NBA Totals Tuesday 3-13-12
I'm now seeing 64/36 in favor of the OVER and line movement to 206.0 (what a difference a couple of minutes can make). I am going to continue monitoring this until game time. In the mean time, I'm comfortable with my research and the information I've gathered for this game. I'm guessing the public totals can be very volatile at this time today, considering it's 6PM on the east coast and people are getting their bets in for the day. I will wait to see when it settles down after a while.
I'm now seeing 64/36 in favor of the OVER and line movement to 206.0 (what a difference a couple of minutes can make). I am going to continue monitoring this until game time. In the mean time, I'm comfortable with my research and the information I've gathered for this game. I'm guessing the public totals can be very volatile at this time today, considering it's 6PM on the east coast and people are getting their bets in for the day. I will wait to see when it settles down after a while.
Since 1/10/12 SACs have not given up 100 points at home 2 games in a row.
But they have made very ordinary offenses look very good, as I noted before. If Curry's not playing, that's fine because Golden State has several other players more than capable of picking up those points.
Since 1/10/12 SACs have not given up 100 points at home 2 games in a row.
But they have made very ordinary offenses look very good, as I noted before. If Curry's not playing, that's fine because Golden State has several other players more than capable of picking up those points.
Numbers-wise, LAL/MEM UNDER would normally be considered a play, but I don't have any way of including the loss of Gay into the total number. For now, it's going to be the GS/SAC OVER as the only play tonight. GL to all.
Numbers-wise, LAL/MEM UNDER would normally be considered a play, but I don't have any way of including the loss of Gay into the total number. For now, it's going to be the GS/SAC OVER as the only play tonight. GL to all.
I never read the next two pages of this post i checked what your projected game total was and some stats from gsw v sac games and took the under you should have stuck w your original number
Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Nice call on your play; a win is a win.
I never read the next two pages of this post i checked what your projected game total was and some stats from gsw v sac games and took the under you should have stuck w your original number
Shoulda, woulda, coulda. Nice call on your play; a win is a win.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
