Miami on a back to back and go to the AT and T Center to face a Spurs team that is posting big numbers on the scoring end. Mainly the big scores are against teams with limited capacity to defend the paint or Tim Duncan. In most cases, it's a pick your poison proposition as the ball can go to Duncan or out to the shooters.
The Heat have no one who can defend Duncan. The ball will be sent to him via ball rotations and apart from the regular 3 point threats, the Spurs will know that the Heat are not an easy beat and loom as an Adam and Eve on a Raft and wreck 'em upset special.
The Heat beat the Spurs on here last time out. The past 9 of 10 contests have not even threatened to exceed 195 points. With Miami on a back to back, I expect to see the Spurs try and blow this game early but the pace should settle and provided the Heat hang in and defend, has the potential to be turn into a defensive struggle.
Play: Under 195
0
12/31/2009 San Antonio v Miami Total: 195
Miami on a back to back and go to the AT and T Center to face a Spurs team that is posting big numbers on the scoring end. Mainly the big scores are against teams with limited capacity to defend the paint or Tim Duncan. In most cases, it's a pick your poison proposition as the ball can go to Duncan or out to the shooters.
The Heat have no one who can defend Duncan. The ball will be sent to him via ball rotations and apart from the regular 3 point threats, the Spurs will know that the Heat are not an easy beat and loom as an Adam and Eve on a Raft and wreck 'em upset special.
The Heat beat the Spurs on here last time out. The past 9 of 10 contests have not even threatened to exceed 195 points. With Miami on a back to back, I expect to see the Spurs try and blow this game early but the pace should settle and provided the Heat hang in and defend, has the potential to be turn into a defensive struggle.
Slyspy, I just noticed your thread. How have you been making out? I play quite a few totals and I believe you are bang on for the S.A. game. Good luck!
0
Slyspy, I just noticed your thread. How have you been making out? I play quite a few totals and I believe you are bang on for the S.A. game. Good luck!
I'm not too fussed but going back to 1 Unit Plays for a month with 3 plays a day.
The trends are all over the place too so we will have to review how teams are going to go with the remaining 60% of the Season before the Playoffs.
I expect it becomes integral that teams and coaches look at where they are at and focus on winning games at home for chances to make the Playoffs. That's where it's at - Home Wins.
0
Hope everyone had a great NY
Record is at 35-24.
I'm not too fussed but going back to 1 Unit Plays for a month with 3 plays a day.
The trends are all over the place too so we will have to review how teams are going to go with the remaining 60% of the Season before the Playoffs.
I expect it becomes integral that teams and coaches look at where they are at and focus on winning games at home for chances to make the Playoffs. That's where it's at - Home Wins.
All I'm going to say is provided the NY festivities haven't gone to their system, I expect nothing short of 220 points here. The Wolves can score and with good big man presence and a compliment of decent shooters to keep them in the contest.
The problem for the Wolves is that when they play teams with good shooters, they have a huge problem and concede well beyond 105 points. The Magic will keep the scoreboard ticking like a clock and this game will bottle out to junk time wih minimal D from either end.
Both teams play again on the 2nd so expect the Magic to rest their stars and slack off on D especially in the 4th Qtr.
Play: Over 204
0
01/01/2010 Minnesota v Orlando Total: 204
All I'm going to say is provided the NY festivities haven't gone to their system, I expect nothing short of 220 points here. The Wolves can score and with good big man presence and a compliment of decent shooters to keep them in the contest.
The problem for the Wolves is that when they play teams with good shooters, they have a huge problem and concede well beyond 105 points. The Magic will keep the scoreboard ticking like a clock and this game will bottle out to junk time wih minimal D from either end.
Both teams play again on the 2nd so expect the Magic to rest their stars and slack off on D especially in the 4th Qtr.
In the past 10 contests, the total has exceeded 201 only twice. The Spurs tend to defend the Wizards as good as anyone and although they have a smaller line up, I can see the Wizards struggle for points.
It's a close call but with a game the next day, I expect the Spurs to slow the tempo down and control this game.
Arenas may be suspended and he is questionable. It won't matter much anyway. I expect the Spurs to defend the perimeter well and look for some cheap fast break points.
Play: Under 201
0
01/02/2010 Washington v San Antonio Total: 201
In the past 10 contests, the total has exceeded 201 only twice. The Spurs tend to defend the Wizards as good as anyone and although they have a smaller line up, I can see the Wizards struggle for points.
It's a close call but with a game the next day, I expect the Spurs to slow the tempo down and control this game.
Arenas may be suspended and he is questionable. It won't matter much anyway. I expect the Spurs to defend the perimeter well and look for some cheap fast break points.
This is such a 50/50 call but the key here is that I think that there will be some nuetralisation inside the paint battle between Naoh and Howard.
Sure Howard is better than Noah 9.5 times out of 10 but with the Bulls gaining some momentum with 2 wins in a row and the Magic coming off a game the previous nite, I can see a slow tempo displayed by both.
