• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 4
      NFL Week 4
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum

    NBA Tuesday.. 57-39 YTD (59.4%)

    12 Next Last»
    capperintuition
    si1ly
    WageDiscipline
    308655406
    afgking4life
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 6830
    Posts: 44
    12 Next Last»
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 8:05 PM ET #1

    Last Thursday extended my streak of  .500 or above nights to 9-straight.  That streak includes 3 100% nights, but I still consider it a bit of a cold streak.  I did turn Thursday into a winning night by hitting my second-straight middle in as many nights, with a 15.5-point middle that odds makers allowed us to hit on the Hawks/Magic game.  As I’ve mentioned, I will release all halftime hedge bets for my official plays via twitter, follow if you need help tracking and assessing hedges on the plays I post.

    3 plays for Tuesday:

    Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5

    Mathematically projected score: Celtics 91 Cavaliers 93

    Looks like the public is bullish on the Celtics coming out of break.  Maybe everyone has forgotten the Celtics forgettable start to the season.  I’m expecting to read a lot of people say the Celtics are “rested” so that is the reason they will cover.  Ah, the public and their futile attempts to explain why they make bandwagon bets on road favorites.

    The fact of the matter is that the Cavs are competitive enough to be favored in most of their games at home, why would this Boston team be an exception?  A good way to evaluate this line is by looking at the UTA/SAC game tomorrow, Sacramento is laying 2 at home against a Jazz team that is quite similar to this Celtics team, I actually rank the Jazz a bit higher than the Celtics.  Cleveland and Sacramento are my #23 and #24 ranked teams, respectively, so they are as similar as it gets.  However, there is a 5.5-point disparity between the lines in these games.  It’s a simple case of line-inflation for a road favorite with a strong tradition.

    I expect this line to improve with time.

    New Orleans Hornets +13.5

    Mathematically projected score: Hornets 92 Bulls 98

    The Hornets are quietly becoming one of the most undervalued teams in the NBA.  They’ve snuck into my top-15 road teams and lines are still inflated despite the ATS cover streak they took into the break.  Chicago holds a trend advantage on New Orleans, but that isn’t nearly enough to offset the resounding ATS edge the Hornets hold in this match.

    Chicago is a major contender that took a 60% cover rate into the break, books tend to evaluate themselves at the midway point and try to correct some of the teams they undervalues in the first half.  Chicago is one of the teams that is likely to see far less ATS covers in the second half of this season, because the books lose money on popular teams that cover at a high rate.

    Another reason for this inflated line is the trouncing that Chicago put on the Hornets last time out, in NO.  Every game is an independent event when it comes to probability, the public doesn’t understand that so you can always get value with a team that got blown out in the last match-up against a given team.  The most recent memory I have of this situation is when we were on the Suns +2.5 at home against a Laker team that beat them by 12 points 2 days earlier.  To jog your memory, the Suns won that game by 12 points..  I don’t expect the Hornets to beat the Bulls, but they will hang tough in a game where most of the Bulls focus will be on heading to San Antonio on the following night.

    This line has already moved a full point in the Hornets favor, so just let it push it’s way higher and higher.

    New Jersey Nets +10.5

    Mathematically projected score: Nets 92 Mavericks 97

    As you know, I love betting on New Jersey when they are on the road.  They are on of the few counter intuitive teams that plays better on the road than they do at home (based on my weighted power rankings.)  Also, the Nets are on Vegas’ midway evaluation as a team that needs to be boosted in order to avoid profitable blind fading.  They covered only 43% of their games in the first half, anything that is outside the 48-52% range is a huge deal to Vegas odds makers.  Keep in mind that most teams land within that 48-52% range by the end of the season, in terms of ATS win pct.

    On the other hand the Mavs are covering 58.8% of their spreads, an alarming figure that should be priority #1 for odds makers to move on.  You CANNOT undervalue the defending world champions if you are trying to minimize loss and maximize profits.. and Vegas undervalued the Mavs in the first half of the season, don't expect them to continue making that mistake.

