We always seem to have varying opinions on a lot of games but I always like your input and always keep things friendly because I respect what you do. The definition of "VALUE" is An amount of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent at a fair price or return.
We already know you don't play the "THEIR DUE" card, as we all know its better to ride a streak then attempt to predict when it will end. When you have a team that is 10-0 at home this season and traditionally always better at home. Since getting Manny from Boston the Dodgers record at home with him in the lineup (regular season) is 28-7 dating back to last year on August 1st (18-7 last year 10-0 this season). You have a below average ball club in general with the D-backs and a team that is even worse on the road. Since the all-star break last season is they are 37-51 on the road and have haven't hit lefties well. I know Stults isn't a big time pitcher by any means but he already shut these guys down and you are dealing with a team that is batting .091 against lefties on the road.
Whether you win this wager or not and I hope you do BOL there is not a single OUNCE of value in this wager. The Value actually lies with the dodgers, and in fact yesterday even the Dodgers at -200 had value and more so when it dropped to -180. At -220 your break even point is 67% and with a 9-0 home record and winning 8 of the last 10 against the Padres that carried value. We know they won't go 20-0 or will they? At this point it isn't a HUGE deal of data to back things up but at only +130 range I'll promise you right now the D-Backs won't win this game tonight 44% of the time. 1-7 in the last 8 meetings and 0-5 in the last 5 meetings in LA.
Again you may win tonight, but the numbers don't support any value at the +130 range. If you would of waited until 9-10 PM when all the suckers in the world are down for the night and thats the last game of the evening you will be able to get the D-Backs at +150 no doubt. Then there maybe some value at that point.
MEANT TO READ AT -200***************
0
Quote Originally Posted by WiseGuys-R-Us:
We always seem to have varying opinions on a lot of games but I always like your input and always keep things friendly because I respect what you do. The definition of "VALUE" is An amount of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent at a fair price or return.
We already know you don't play the "THEIR DUE" card, as we all know its better to ride a streak then attempt to predict when it will end. When you have a team that is 10-0 at home this season and traditionally always better at home. Since getting Manny from Boston the Dodgers record at home with him in the lineup (regular season) is 28-7 dating back to last year on August 1st (18-7 last year 10-0 this season). You have a below average ball club in general with the D-backs and a team that is even worse on the road. Since the all-star break last season is they are 37-51 on the road and have haven't hit lefties well. I know Stults isn't a big time pitcher by any means but he already shut these guys down and you are dealing with a team that is batting .091 against lefties on the road.
Whether you win this wager or not and I hope you do BOL there is not a single OUNCE of value in this wager. The Value actually lies with the dodgers, and in fact yesterday even the Dodgers at -200 had value and more so when it dropped to -180. At -220 your break even point is 67% and with a 9-0 home record and winning 8 of the last 10 against the Padres that carried value. We know they won't go 20-0 or will they? At this point it isn't a HUGE deal of data to back things up but at only +130 range I'll promise you right now the D-Backs won't win this game tonight 44% of the time. 1-7 in the last 8 meetings and 0-5 in the last 5 meetings in LA.
Again you may win tonight, but the numbers don't support any value at the +130 range. If you would of waited until 9-10 PM when all the suckers in the world are down for the night and thats the last game of the evening you will be able to get the D-Backs at +150 no doubt. Then there maybe some value at that point.
We always seem to have varying opinions on a lot of games but I always like your input and always keep things friendly because I respect what you do. The definition of "VALUE" is An amount of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent at a fair price or return.
We already know you don't play the "THEIR DUE" card, as we all know its better to ride a streak then attempt to predict when it will end. When you have a team that is 10-0 at home this season and traditionally always better at home. Since getting Manny from Boston the Dodgers record at home with him in the lineup (regular season) is 28-7 dating back to last year on August 1st (18-7 last year 10-0 this season). You have a below average ball club in general with the D-backs and a team that is even worse on the road. Since the all-star break last season is they are 37-51 on the road and have haven't hit lefties well. I know Stults isn't a big time pitcher by any means but he already shut these guys down and you are dealing with a team that is batting .091 against lefties on the road.
