In post 39 you mentioned the height. Then in pretty much every other insightful ( sense sarcasm here, dont have a hissy fit youngin) post you mention the same comment, as if to justify why the announcers were 'complete morons, assholes, or both.' and 'If they are sick fucks and find that funny, fine.'
I understand you are a huge A’s homer and feel you have to defend your team. I really do. But you need to understand this isn’t someone saying your team has no offense or that your team sucks. This is your team’s announcers laughing for 10+ seconds when they see a fan go over a rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
Most rational people would find something wrong with that.
Again: you need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
In post 39 you mentioned the height. Then in pretty much every other insightful ( sense sarcasm here, dont have a hissy fit youngin) post you mention the same comment, as if to justify why the announcers were 'complete morons, assholes, or both.' and 'If they are sick fucks and find that funny, fine.'
I understand you are a huge A’s homer and feel you have to defend your team. I really do. But you need to understand this isn’t someone saying your team has no offense or that your team sucks. This is your team’s announcers laughing for 10+ seconds when they see a fan go over a rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
Most rational people would find something wrong with that.
Again: you need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
The announcers didn't realize how far the guy fell. They thought there might have been a plat form right below the wall ( as they have in Oakland). It was not the announcers home park so they were unfamiliar with the outfield bleachers. The man lost his life and all you people bring up is that the announcers had a chuckle. Most people might have a little laugh when they see someone fall, had they realized how far of a drop it was they would have been more serious. Once they had a closer look at the distance he fell, they realized it could have been serious. They meant no harm by that chuckle, and they did wish him well after taking a closer look at the situation.
Nice try, but it’s obvious you are the one making a big deal about your team's announcers laughing.
One post read:
"How bad do those announcers feel now having laughed about it."
The next post quoted that one and read:
"“Just for a baseball.”
“You were right, someone did tumble.”
*laughing*
"
That’s when you become
enraged that someone would dare say anything negative about your team’s
announcers who laughed for 10+ seconds when they saw a fan go over a
rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
It made you so pissed off
that you quoted a post that was answering a question about how many
feet up it was and started on another one of your tirades.
You need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
Please inform me what part of my statement is so enraged? Again, you do not have to repeat repeat repeat the same statement in every thread. Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back. You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
The announcers didn't realize how far the guy fell. They thought there might have been a plat form right below the wall ( as they have in Oakland). It was not the announcers home park so they were unfamiliar with the outfield bleachers. The man lost his life and all you people bring up is that the announcers had a chuckle. Most people might have a little laugh when they see someone fall, had they realized how far of a drop it was they would have been more serious. Once they had a closer look at the distance he fell, they realized it could have been serious. They meant no harm by that chuckle, and they did wish him well after taking a closer look at the situation.
Nice try, but it’s obvious you are the one making a big deal about your team's announcers laughing.
One post read:
"How bad do those announcers feel now having laughed about it."
The next post quoted that one and read:
"“Just for a baseball.”
“You were right, someone did tumble.”
*laughing*
"
That’s when you become
enraged that someone would dare say anything negative about your team’s
announcers who laughed for 10+ seconds when they saw a fan go over a
rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
It made you so pissed off
that you quoted a post that was answering a question about how many
feet up it was and started on another one of your tirades.
You need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
Please inform me what part of my statement is so enraged? Again, you do not have to repeat repeat repeat the same statement in every thread. Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back. You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
Most non believers want hard material evidence to believe in the existence of God, yet many of these same non believers believe Casey Anthony committed the crime or knew who did the crime even though they dont have material evidence.
What, and believers don't? There are just as many believers who think Casey Anthony killed her little girl. Just leave the Casey Anthony case out of this, Rostos. That comparison was terrible.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
I brought up this example as it is very powerful.
Most non believers want hard material evidence to believe in the existence of God, yet many of these same non believers believe Casey Anthony committed the crime or knew who did the crime even though they dont have material evidence.
What, and believers don't? There are just as many believers who think Casey Anthony killed her little girl. Just leave the Casey Anthony case out of this, Rostos. That comparison was terrible.
Nice try, but it’s obvious you are the one making a big deal about your team's announcers laughing.
One post read:
"How bad do those announcers feel now having laughed about it."
The next post quoted that one and read:
"“Just for a baseball.”
“You were right, someone did tumble.”
*laughing*
"
That’s when you become enraged that someone would dare say anything negative about your team’s announcers who laughed for 10+ seconds when they saw a fan go over a rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
It made you so pissed off that you quoted a post that was answering a question about how many feet up it was and started on another one of your tirades.
