2026 YTD so far: 414 - 296+46.62u*[165 - 110 *BB!]
2025 FINAL YTD: 177 - 115+28.47u*60.6%
2024 FINAL YTD: 186 - 117+52.72u*61.5%[71 - 44 *BB!]
*All counted at the common standard "one unit per bet" - as this is a record of my skills at picking winners (or lack thereof!) not an accounting of how much money (units) I may claim to bet, despite the fact, like most, I OFTEN bet more on some.
4
MLB
2026 YTD so far: 414 - 296+46.62u*[165 - 110 *BB!]
2025 FINAL YTD: 177 - 115+28.47u*60.6%
2024 FINAL YTD: 186 - 117+52.72u*61.5%[71 - 44 *BB!]
*All counted at the common standard "one unit per bet" - as this is a record of my skills at picking winners (or lack thereof!) not an accounting of how much money (units) I may claim to bet, despite the fact, like most, I OFTEN bet more on some.
Umpire in washington game has a 1-18 bias towards the under. Thats a pretty crazy number, to see an umpire have such a bias. Is this guy calling strikes on every pitch? But even with that bias, i hate under bets and just cant bet it.
This umps whole family and all his friends must have cleaned up this season
2
Umpire in washington game has a 1-18 bias towards the under. Thats a pretty crazy number, to see an umpire have such a bias. Is this guy calling strikes on every pitch? But even with that bias, i hate under bets and just cant bet it.
This umps whole family and all his friends must have cleaned up this season
Good evening sir , I check your thread out quite often. You offer a lot of insight. If you’ve ever checked any of my threads out , you know I bet pretty heavy , win or lose. I’ve capped everything I could today, and my two best plays I see is under 7.5 Pit/SD & Cleveland ml & rl , any insights on these two games ? Thanks man in advance if you have any advice here.
1
@fubah2
Good evening sir , I check your thread out quite often. You offer a lot of insight. If you’ve ever checked any of my threads out , you know I bet pretty heavy , win or lose. I’ve capped everything I could today, and my two best plays I see is under 7.5 Pit/SD & Cleveland ml & rl , any insights on these two games ? Thanks man in advance if you have any advice here.
@fubah2 Good evening sir , I check your thread out quite often. You offer a lot of insight. If you’ve ever checked any of my threads out , you know I bet pretty heavy , win or lose. I’ve capped everything I could today, and my two best plays I see is under 7.5 Pit/SD & Cleveland ml & rl , any insights on these two games ?
Thanks man in advance if you have any advice here.
@Rolexsports
Pitts/SD, I see two better than avg starters and two better than avg pens, with a small +0.5 run edge overall to Padres due mainly to slightly stronger bats particularly vs righties in their home venue ......so my estimate is 7.5 runs give or take a run either way
With elite starter MESSICK on the mound and an expected fair edge at the plate, I have Cleveland marked for ~+1.1 run edge, but could be anywhere from +0.6 to +1.6 due to obvious volatility in assessing the tiny sample size on KLASSEN's game....I like the play myself but my stats over the decades do prefer slightly lower odds (lower to mid-150's) with this amount of perceived edge.
My est game total is 5.2 to 7.8 runs
BoL with your bets tonight!
1
Quote Originally Posted by Rolexsports:
@fubah2 Good evening sir , I check your thread out quite often. You offer a lot of insight. If you’ve ever checked any of my threads out , you know I bet pretty heavy , win or lose. I’ve capped everything I could today, and my two best plays I see is under 7.5 Pit/SD & Cleveland ml & rl , any insights on these two games ?
Thanks man in advance if you have any advice here.
@Rolexsports
Pitts/SD, I see two better than avg starters and two better than avg pens, with a small +0.5 run edge overall to Padres due mainly to slightly stronger bats particularly vs righties in their home venue ......so my estimate is 7.5 runs give or take a run either way
With elite starter MESSICK on the mound and an expected fair edge at the plate, I have Cleveland marked for ~+1.1 run edge, but could be anywhere from +0.6 to +1.6 due to obvious volatility in assessing the tiny sample size on KLASSEN's game....I like the play myself but my stats over the decades do prefer slightly lower odds (lower to mid-150's) with this amount of perceived edge.
Thank you for advise on both, I’m seeing very similar numbers on both games. I think I’m going to play them both separately but won’t go to heavy on them. I believe worse case is I split and lose a lil juice. I think Cleveland can dominate if they play their game. Thanks bro and good luck tonight on your plays .
0
@fubah2
Thank you for advise on both, I’m seeing very similar numbers on both games. I think I’m going to play them both separately but won’t go to heavy on them. I believe worse case is I split and lose a lil juice. I think Cleveland can dominate if they play their game. Thanks bro and good luck tonight on your plays .
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: LEAN to Cleveland but I want a lower line . . . Also LEAN Twinkies... I have them for ~ +0.9 run edge over struggling A's....
Also a "woulda bet" (but won't) on PADRES
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: LEAN to Cleveland but I want a lower line . . . Also LEAN Twinkies... I have them for ~ +0.9 run edge over struggling A's....