack at 22. Averaged around 4 points in the paint. And he made ridiculous bonehead turnovers. I love Steph Curry. I love the Warriors. I don't think Trae will ever match what Steph has become but Steph was super flawed at 22. Trae's inefficient, ball dominant style, as ugly as it it at times, translated directly to the pros. He distributes the rock. He gets into the paint. He gets to the line, which gets scoffed at, but is extremely important in basketball. Steph looked great at Davidson but it took him several years to find his game at the pro level. It wasn't because of Monta, or the garbage team, it was his own physical limitations. They brought in specialists. Strengthened his body, his ankles. Changed his entire physiology. We was still a work in progress in his first full season without Monta, when he was 3 or 4 years older than Trae is now. You've admitted Steph doesn't distribute the ball as well. You make the excuse that he's not a true PG but he is though. So that's a flaw. The numbers dictate that he wasn't better in the paint. Neither is a good defender. So all you're saying is Steph was a better jump shooter at 22, which nobody can deny. That's a moot point.

I can't believe this thread is still going.

voices in my head????..O M F G.. are you telling me that you NEVER WROTE the words "most offensively skilled player of all time" when referring to 22 year old curry???i mean its only happened about 37 times...because ya know,youre very very dumb or some kind of malfunctioning robot.....jeezus christ,am i gonna have to dig up every single quote of yours to make you look even more stupid than what you already do???sigh.....okay then,here we go.

p.s. aint no need to start randomly rounding stuff up just to make "your boy" look good..i mean surely the "greatest offensively skilled player of all time" doesnt need that??......ACTUAL NUMBERS-18.6 points per game,5.8 assists per game.NOT 19 & 6.

either way that is fairly paltry production for ALL THAT SKILL that he had at that point in time...you know,being that he was "most skilled in history"