OKC's 3Qs & Half & game made a profit & parlays of OKC & Over / GS & under.
The Hero-ballers Vs. Splash Bros. means a Game 7 = GS ML, as it taxes them as opposed to the Cavs, & sets up LeBron as a dog, maybe in 1st game, & gives James sweet taste of revenge S.A. had.
0
OKC's 3Qs & Half & game made a profit & parlays of OKC & Over / GS & under.
The Hero-ballers Vs. Splash Bros. means a Game 7 = GS ML, as it taxes them as opposed to the Cavs, & sets up LeBron as a dog, maybe in 1st game, & gives James sweet taste of revenge S.A. had.
Dribbling past all five foes, finishing inside, and passing on the move, Kyrie Irving did for Duke. These are Kyrie strengths that the first-ever unanimous MVP in history, Steph Curry, lacks.
These are reasons for Kyrie outplaying Curry in the 2016 NBA Finals — he's the series' leading scorer at 28 per game, having hit the 30-point mark in each of the past three contests. Kyrie is outscoring Curry by six points per game while shooting better from the floor (48% vs. 42%), about even from three, and with similar assist numbers — but Kyrie has far fewer turnovers than Curry. Kyrie has too easily scored over 50 points in NBA games, and he did it without the luxury of having second-option-help (like a Klay, Draymond, Andre, Barnes, etc.).
0
Dribbling past all five foes, finishing inside, and passing on the move, Kyrie Irving did for Duke. These are Kyrie strengths that the first-ever unanimous MVP in history, Steph Curry, lacks.
These are reasons for Kyrie outplaying Curry in the 2016 NBA Finals — he's the series' leading scorer at 28 per game, having hit the 30-point mark in each of the past three contests. Kyrie is outscoring Curry by six points per game while shooting better from the floor (48% vs. 42%), about even from three, and with similar assist numbers — but Kyrie has far fewer turnovers than Curry. Kyrie has too easily scored over 50 points in NBA games, and he did it without the luxury of having second-option-help (like a Klay, Draymond, Andre, Barnes, etc.).
Dribbling past all five foes, finishing inside, and passing on the move, Kyrie Irving did for Duke. These are Kyrie strengths that the first-ever unanimous MVP in history, Steph Curry, lacks.
These are reasons for Kyrie outplaying Curry in the 2016 NBA Finals — he's the series' leading scorer at 28 per game, having hit the 30-point mark in each of the past three contests. Kyrie is outscoring Curry by six points per game while shooting better from the floor (48% vs. 42%), about even from three, and with similar assist numbers — but Kyrie has far fewer turnovers than Curry. Kyrie has too easily scored over 50 points in NBA games, and he did it without the luxury of having second-option-help (like a Klay, Draymond, Andre, Barnes, etc.).
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pendo:
Dribbling past all five foes, finishing inside, and passing on the move, Kyrie Irving did for Duke. These are Kyrie strengths that the first-ever unanimous MVP in history, Steph Curry, lacks.
These are reasons for Kyrie outplaying Curry in the 2016 NBA Finals — he's the series' leading scorer at 28 per game, having hit the 30-point mark in each of the past three contests. Kyrie is outscoring Curry by six points per game while shooting better from the floor (48% vs. 42%), about even from three, and with similar assist numbers — but Kyrie has far fewer turnovers than Curry. Kyrie has too easily scored over 50 points in NBA games, and he did it without the luxury of having second-option-help (like a Klay, Draymond, Andre, Barnes, etc.).
GS hit a shot at the end for 11...but still they got what, 12 pts in almost 20 mins dating back to game 5 at home
In fact, that's true what you point out MGM-P. Strange. It appears that the Cavs play better Defense than GoState (Curry+Barnes are very, very weak links); a No-Love Cavs ( + JR Smith concentrating on D) are an obviously better defensive squad, as that Jefferson stifle's Andre's passing tons - perimeter passes only, since the 2nd steal he made off him) while he is also changing Green's play down low.
Go State knows doubling LeBron won't work because of Lebron's expansive court vision and pinpoint passing costs many easy 2's.