    This is another look-ahead game.  Dallas is on the first leg of a b2b against a seemingly harmless Nets team and they have to head to Memphis the next night to take-on a divisional foe.  The only issue is that the Nets have arguably the best point guard in the game, second-chance points from Humphries’ efforts, a top-5 rookie in Brooks.. oh, and they just got their 7-footer back.  If the Nets are firing on all cylinders they have a shot with any team in the league, I’ll take a double digit cushion any day on the Nets.

    Once again, we are opposing public perception with this play so we can wait for a better number.

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    Last Thursday extended my streak of  .500 or above nights to 9-straight.  That streak includes 3 100% nights, but I still consider it a bit of a cold streak.  I did turn Thursday into a winning night by hitting my second-straight middle in as many nights, with a 15.5-point middle that odds makers allowed us to hit on the Hawks/Magic game.  As I’ve mentioned, I will release all halftime hedge bets for my official plays via twitter, follow if you need help tracking and assessing hedges on the plays I post.

    3 plays for Tuesday:

    Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5

    Mathematically projected score: Celtics 91 Cavaliers 93

    Looks like the public is bullish on the Celtics coming out of break.  Maybe everyone has forgotten the Celtics forgettable start to the season.  I’m expecting to read a lot of people say the Celtics are “rested” so that is the reason they will cover.  Ah, the public and their futile attempts to explain why they make bandwagon bets on road favorites.

    The fact of the matter is that the Cavs are competitive enough to be favored in most of their games at home, why would this Boston team be an exception?  A good way to evaluate this line is by looking at the UTA/SAC game tomorrow, Sacramento is laying 2 at home against a Jazz team that is quite similar to this Celtics team, I actually rank the Jazz a bit higher than the Celtics.  Cleveland and Sacramento are my #23 and #24 ranked teams, respectively, so they are as similar as it gets.  However, there is a 5.5-point disparity between the lines in these games.  It’s a simple case of line-inflation for a road favorite with a strong tradition.

    I expect this line to improve with time.

    New Orleans Hornets +13.5

    Mathematically projected score: Hornets 92 Bulls 98

    The Hornets are quietly becoming one of the most undervalued teams in the NBA.  They’ve snuck into my top-15 road teams and lines are still inflated despite the ATS cover streak they took into the break.  Chicago holds a trend advantage on New Orleans, but that isn’t nearly enough to offset the resounding ATS edge the Hornets hold in this match.

    Chicago is a major contender that took a 60% cover rate into the break, books tend to evaluate themselves at the midway point and try to correct some of the teams they undervalues in the first half.  Chicago is one of the teams that is likely to see far less ATS covers in the second half of this season, because the books lose money on popular teams that cover at a high rate.

    Another reason for this inflated line is the trouncing that Chicago put on the Hornets last time out, in NO.  Every game is an independent event when it comes to probability, the public doesn’t understand that so you can always get value with a team that got blown out in the last match-up against a given team.  The most recent memory I have of this situation is when we were on the Suns +2.5 at home against a Laker team that beat them by 12 points 2 days earlier.  To jog your memory, the Suns won that game by 12 points..  I don’t expect the Hornets to beat the Bulls, but they will hang tough in a game where most of the Bulls focus will be on heading to San Antonio on the following night.

    This line has already moved a full point in the Hornets favor, so just let it push it’s way higher and higher.

    New Jersey Nets +10.5

    Mathematically projected score: Nets 92 Mavericks 97

    As you know, I love betting on New Jersey when they are on the road.  They are on of the few counter intuitive teams that plays better on the road than they do at home (based on my weighted power rankings.)  Also, the Nets are on Vegas’ midway evaluation as a team that needs to be boosted in order to avoid profitable blind fading.  They covered only 43% of their games in the first half, anything that is outside the 48-52% range is a huge deal to Vegas odds makers.  Keep in mind that most teams land within that 48-52% range by the end of the season, in terms of ATS win pct.

    On the other hand the Mavs are covering 58.8% of their spreads, an alarming figure that should be priority #1 for odds makers to move on.  You CANNOT undervalue the defending world champions if you are trying to minimize loss and maximize profits.. and Vegas undervalued the Mavs in the first half of the season, don't expect them to continue making that mistake.