You need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
Please inform me what part of my statement is so enraged? Again, you do not have to repeat repeat repeat the same statement in every thread. Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back. You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
Try reading the rest of your posts after that. It's obvious you are angry about someone saying something negative about your team's announcers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Nice try, but it’s obvious you are the one making a big deal about your team's announcers laughing.
One post read:
"How bad do those announcers feel now having laughed about it."
The next post quoted that one and read:
"“Just for a baseball.”
“You were right, someone did tumble.”
*laughing*
"
That’s when you become enraged that someone would dare say anything negative about your team’s announcers who laughed for 10+ seconds when they saw a fan go over a rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
It made you so pissed off that you quoted a post that was answering a question about how many feet up it was and started on another one of your tirades.
You need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
Please inform me what part of my statement is so enraged? Again, you do not have to repeat repeat repeat the same statement in every thread. Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back. You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
Try reading the rest of your posts after that. It's obvious you are angry about someone saying something negative about your team's announcers.
I understand you are a huge A’s homer and feel you have to defend your team. I really do. But you need to understand this isn’t someone saying your team has no offense or that your team sucks. This is your team’s announcers laughing for 10+ seconds when they see a fan go over a rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
Most rational people would find something wrong with that.
Again: you need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
Yes we get it they laughed for a few seconds. Do you not understand that the announces are unfamiliar* with the ball park. Every other stadium has padded platforms under rails for this type of situation. So with in those 10 seconds the announcers unfamiliar with the situation and assumed Texas had a park like everyother stadium. Until they realized how far the man fell did they understand it was a serious situation.
*un·fa·mil·iar
ADJECTIVE:
Not being acquainted; not conversant: unfamiliar with the ballpark.
Not within one's knowledge; strange: unfamiliar faces.
Used in a sentence; The announcers were unfamiliar with the ball parks structural engineering, and did not realize the servility of the situation until further attention was made on the surroundings.
Please retake freshman English. It might do you some use.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
I understand you are a huge A’s homer and feel you have to defend your team. I really do. But you need to understand this isn’t someone saying your team has no offense or that your team sucks. This is your team’s announcers laughing for 10+ seconds when they see a fan go over a rail falling head first and disappearing behind a huge wall.
Most rational people would find something wrong with that.
Again: you need to calm down, take off your A’s homer glasses, and try to look at this objectively.
Yes we get it they laughed for a few seconds. Do you not understand that the announces are unfamiliar* with the ball park. Every other stadium has padded platforms under rails for this type of situation. So with in those 10 seconds the announcers unfamiliar with the situation and assumed Texas had a park like everyother stadium. Until they realized how far the man fell did they understand it was a serious situation.
*un·fa·mil·iar
ADJECTIVE:
Not being acquainted; not conversant: unfamiliar with the ballpark.
Not within one's knowledge; strange: unfamiliar faces.
Used in a sentence; The announcers were unfamiliar with the ball parks structural engineering, and did not realize the servility of the situation until further attention was made on the surroundings.
Please retake freshman English. It might do you some use.
The point is, you dont need material evidence to believe in something that you know is true.
Well, that's a good thing, because believers seem to have none. But HOW do you know it's true? It seems to me that you don't, that you simply choose to believe, therefore the story is true, and therefore non-believers (or the "I don't know" crowd that I belong to) are wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
The point is, you dont need material evidence to believe in something that you know is true.
Well, that's a good thing, because believers seem to have none. But HOW do you know it's true? It seems to me that you don't, that you simply choose to believe, therefore the story is true, and therefore non-believers (or the "I don't know" crowd that I belong to) are wrong.
What, and believers don't? There are just as many believers who think Casey Anthony killed her little girl. Just leave the Casey Anthony case out of this, Rostos. That comparison was terrible.
No, as i said, non believers want material evidence. Believers dont have material evidence yet believe. The non believers are hypocritical in there thinking here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
What, and believers don't? There are just as many believers who think Casey Anthony killed her little girl. Just leave the Casey Anthony case out of this, Rostos. That comparison was terrible.
No, as i said, non believers want material evidence. Believers dont have material evidence yet believe. The non believers are hypocritical in there thinking here.
As i said God gives life and takes it as he sees fit. My point that no one knows the inner workings of God mind, for example, why he took away a supposed man with his 6 yr old son, or innocent people, and some evil people are allowed to live. This is what i was refering to in terms of WHY he allows this., That is something we dont know...The WHY.