Then if Cavs set double picks for LeBron, Cavs' FG%age goes up astronomically
...until the Go State team adjusts... then Cavs set weak-side picks: + to free Kyrie + open Thompson Dunk-Dimes
If that 6'11 Channing Frye = Secret weapon for Game Seven and goes off for 7 of 9 on 3pters.. Game Over.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mgmprofits:
GS hit a shot at the end for 11...but still they got what, 12 pts in almost 20 mins dating back to game 5 at home
In fact, that's true what you point out MGM-P. Strange. It appears that the Cavs play better Defense than GoState (Curry+Barnes are very, very weak links); a No-Love Cavs ( + JR Smith concentrating on D) are an obviously better defensive squad, as that Jefferson stifle's Andre's passing tons - perimeter passes only, since the 2nd steal he made off him) while he is also changing Green's play down low.
Go State knows doubling LeBron won't work because of Lebron's expansive court vision and pinpoint passing costs many easy 2's.
Then if Cavs set double picks for LeBron, Cavs' FG%age goes up astronomically
...until the Go State team adjusts... then Cavs set weak-side picks: + to free Kyrie + open Thompson Dunk-Dimes
If that 6'11 Channing Frye = Secret weapon for Game Seven and goes off for 7 of 9 on 3pters.. Game Over.
OKC's 3Qs & Half & game made a profit & parlays of OKC & Over / GS & under.
The Hero-ballers Vs. Splash Bros. means a Game 7 = GS ML, as it taxes them as opposed to the Cavs, & sets up LeBron as a dog, maybe in 1st game, & gives James sweet taste of revenge S.A. had.
Y E S !!! Money line (+165)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pendo:
OKC's 3Qs & Half & game made a profit & parlays of OKC & Over / GS & under.
The Hero-ballers Vs. Splash Bros. means a Game 7 = GS ML, as it taxes them as opposed to the Cavs, & sets up LeBron as a dog, maybe in 1st game, & gives James sweet taste of revenge S.A. had.
The NHL & NBA Finals were alike in ways: Midwest towns that have seen better days versus the Wealthy Silicon Valley Boys: Pitt vs. San Jose and Cleveland vs. Oakland
Futures were sweet hit!
0
The NHL & NBA Finals were alike in ways: Midwest towns that have seen better days versus the Wealthy Silicon Valley Boys: Pitt vs. San Jose and Cleveland vs. Oakland
Did you know that the Affilates are in league w/ the bookies?
They make money when their followers lose. They get a cut of the bookies' winnings. Thet would not make their AFFILIATE MONEY if they let you know that they make money by your losing => they are an AFFILIATION.
They have balances attached to their accounts. Their accounts are connected to online-books, too. They make money when their customers lose.
This is how such folks & their sites are maintained in the poulation. __________________________________________
So here's how to beat the Bookmaker's tipsters — herein called 'Covers Experts' and also 'Steamwire' wherein Free Picks = 55-60%; Premium Picks = 65% graded wagers: A day the 'Free Picks' happen to mostly win, fade them the next day. For example, if on Sunday,
their free picks go 4-1 or 3-1 then fade them all on Monday. It's b/c their intent = pos. bal. of losses. SBR, Covers, etc., will balance out their accounts - - there has to be more losers - - or else they will not get paid. They are all A F F I L I A T E S
You'd be surprised how many don't know what this A-word means, and have never learned how sites giving out free picks make money.
0
Did you know that the Affilates are in league w/ the bookies?
They make money when their followers lose. They get a cut of the bookies' winnings. Thet would not make their AFFILIATE MONEY if they let you know that they make money by your losing => they are an AFFILIATION.
They have balances attached to their accounts. Their accounts are connected to online-books, too. They make money when their customers lose.
This is how such folks & their sites are maintained in the poulation. __________________________________________
So here's how to beat the Bookmaker's tipsters — herein called 'Covers Experts' and also 'Steamwire' wherein Free Picks = 55-60%; Premium Picks = 65% graded wagers: A day the 'Free Picks' happen to mostly win, fade them the next day. For example, if on Sunday,
their free picks go 4-1 or 3-1 then fade them all on Monday. It's b/c their intent = pos. bal. of losses. SBR, Covers, etc., will balance out their accounts - - there has to be more losers - - or else they will not get paid. They are all A F F I L I A T E S
You'd be surprised how many don't know what this A-word means, and have never learned how sites giving out free picks make money.
