I finished 2008 with an early win and Houstongetting ready for New Year's party with their 2nd half meltdown play. Looks like I will place Houston with Detroit in the same category..the "DO NOT TOUCH" category. Haha.
Also, I did not start 2009 well. I took enn State yesterday againts USC. t was my first NCAA Football bet, which I should not have doe, but it was New Years with the family and relatives and it was nice to cheer for and against with people after New Year's dinner.
Still it's not a good bet and not a good sign. Normally people would lose their shrt and start betting heavy or with higher amounts to try and get back what they lost, when they lose more 3/4 of their winnings in two short days.
I'll just stay calm and hey, it happens. I just like the fun of betting. Although it was rather disconcerting when I had back to back losses like that. If I just stayed the way I've been playing before the New Years, then I would have just los 10 percnt of mymoney instead of 75 %. But that's okay.
Looks like I'll have to recover it little by little. I am definitely taking the NY Knicks at -2 (buying the half point). Quentin Richardson is playing and he seems to be a catalyst for that team's offense. It seems to run or shoot smoother with him around. I am also looking at Cleveland at home -11.5 (buying hafl tpoint). I am tempted to play Orlando but their opponents Miami are in a hot streak ATS right now. As for Boton, they should destroy Washington wic they probably will do, but Boston has been dismal lately against really bad teams. We'll just watch Boston from far away from now.
I finished 2008 with an early win and Houstongetting ready for New Year's party with their 2nd half meltdown play. Looks like I will place Houston with Detroit in the same category..the "DO NOT TOUCH" category. Haha.
Also, I did not start 2009 well. I took enn State yesterday againts USC. t was my first NCAA Football bet, which I should not have doe, but it was New Years with the family and relatives and it was nice to cheer for and against with people after New Year's dinner.
Still it's not a good bet and not a good sign. Normally people would lose their shrt and start betting heavy or with higher amounts to try and get back what they lost, when they lose more 3/4 of their winnings in two short days.
I'll just stay calm and hey, it happens. I just like the fun of betting. Although it was rather disconcerting when I had back to back losses like that. If I just stayed the way I've been playing before the New Years, then I would have just los 10 percnt of mymoney instead of 75 %. But that's okay.
Looks like I'll have to recover it little by little. I am definitely taking the NY Knicks at -2 (buying the half point). Quentin Richardson is playing and he seems to be a catalyst for that team's offense. It seems to run or shoot smoother with him around. I am also looking at Cleveland at home -11.5 (buying hafl tpoint). I am tempted to play Orlando but their opponents Miami are in a hot streak ATS right now. As for Boton, they should destroy Washington wic they probably will do, but Boston has been dismal lately against really bad teams. We'll just watch Boston from far away from now.
The Over should be o problem for both teams, but I just want to stay cautious right now. But I am looking to bet on the Knicks winning by at least three instead. Good luck on your play.
The Over should be o problem for both teams, but I just want to stay cautious right now. But I am looking to bet on the Knicks winning by at least three instead. Good luck on your play.
Indy does, in fact, put up more points than most - averaging 102+ PPG. More importantly, they give up 104+. Indy has had a total set as high as 226.5 (against GS earlier this season). Total for that game was 247 (in regulation).
Neither of these teams like to defend (although Indy pays more attention to D than NY), and the respective teams' style of play leads me to believe that this will be a track meet. The line was set that high for a reason (and has risen at my book to 229).
In my view, the books are begging for UNDER bets when they set the line that high.
If I were going to be the game total, I would lean to the OVER. But I think a better bet is OVER 116 first half.
Just my two cents.
Indy does, in fact, put up more points than most - averaging 102+ PPG. More importantly, they give up 104+. Indy has had a total set as high as 226.5 (against GS earlier this season). Total for that game was 247 (in regulation).
Neither of these teams like to defend (although Indy pays more attention to D than NY), and the respective teams' style of play leads me to believe that this will be a track meet. The line was set that high for a reason (and has risen at my book to 229).
In my view, the books are begging for UNDER bets when they set the line that high.
If I were going to be the game total, I would lean to the OVER. But I think a better bet is OVER 116 first half.
Just my two cents.
Wow! Both of my so called picks would have hit today. The Knicks and the Lakers.
I just wanted to pass a day without betting. So I took Sunday off. Just wanted to be on the safe side, since I had more bad beats since the New Year.
Perhaps Monday can be a good day again.
Wow! Both of my so called picks would have hit today. The Knicks and the Lakers.
I just wanted to pass a day without betting. So I took Sunday off. Just wanted to be on the safe side, since I had more bad beats since the New Year.
Perhaps Monday can be a good day again.
I am taking the Utah Jazz -10 (buying half the point). If they just play a little defense on GSW then they should be able to cover. However, Williams is listed as questionable, but he might probably play. If not, then the Utah Jazz is still a much better team and better coached team in terms of defense as well.
I am taking the Utah Jazz -10 (buying half the point). If they just play a little defense on GSW then they should be able to cover. However, Williams is listed as questionable, but he might probably play. If not, then the Utah Jazz is still a much better team and better coached team in terms of defense as well.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.