    This is another look-ahead game.  Dallas is on the first leg of a b2b against a seemingly harmless Nets team and they have to head to Memphis the next night to take-on a divisional foe.  The only issue is that the Nets have arguably the best point guard in the game, second-chance points from Humphries’ efforts, a top-5 rookie in Brooks.. oh, and they just got their 7-footer back.  If the Nets are firing on all cylinders they have a shot with any team in the league, I’ll take a double digit cushion any day on the Nets.

    Once again, we are opposing public perception with this play so we can wait for a better number.

     
    si1ly
    si1ly
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2008
    Posts: 12061
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 8:13 PM ET #2

    Great read.  I can appreciate your style.  We're both going after the same thing.  My updated power ranking are up, you should check them out.  My models agree with everything you said.  New Jersey does play better on the road.  The Cavs should be favored against Boston.  Dallas should only win by 5.  If I bet on value alone, these three games would be at the top of the list on my card.  Good luck CI!
    Reply
    Great read.  I can appreciate your style.  We're both going after the same thing.  My updated power ranking are up, you should check them out.  My models agree with everything you said.  New Jersey does play better on the road.  The Cavs should be favored against Boston.  Dallas should only win by 5.  If I bet on value alone, these three games would be at the top of the list on my card.  Good luck CI!
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 8:49 PM ET #3

    Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:

    Great read.  I can appreciate your style.  We're both going after the same thing.  My updated power ranking are up, you should check them out.  My models agree with everything you said.  New Jersey does play better on the road.  The Cavs should be favored against Boston.  Dallas should only win by 5.  If I bet on value alone, these three games would be at the top of the list on my card.  Good luck CI!


    Appreciate it, we definitely have similar perspectives.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by si1ly:

    Great read.  I can appreciate your style.  We're both going after the same thing.  My updated power ranking are up, you should check them out.  My models agree with everything you said.  New Jersey does play better on the road.  The Cavs should be favored against Boston.  Dallas should only win by 5.  If I bet on value alone, these three games would be at the top of the list on my card.  Good luck CI!


    Appreciate it, we definitely have similar perspectives.
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 8:50 PM ET #4

    As always, you can find my documented February ATS record and my full daily scoring table of mathematically projected scores in my covers space.
    Reply
    As always, you can find my documented February ATS record and my full daily scoring table of mathematically projected scores in my covers space.
     
    WageDiscipline
    WageDiscipline
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 718
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 9:38 PM ET #5

    Interesting perspectives and insight.  Best of luck capper.
    Reply
    Interesting perspectives and insight.  Best of luck capper.
     
    308655406
    308655406
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 12
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 10:14 PM ET #6

    Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5?

    even Anderson Varejao won't play?
    Reply
    Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5?

    even Anderson Varejao won't play?
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 11:22 PM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by 308655406:

    Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5?

    even Anderson Varejao won't play?


    Varejao has been absent for the majority of Cleveland's past 10 games.  Vegas has made adequate adjustments for his injury by now, it is negligible. Injuries to Wilcox and O'Neal carry more weight than Varejao's injury at this point.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by 308655406:

    Cleveland Cavaliers +3.5?

    even Anderson Varejao won't play?


    Varejao has been absent for the majority of Cleveland's past 10 games.  Vegas has made adequate adjustments for his injury by now, it is negligible. Injuries to Wilcox and O'Neal carry more weight than Varejao's injury at this point.

     
    afgking4life
    afgking4life
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 292
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 11:38 PM ET #8

    What do you think of Sacramento?
    Reply
    What do you think of Sacramento?
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 11:42 PM ET #9

    Quote Originally Posted by afgking4life:

    What do you think of Sacramento?


    Pegged them at a 3-point ATS edge.  5 points is my minimum for a play, so they are pretty close.  I consider the Kings and Cavs games to be very similar, so the Cavs are a much better bargain but both have good ATS edges.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by afgking4life:

    What do you think of Sacramento?


    Pegged them at a 3-point ATS edge.  5 points is my minimum for a play, so they are pretty close.  I consider the Kings and Cavs games to be very similar, so the Cavs are a much better bargain but both have good ATS edges.
     