Sports Investing grows in popularity in mainstream society. More than 839 billion dollars is wagered on sports every year. Stock markets face uncertainty & decline, but sports investing is becoming a viable option for even smallish investors.
Leagues, owners, management, coaches, and players are all making big money. Players & coaches are multi-millionaires! The owners of teams & colleges make huge amounts of cash. TV, media, ad companies all are getting wealthy from sports. Fans pay for these folks to make this kind of mega-money. Now fans get to make money through sports wagering.
The part that shocks most ameteurs...Picking 55% winners over the course of 1000 plays (at an average of 3/4 plays per day for 1 year) will double your money. This also protects you against prolonged losing streaks common in sports betting.
I'll explain: 55% winners over 1000 plays breaks down as follow... 550 wins & 450 losses. Add 45 to the losses for the vig... 550-450-45=55 net wins. Since you'll be playing over 20 plays per week, you don't want to risk more than 2% of your bankroll per game. Say your BR is $50,000 =you're a $1000 per game player. It is IMPERATIVE not to change that amount NO MATTER WHAT. That's just the size player you chose to be via your investment. So after 1000 plays at 55% winners nets you $55,000, more than doubling your investment.
Go see if Meryll Lynch has a mutual fund w/ that kind of return. It's not as easy as it seems to go 55%-58% over the long haul.
0
Sports Investing 101
Sports Investing grows in popularity in mainstream society. More than 839 billion dollars is wagered on sports every year. Stock markets face uncertainty & decline, but sports investing is becoming a viable option for even smallish investors.
Leagues, owners, management, coaches, and players are all making big money. Players & coaches are multi-millionaires! The owners of teams & colleges make huge amounts of cash. TV, media, ad companies all are getting wealthy from sports. Fans pay for these folks to make this kind of mega-money. Now fans get to make money through sports wagering.
The part that shocks most ameteurs...Picking 55% winners over the course of 1000 plays (at an average of 3/4 plays per day for 1 year) will double your money. This also protects you against prolonged losing streaks common in sports betting.
I'll explain: 55% winners over 1000 plays breaks down as follow... 550 wins & 450 losses. Add 45 to the losses for the vig... 550-450-45=55 net wins. Since you'll be playing over 20 plays per week, you don't want to risk more than 2% of your bankroll per game. Say your BR is $50,000 =you're a $1000 per game player. It is IMPERATIVE not to change that amount NO MATTER WHAT. That's just the size player you chose to be via your investment. So after 1000 plays at 55% winners nets you $55,000, more than doubling your investment.
Go see if Meryll Lynch has a mutual fund w/ that kind of return. It's not as easy as it seems to go 55%-58% over the long haul.
Sports Investing grows in popularity in mainstream society. More than 839 billion dollars is wagered on sports every year. Stock markets face uncertainty & decline, but sports investing is becoming a viable option for even smallish investors.
Leagues, owners, management, coaches, and players are all making big money. Players & coaches are multi-millionaires! The owners of teams & colleges make huge amounts of cash. TV, media, ad companies all are getting wealthy from sports. Fans pay for these folks to make this kind of mega-money. Now fans get to make money through sports wagering.
The part that shocks most ameteurs...Picking 55% winners over the course of 1000 plays (at an average of 3/4 plays per day for 1 year) will double your money. This also protects you against prolonged losing streaks common in sports betting.
I'll explain: 55% winners over 1000 plays breaks down as follow... 550 wins & 450 losses. Add 45 to the losses for the vig... 550-450-45=55 net wins. Since you'll be playing over 20 plays per week, you don't want to risk more than 2% of your bankroll per game. Say your BR is $50,000 =you're a $1000 per game player. It is IMPERATIVE not to change that amount NO MATTER WHAT. That's just the size player you chose to be via your investment. So after 1000 plays at 55% winners nets you $55,000, more than doubling your investment.
Go see if Meryll Lynch has a mutual fund w/ that kind of return. It's not as easy as it seems to go 55%-58% over the long haul.