Whether you win this wager or not and I hope you do BOL there is not a single OUNCE of value in this wager. The Value actually lies with the dodgers, and in fact yesterday even the Dodgers at -200 had value and more so when it dropped to -180. At -220 your break even point is 67% and with a 9-0 home record and winning 8 of the last 10 against the Padres that carried value. We know they won't go 20-0 or will they? At this point it isn't a HUGE deal of data to back things up but at only +130 range I'll promise you right now the D-Backs won't win this game tonight 44% of the time. 1-7 in the last 8 meetings and 0-5 in the last 5 meetings in LA.
Again you may win tonight, but the numbers don't support any value at the +130 range. If you would of waited until 9-10 PM when all the suckers in the world are down for the night and thats the last game of the evening you will be able to get the D-Backs at +150 no doubt. Then there maybe some value at that point.
I completely agree the value in this game lies with the Dodgers...they should be in the -170 range so -140 really is a bargain in my opinion..I'm staying off the game though and hope GH wins his DBacks bet...but there is no value in the DBacks line here.
GH - I am also on the Cards and Angels as part of my plays...BOL with all your plays...and nice write-up wiseguys!
0
Quote Originally Posted by WiseGuys-R-Us:
We always seem to have varying opinions on a lot of games but I always like your input and always keep things friendly because I respect what you do. The definition of "VALUE" is An amount of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent at a fair price or return.
We already know you don't play the "THEIR DUE" card, as we all know its better to ride a streak then attempt to predict when it will end. When you have a team that is 10-0 at home this season and traditionally always better at home. Since getting Manny from Boston the Dodgers record at home with him in the lineup (regular season) is 28-7 dating back to last year on August 1st (18-7 last year 10-0 this season). You have a below average ball club in general with the D-backs and a team that is even worse on the road. Since the all-star break last season is they are 37-51 on the road and have haven't hit lefties well. I know Stults isn't a big time pitcher by any means but he already shut these guys down and you are dealing with a team that is batting .091 against lefties on the road.
Whether you win this wager or not and I hope you do BOL there is not a single OUNCE of value in this wager. The Value actually lies with the dodgers, and in fact yesterday even the Dodgers at -200 had value and more so when it dropped to -180. At -220 your break even point is 67% and with a 9-0 home record and winning 8 of the last 10 against the Padres that carried value. We know they won't go 20-0 or will they? At this point it isn't a HUGE deal of data to back things up but at only +130 range I'll promise you right now the D-Backs won't win this game tonight 44% of the time. 1-7 in the last 8 meetings and 0-5 in the last 5 meetings in LA.
Again you may win tonight, but the numbers don't support any value at the +130 range. If you would of waited until 9-10 PM when all the suckers in the world are down for the night and thats the last game of the evening you will be able to get the D-Backs at +150 no doubt. Then there maybe some value at that point.
I completely agree the value in this game lies with the Dodgers...they should be in the -170 range so -140 really is a bargain in my opinion..I'm staying off the game though and hope GH wins his DBacks bet...but there is no value in the DBacks line here.
GH - I am also on the Cards and Angels as part of my plays...BOL with all your plays...and nice write-up wiseguys!
We always seem to have varying opinions on a lot of games but I always like your input and always keep things friendly because I respect what you do. The definition of "VALUE" is An amount of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent at a fair price or return.
We already know you don't play the "THEIR DUE" card, as we all know its better to ride a streak then attempt to predict when it will end. When you have a team that is 10-0 at home this season and traditionally always better at home. Since getting Manny from Boston the Dodgers record at home with him in the lineup (regular season) is 28-7 dating back to last year on August 1st (18-7 last year 10-0 this season). You have a below average ball club in general with the D-backs and a team that is even worse on the road. Since the all-star break last season is they are 37-51 on the road and have haven't hit lefties well. I know Stults isn't a big time pitcher by any means but he already shut these guys down and you are dealing with a team that is batting .091 against lefties on the road.
Whether you win this wager or not and I hope you do BOL there is not a single OUNCE of value in this wager. The Value actually lies with the dodgers, and in fact yesterday even the Dodgers at -200 had value and more so when it dropped to -180. At -220 your break even point is 67% and with a 9-0 home record and winning 8 of the last 10 against the Padres that carried value. We know they won't go 20-0 or will they? At this point it isn't a HUGE deal of data to back things up but at only +130 range I'll promise you right now the D-Backs won't win this game tonight 44% of the time. 1-7 in the last 8 meetings and 0-5 in the last 5 meetings in LA.
