Saturday, Aug 22:
W Toronto -102 @pinn
W Brewskies -159 @pinn
2 - 0 +2.00u
I broke the Saturday jinx!
More LEANS I'm not betting but "woulda"
if I wasn't so damn skittish about regression, which is compounded on me by being a Saturday.
...in the Tampa/ORIOLES game I make the hometown O's for a decent +0.5 run edge and about a 54% odds to win, while getting PLUS $$$
...Cubs/SEA game I have estimated for 8.2+ runs so an over 7 should have a decent shot....10 runs were scored in 9 innings last night facing BETTER pitching than they do tonight...
More LEANS I'm not betting but "woulda"
if I wasn't so damn skittish about regression, which is compounded on me by being a Saturday.
...in the Tampa/ORIOLES game I make the hometown O's for a decent +0.5 run edge and about a 54% odds to win, while getting PLUS $$$
...Cubs/SEA game I have estimated for 8.2+ runs so an over 7 should have a decent shot....10 runs were scored in 9 innings last night facing BETTER pitching than they do tonight...
Saturday, Aug 22: W Toronto -102 @pinn W Brewskies -159 @pinn 2 - 0 +2.00u I broke the Saturday jinx!
King Fubah... Brew was my play and I had a hard lean on BooJays who are on my do not bet list.. between my strong confidence in D$ Cease & your lean.. You help secure one of my 3 wins today... FuuuuuuuuBaaahhhh! I hope youre feeling great today... You are Gold!!
Saturday, Aug 22: W Toronto -102 @pinn W Brewskies -159 @pinn 2 - 0 +2.00u I broke the Saturday jinx!
King Fubah... Brew was my play and I had a hard lean on BooJays who are on my do not bet list.. between my strong confidence in D$ Cease & your lean.. You help secure one of my 3 wins today... FuuuuuuuuBaaahhhh! I hope youre feeling great today... You are Gold!!
This is not a bet or recommended pick: for me it's a "woulda, but didn't"
LEAN only to the over 8 alt-line on cards/PHIL ....I estimate 10.1 runs, give or take 2 runs either way.
So, after just 3 innings, 7 runs have already been scored . . . ![]()
This is not a bet or recommended pick: for me it's a "woulda, but didn't"
LEAN only to the over 8 alt-line on cards/PHIL ....I estimate 10.1 runs, give or take 2 runs either way.
So, after just 3 innings, 7 runs have already been scored . . . ![]()
Angels/TEXAS is underway and I have TEXAS figured for only +0.5 run edge ![]()
Had I been in a mood for betting I woulda taken a +1.5 on Anaheim for a "value bet"
Angels/TEXAS is underway and I have TEXAS figured for only +0.5 run edge ![]()
Had I been in a mood for betting I woulda taken a +1.5 on Anaheim for a "value bet"
And right after I finished typing that, I looked up and Angels are already on the board with another runner in scoring position...
And right after I finished typing that, I looked up and Angels are already on the board with another runner in scoring position...
...and of course betting the waaaaaaaaay over-priced DODGERS at home is completely OUT OF THE QUESTION
...and of course betting the waaaaaaaaay over-priced DODGERS at home is completely OUT OF THE QUESTION
I have CLEVELAND with a decent +0.8 run edge over the Rockies - who are without a decent batter (Goodman) and lost 1 - 9 last night when Cleveland bats were facing a mediocre righty starter (Gordon)......tonight Rockies send up roughly the same....
I have CLEVELAND with a decent +0.8 run edge over the Rockies - who are without a decent batter (Goodman) and lost 1 - 9 last night when Cleveland bats were facing a mediocre righty starter (Gordon)......tonight Rockies send up roughly the same....
Looking at the Reds/DBacks matchup,
on paper this looks like a sure-thing/LOCK for DBacks
Better offense, better starter, better bullpen. Logical play.
Looking at the Reds/DBacks matchup,
on paper this looks like a sure-thing/LOCK for DBacks
Better offense, better starter, better bullpen. Logical play.
This is not a bet or recommended pick: for me it's a "woulda, but didn't"
LEAN only to the over 8 alt-line on cards/PHIL ....I estimate 10.1 runs, give or take 2 runs either way.
...and after 6 innings, 12 runs are in . . . ![]()
This is not a bet or recommended pick: for me it's a "woulda, but didn't"
LEAN only to the over 8 alt-line on cards/PHIL ....I estimate 10.1 runs, give or take 2 runs either way.
...and after 6 innings, 12 runs are in . . . ![]()
In the final game, I have PADRES with a SOLID +1.2 run edge against a very reasonable line given that edge...This is a "woulda" for me but I'm not going risk ruining a 2 - 0 Saturday, even if I figure about 66.6% chance to win
In the final game, I have PADRES with a SOLID +1.2 run edge against a very reasonable line given that edge...This is a "woulda" for me but I'm not going risk ruining a 2 - 0 Saturday, even if I figure about 66.6% chance to win
Posted by fubah2 Saturday, Aug 22: W Toronto -102 @pinn W Brewskies -159 @pinn 2 - 0 +2.00u ... AND ON A SATURDAY
.. wtf i slept in LOL
Posted by fubah2 Saturday, Aug 22: W Toronto -102 @pinn W Brewskies -159 @pinn 2 - 0 +2.00u ... AND ON A SATURDAY
.. wtf i slept in LOL
Yep. LOGICAL. Maybe even "too good to be true" ![]()
And my logical plays very often elude me. It's frustrating.