That's not the only thing we don't know. We don't know squat. When it comes to the existence of God or the afterlife (if there is an afterlife), we don't know squat about squat. We just have a majority of mankind that wants or needs to believe they know when they really don't know anything. I'm afraid that's the bottom line. Most of the world does not want to face that reality.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
As i said God gives life and takes it as he sees fit. My point that no one knows the inner workings of God mind, for example, why he took away a supposed man with his 6 yr old son, or innocent people, and some evil people are allowed to live. This is what i was refering to in terms of WHY he allows this., That is something we dont know...The WHY.
That's not the only thing we don't know. We don't know squat. When it comes to the existence of God or the afterlife (if there is an afterlife), we don't know squat about squat. We just have a majority of mankind that wants or needs to believe they know when they really don't know anything. I'm afraid that's the bottom line. Most of the world does not want to face that reality.
Try reading the rest of your posts after that. It's obvious you are angry about someone saying something negative about your team's announcers.
Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear
and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back.
You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
I just reread that so to answer your question..... Yes the mosquito that keeps buzzing around your ear. You do make me laugh with how redundant* redundant* redundant* you are. Did you take your medication today son?
redundant Exceeding what is necessary or natural; superfluous. Needlessly wordy or repetitive in expression: a student paper filled with redundant phrases. Of or relating to linguistic redundancy. Dismissed...
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
Try reading the rest of your posts after that. It's obvious you are angry about someone saying something negative about your team's announcers.
Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear
and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back.
You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
I just reread that so to answer your question..... Yes the mosquito that keeps buzzing around your ear. You do make me laugh with how redundant* redundant* redundant* you are. Did you take your medication today son?
redundant Exceeding what is necessary or natural; superfluous. Needlessly wordy or repetitive in expression: a student paper filled with redundant phrases. Of or relating to linguistic redundancy. Dismissed...
Well, that's a good thing, because believers seem to have none. But HOW do you know it's true? It seems to me that you don't, that you simply choose to believe, therefore the story is true, and therefore non-believers (or the "I don't know" crowd that I belong to) are wrong.
Origins of the universe?
Fine tuning of the universe?
Objective moral codes?
Jesus Christ?
Personal experience?
These are very very powerful sign posts.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Well, that's a good thing, because believers seem to have none. But HOW do you know it's true? It seems to me that you don't, that you simply choose to believe, therefore the story is true, and therefore non-believers (or the "I don't know" crowd that I belong to) are wrong.
Yes we get it they laughed for a few seconds. Do you not understand that the announces are unfamiliar* with the ball park. Every other stadium has padded platforms under rails for this type of situation. So with in those 10 seconds the announcers unfamiliar with the situation and assumed Texas had a park like everyother stadium. Until they realized how far the man fell did they understand it was a serious situation.
*un·fa·mil·iar
ADJECTIVE:
Not being acquainted; not conversant: unfamiliar with the ballpark.
Not within one's knowledge; strange: unfamiliar faces.
Used in a sentence; The announcers were unfamiliar with the ball parks structural engineering, and did not realize the servility of the situation until further attention was made on the surroundings.
Please retake freshman English. It might do you some use.
They see a man fall over a rail head first and disappear. They have no idea of his condition and they just assume he is perfectly fine and laugh about it for 10+ seconds, but because they are unfamiliar with the ballpark it makes it ok?
You are one of the biggest homers of any team I have ever encountered if you honestly believe that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Yes we get it they laughed for a few seconds. Do you not understand that the announces are unfamiliar* with the ball park. Every other stadium has padded platforms under rails for this type of situation. So with in those 10 seconds the announcers unfamiliar with the situation and assumed Texas had a park like everyother stadium. Until they realized how far the man fell did they understand it was a serious situation.
*un·fa·mil·iar
ADJECTIVE:
Not being acquainted; not conversant: unfamiliar with the ballpark.
Not within one's knowledge; strange: unfamiliar faces.
Used in a sentence; The announcers were unfamiliar with the ball parks structural engineering, and did not realize the servility of the situation until further attention was made on the surroundings.
Please retake freshman English. It might do you some use.
They see a man fall over a rail head first and disappear. They have no idea of his condition and they just assume he is perfectly fine and laugh about it for 10+ seconds, but because they are unfamiliar with the ballpark it makes it ok?
You are one of the biggest homers of any team I have ever encountered if you honestly believe that.
That's not the only thing we don't know. We don't know squat. When it comes to the existence of God or the afterlife (if there is an afterlife), we don't know squat about squat. We just have a majority of mankind that wants or needs to believe they know when they really don't know anything. I'm afraid that's the bottom line. Most of the world does not want to face that reality.