Again you may win tonight, but the numbers don't support any value at the +130 range. If you would of waited until 9-10 PM when all the suckers in the world are down for the night and thats the last game of the evening you will be able to get the D-Backs at +150 no doubt. Then there maybe some value at that point.
Excellent post but I don't agree with you. You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants. Meanwhile, Stultz has been horrible of late and the Dodgers are just 2-2 as a starting pitcher in his career at Dodger Stadium. Davis is as sharp as he's been over the past few years and the Dodgers are hitting 25 points lower against left handers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WiseGuys-R-Us:
We always seem to have varying opinions on a lot of games but I always like your input and always keep things friendly because I respect what you do. The definition of "VALUE" is An amount of goods, services, or money, considered to be a fair and suitable equivalent at a fair price or return.
We already know you don't play the "THEIR DUE" card, as we all know its better to ride a streak then attempt to predict when it will end. When you have a team that is 10-0 at home this season and traditionally always better at home. Since getting Manny from Boston the Dodgers record at home with him in the lineup (regular season) is 28-7 dating back to last year on August 1st (18-7 last year 10-0 this season). You have a below average ball club in general with the D-backs and a team that is even worse on the road. Since the all-star break last season is they are 37-51 on the road and have haven't hit lefties well. I know Stults isn't a big time pitcher by any means but he already shut these guys down and you are dealing with a team that is batting .091 against lefties on the road.
Whether you win this wager or not and I hope you do BOL there is not a single OUNCE of value in this wager. The Value actually lies with the dodgers, and in fact yesterday even the Dodgers at -200 had value and more so when it dropped to -180. At -220 your break even point is 67% and with a 9-0 home record and winning 8 of the last 10 against the Padres that carried value. We know they won't go 20-0 or will they? At this point it isn't a HUGE deal of data to back things up but at only +130 range I'll promise you right now the D-Backs won't win this game tonight 44% of the time. 1-7 in the last 8 meetings and 0-5 in the last 5 meetings in LA.
Again you may win tonight, but the numbers don't support any value at the +130 range. If you would of waited until 9-10 PM when all the suckers in the world are down for the night and thats the last game of the evening you will be able to get the D-Backs at +150 no doubt. Then there maybe some value at that point.
Excellent post but I don't agree with you. You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants. Meanwhile, Stultz has been horrible of late and the Dodgers are just 2-2 as a starting pitcher in his career at Dodger Stadium. Davis is as sharp as he's been over the past few years and the Dodgers are hitting 25 points lower against left handers.
Excellent post but I don't agree with you. You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants. Meanwhile, Stultz has been horrible of late and the Dodgers are just 2-2 as a starting pitcher in his career at Dodger Stadium. Davis is as sharp as he's been over the past few years and the Dodgers are hitting 25 points lower against left handers.
...that's an understatement...
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
Excellent post but I don't agree with you. You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants. Meanwhile, Stultz has been horrible of late and the Dodgers are just 2-2 as a starting pitcher in his career at Dodger Stadium. Davis is as sharp as he's been over the past few years and the Dodgers are hitting 25 points lower against left handers.
You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants.
ARI was 1-2 in 3 games Davis started against the Giants and Colorado this year. He has given up 21 hits in those 19 innings pitched against the bottom dwellers. Furcal is 6 for 21 (.286) with 2 walks. Hudson is 0 for 4. Manny is 9 for 18 with 2 walks. Ethier is 5 for 14 with 3 walks. Loney is 5 for 11 with a walk. Kemp is 8 for 16 with 2 triples and 2 walks. Blake is 2 for 5 with a walk. Maybe even Pierre will start he is 11 for 28 with 3 walks against Davis.
Davis was hammered by the Dodgers in his last 3 starts against them in 2008. On July 18th he allowed 5 runs in 3 innings on 5 hits and 3 walks. 2 weeks after that he allowed 5 runs on 6 hits in 1.2 innings. A month later he went 5 innings giving up only 2 runs on 8 hits and 3 walks. The Dodgers are too lethal right now.I like the Dodgers team total over 4.5. Not sure what Stults gives off tonight but I think the Dodgers have a solid chance of hitting 5 runs.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants.
