First, the rant. If ever there existed a reason to believe in “The Fix” it was the Rangers game yesterday. With the better offense, at home, in Arlington; shutout by Soroka and the D-bax bullpen? Fuggetaboutit. You gotta be kidding me. The only way that happens is if the Rangers are ordered not to score if it will ties or surpass what the D-bax put up. Hence, a SHUTOUT. They did nor score because they were not permitted to. A huge amount of money was wagered on the D-bax in the early part of the day, before lineups were even published. That ain’t no accident fellow chumps, somebody knew something. It pizzed me enough I totally forgot to go with the Giants, a great underdog winner I alerted you to earlier. Now then, thanks for letting me get that off my chest. It is not good that an old man in bad health should be so angry.
F5 - Athletics -155 – Pallante/Springs
I am taking the worst odds I can get because I want a winner, period. I am fed up with “value” because it does not exist. I will go with overwhelming advantage and pay the price. I will also delay the write up and see if anyone else can provide it. I will prepare it and post about noon P.D.T. Have fun with that!
PAYOR. Play at your own risk.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
3
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
17-25-2, -542.03, - RoR -14.9 %
JMHO – 5/12
First, the rant. If ever there existed a reason to believe in “The Fix” it was the Rangers game yesterday. With the better offense, at home, in Arlington; shutout by Soroka and the D-bax bullpen? Fuggetaboutit. You gotta be kidding me. The only way that happens is if the Rangers are ordered not to score if it will ties or surpass what the D-bax put up. Hence, a SHUTOUT. They did nor score because they were not permitted to. A huge amount of money was wagered on the D-bax in the early part of the day, before lineups were even published. That ain’t no accident fellow chumps, somebody knew something. It pizzed me enough I totally forgot to go with the Giants, a great underdog winner I alerted you to earlier. Now then, thanks for letting me get that off my chest. It is not good that an old man in bad health should be so angry.
F5 - Athletics -155 – Pallante/Springs
I am taking the worst odds I can get because I want a winner, period. I am fed up with “value” because it does not exist. I will go with overwhelming advantage and pay the price. I will also delay the write up and see if anyone else can provide it. I will prepare it and post about noon P.D.T. Have fun with that!
Amigo - it's nice to see you. I don't frequent the mlb forum much recently, but I was looking for your posts.
It would be great if you stick around even if you lose your play.
I'm being completely straight forward.. I probably have one of the worst track records on covers posting plays. Literally everytime I post something the bet is cursed and finds a way to lose. Really kind of messes with your head after awhile. But overall I definitely consider myself way above average in terms of my handicapping ability. Bankroll management and things like this are a separate discussion. Wish you luck today on your bets, and hope to see more from you win or lose.. Doesn't matter to me.. I'll make my own decision on whether or not to tail you on the play.
2
Amigo - it's nice to see you. I don't frequent the mlb forum much recently, but I was looking for your posts.
It would be great if you stick around even if you lose your play.
I'm being completely straight forward.. I probably have one of the worst track records on covers posting plays. Literally everytime I post something the bet is cursed and finds a way to lose. Really kind of messes with your head after awhile. But overall I definitely consider myself way above average in terms of my handicapping ability. Bankroll management and things like this are a separate discussion. Wish you luck today on your bets, and hope to see more from you win or lose.. Doesn't matter to me.. I'll make my own decision on whether or not to tail you on the play.
I'm on TB today, another trap, hoping not, and that the line is low due to TOR's showing last year in the World Series
If something is fishy, it's not the players, that secret is impossible to keep. Probably the balls. Maybe they invented dead balls that Just don't carry. Sound waves aimed at batters?
Something just ain't right
The pen is mightier than the pigs
0
Key! You're KEY
I'm on TB today, another trap, hoping not, and that the line is low due to TOR's showing last year in the World Series
If something is fishy, it's not the players, that secret is impossible to keep. Probably the balls. Maybe they invented dead balls that Just don't carry. Sound waves aimed at batters?