55%-58% sounds like a great return, however question remains how do we get 55%!!!
Good read very interesting
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pendo:
Sports Investing 101
Sports Investing grows in popularity in mainstream society. More than 839 billion dollars is wagered on sports every year. Stock markets face uncertainty & decline, but sports investing is becoming a viable option for even smallish investors.
Leagues, owners, management, coaches, and players are all making big money. Players & coaches are multi-millionaires! The owners of teams & colleges make huge amounts of cash. TV, media, ad companies all are getting wealthy from sports. Fans pay for these folks to make this kind of mega-money. Now fans get to make money through sports wagering.
The part that shocks most ameteurs...Picking 55% winners over the course of 1000 plays (at an average of 3/4 plays per day for 1 year) will double your money. This also protects you against prolonged losing streaks common in sports betting.
I'll explain: 55% winners over 1000 plays breaks down as follow... 550 wins & 450 losses. Add 45 to the losses for the vig... 550-450-45=55 net wins. Since you'll be playing over 20 plays per week, you don't want to risk more than 2% of your bankroll per game. Say your BR is $50,000 =you're a $1000 per game player. It is IMPERATIVE not to change that amount NO MATTER WHAT. That's just the size player you chose to be via your investment. So after 1000 plays at 55% winners nets you $55,000, more than doubling your investment.
Go see if Meryll Lynch has a mutual fund w/ that kind of return. It's not as easy as it seems to go 55%-58% over the long haul.
55%-58% sounds like a great return, however question remains how do we get 55%!!!
TOP 10 — based on eyeball-tests: Week 1, Wk 2, Wk 3 Who would beat who...
1 OHIO ST (A well-oiled, urban machine = they don'r rebuild, they just reload!) 2 LOUISVILLE (SAMUEL + L. JACKSON = x3 explosive than Clem's Watson) 3 ALABAMA (fell 18 pts down to Ole Miss = Fla St even beat them up bad ) 4 HOUSTON 4b CLEMSON 5 MICHIGAN ST 5b MICHIGAN 5c NEBRASKA 6 ARKANSAS 6b FLORIDA 7 BAYLOR 8 STANFORD 9 SAN DIEGO ST 9b TEXAS A&M 10 WEST VIRGINIA
0
TOP 10 — based on eyeball-tests: Week 1, Wk 2, Wk 3 Who would beat who...
1 OHIO ST (A well-oiled, urban machine = they don'r rebuild, they just reload!) 2 LOUISVILLE (SAMUEL + L. JACKSON = x3 explosive than Clem's Watson) 3 ALABAMA (fell 18 pts down to Ole Miss = Fla St even beat them up bad ) 4 HOUSTON 4b CLEMSON 5 MICHIGAN ST 5b MICHIGAN 5c NEBRASKA 6 ARKANSAS 6b FLORIDA 7 BAYLOR 8 STANFORD 9 SAN DIEGO ST 9b TEXAS A&M 10 WEST VIRGINIA
Dallas falls into a phenomenal situation: Since '83, home fav's who gave up = 24 pts last year, after a playing a game w/ 50 total pts or more scored: 28-3 ATS (90.3%).
0
Dallas falls into a phenomenal situation: Since '83, home fav's who gave up = 24 pts last year, after a playing a game w/ 50 total pts or more scored: 28-3 ATS (90.3%).
Dallas falls into a phenomenal situation: Since '83, home fav's who gave up = 24 pts last year, after a playing a game w/ 50 total pts or more scored: 28-3 ATS (90.3%).
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pendo:
Dallas falls into a phenomenal situation: Since '83, home fav's who gave up = 24 pts last year, after a playing a game w/ 50 total pts or more scored: 28-3 ATS (90.3%).
Originally leaned under, primarily b/c of turnovers. but expect 1 or 2 of the giveaways to lead directly to pts, which might push this thing up to the 45-50 point range. Both teams had totals c. 42 last week & both went under. Chicago had a lead at Houston then lost 23-14; and, Phil took down the Cleveland Browns 29-10.
One good game against an awful team has a lots of folks buying into rookie QB Wentz to have another field day against a Bears defense that HC Fox has a lot of work to do to fix up. But Bears will stop the ball better than Cleveland did, so Under seems to be more likely,what with 7 out of 10 bets on the Over.