But when it seems "too good to be true" I prefer to PASS and look at other games...I don't need the stress. I risk nothing by passing, and I'm fine even if it eventually wins....
Yep. LOGICAL. Maybe even "too good to be true" ![]()
And my logical plays very often elude me. It's frustrating.
But when it seems "too good to be true" I prefer to PASS and look at other games...I don't need the stress. I risk nothing by passing, and I'm fine even if it eventually wins....
UGHH! End of 7 innings and the hometown Rangers have ONE HIT.
Looking now like what "woulda" been a +RL value bet on ANGELS may find success...
UGHH! End of 7 innings and the hometown Rangers have ONE HIT.
Looking now like what "woulda" been a +RL value bet on ANGELS may find success...
Yep. LOGICAL. Maybe even >>>> "too good to be true" ![]()
And my logical plays very often elude me. It's frustrating.
But when it seems "too good to be true" I prefer to PASS and look at other games...I don't need the stress. I risk nothing by passing, and I'm fine even if it eventually wins....
GOOD starter for DBacks (Soroka) getting a beatdown by the weak/struggling REDS offense. Allowed 10 to reach, 6 earnies, and is mercifully yanked after only 3.1 ip, trailing 6 to zip...Lowder pitching very well, though he's been better than average the past month
Yep. LOGICAL. Maybe even >>>> "too good to be true" ![]()
And my logical plays very often elude me. It's frustrating.
But when it seems "too good to be true" I prefer to PASS and look at other games...I don't need the stress. I risk nothing by passing, and I'm fine even if it eventually wins....
GOOD starter for DBacks (Soroka) getting a beatdown by the weak/struggling REDS offense. Allowed 10 to reach, 6 earnies, and is mercifully yanked after only 3.1 ip, trailing 6 to zip...Lowder pitching very well, though he's been better than average the past month
More LEANS I'm not betting but "woulda" if I wasn't so damn skittish about regression, which is compounded on me by being a Saturday.![]()
...in the Tampa/ORIOLES game I make the hometown O's for a decent +0.5 run edge and about a 54% odds to win, while getting PLUS $$$
O's win 3 - 2 ![]()
More LEANS I'm not betting but "woulda" if I wasn't so damn skittish about regression, which is compounded on me by being a Saturday.![]()
...in the Tampa/ORIOLES game I make the hometown O's for a decent +0.5 run edge and about a 54% odds to win, while getting PLUS $$$
O's win 3 - 2 ![]()
This is not a bet or recommended pick: for me it's a "woulda, but didn't"
LEAN only to the over 8 alt-line on cards/PHIL ....I estimate 10.1 runs, give or take 2 runs either way.
Final score: 12 - 3 ![]()
This is not a bet or recommended pick: for me it's a "woulda, but didn't"
LEAN only to the over 8 alt-line on cards/PHIL ....I estimate 10.1 runs, give or take 2 runs either way.
Final score: 12 - 3 ![]()
...Cubs/SEA game I have estimated for 8.2+ runs so an over 7 should have a decent shot....10 runs were scored in 9 innings last night facing BETTER pitching than they do tonight...
Game just went final: 5 - 4 over!! ![]()
...Cubs/SEA game I have estimated for 8.2+ runs so an over 7 should have a decent shot....10 runs were scored in 9 innings last night facing BETTER pitching than they do tonight...
Game just went final: 5 - 4 over!! ![]()
Game just went final: 3 - 2 walkoff winner for Baahhstin!
However, had I actually bet this, it's a "woulda pushed" -1 RL on the homies
Game just went final: 3 - 2 walkoff winner for Baahhstin!
However, had I actually bet this, it's a "woulda pushed" -1 RL on the homies
Yep! ANGELS win 3 - 0 with great value on either their ML or +1.5 RL ![]()
Yep! ANGELS win 3 - 0 with great value on either their ML or +1.5 RL ![]()
In my capping notes early in the day, I had the Marlins listed for a +1.5 run edge **IF** ABRAMS was held out for Washington. At the time it was uncertain so I set it aside waiting for the lineups.......then forgot about it in the excitement of following my 2 winners in their still tight later innings.
ABRAMS (ankle injury) - a HUGE KEY batter for the NATS, esp. with their TOP bat vs righties, James Wood, already OUT
- was indeed held out and had I been paying attention I believe I "woulda" bet the -1 RL on Miami.
They won by 2.
In my capping notes early in the day, I had the Marlins listed for a +1.5 run edge **IF** ABRAMS was held out for Washington. At the time it was uncertain so I set it aside waiting for the lineups.......then forgot about it in the excitement of following my 2 winners in their still tight later innings.
ABRAMS (ankle injury) - a HUGE KEY batter for the NATS, esp. with their TOP bat vs righties, James Wood, already OUT
- was indeed held out and had I been paying attention I believe I "woulda" bet the -1 RL on Miami.
They won by 2.
Cleveland wins 4 - 3 ![]()
Cleveland wins 4 - 3 ![]()