Dont know squat? Have you readthe bible?
What are you gonna say? Cause it was written by man it should be discounted? So everything that you have written should also be discounted, after all, u r also man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
That's not the only thing we don't know. We don't know squat. When it comes to the existence of God or the afterlife (if there is an afterlife), we don't know squat about squat. We just have a majority of mankind that wants or needs to believe they know when they really don't know anything. I'm afraid that's the bottom line. Most of the world does not want to face that reality.
Dont know squat? Have you readthe bible?
What are you gonna say? Cause it was written by man it should be discounted? So everything that you have written should also be discounted, after all, u r also man.
In this life things happen for a reason. My best friend who was supposed to go to the movies chose to attend a baseball game a few years back. While he wasnt looking a line drive hit him in the head and he died instantly. Would he have died if he had went to the theater? Probably not but it was intended for him to attend the baseball game and sit in that particular seat in the fifth row. There are a lot of stories of people dying from freakish accidents and there are reasons for them. THERE TIME ON EARTH WAS DONE AND THEY HAVE DONE THE WORK THEY CAME HERE TO DO. I would hope you attend church on sundays and see for yourself firsthand miracles and sadness that have gripped all of us in our lives.
0
thanks rostos for your imput as you see it.
mr bator:
In this life things happen for a reason. My best friend who was supposed to go to the movies chose to attend a baseball game a few years back. While he wasnt looking a line drive hit him in the head and he died instantly. Would he have died if he had went to the theater? Probably not but it was intended for him to attend the baseball game and sit in that particular seat in the fifth row. There are a lot of stories of people dying from freakish accidents and there are reasons for them. THERE TIME ON EARTH WAS DONE AND THEY HAVE DONE THE WORK THEY CAME HERE TO DO. I would hope you attend church on sundays and see for yourself firsthand miracles and sadness that have gripped all of us in our lives.
No, it is accepted in the scientific community that the universe began to exist. At this point in time, space, time and matter began to exist. Prior to this point there was NOTHING.
The non believer is backed into a corner believeing that space, time and matter popped out of nothing, by nothing for nothing.
I believe something OUTSIDE of space, time and matter created these. An intelligent mind.
At least when we see a magician pull a rabbit out of a hat, there is a magician conducting this, the non believer doesnt even believe there is a magician, he just simply believes the rabbit just popped out of nothing.
That's completely ridiculous. No one under the age of ten believes a magician can make a rabbit appear out of thin air. By the way, any adult who does believe that the magician made the rabbit appear out of thin air is still believing in something approximately one million times less far-fetched than what you believe in concerning the creation of the universe.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
No, it is accepted in the scientific community that the universe began to exist. At this point in time, space, time and matter began to exist. Prior to this point there was NOTHING.
The non believer is backed into a corner believeing that space, time and matter popped out of nothing, by nothing for nothing.
I believe something OUTSIDE of space, time and matter created these. An intelligent mind.
At least when we see a magician pull a rabbit out of a hat, there is a magician conducting this, the non believer doesnt even believe there is a magician, he just simply believes the rabbit just popped out of nothing.
That's completely ridiculous. No one under the age of ten believes a magician can make a rabbit appear out of thin air. By the way, any adult who does believe that the magician made the rabbit appear out of thin air is still believing in something approximately one million times less far-fetched than what you believe in concerning the creation of the universe.
I believe God created the universe as explained in Genesis.
I just googled "Genesis" and it said something about "Sexy Gorgeous Girls in Hardcore Action." Wow, I have to check this out. I might become a believer after all!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
I believe God created the universe as explained in Genesis.
I just googled "Genesis" and it said something about "Sexy Gorgeous Girls in Hardcore Action." Wow, I have to check this out. I might become a believer after all!
That's completely ridiculous. No one under the age of ten believes a magician can make a rabbit appear out of thin air. By the way, any adult who does believe that the magician made the rabbit appear out of thin air is still believing in something approximately one million times less far-fetched than what you believe in concerning the creation of the universe.
Oh gees, how old are you? If you cant see the point i am trying to make then i wont bother.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
That's completely ridiculous. No one under the age of ten believes a magician can make a rabbit appear out of thin air. By the way, any adult who does believe that the magician made the rabbit appear out of thin air is still believing in something approximately one million times less far-fetched than what you believe in concerning the creation of the universe.
Oh gees, how old are you? If you cant see the point i am trying to make then i wont bother.