Eagles beat Browns at home last weekend, but keep things in perspective: Wentz was going up against Browns' defense. At the end of the year, the Browns will have one of the 3 or 4 worst defenses in the NFL. Wentz & Eagles offense won't have the same luxury tonight playing on the road at Soldier Field vs. Bears.
Fox went out & got Danny Trevathan, Jerrell Freeman to form a tremendous duo at the linebacker position. Bears will be improved this year, especially against the run. I see this line being an overreaction to one solid Week 1 performance by the Eagles' North Dakota State QB Carson Wentz...
Jay Cutler improved last year & he should by now get a similar season to last year's. But Bears have enough weapons around Cuntler to allow him to not have to feel that he has do everything himself..
Worst home record last year means Bears must come from behind, so bet Phil for the 1st Half, and Bears for the game and in the 2nd Half ML.
0
Eagles @ Chicago — Bears -3 & for the 2nd Half
Originally leaned under, primarily b/c of turnovers. but expect 1 or 2 of the giveaways to lead directly to pts, which might push this thing up to the 45-50 point range. Both teams had totals c. 42 last week & both went under. Chicago had a lead at Houston then lost 23-14; and, Phil took down the Cleveland Browns 29-10.
One good game against an awful team has a lots of folks buying into rookie QB Wentz to have another field day against a Bears defense that HC Fox has a lot of work to do to fix up. But Bears will stop the ball better than Cleveland did, so Under seems to be more likely,what with 7 out of 10 bets on the Over.
Eagles beat Browns at home last weekend, but keep things in perspective: Wentz was going up against Browns' defense. At the end of the year, the Browns will have one of the 3 or 4 worst defenses in the NFL. Wentz & Eagles offense won't have the same luxury tonight playing on the road at Soldier Field vs. Bears.
Fox went out & got Danny Trevathan, Jerrell Freeman to form a tremendous duo at the linebacker position. Bears will be improved this year, especially against the run. I see this line being an overreaction to one solid Week 1 performance by the Eagles' North Dakota State QB Carson Wentz...
Jay Cutler improved last year & he should by now get a similar season to last year's. But Bears have enough weapons around Cuntler to allow him to not have to feel that he has do everything himself..
Worst home record last year means Bears must come from behind, so bet Phil for the 1st Half, and Bears for the game and in the 2nd Half ML.
To get shredded up by a rookie QB whose only 1st string because the Vikes Bridgewater got injured bad; granted, WENTZ QB'd the 5-yr #1 powerhouse FCS football program North Dakota State, but really...? ...after the worst home record last year, to become 0-12...
The Bears organization went into steep decline right after the loss to P. Manning in the SB... Then management dreamt up a big plan to suck up Denver's QB castoff, one Jaygay CUNTLER !
Even do a Detroit Lions winless season won't help this scam of an outfit — Tressman, now Fox, another Denver reject...
The Bears' players could be seen on TV to just quit playing, from the 3rd Quarter on...
0
To get shredded up by a rookie QB whose only 1st string because the Vikes Bridgewater got injured bad; granted, WENTZ QB'd the 5-yr #1 powerhouse FCS football program North Dakota State, but really...? ...after the worst home record last year, to become 0-12...
The Bears organization went into steep decline right after the loss to P. Manning in the SB... Then management dreamt up a big plan to suck up Denver's QB castoff, one Jaygay CUNTLER !
Even do a Detroit Lions winless season won't help this scam of an outfit — Tressman, now Fox, another Denver reject...
The Bears' players could be seen on TV to just quit playing, from the 3rd Quarter on...
dah Bears are 3 clicks worse than anyone imagined.
And to think that the Bears had all those Draft picks — could have even taken Dak P. (the Alabama Killer) ,,,Sex Tapes on the owners means Cutler stays the ONE & ONLY QB (and makes top dollar each year).
0
dah Bears are 3 clicks worse than anyone imagined.
And to think that the Bears had all those Draft picks — could have even taken Dak P. (the Alabama Killer) ,,,Sex Tapes on the owners means Cutler stays the ONE & ONLY QB (and makes top dollar each year).