    LaDaddy
    LaDaddy
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2007
    Posts: 22824
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 11:48 PM ET #10

    .gL
    Reply
    .gL
     
    TRAIN69
    TRAIN69
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2002
    Posts: 55678
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 11:50 PM ET #11

    Good read. Like the picks. Also think Detroit at home is under valued vs Philly. The 76er offense has been sputtering and the Pistons have quietly been playing some nice ball. Also like the T Wolves catching 7 against the Clips, whos All Star tandem spent the weekend with the best of the best. Dont think they will be focused...

     

    bol

    Reply

    Good read. Like the picks. Also think Detroit at home is under valued vs Philly. The 76er offense has been sputtering and the Pistons have quietly been playing some nice ball. Also like the T Wolves catching 7 against the Clips, whos All Star tandem spent the weekend with the best of the best. Dont think they will be focused...

     

    bol

     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 27, 2012 - 11:54 PM ET #12

    Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

    Good read. Like the picks. Also think Detroit at home is under valued vs Philly. The 76er offense has been sputtering and the Pistons have quietly been playing some nice ball. Also like the T Wolves catching 7 against the Clips, whos All Star tandem spent the weekend with the best of the best. Dont think they will be focused...

     

    bol



    Agreed.  I gave the Pistons a 3-point ATS edge, so they were just outside the bubble as well.  If that line hits 5, I would consider taking them.  I'll give a home dog the benefit of falling just short of my ATS edge threshold.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

    Good read. Like the picks. Also think Detroit at home is under valued vs Philly. The 76er offense has been sputtering and the Pistons have quietly been playing some nice ball. Also like the T Wolves catching 7 against the Clips, whos All Star tandem spent the weekend with the best of the best. Dont think they will be focused...

     

    bol



    Agreed.  I gave the Pistons a 3-point ATS edge, so they were just outside the bubble as well.  If that line hits 5, I would consider taking them.  I'll give a home dog the benefit of falling just short of my ATS edge threshold.
     
    jaredms
    jaredms
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2005
    Posts: 192
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 12:12 AM ET #13

    what's ur twitter handle?  I would like to follow.  lost 500 on Nd tonight only have 1k to work w for the week need some help. Ty pal.
    Reply
    what's ur twitter handle?  I would like to follow.  lost 500 on Nd tonight only have 1k to work w for the week need some help. Ty pal.
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 12:17 AM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by jaredms:

    what's ur twitter handle?  I would like to follow.  lost 500 on Nd tonight only have 1k to work w for the week need some help. Ty pal.


    Tough luck, cut those units down in size.  No such thing as a sure shot.  My handle is @mrchandman
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jaredms:

    what's ur twitter handle?  I would like to follow.  lost 500 on Nd tonight only have 1k to work w for the week need some help. Ty pal.


    Tough luck, cut those units down in size.  No such thing as a sure shot.  My handle is @mrchandman
     
    308655406
    308655406
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 12
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 1:33 AM ET #15

    Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition:



    Varejao has been absent for the majority of Cleveland's past 10 games.  Vegas has made adequate adjustments for his injury by now, it is negligible. Injuries to Wilcox and O'Neal carry more weight than Varejao's injury at this point.



    Wilcox will play, and Bass is back for the Cs too.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition:



    Varejao has been absent for the majority of Cleveland's past 10 games.  Vegas has made adequate adjustments for his injury by now, it is negligible. Injuries to Wilcox and O'Neal carry more weight than Varejao's injury at this point.



    Wilcox will play, and Bass is back for the Cs too.

     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 2:24 AM ET #16

    Quote Originally Posted by 308655406:



    Wilcox will play, and Bass is back for the Cs too.



    You must be new to my threads if you think there tic-tack injuries hold any weight.  Varejao is the only injured play we have mentioned that hold any real weight for his team, but he has been gone for long enough that his injury is accurately accounted for in this line.