The Magic didn't shoot well for much of the Game against the Wolves and it won't bode well here if the Bulls elect to play tight D.
Play: Under 193
0
01/02/2010 Cjicago v Orlando Total: 193
This is such a 50/50 call but the key here is that I think that there will be some nuetralisation inside the paint battle between Naoh and Howard.
Sure Howard is better than Noah 9.5 times out of 10 but with the Bulls gaining some momentum with 2 wins in a row and the Magic coming off a game the previous nite, I can see a slow tempo displayed by both.
The Magic didn't shoot well for much of the Game against the Wolves and it won't bode well here if the Bulls elect to play tight D.
This is the replica of the previous match up which Houston won 108 - 100. The total was also set at 194.
The only difference is it's at the Hornet's nest and I don't think Houston will dictate the terms as well as they did when they last played. What this means is that the Houston run and gun will be nullified by the Hornets and I expect Paul to control the tempo well.
The problem for unders betting on Houston games is that gnat - Aaron Brroks. All I see him do is mindlessly run at defenders and get fast break lay ups or jack up 3 pointers.
I'm sure the Hornet's key to victory is to swat this guy and make sure he doesn't get into the lanes and drive to the bucket.
If this happens, it is going to be a bad call here because what will eventuate is a high tempo contest and alot of scoring.
Play: Under 194
0
01/02/2010 New Orleans v Houston Total: 194
This is the replica of the previous match up which Houston won 108 - 100. The total was also set at 194.
The only difference is it's at the Hornet's nest and I don't think Houston will dictate the terms as well as they did when they last played. What this means is that the Houston run and gun will be nullified by the Hornets and I expect Paul to control the tempo well.
The problem for unders betting on Houston games is that gnat - Aaron Brroks. All I see him do is mindlessly run at defenders and get fast break lay ups or jack up 3 pointers.
I'm sure the Hornet's key to victory is to swat this guy and make sure he doesn't get into the lanes and drive to the bucket.
If this happens, it is going to be a bad call here because what will eventuate is a high tempo contest and alot of scoring.
Keep playin and rollin brother! And whoever is worried about this man posting and this thread rolling................BEAT IT AND FIND A NEW THREAD!
Sounds like you mean me BigNobody191. Nine posts in two years and you decide to defend this thread? Why? Because I made a comment about the length of this thread?
It's not like I said anything about how slypsy occasionaly will post that he played a better line on a game after it's over, rather than the one he posted before the game and actually won his bet adding a win to his total. In post #489 he says he wen 2-1 today. His posted plays went 1-1 and a push.
This isnt the first time that I've seen discrepencies in his posted plays and what he states his record is.
This is why a daily thread is better. It's easier to keep track of a persons record to see how they are performing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigSteve191:
Keep playin and rollin brother! And whoever is worried about this man posting and this thread rolling................BEAT IT AND FIND A NEW THREAD!
Sounds like you mean me BigNobody191. Nine posts in two years and you decide to defend this thread? Why? Because I made a comment about the length of this thread?
It's not like I said anything about how slypsy occasionaly will post that he played a better line on a game after it's over, rather than the one he posted before the game and actually won his bet adding a win to his total. In post #489 he says he wen 2-1 today. His posted plays went 1-1 and a push.
This isnt the first time that I've seen discrepencies in his posted plays and what he states his record is.
This is why a daily thread is better. It's easier to keep track of a persons record to see how they are performing.
It's not like I said anything about how slypsy occasionaly will post that he played a better line on a game after it's over, rather than the one he posted before the game and actually won his bet adding a win to his total. In post #489 he says he wen 2-1 today. His posted plays went 1-1 and a push.
This isnt the first time that I've seen discrepencies in his posted plays and what he states his record is.
Yeah, it feels pretty much FedUp, I feel like a cosmic idiot losing money on such a unbeliavable way (fuck you Anderson!) where both New Orleans/Houston and Chi/Orlando managed to score 15+ in last couple of mins...
..only to see the next morning that tipster I followed actually bet on another picks than he actually posted.
This is just so not fair, admit your losses dude!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vegasville:
It's not like I said anything about how slypsy occasionaly will post that he played a better line on a game after it's over, rather than the one he posted before the game and actually won his bet adding a win to his total. In post #489 he says he wen 2-1 today. His posted plays went 1-1 and a push.
This isnt the first time that I've seen discrepencies in his posted plays and what he states his record is.
Yeah, it feels pretty much FedUp, I feel like a cosmic idiot losing money on such a unbeliavable way (fuck you Anderson!) where both New Orleans/Houston and Chi/Orlando managed to score 15+ in last couple of mins...
..only to see the next morning that tipster I followed actually bet on another picks than he actually posted.
Yeah whatever. The thing about the Totals is that my asshole Bookies dont release them necessarily at the same time to when the Covers total is released.
Anyway - take it from me, I havent even taken the tips of 2-1-0 from yesterday into account as that. It is still 1-1-1
Spurs v Toronto - Under 201.5
0
Yeah whatever. The thing about the Totals is that my asshole Bookies dont release them necessarily at the same time to when the Covers total is released.
