Thanks for the play snap. I was just curious as to why you like unders better than overs? Is it easier for your system to spot pitchers dominating over a line up than the other way around?
0
Thanks for the play snap. I was just curious as to why you like unders better than overs? Is it easier for your system to spot pitchers dominating over a line up than the other way around?
My book had it at 8.5 -120. Another one in the win column, thanks snap! Won't say winner winner chicken dinner cause I hate that saying ( along with it is what it is and it's all good) no offense realchosen. Lol. Why would we eat chicken after winning. Hell give me a lobster! It still rimes.
0
My book had it at 8.5 -120. Another one in the win column, thanks snap! Won't say winner winner chicken dinner cause I hate that saying ( along with it is what it is and it's all good) no offense realchosen. Lol. Why would we eat chicken after winning. Hell give me a lobster! It still rimes.
Thanks for the play snap. I was just curious as to why you like unders better than overs? Is it easier for your system to spot pitchers dominating over a line up than the other way around?
I have a strong system for overs but it has seemed in the past that my systems slightly favor under's rather than over's. In any case the over system worked well tonight.
0
Quote Originally Posted by oreooreo1:
Thanks for the play snap. I was just curious as to why you like unders better than overs? Is it easier for your system to spot pitchers dominating over a line up than the other way around?
I have a strong system for overs but it has seemed in the past that my systems slightly favor under's rather than over's. In any case the over system worked well tonight.