    Wilcox is a net -2.7 (+/-), O'Neal is a net -5.3 (+/-) and Bass just barely contributes positively for the Celtics at +1.2.. The injuries are absolutely negligible in this match-up.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by 308655406:



    Wilcox will play, and Bass is back for the Cs too.



    You must be new to my threads if you think there tic-tack injuries hold any weight.  Varejao is the only injured play we have mentioned that hold any real weight for his team, but he has been gone for long enough that his injury is accurately accounted for in this line.

    Wilcox is a net -2.7 (+/-), O'Neal is a net -5.3 (+/-) and Bass just barely contributes positively for the Celtics at +1.2.. The injuries are absolutely negligible in this match-up.
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 2:33 AM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition:



    You must be new to my threads if you think there tic-tack injuries hold any weight.  Varejao is the only injured play we have mentioned that hold any real weight for his team, but he has been gone for long enough that his injury is accurately accounted for in this line.

    Wilcox is a net -2.7 (+/-), O'Neal is a net -5.3 (+/-) and Bass just barely contributes positively for the Celtics at +1.2.. The injuries are absolutely negligible in this match-up.

    Just so the injury mavens out there don't think I am speaking blasphemy.  When I say that the injuries are negligible it means that there is no market edge to be gained by factoring these injuries.  Of course the injuries will affect the game, but Vegas is dialed-in on their assessment of the injuries in this game because they are run-of-the-mill and Varejao has been out long enough for them to quantify the line adjustment, which is still very small.

    If anything, Varejao's injury still ever so slightly pays to the Cavs ATS value because people like you are still lingering over an injury that occurred 7 games ago.  For that reason, Vegas may need to inflate the line a bit because of the irrational Boston money basing the play on an old injury that has been properly quantified.


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition:



    You must be new to my threads if you think there tic-tack injuries hold any weight.  Varejao is the only injured play we have mentioned that hold any real weight for his team, but he has been gone for long enough that his injury is accurately accounted for in this line.

    Wilcox is a net -2.7 (+/-), O'Neal is a net -5.3 (+/-) and Bass just barely contributes positively for the Celtics at +1.2.. The injuries are absolutely negligible in this match-up.

    Just so the injury mavens out there don't think I am speaking blasphemy.  When I say that the injuries are negligible it means that there is no market edge to be gained by factoring these injuries.  Of course the injuries will affect the game, but Vegas is dialed-in on their assessment of the injuries in this game because they are run-of-the-mill and Varejao has been out long enough for them to quantify the line adjustment, which is still very small.

    If anything, Varejao's injury still ever so slightly pays to the Cavs ATS value because people like you are still lingering over an injury that occurred 7 games ago.  For that reason, Vegas may need to inflate the line a bit because of the irrational Boston money basing the play on an old injury that has been properly quantified.


     
    Metallica2467
    Metallica2467
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2006
    Posts: 51193
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 9:47 AM ET #18

    R.I.P. Legend
    Reply
     
    rlawson
    rlawson
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2007
    Posts: 1926
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 10:16 AM ET #19

    Reply
     
    Stew Baker
    Stew Baker
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 650
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 10:38 AM ET #20

    Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition:



    Pegged them at a 3-point ATS edge.  5 points is my minimum for a play, so they are pretty close.  I consider the Kings and Cavs games to be very similar, so the Cavs are a much better bargain but both have good ATS edges.
    So being a home non-dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Sacramento to be playable, making them a play at -1/2 (which in reality is pick)? Similarly, being a road dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Washington, making them a play at +8 1/2?
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by capperintuition:



    Pegged them at a 3-point ATS edge.  5 points is my minimum for a play, so they are pretty close.  I consider the Kings and Cavs games to be very similar, so the Cavs are a much better bargain but both have good ATS edges.
    So being a home non-dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Sacramento to be playable, making them a play at -1/2 (which in reality is pick)? Similarly, being a road dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Washington, making them a play at +8 1/2?
     
    mlesnet
    mlesnet
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2012
    Posts: 3099
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 11:39 AM ET #21

    Which one of the 3 picks is your favorite?
    Reply
    Which one of the 3 picks is your favorite?
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 11:53 AM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker:

    So being a home non-dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Sacramento to be playable, making them a play at -1/2 (which in reality is pick)? Similarly, being a road dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Washington, making them a play at +8 1/2?