No, as i said, non believers want material evidence. Believers dont have material evidence yet believe. The non believers are hypocritical in there thinking here.
So, you're saying that non-believers want material evidence of the existence of God, but they don't need any when it comes to the guilt of Casey Anthony. I hope no one comes in here and reads any of this because they might conclude that you're screwy, and that wouldn't be nice.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
No, as i said, non believers want material evidence. Believers dont have material evidence yet believe. The non believers are hypocritical in there thinking here.
So, you're saying that non-believers want material evidence of the existence of God, but they don't need any when it comes to the guilt of Casey Anthony. I hope no one comes in here and reads any of this because they might conclude that you're screwy, and that wouldn't be nice.
your crossing into religion, laughing about afterlife and such and you obviously don't have any hindsite into the whole world in general about life. Its a shame you feel that way as someday when you go to the otherside maybe you will understand. Maybe for now you should keep your funny comments to yourself as they are disrespectful and a dishonor to your maker and im sure to many people on this board. Your not god like you think you are just because your popular on this sports forum bro.
0
mr bator:
your crossing into religion, laughing about afterlife and such and you obviously don't have any hindsite into the whole world in general about life. Its a shame you feel that way as someday when you go to the otherside maybe you will understand. Maybe for now you should keep your funny comments to yourself as they are disrespectful and a dishonor to your maker and im sure to many people on this board. Your not god like you think you are just because your popular on this sports forum bro.
Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back. You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
I just reread that so to answer your question..... Yes the mosquito that keeps buzzing around your ear. You do make me laugh with how redundant* redundant* redundant* you are. Did you take your medication today son?
redundant Exceeding what is necessary or natural; superfluous. Needlessly wordy or repetitive in expression: a student paper filled with redundant phrases. Of or relating to linguistic redundancy. Dismissed...
Is that all you’re left with? Copying and pasting definitions from a dictionary and rants and mosquitoes.
biggame
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigGame90:
Do you know those mosquitoes and little bees that fly around your ear and keep buzzing, you try to knock them off and they keep coming back. You know, those annoying little SOBs. Tag, your it. Check Mate.
I just reread that so to answer your question..... Yes the mosquito that keeps buzzing around your ear. You do make me laugh with how redundant* redundant* redundant* you are. Did you take your medication today son?
redundant Exceeding what is necessary or natural; superfluous. Needlessly wordy or repetitive in expression: a student paper filled with redundant phrases. Of or relating to linguistic redundancy. Dismissed...
Is that all you’re left with? Copying and pasting definitions from a dictionary and rants and mosquitoes.
First time I'm thinking on the same level as MrBator: I don't know shit.
There's no proof to how the universe created itself/ was created so I have no opinion about that.
There's no proof about some "God" so I have no opinion about that.
If you can't explain something, doesn't mean God did it.
People knew the WHOLE universe was created for them and everything revolves around the earth...until they found that it didn't.
Old greek's thought there was a "thunder god" ....until they found out how thunder worked.
People will believe in some "god" who created the universe....until they'll find out how the universe works.
Oh and, some guy dying because he wasn't careful enough? People die everyday who deserved it far less than that guy but this one was on television so let's talk about it...
Also, the thread title is kinda right. Of course Josh Hamilton didn't want to kill him, this whole thing was after all an accident. But, technically, Josh Hamilton did something that lead another man to also do something which then killed him. So, although this was an accident, the title is kinda right.
Since after that post a lot of people will hate me I guess I have to register a new username... oh well that was worth it.
0
First time I'm thinking on the same level as MrBator: I don't know shit.
There's no proof to how the universe created itself/ was created so I have no opinion about that.
There's no proof about some "God" so I have no opinion about that.
If you can't explain something, doesn't mean God did it.
People knew the WHOLE universe was created for them and everything revolves around the earth...until they found that it didn't.
Old greek's thought there was a "thunder god" ....until they found out how thunder worked.
People will believe in some "god" who created the universe....until they'll find out how the universe works.
Oh and, some guy dying because he wasn't careful enough? People die everyday who deserved it far less than that guy but this one was on television so let's talk about it...
Also, the thread title is kinda right. Of course Josh Hamilton didn't want to kill him, this whole thing was after all an accident. But, technically, Josh Hamilton did something that lead another man to also do something which then killed him. So, although this was an accident, the title is kinda right.
Since after that post a lot of people will hate me I guess I have to register a new username... oh well that was worth it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
"
What a horrible accident.
biggame
Hot Forum Topics
