Yeah, well I've learned my lesson with the Bruins....they've hosed me time and time again.
well coach...and that comment wasnt blaming you....i LOVED the bruins as soon as i saw the sabres hadnt scored but 7 goals in the 1P all season...we both based that on a total FADE of buffalo, not ON boston...over the course of the season we gonna make that cash fading buffalo 1P...
Quote Originally Posted by Coach19:
Yeah, well I've learned my lesson with the Bruins....they've hosed me time and time again.
well coach...and that comment wasnt blaming you....i LOVED the bruins as soon as i saw the sabres hadnt scored but 7 goals in the 1P all season...we both based that on a total FADE of buffalo, not ON boston...over the course of the season we gonna make that cash fading buffalo 1P...
well coach...and that comment wasnt blaming you....i LOVED the bruins as soon as i saw the sabres hadnt scored but 7 goals in the 1P all season...we both based that on a total FADE of buffalo, not ON boston...over the course of the season we gonna make that cash fading buffalo 1P...
There's a number of really solid trends in the NHL but you always need to factor in the matchups....stay tuned.
Quote Originally Posted by pigskinpicker:
well coach...and that comment wasnt blaming you....i LOVED the bruins as soon as i saw the sabres hadnt scored but 7 goals in the 1P all season...we both based that on a total FADE of buffalo, not ON boston...over the course of the season we gonna make that cash fading buffalo 1P...
There's a number of really solid trends in the NHL but you always need to factor in the matchups....stay tuned.
Like playing TT overs which equate to an average of 2 pts/min...especially on teams that can knock down the three. I think the SA bench will continue to push the ball though, obviously, will come down to finishing.
Quote Originally Posted by pigskinpicker:
good luck with that coach
Like playing TT overs which equate to an average of 2 pts/min...especially on teams that can knock down the three. I think the SA bench will continue to push the ball though, obviously, will come down to finishing.
well coach...and that comment wasnt blaming you....i LOVED the bruins as soon as i saw the sabres hadnt scored but 7 goals in the 1P all season...we both based that on a total FADE of buffalo, not ON boston...over the course of the season we gonna make that cash fading buffalo 1P...
Same here, Pig! It was a definite fade of Buffalo. Gonna keep that info close by, definitely gonna play it again!
Quote Originally Posted by pigskinpicker:
well coach...and that comment wasnt blaming you....i LOVED the bruins as soon as i saw the sabres hadnt scored but 7 goals in the 1P all season...we both based that on a total FADE of buffalo, not ON boston...over the course of the season we gonna make that cash fading buffalo 1P...
Same here, Pig! It was a definite fade of Buffalo. Gonna keep that info close by, definitely gonna play it again!
Thanks for the feedback. I really appreciate all of the efforts you gus put into this thread daily.
thanks jordan....thats much appreciated...i cant speak for the others, but i can promise you, when i post any play in here, its only after a LOT of numbers, analysis and thought, which takes time when you multiply that by all the possibilities..
Quote Originally Posted by cjordanj1217:
Thanks for the feedback. I really appreciate all of the efforts you gus put into this thread daily.
thanks jordan....thats much appreciated...i cant speak for the others, but i can promise you, when i post any play in here, its only after a LOT of numbers, analysis and thought, which takes time when you multiply that by all the possibilities..
Well, Brick....had you played the Pens -1/2 1P (+180) as well, you'd be up on the night.
thats why i played BOTH the + money plays last night...split and make a small profit.....but i had to make the action reverse too...sighhh, what a moron..but brick, coach makes a good point....when you tail, sometime you have to follow all of em to make money...if you pick and choose, you run the risk of tailing the losers..its a crap shoot.....man, i love to roll the bones..
Quote Originally Posted by Coach19:
Well, Brick....had you played the Pens -1/2 1P (+180) as well, you'd be up on the night.
thats why i played BOTH the + money plays last night...split and make a small profit.....but i had to make the action reverse too...sighhh, what a moron..but brick, coach makes a good point....when you tail, sometime you have to follow all of em to make money...if you pick and choose, you run the risk of tailing the losers..its a crap shoot.....man, i love to roll the bones..
thats why i played BOTH the + money plays last night...split and make a small profit.....but i had to make the action reverse too...sighhh, what a moron..but brick, coach makes a good point....when you tail, sometime you have to follow all of em to make money...if you pick and choose, you run the risk of tailing the losers..its a crap shoot.....man, i love to roll the bones..
Thanks, Pig...but I meant no disrespect to Brick. My point was, I'm posting a number of + value NHL plays which, by definition, are "underdogs". Thus, I'm not expecting to hit them all but to go a minimum of 50% to turn a profit. Anything above that is gravy. That said, picking and choosing plays defeats the purpose.
Quote Originally Posted by pigskinpicker:
thats why i played BOTH the + money plays last night...split and make a small profit.....but i had to make the action reverse too...sighhh, what a moron..but brick, coach makes a good point....when you tail, sometime you have to follow all of em to make money...if you pick and choose, you run the risk of tailing the losers..its a crap shoot.....man, i love to roll the bones..
Thanks, Pig...but I meant no disrespect to Brick. My point was, I'm posting a number of + value NHL plays which, by definition, are "underdogs". Thus, I'm not expecting to hit them all but to go a minimum of 50% to turn a profit. Anything above that is gravy. That said, picking and choosing plays defeats the purpose.