Anyway - take it from me, I havent even taken the tips of 2-1-0 from yesterday into account as that. It is still 1-1-1
TVex thanks for being an asshole and doing your own research.....Man you gotta lot of nerve for being critical of cappers with your 5th post.......Hope it hits and you couldn't get it in
0
TVex thanks for being an asshole and doing your own research.....Man you gotta lot of nerve for being critical of cappers with your 5th post.......Hope it hits and you couldn't get it in
I think its fair enough to request earlier picks. The problem for me is that since Im in Australia, I dont even get the Totals on games till in the morning as some games I prefer have the odds closed.
Anyhow, I was at the Hopman Cup Tennis so couldnt exactly do much with the NBA.
I will see what i can do for tomorrow.
0
OK OK OK
I think its fair enough to request earlier picks. The problem for me is that since Im in Australia, I dont even get the Totals on games till in the morning as some games I prefer have the odds closed.
Anyhow, I was at the Hopman Cup Tennis so couldnt exactly do much with the NBA.
These 2 teams can seriously resort to some low scorers mainly on account of bad shooting or poor positioning when taking shots - particularly Utah who can be clamped down seriously.
The Hornets have dialed up the D when needed in some recent contests but that is normally the difference in them winning or not. They are not a 100+ point team and don't really threaten the scoreboard as if they have a restraining order on it.
This is a contest between 2 higher credentialed teams and this will be enough to suggest both teams know they are beatable by each other.
I expect better ball protection by Utah who can be prone to some horrible play for long periods. They turned the ball over 25 times against a depleted Denver team and lost as an 8 point favorite in that game.
Play: Under 196
0
01/04/2010 Utah v New Orleans Total: 196
These 2 teams can seriously resort to some low scorers mainly on account of bad shooting or poor positioning when taking shots - particularly Utah who can be clamped down seriously.
The Hornets have dialed up the D when needed in some recent contests but that is normally the difference in them winning or not. They are not a 100+ point team and don't really threaten the scoreboard as if they have a restraining order on it.
This is a contest between 2 higher credentialed teams and this will be enough to suggest both teams know they are beatable by each other.
I expect better ball protection by Utah who can be prone to some horrible play for long periods. They turned the ball over 25 times against a depleted Denver team and lost as an 8 point favorite in that game.
The Hawks must be wondering what went wrong against both Cleveland and New York after holding big leads and subsequently losing.
I can tell you what went wrong! Their lack of perimeter D is what did them and the occasional brilliance by the opponent when attacking the paint.
The fact that the Hawks need to get back on track will twist and thwart this game into a high defensive game where shooting shots at every 10 clicks will be holstered for the night.
Miami have also dropped a couple and similarly will be of the same mind set here. I don't think either team are running their offensives too well when teams play D.
The formula will be that Miami D + Atlanta D = Under 195.5.
Play: Under 195.5
0
01/04/2010 Miami v Atlanta Total: 195.5
The Hawks must be wondering what went wrong against both Cleveland and New York after holding big leads and subsequently losing.
I can tell you what went wrong! Their lack of perimeter D is what did them and the occasional brilliance by the opponent when attacking the paint.
The fact that the Hawks need to get back on track will twist and thwart this game into a high defensive game where shooting shots at every 10 clicks will be holstered for the night.
Miami have also dropped a couple and similarly will be of the same mind set here. I don't think either team are running their offensives too well when teams play D.
The formula will be that Miami D + Atlanta D = Under 195.5.
The Hawks must be wondering what went wrong against both Cleveland and New York after holding big leads and subsequently losing.
I can tell you what went wrong! Their lack of perimeter D is what did them and the occasional brilliance by the opponent when attacking the paint.
The fact that the Hawks need to get back on track will twist and thwart this game into a high defensive game where shooting shots at every 10 clicks will be holstered for the night.
Miami have also dropped a couple and similarly will be of the same mind set here. I don't think either team are running their offensives too well when teams play D.
The formula will be that Miami D + Atlanta D = Under 195.5.
Play: Under 195.5
Hey slyspy, what do you think of the OKC @ Chicago Bulls game this evening over or under 194.5 ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by slyspy700:
01/04/2010 Miami v Atlanta Total: 195.5
The Hawks must be wondering what went wrong against both Cleveland and New York after holding big leads and subsequently losing.
I can tell you what went wrong! Their lack of perimeter D is what did them and the occasional brilliance by the opponent when attacking the paint.
The fact that the Hawks need to get back on track will twist and thwart this game into a high defensive game where shooting shots at every 10 clicks will be holstered for the night.
Miami have also dropped a couple and similarly will be of the same mind set here. I don't think either team are running their offensives too well when teams play D.
The formula will be that Miami D + Atlanta D = Under 195.5.
Play: Under 195.5
Hey slyspy, what do you think of the OKC @ Chicago Bulls game this evening over or under 194.5 ?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.