@AdVictoriam
So you don't count Toronto RL and Cincinnati ML as losses in your record ?
@Othcar
Go back and double check yourself. I counted them as losses.
Losers
Atlanta RL
Toronto RL
Cincy RL
Winners
Atlanta TT Over
LA Dodgers TT Over
5 plays on the day. Record of 2-3.
@Othcar
Go back and double check yourself. I counted them as losses.
Losers
Atlanta RL
Toronto RL
Cincy RL
Winners
Atlanta TT Over
LA Dodgers TT Over
5 plays on the day. Record of 2-3.
@AdVictoriam
Hmmmm....i'm showing 8 plays and you went 3-5 for -6 units plus lost juice. POST #24 you have Atl game 1 RL -1.5 -120 @3 units (LOST). Also for game 1,you have Atl TT over 4.5 -127 @ 3 units(Won) POST#46 for game 2 Atl-Mets O9 +100 for 3 units (LOST) Atl TT over 4.5 -115 @3 units(Lost) Mets TT over 3.5 -150 @ 3 units(Won) POST #63 Tor RL -1.5 +100 @3 units(LOST) POST#68 Cinn+180 @3 units(LOST) POST#72 Dodgers TT over 4.5 -130 @ 3 units(WON) I'm showing you went 3-5 for -6 UNITS plus juice lost,so your record is not accurate. Maybe you should be double checking yourself because people are paying attention,and i've called you out on this before
Is this another "old man moment" as you say??
@AdVictoriam
Hmmmm....i'm showing 8 plays and you went 3-5 for -6 units plus lost juice. POST #24 you have Atl game 1 RL -1.5 -120 @3 units (LOST). Also for game 1,you have Atl TT over 4.5 -127 @ 3 units(Won) POST#46 for game 2 Atl-Mets O9 +100 for 3 units (LOST) Atl TT over 4.5 -115 @3 units(Lost) Mets TT over 3.5 -150 @ 3 units(Won) POST #63 Tor RL -1.5 +100 @3 units(LOST) POST#68 Cinn+180 @3 units(LOST) POST#72 Dodgers TT over 4.5 -130 @ 3 units(WON) I'm showing you went 3-5 for -6 UNITS plus juice lost,so your record is not accurate. Maybe you should be double checking yourself because people are paying attention,and i've called you out on this before
Is this another "old man moment" as you say??
@collectNOW
Went back and re checked again.
You are close to correct. I did make a mistake or two.
My apologies.
(3-5) and -4.05 units is my correction.
3 winners at +3 = 9
5 winners at -13.05 units
Balance of -4.05 units for the day.
I will correct the cumulative total in my newest thread.
Thanks for the double/triple check!
@collectNOW
Went back and re checked again.
You are close to correct. I did make a mistake or two.
My apologies.
(3-5) and -4.05 units is my correction.
3 winners at +3 = 9
5 winners at -13.05 units
Balance of -4.05 units for the day.
I will correct the cumulative total in my newest thread.
Thanks for the double/triple check!
@AdVictoriam
"Close to correct?" I think i am 100% being correct. You also might want to recheck what you write before you hit send. Your above post has you winning 8 games. 3 winners at +3 =9 and 5 winners at -13.05 units(your words). You should have put 5 LOSERS at -13.05 units. This is the type of stuff that is sneaky and deceiving.
@AdVictoriam
"Close to correct?" I think i am 100% being correct. You also might want to recheck what you write before you hit send. Your above post has you winning 8 games. 3 winners at +3 =9 and 5 winners at -13.05 units(your words). You should have put 5 LOSERS at -13.05 units. This is the type of stuff that is sneaky and deceiving.
Hey AD don't let him bother you. We all make mistakes. Since I have been back it has been rough on me yesterday. No worries though because tonight is the night with Rod Stewart . Bol to you
Hey AD don't let him bother you. We all make mistakes. Since I have been back it has been rough on me yesterday. No worries though because tonight is the night with Rod Stewart . Bol to you
@collectNOW
Relax, my friend.
Obviously those are losses and not winners as I have the (-) in front of the units.
I simply had a typo. It happens.
But I do appreciate your close observations.
Covers desperately needs guys like you!
@collectNOW
Relax, my friend.
Obviously those are losses and not winners as I have the (-) in front of the units.
I simply had a typo. It happens.
But I do appreciate your close observations.
Covers desperately needs guys like you!
@collectNOW
You are 100% correct, and he's not counting the juice, at all, which is just dishonest. He's got 3 winners and he's claiming 9 units of profit from those winners. But none of those bets were at even money or plus money.
The first bet he won was at -127. So 3 units wagered at -127 is a 2.36 unit profit.
The 2nd bet he won was at -150. So 3 units wagered at -150 is a 2 unit profit.
The 3rd bet he won was at -130. So 3 units wagered at -130 is a 2.3 unit profit.
So he's got 3 winners, for a profit of 6.66 units. And 5 losers for a loss of 15 units. So 6.66 minus 15 is a loss of 8.34 units on the day. But yet he's claiming a 4.05 unit loss for the day. Has he been doing this faux math every day?
@collectNOW
You are 100% correct, and he's not counting the juice, at all, which is just dishonest. He's got 3 winners and he's claiming 9 units of profit from those winners. But none of those bets were at even money or plus money.
The first bet he won was at -127. So 3 units wagered at -127 is a 2.36 unit profit.
The 2nd bet he won was at -150. So 3 units wagered at -150 is a 2 unit profit.
The 3rd bet he won was at -130. So 3 units wagered at -130 is a 2.3 unit profit.
So he's got 3 winners, for a profit of 6.66 units. And 5 losers for a loss of 15 units. So 6.66 minus 15 is a loss of 8.34 units on the day. But yet he's claiming a 4.05 unit loss for the day. Has he been doing this faux math every day?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.