ARI was 1-2 in 3 games Davis started against the Giants and Colorado this year. He has given up 21 hits in those 19 innings pitched against the bottom dwellers. Furcal is 6 for 21 (.286) with 2 walks. Hudson is 0 for 4. Manny is 9 for 18 with 2 walks. Ethier is 5 for 14 with 3 walks. Loney is 5 for 11 with a walk. Kemp is 8 for 16 with 2 triples and 2 walks. Blake is 2 for 5 with a walk. Maybe even Pierre will start he is 11 for 28 with 3 walks against Davis.
Davis was hammered by the Dodgers in his last 3 starts against them in 2008. On July 18th he allowed 5 runs in 3 innings on 5 hits and 3 walks. 2 weeks after that he allowed 5 runs on 6 hits in 1.2 innings. A month later he went 5 innings giving up only 2 runs on 8 hits and 3 walks. The Dodgers are too lethal right now.I like the Dodgers team total over 4.5. Not sure what Stults gives off tonight but I think the Dodgers have a solid chance of hitting 5 runs.
I like the call on SD, but SF makes me nervous still, seems more of a no play. Overall I like it. BOL
I mean this with no disrespect...but your comment is indicative why many people lose money betting baseball....and that is regardless of the outcome of the Giants' game tonight....of course the SF play will make any gambler nervous....they are getting +178...they are expected to win this game only 36 out of 100 times.....the Padres based upon the line are expected to win tonight's game 47 out of 100 times.....the question is not about which team gives you more confidence....the real gambling question is does one think the Giants will win this game more than 36 out of 100 times (equivalent of a team going 58-104 for the season) and does one think the Padres will win more than 47 out of 100 (equivalent of a team going 76-86 for the season). Will these teams in your mind outperform the line?
0
Quote Originally Posted by JABirm37:
I like the call on SD, but SF makes me nervous still, seems more of a no play. Overall I like it. BOL
I mean this with no disrespect...but your comment is indicative why many people lose money betting baseball....and that is regardless of the outcome of the Giants' game tonight....of course the SF play will make any gambler nervous....they are getting +178...they are expected to win this game only 36 out of 100 times.....the Padres based upon the line are expected to win tonight's game 47 out of 100 times.....the question is not about which team gives you more confidence....the real gambling question is does one think the Giants will win this game more than 36 out of 100 times (equivalent of a team going 58-104 for the season) and does one think the Padres will win more than 47 out of 100 (equivalent of a team going 76-86 for the season). Will these teams in your mind outperform the line?
ARI was 1-2 in 3 games Davis started against the Giants and Colorado this year. He has given up 21 hits in those 19 innings pitched against the bottom dwellers. Furcal is 6 for 21 (.286) with 2 walks. Hudson is 0 for 4. Manny is 9 for 18 with 2 walks. Ethier is 5 for 14 with 3 walks. Loney is 5 for 11 with a walk. Kemp is 8 for 16 with 2 triples and 2 walks. Blake is 2 for 5 with a walk. Maybe even Pierre will start he is 11 for 28 with 3 walks against Davis.
Davis was hammered by the Dodgers in his last 3 starts against them in 2008. On July 18th he allowed 5 runs in 3 innings on 5 hits and 3 walks. 2 weeks after that he allowed 5 runs on 6 hits in 1.2 innings. A month later he went 5 innings giving up only 2 runs on 8 hits and 3 walks. The Dodgers are too lethal right now.I like the Dodgers team total over 4.5. Not sure what Stults gives off tonight but I think the Dodgers have a solid chance of hitting 5 runs.
all good...I just see Davis as a different pitcher right now...let's not forget that he fought the good fight against cancer last year.....I think he is throwing as well as he has in years...in the game you reference on 7/18/08, Davis threw 37 cutters and 23 fastballs...last week against the Cubs, he threw only 5 fast balls all game and threw 60 sliders...I feel he is a completely different pitcher right now than he was last year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by slumdog:
ARI was 1-2 in 3 games Davis started against the Giants and Colorado this year. He has given up 21 hits in those 19 innings pitched against the bottom dwellers. Furcal is 6 for 21 (.286) with 2 walks. Hudson is 0 for 4. Manny is 9 for 18 with 2 walks. Ethier is 5 for 14 with 3 walks. Loney is 5 for 11 with a walk. Kemp is 8 for 16 with 2 triples and 2 walks. Blake is 2 for 5 with a walk. Maybe even Pierre will start he is 11 for 28 with 3 walks against Davis.
