Posted:
#51
Quote Originally Posted by UKCrunch:
OAK/PHIL UNDER 7.5 @ -122
Two high-mileage and understandably jaded offenses that are struggling for production, going against two quality and stingy starting pitchers (Cahill 7-5 3.24 ERA 1.33 WHIP, HAMELS 9-3 2.51 ERA 0.93 WHIP). These two teams have also failed to put up a total of over 7 in their last 7 interleague meetings and have only 6 overs between them, in their last 20 games combined. I also like Angel Hernandez (UMP) for unders.
LAA -1.5 @ +250
This is more of a gut play than anything. I would have priced this game as more of a coin toss. Probably marginally favouring the road team. So, the +130 on the Angels looks real value and given that 33 of the Dodgers 43 losses this season have been by more than one run, I've taken the Angels -1.5.
Best of luck.
OAK/PHIL UNDER 7.5 @ -122
Two high-mileage and understandably jaded offenses that are struggling for production, going against two quality and stingy starting pitchers (Cahill 7-5 3.24 ERA 1.33 WHIP, HAMELS 9-3 2.51 ERA 0.93 WHIP). These two teams have also failed to put up a total of over 7 in their last 7 interleague meetings and have only 6 overs between them, in their last 20 games combined. I also like Angel Hernandez (UMP) for unders.
LAA -1.5 @ +250
This is more of a gut play than anything. I would have priced this game as more of a coin toss. Probably marginally favouring the road team. So, the +130 on the Angels looks real value and given that 33 of the Dodgers 43 losses this season have been by more than one run, I've taken the Angels -1.5.
Best of luck.
Kuroda hasn't won a game in how long combine that with how the Angels dominate the Dodgers H2H and yet Kuroda here is a favourite? Combine that with the public on the Angels...that LAA -1.5 is already a losing wager.
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by BigUnit]
Hot Forum Topics
