MORE PICKS WILL BE ADDED MOMENTARILY Picks & Results: 8-1, 89%
04/01/2013: SF (Cain) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 4-0) 04/02/2013: SF (Bumgarner) @ LAD (Ryu) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 3-0) 04/04/2013: PHI (Lee) @ ATL (Medlen) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 2-0) 04/06/2013: PITT (Burnett) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 1-0) 04/08/2013: MIL (Estrada) at CHC (Jackson) OVER 9.5, -105 (W 7-4) 04/08/2013: COL (De La Rosa) @ SF (Bumgarner) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 4-2) 04/10/2013: TB (Moore) at Texas (Holland) UNDER 8.5, -115 (W 2-0) 04/11/2013: LAD (Greinke) at SD (Marquis) UNDER 7, +100 (W 3-2) 04/12/2013: SF (Cain) at CHC (Villlanueva) OVER 9.5, -110 (L 4-3)
0
MORE PICKS WILL BE ADDED MOMENTARILY Picks & Results: 8-1, 89%
04/01/2013: SF (Cain) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 4-0) 04/02/2013: SF (Bumgarner) @ LAD (Ryu) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 3-0) 04/04/2013: PHI (Lee) @ ATL (Medlen) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 2-0) 04/06/2013: PITT (Burnett) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 1-0) 04/08/2013: MIL (Estrada) at CHC (Jackson) OVER 9.5, -105 (W 7-4) 04/08/2013: COL (De La Rosa) @ SF (Bumgarner) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 4-2) 04/10/2013: TB (Moore) at Texas (Holland) UNDER 8.5, -115 (W 2-0) 04/11/2013: LAD (Greinke) at SD (Marquis) UNDER 7, +100 (W 3-2) 04/12/2013: SF (Cain) at CHC (Villlanueva) OVER 9.5, -110 (L 4-3)
The only thing I'm scared of is when people get hot and start to get huge views here, weird things tend to happen.........
Then don't follow him....its all your choice and if you lose, you can only blame yourself for following him and not making your own decisions.
Why do guys here complain when they follow someone and lose?..if that gets you angry, do your own handicapping and if your plays match SNAP's, then make a play....otherwise, lay off and just congratulate him if he wins or say nothing if he loses.
GL today SNAP....waiting for your afternoon plays to see if it matches mine....
I'm leaning on these so far: CINCY / PITT - OVER ATL / WASH - OVER LAD / ARIZ - UNDER COL / SD - OVER TEX / SEA - UNDER
The 2 Unders are looking good, but hard to work with only 6.5 for TEX/SEA.
0
Quote Originally Posted by exile1025:
The only thing I'm scared of is when people get hot and start to get huge views here, weird things tend to happen.........
Then don't follow him....its all your choice and if you lose, you can only blame yourself for following him and not making your own decisions.
Why do guys here complain when they follow someone and lose?..if that gets you angry, do your own handicapping and if your plays match SNAP's, then make a play....otherwise, lay off and just congratulate him if he wins or say nothing if he loses.
GL today SNAP....waiting for your afternoon plays to see if it matches mine....
I'm leaning on these so far: CINCY / PITT - OVER ATL / WASH - OVER LAD / ARIZ - UNDER COL / SD - OVER TEX / SEA - UNDER
The 2 Unders are looking good, but hard to work with only 6.5 for TEX/SEA.
Then don't follow him....its all your choice and if you lose, you can only blame yourself for following him and not making your own decisions.
Why do guys here complain when they follow someone and lose?..if that gets you angry, do your own handicapping and if your plays match SNAP's, then make a play....otherwise, lay off and just congratulate him if he wins or say nothing if he loses.
GL today SNAP....waiting for your afternoon plays to see if it matches mine....
I'm leaning on these so far: CINCY / PITT - OVER ATL / WASH - OVER LAD / ARIZ - UNDER COL / SD - OVER TEX / SEA - UNDER
The 2 Unders are looking good, but hard to work with only 6.5 for TEX/SEA.
with ya on atl and lad totals. i think cin gm goes under. LOVE OVER 8 DET/OAK.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jedi-Yorda:
Then don't follow him....its all your choice and if you lose, you can only blame yourself for following him and not making your own decisions.
Why do guys here complain when they follow someone and lose?..if that gets you angry, do your own handicapping and if your plays match SNAP's, then make a play....otherwise, lay off and just congratulate him if he wins or say nothing if he loses.
GL today SNAP....waiting for your afternoon plays to see if it matches mine....