    Everything must be 5-points to elicit a play, except for home dogs.  home teams and underdogs have been shown to be undervalued by ~2% each, so there is enough implicit value to tip the scales.  Home favs and road dogs do not hold additional implicit value, so they must have a 5-point ATS edge.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Stew Baker:

    So being a home non-dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Sacramento to be playable, making them a play at -1/2 (which in reality is pick)? Similarly, being a road dog, you would need a 4 1/2 pt. edge for Washington, making them a play at +8 1/2?


    Everything must be 5-points to elicit a play, except for home dogs.  home teams and underdogs have been shown to be undervalued by ~2% each, so there is enough implicit value to tip the scales.  Home favs and road dogs do not hold additional implicit value, so they must have a 5-point ATS edge.
     
    capperintuition
    capperintuition
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2012
    Posts: 319
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 11:56 AM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by mlesnet:

    Which one of the 3 picks is your favorite?


    It's a tough call between the Hornets and the Cavs.  Hornets hold the better ATS edge, but I don't think the Cavs will have much issue winning this home game.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by mlesnet:

    Which one of the 3 picks is your favorite?


    It's a tough call between the Hornets and the Cavs.  Hornets hold the better ATS edge, but I don't think the Cavs will have much issue winning this home game.
     
    bigDe1002003
    bigDe1002003
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 478
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 12:13 PM ET #24

    In regards to the Cleveland game, everything you stated makes plenty of sense; however, in this particular situation, do you not feel that the urgency level of Boston is much higher now that they are past the All star break?  Also, they were able to practice more over the break, which is something they really needed as a team.  Bass and Wilcox also practiced.  I don't think O'Neill joined the team for practice though.

    I agree that earlier in the year when they played dallas (1/11/12) after 4 straight days of no games, they should've been "rested", but that last time they were originally out of shape and doc rivers made them do conditioning during their days off.  So, their very next game they were sore and exhausted.  This time around, the celts players are in game shape and they had ample time to practice together, which they didn't really have much of before.  Also, Rondo and Pierce stated over the break that their team was lacking offensive and defensive discipline and they planned to work on that during the break.

    Anyways, I completely agree with you on much of what you said because the fact of the matter is the Cavs are competitive enough to be favorites in most of their home games.  But, the Celtics are a veteran team that is actually rested this game, lol (first time all year).  Also, do you think the "look ahead angle" matters for Cavs?  
    Reply
    In regards to the Cleveland game, everything you stated makes plenty of sense; however, in this particular situation, do you not feel that the urgency level of Boston is much higher now that they are past the All star break?  Also, they were able to practice more over the break, which is something they really needed as a team.  Bass and Wilcox also practiced.  I don't think O'Neill joined the team for practice though.

    I agree that earlier in the year when they played dallas (1/11/12) after 4 straight days of no games, they should've been "rested", but that last time they were originally out of shape and doc rivers made them do conditioning during their days off.  So, their very next game they were sore and exhausted.  This time around, the celts players are in game shape and they had ample time to practice together, which they didn't really have much of before.  Also, Rondo and Pierce stated over the break that their team was lacking offensive and defensive discipline and they planned to work on that during the break.

    Anyways, I completely agree with you on much of what you said because the fact of the matter is the Cavs are competitive enough to be favorites in most of their home games.  But, the Celtics are a veteran team that is actually rested this game, lol (first time all year).  Also, do you think the "look ahead angle" matters for Cavs?  
     
     
    714cuzzin
    714cuzzin
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 12653
    Posted: Feb. 28, 2012 - 12:21 PM ET #25

    Reply
    All Forums | NBA Betting Forum
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 456,248
    • Thursday 10/01/2026 753
    • PART DEUX 206
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,992
    • Steelers vs Browns in-game live TNF 2,102
    • Cleveland Bettors 2,566
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 103,202
    • The MLB Playoffs are here. 12,117
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 29,934
    • Happening just recently . . . 36,843

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.