Davis was hammered by the Dodgers in his last 3 starts against them in 2008. On July 18th he allowed 5 runs in 3 innings on 5 hits and 3 walks. 2 weeks after that he allowed 5 runs on 6 hits in 1.2 innings. A month later he went 5 innings giving up only 2 runs on 8 hits and 3 walks. The Dodgers are too lethal right now.I like the Dodgers team total over 4.5. Not sure what Stults gives off tonight but I think the Dodgers have a solid chance of hitting 5 runs.
all good...I just see Davis as a different pitcher right now...let's not forget that he fought the good fight against cancer last year.....I think he is throwing as well as he has in years...in the game you reference on 7/18/08, Davis threw 37 cutters and 23 fastballs...last week against the Cubs, he threw only 5 fast balls all game and threw 60 sliders...I feel he is a completely different pitcher right now than he was last year.
Excellent post but I don't agree with you. You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants. Meanwhile, Stultz has been horrible of late and the Dodgers are just 2-2 as a starting pitcher in his career at Dodger Stadium. Davis is as sharp as he's been over the past few years and the Dodgers are hitting 25 points lower against left handers.
Never any disrespect like I said previously and thats why theres two teams in every wager you can bet one or the other. The 10-0 part was about 25% of the validity to my post and there was about 3 other paragraphs with other points. You state 25 points lower as a whole you are correct but are shelling lefties at home where the game is this evening. It soley goes hand in hand why they are 10-0 at home it's because they are hitting in the .330s. In fact .333 against lefties at home. Davis has pitched well, but at age 33 I think it's safe to say the 2.31 era to start the season will only go up as his CAREER average is over 2 points higher. So I don't see Davis and think hey this guy is lights out and is a guy who has a 2.31 era. Add in the fact his team doesn't support him at all when he's on the mound except on a get away day against the Cubs. Other then the 10-0 win there he's gotten 6 runs of support in the 4 other games he's started.
We have differing opinions and thats great. There has been a number of times the games you chose back me off of the other side. Was just hoping I would help you here. Again, very well maybe a winner and after all this talk I'm sure your odds have improved lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
Excellent post but I don't agree with you. You've stripped the play of any of its individual attributes and left it at the fact that the Dodgers are 10-0 at home against the Padres, Rockies and Giants. Meanwhile, Stultz has been horrible of late and the Dodgers are just 2-2 as a starting pitcher in his career at Dodger Stadium. Davis is as sharp as he's been over the past few years and the Dodgers are hitting 25 points lower against left handers.
Never any disrespect like I said previously and thats why theres two teams in every wager you can bet one or the other. The 10-0 part was about 25% of the validity to my post and there was about 3 other paragraphs with other points. You state 25 points lower as a whole you are correct but are shelling lefties at home where the game is this evening. It soley goes hand in hand why they are 10-0 at home it's because they are hitting in the .330s. In fact .333 against lefties at home. Davis has pitched well, but at age 33 I think it's safe to say the 2.31 era to start the season will only go up as his CAREER average is over 2 points higher. So I don't see Davis and think hey this guy is lights out and is a guy who has a 2.31 era. Add in the fact his team doesn't support him at all when he's on the mound except on a get away day against the Cubs. Other then the 10-0 win there he's gotten 6 runs of support in the 4 other games he's started.
We have differing opinions and thats great. There has been a number of times the games you chose back me off of the other side. Was just hoping I would help you here. Again, very well maybe a winner and after all this talk I'm sure your odds have improved lol.
What's an understatement? The guy is a bullpen guy converting into a starter so he's getting his innings up. He will pitch roughly 5 innings again today and has done what he has been asked to do. With the weak offense in that division I think it's safe to say you tell a pitcher for the Dodgers go out and pitch 5 innings and don't let anymore then 2-3 runs up and you've done your job.
Outside of his last game in SF that was getaway game and a team that faced him twice in 10 days I think that one bad appearance doesn't label him as HORRIBLE LATELY. One start? Come on guys hes a bullpen guy working his innings up so he will only go 5 innings 6 at the most ANYTIME HE EVER PITCHES.
0
Quote Originally Posted by happycap:
...that's an understatement...