I'm leaning on these so far: CINCY / PITT - OVER ATL / WASH - OVER LAD / ARIZ - UNDER COL / SD - OVER TEX / SEA - UNDER
The 2 Unders are looking good, but hard to work with only 6.5 for TEX/SEA.
with ya on atl and lad totals. i think cin gm goes under. LOVE OVER 8 DET/OAK.
THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER PLAY ADDED. I WILL LET YOU KNOW ASAP. Picks & Results: 8-1, 89%
04/01/2013: SF (Cain) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 4-0) 04/02/2013: SF (Bumgarner) @ LAD (Ryu) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 3-0) 04/04/2013: PHI (Lee) @ ATL (Medlen) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 2-0) 04/06/2013: PITT (Burnett) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 1-0) 04/08/2013: MIL (Estrada) at CHC (Jackson) OVER 9.5, -105 (W 7-4) 04/08/2013: COL (De La Rosa) @ SF (Bumgarner) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 4-2) 04/10/2013: TB (Moore) at Texas (Holland) UNDER 8.5, -115 (W 2-0) 04/11/2013: LAD (Greinke) at SD (Marquis) UNDER 7, +100 (W 3-2) 04/12/2013: SF (Cain) at CHC (Villlanueva) OVER 9.5, -110 (L 4-3) 04/12/2013: CWS (Quintana) at CLE (Masterson) UNDER 7.5, -110 04/12/2013: MIL (Lohse) at STL (Miller) UNDER 7.5, -120
0
THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER PLAY ADDED. I WILL LET YOU KNOW ASAP. Picks & Results: 8-1, 89%
04/01/2013: SF (Cain) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 4-0) 04/02/2013: SF (Bumgarner) @ LAD (Ryu) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 3-0) 04/04/2013: PHI (Lee) @ ATL (Medlen) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 2-0) 04/06/2013: PITT (Burnett) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 1-0) 04/08/2013: MIL (Estrada) at CHC (Jackson) OVER 9.5, -105 (W 7-4) 04/08/2013: COL (De La Rosa) @ SF (Bumgarner) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 4-2) 04/10/2013: TB (Moore) at Texas (Holland) UNDER 8.5, -115 (W 2-0) 04/11/2013: LAD (Greinke) at SD (Marquis) UNDER 7, +100 (W 3-2) 04/12/2013: SF (Cain) at CHC (Villlanueva) OVER 9.5, -110 (L 4-3) 04/12/2013: CWS (Quintana) at CLE (Masterson) UNDER 7.5, -110 04/12/2013: MIL (Lohse) at STL (Miller) UNDER 7.5, -120
Then don't follow him....its all your choice and if you lose, you can only blame yourself for following him and not making your own decisions.
Why do guys here complain when they follow someone and lose?..if that gets you angry, do your own handicapping and if your plays match SNAP's, then make a play....otherwise, lay off and just congratulate him if he wins or say nothing if he loses.
GL today SNAP....waiting for your afternoon plays to see if it matches mine....
I'm leaning on these so far: CINCY / PITT - OVER *****TIGHT LINE*****
ATL / WASH - OVER*****HAS MY SLIGHT INTEREST*****
LAD / ARIZ - UNDER*****IF IT OPENED AT 7 WOULD BE A PLAY FOR ME. A HIGH OPEN FOR A KERSHAW START HAS ME BACKED OFF A BIT. I MAY STILL MAKE A PLAY WITH MY FINAL UPDATE*****
COL / SD - OVER*****NO INTEREST*****
TEX / SEA - UNDER*****I PERSONALLY DONT PLAY TOTALS BELOW 7 WITH AL GAMES*****
The 2 Unders are looking good, but hard to work with only 6.5 for TEX/SEA.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jedi-Yorda:
Then don't follow him....its all your choice and if you lose, you can only blame yourself for following him and not making your own decisions.
Why do guys here complain when they follow someone and lose?..if that gets you angry, do your own handicapping and if your plays match SNAP's, then make a play....otherwise, lay off and just congratulate him if he wins or say nothing if he loses.
GL today SNAP....waiting for your afternoon plays to see if it matches mine....
I'm leaning on these so far: CINCY / PITT - OVER *****TIGHT LINE*****
ATL / WASH - OVER*****HAS MY SLIGHT INTEREST*****
LAD / ARIZ - UNDER*****IF IT OPENED AT 7 WOULD BE A PLAY FOR ME. A HIGH OPEN FOR A KERSHAW START HAS ME BACKED OFF A BIT. I MAY STILL MAKE A PLAY WITH MY FINAL UPDATE*****
COL / SD - OVER*****NO INTEREST*****
TEX / SEA - UNDER*****I PERSONALLY DONT PLAY TOTALS BELOW 7 WITH AL GAMES*****
The 2 Unders are looking good, but hard to work with only 6.5 for TEX/SEA.
THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER PLAY ADDED. I WILL LET YOU KNOW ASAP. Picks & Results: 8-1, 89%
04/01/2013: SF (Cain) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 4-0) 04/02/2013: SF (Bumgarner) @ LAD (Ryu) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 3-0) 04/04/2013: PHI (Lee) @ ATL (Medlen) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 2-0) 04/06/2013: PITT (Burnett) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 1-0) 04/08/2013: MIL (Estrada) at CHC (Jackson) OVER 9.5, -105 (W 7-4) 04/08/2013: COL (De La Rosa) @ SF (Bumgarner) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 4-2) 04/10/2013: TB (Moore) at Texas (Holland) UNDER 8.5, -115 (W 2-0) 04/11/2013: LAD (Greinke) at SD (Marquis) UNDER 7, +100 (W 3-2) 04/12/2013: SF (Cain) at CHC (Villlanueva) OVER 9.5, -110 (L 4-3) 04/12/2013: CWS (Quintana) at CLE (Masterson) UNDER 7.5, -110 04/12/2013: MIL (Lohse) at STL (Miller) UNDER 7.5, -120
I'm playing CLE (Masterson) on RL and the ML and don't want to overload on 1 game (though the UN does look good).
I'm may follow you on the MIL/STL game as that was one of the games I looked at earlier. LOHSE should be good, but a little weary of MILLER; he pitched well at SF, but his D cost him the game (and runs).
GL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SnapSports:
THERE IS A GOOD POSSIBILITY OF ANOTHER PLAY ADDED. I WILL LET YOU KNOW ASAP. Picks & Results: 8-1, 89%
04/01/2013: SF (Cain) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 4-0) 04/02/2013: SF (Bumgarner) @ LAD (Ryu) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 3-0) 04/04/2013: PHI (Lee) @ ATL (Medlen) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 2-0) 04/06/2013: PITT (Burnett) @ LAD (Kershaw) UNDER 6, -110 (W 1-0) 04/08/2013: MIL (Estrada) at CHC (Jackson) OVER 9.5, -105 (W 7-4) 04/08/2013: COL (De La Rosa) @ SF (Bumgarner) UNDER 6.5, -110 (W 4-2) 04/10/2013: TB (Moore) at Texas (Holland) UNDER 8.5, -115 (W 2-0) 04/11/2013: LAD (Greinke) at SD (Marquis) UNDER 7, +100 (W 3-2) 04/12/2013: SF (Cain) at CHC (Villlanueva) OVER 9.5, -110 (L 4-3) 04/12/2013: CWS (Quintana) at CLE (Masterson) UNDER 7.5, -110 04/12/2013: MIL (Lohse) at STL (Miller) UNDER 7.5, -120
I'm playing CLE (Masterson) on RL and the ML and don't want to overload on 1 game (though the UN does look good).
I'm may follow you on the MIL/STL game as that was one of the games I looked at earlier. LOHSE should be good, but a little weary of MILLER; he pitched well at SF, but his D cost him the game (and runs).
I'm playing CLE (Masterson) on RL and the ML and don't want to overload on 1 game (though the UN does look good).
I'm may follow you on the MIL/STL game as that was one of the games I looked at earlier. LOHSE should be good, but a little weary of MILLER; he pitched well at SF, but his D cost him the game (and runs).
GL!
Conversation is good and thats why we are here but I have a method to my madness and I stick to what got me here. I don't really give a damn how a team's defense played in their last game and I only play totals.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jedi-Yorda:
I'm playing CLE (Masterson) on RL and the ML and don't want to overload on 1 game (though the UN does look good).
I'm may follow you on the MIL/STL game as that was one of the games I looked at earlier. LOHSE should be good, but a little weary of MILLER; he pitched well at SF, but his D cost him the game (and runs).
GL!
Conversation is good and thats why we are here but I have a method to my madness and I stick to what got me here. I don't really give a damn how a team's defense played in their last game and I only play totals.
Conversation is good and thats why we are here but I have a method to my madness and I stick to what got me here. I don't really give a damn how a team's defense played in their last game and I only play totals.
All good...break the book!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SnapSports:
Conversation is good and thats why we are here but I have a method to my madness and I stick to what got me here. I don't really give a damn how a team's defense played in their last game and I only play totals.