Home System
He said in his original post to bet to win 1U each game.
If the home team drops it's first game of a 6 game (or at least a 6 game) homestand, then do you double up on game 2? Or do you still bet to win 1U?
It looks like the premise of this system is that teams that are good at home, will win a 6 game homestand series.
Am I correct?
He said in his original post to bet to win 1U each game.
If the home team drops it's first game of a 6 game (or at least a 6 game) homestand, then do you double up on game 2? Or do you still bet to win 1U?
It looks like the premise of this system is that teams that are good at home, will win a 6 game homestand series.
Am I correct?
tirepressure,
How you bet is up to you. Doubling up is typical of many chase systems but there are other methods. Check out the Systems and Strategies forum.
![]()
tirepressure,
How you bet is up to you. Doubling up is typical of many chase systems but there are other methods. Check out the Systems and Strategies forum.
![]()
I am willing to give this a shot and on most chase systems doubling up after each loss is vital to it's "success" so I don't want to screw this up by not betting it correctly.
I am willing to give this a shot and on most chase systems doubling up after each loss is vital to it's "success" so I don't want to screw this up by not betting it correctly.
tirepressure,
How you bet is up to you. Doubling up is typical of many chase systems but there are other methods. Check out the Systems and Strategies forum.
![]()
tirepressure,
How you bet is up to you. Doubling up is typical of many chase systems but there are other methods. Check out the Systems and Strategies forum.
![]()
RealRedDragon,
That bankroll is from a post by capper123, the source of this strategy. I think the gist of what he is saying is you have to be prepared to cover that Game 6 commitment.
tirepressure,
It looks like the premise of this system is that teams that are good at home, will win a 6 game homestand series.
I personally removed LAA and SEA from the strategy after they both lost seven in a row. Those were not all home games but it is a good indication that they are not the same team that finished in the top ten last year.
Bad weather and Bad luck hit the Red Sox.
Sunday:
Boston Game 3
![]()
RealRedDragon,
That bankroll is from a post by capper123, the source of this strategy. I think the gist of what he is saying is you have to be prepared to cover that Game 6 commitment.
tirepressure,
It looks like the premise of this system is that teams that are good at home, will win a 6 game homestand series.
I personally removed LAA and SEA from the strategy after they both lost seven in a row. Those were not all home games but it is a good indication that they are not the same team that finished in the top ten last year.
Bad weather and Bad luck hit the Red Sox.
Sunday:
Boston Game 3
![]()
RealRedDragon,
That bankroll is from a post by capper123, the source of this strategy. I think the gist of what he is saying is you have to be prepared to cover that Game 6 commitment.
tirepressure,
It looks like the premise of this system is that teams that are good at home, will win a 6 game homestand series.
I personally removed LAA and SEA from the strategy after they both lost seven in a row. Those were not all home games but it is a good indication that they are not the same team that finished in the top ten last year.
Bad weather and Bad luck hit the Red Sox.
Sunday:
Boston Game 3
![]()
RealRedDragon,
That bankroll is from a post by capper123, the source of this strategy. I think the gist of what he is saying is you have to be prepared to cover that Game 6 commitment.
tirepressure,
It looks like the premise of this system is that teams that are good at home, will win a 6 game homestand series.
I personally removed LAA and SEA from the strategy after they both lost seven in a row. Those were not all home games but it is a good indication that they are not the same team that finished in the top ten last year.
Bad weather and Bad luck hit the Red Sox.
Sunday:
Boston Game 3
![]()
boston should hit tonight.. neimann sucks... tigers will get game two dont worry
I hope so Woodd. September is a different ball game. Teams like Texas don't need to win and will rest their players.
boston should hit tonight.. neimann sucks... tigers will get game two dont worry
I hope so Woodd. September is a different ball game. Teams like Texas don't need to win and will rest their players.
Whoops! My mistake.
Just realized we should have played the Rockies today and they won. I hate to miss a series so I will add them as a game one tomorrow.
Tuesday:
Detroit Game 2
Colorado Game 1
![]()
Whoops! My mistake.
Just realized we should have played the Rockies today and they won. I hate to miss a series so I will add them as a game one tomorrow.
Tuesday:
Detroit Game 2
Colorado Game 1
![]()
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,476
-
Monday 09/21/2026
459
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,092
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,543
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
3,927
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,027
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,458
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,763
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,447
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