What's an understatement? The guy is a bullpen guy converting into a starter so he's getting his innings up. He will pitch roughly 5 innings again today and has done what he has been asked to do. With the weak offense in that division I think it's safe to say you tell a pitcher for the Dodgers go out and pitch 5 innings and don't let anymore then 2-3 runs up and you've done your job.
Outside of his last game in SF that was getaway game and a team that faced him twice in 10 days I think that one bad appearance doesn't label him as HORRIBLE LATELY. One start? Come on guys hes a bullpen guy working his innings up so he will only go 5 innings 6 at the most ANYTIME HE EVER PITCHES.
Never any disrespect like I said previously and thats why theres two teams in every wager you can bet one or the other. The 10-0 part was about 25% of the validity to my post and there was about 3 other paragraphs with other points. You state 25 points lower as a whole you are correct but are shelling lefties at home where the game is this evening. It soley goes hand in hand why they are 10-0 at home it's because they are hitting in the .330s. In fact .333 against lefties at home. Davis has pitched well, but at age 33 I think it's safe to say the 2.31 era to start the season will only go up as his CAREER average is over 2 points higher. So I don't see Davis and think hey this guy is lights out and is a guy who has a 2.31 era. Add in the fact his team doesn't support him at all when he's on the mound except on a get away day against the Cubs. Other then the 10-0 win there he's gotten 6 runs of support in the 4 other games he's started.
We have differing opinions and thats great. There has been a number of times the games you chose back me off of the other side. Was just hoping I would help you here. Again, very well maybe a winner and after all this talk I'm sure your odds have improved lol.
your well thought out arguments are much appreciated and respected....you definitely make some excellent points...we don't have to agree as long as we see both sides of the coin...good luck tonight and feel free to chime in anytime.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WiseGuys-R-Us:
Never any disrespect like I said previously and thats why theres two teams in every wager you can bet one or the other. The 10-0 part was about 25% of the validity to my post and there was about 3 other paragraphs with other points. You state 25 points lower as a whole you are correct but are shelling lefties at home where the game is this evening. It soley goes hand in hand why they are 10-0 at home it's because they are hitting in the .330s. In fact .333 against lefties at home. Davis has pitched well, but at age 33 I think it's safe to say the 2.31 era to start the season will only go up as his CAREER average is over 2 points higher. So I don't see Davis and think hey this guy is lights out and is a guy who has a 2.31 era. Add in the fact his team doesn't support him at all when he's on the mound except on a get away day against the Cubs. Other then the 10-0 win there he's gotten 6 runs of support in the 4 other games he's started.
We have differing opinions and thats great. There has been a number of times the games you chose back me off of the other side. Was just hoping I would help you here. Again, very well maybe a winner and after all this talk I'm sure your odds have improved lol.
your well thought out arguments are much appreciated and respected....you definitely make some excellent points...we don't have to agree as long as we see both sides of the coin...good luck tonight and feel free to chime in anytime.
yeppers...doesn't mean I don't like it...1 unit is still a lot of money.....
in fact, my youngest daughter has now saved up almost $250 in her bank account...when I asked her what she is going to do with it, she said she is saving it....she's smarter than me....she thinks $250 is $2 billion....in my warped sense of reality, I am tossing a unit on the Cards in my smallest play of the season yet if I gave her the value of the unit play, she'd think she hit the lottery.
The good thing is she will get a good percentage of it all, when my time is done!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GameHunter:
yeppers...doesn't mean I don't like it...1 unit is still a lot of money.....
in fact, my youngest daughter has now saved up almost $250 in her bank account...when I asked her what she is going to do with it, she said she is saving it....she's smarter than me....she thinks $250 is $2 billion....in my warped sense of reality, I am tossing a unit on the Cards in my smallest play of the season yet if I gave her the value of the unit play, she'd think she hit the lottery.
The good thing is she will get a good percentage of it all, when my time is done!
It is amazing when you look at the amount you wager - and I'm a dime player - in comparison to everyday things You just have to keep it in perspective and keep the percentage of bankroll as low as possible to avoid feeling the full brunt of a bad losing streak.
0
It is amazing when you look at the amount you wager - and I'm a dime player - in comparison to everyday things You just have to keep it in perspective and keep the percentage of bankroll as low as possible to avoid feeling the full brunt of a bad losing streak.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.