I agree with @Professor1258. Either way, I hope you keep at it Key. To me, there's something to be learned from those that are posting plays and opinions. The record isn't the be all and end all. You've had a tough start. I think everyone here looks forward to your opinion and wants to see you get out of the hole.
3
I agree with @Professor1258. Either way, I hope you keep at it Key. To me, there's something to be learned from those that are posting plays and opinions. The record isn't the be all and end all. You've had a tough start. I think everyone here looks forward to your opinion and wants to see you get out of the hole.
Situations are often more significant than players and obvious stats. The Rangers were in a situation where the under cashed in 23 of the last 24. No fix yesterday, the only people that “knew something” were sharps who knew this situation existed and cashed big again.
0
@KeyElement
Situations are often more significant than players and obvious stats. The Rangers were in a situation where the under cashed in 23 of the last 24. No fix yesterday, the only people that “knew something” were sharps who knew this situation existed and cashed big again.
Rely on old stats as long as you wish. The last 10 vs righty the Rangers have been a far superior offense to the D-bax, one below production averages, the other above. Use what you chose to use.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
@richamp
Rely on old stats as long as you wish. The last 10 vs righty the Rangers have been a far superior offense to the D-bax, one below production averages, the other above. Use what you chose to use.
Here ya go. Pallante holds a slight edge in my pitcher ratings, 63.6/60 over Springs, which may or may not be significant the way pitchers go from Cy Young to Howdy Doody in this day and age. The real deal here is that the A’s offense is far and away better than the Cardinals. Over their seven games vs lefty the Cards are 3-4, average of 35.3 on offense vs the starters, as opposed to the MLB average of 37.8. They are also a very low projected 1.9 o.e.r.a.* vs lefty. The A’s counter that with a 42.2 rating vs righty against an MLB average of 37.4. For a topper, the A’s also have a 6.00 o.e.r.a.* vs righty. Those ratings edges of 5.6 power and 4.1 o.e.r.a.* are very large indeed. They seldom exceed that. So, unless Pallante pulls a Soroka, or unknown forces back the Cards, we should be just fine.
o.e.r.a. = Offensive Earned Run Average. The opposing starters era vs the last ten r/l they faced
(pays) A number of years ago some dimwit on this site could not get the concept of flat wagering through his skull, and kept accusing me of “not deducting the juice” when a favorite of mine lost. So, I point out the profit I will take if I win, a loss is still -100. That is flat wagering; like it or hate it my records are accurate. "Add the juice" has no statistical backing or mathematical sense. Bookies love it and encourage it, because win probability does not increase no matter how much more you pay.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
1
Here ya go. Pallante holds a slight edge in my pitcher ratings, 63.6/60 over Springs, which may or may not be significant the way pitchers go from Cy Young to Howdy Doody in this day and age. The real deal here is that the A’s offense is far and away better than the Cardinals. Over their seven games vs lefty the Cards are 3-4, average of 35.3 on offense vs the starters, as opposed to the MLB average of 37.8. They are also a very low projected 1.9 o.e.r.a.* vs lefty. The A’s counter that with a 42.2 rating vs righty against an MLB average of 37.4. For a topper, the A’s also have a 6.00 o.e.r.a.* vs righty. Those ratings edges of 5.6 power and 4.1 o.e.r.a.* are very large indeed. They seldom exceed that. So, unless Pallante pulls a Soroka, or unknown forces back the Cards, we should be just fine.
o.e.r.a. = Offensive Earned Run Average. The opposing starters era vs the last ten r/l they faced
(pays) A number of years ago some dimwit on this site could not get the concept of flat wagering through his skull, and kept accusing me of “not deducting the juice” when a favorite of mine lost. So, I point out the profit I will take if I win, a loss is still -100. That is flat wagering; like it or hate it my records are accurate. "Add the juice" has no statistical backing or mathematical sense. Bookies love it and encourage it, because win probability does not increase no matter how much more you pay.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.