After starting the season 7 - 8, the Phillies then faced a daunting schedule versus two of the top teams in MLB TWICE each (.617 Cubs and .681 Braves) falling 2 - 11 over that very tough stretch.
So management fired their long-serving very successful manager.
Since then they have gone 15 - 4 and folks are dancing in the streets, crediting the W/L turnaround to the change in manager.
But who did the Phillies face in this 15 - 4 stretch? .426 Giants .447 Marlins .500 A's .383 Rockies .413 BoSox .511 Pirates
Only one team above .500!
Now they start a string of matchups collectively MUCH tougher: .511 Cinci .542 Cleveland .609 @Padres .617 @Dodgers .609 Padres
A significant facet of my handicapping is assessing against WHOM have the teams (or starters) achieved their stats (good or bad)?
Should we expect Phillies' hot streak to continue thru these next 5 series?!
4
. Phillies ?! Against WHOM did they play?
After starting the season 7 - 8, the Phillies then faced a daunting schedule versus two of the top teams in MLB TWICE each (.617 Cubs and .681 Braves) falling 2 - 11 over that very tough stretch.
So management fired their long-serving very successful manager.
Since then they have gone 15 - 4 and folks are dancing in the streets, crediting the W/L turnaround to the change in manager.
But who did the Phillies face in this 15 - 4 stretch? .426 Giants .447 Marlins .500 A's .383 Rockies .413 BoSox .511 Pirates
Only one team above .500!
Now they start a string of matchups collectively MUCH tougher: .511 Cinci .542 Cleveland .609 @Padres .617 @Dodgers .609 Padres
A significant facet of my handicapping is assessing against WHOM have the teams (or starters) achieved their stats (good or bad)?
Should we expect Phillies' hot streak to continue thru these next 5 series?!
CWS +142 @pinn "value bet" ...I have Seattle for a thin +0.2 run edge
NOTES: My "value bets" are specific only to matchups which are either 50/50 or damn close while the dog is getting *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$. The theory is, if I am reasonably accurate at identifying 50/50 matchups then, over the season, I should anticipate at or very close to half wins and half losers --> but because ALL the bets are for *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$ then logically I should be up decent profit!
In theory.
But remember, I do expect to loseclose to HALF of all my "value bets." If you're looking for winners, my "value bets" are NOT the place to start. Yes, profit is anticipated over the season but the actual WIN/LOSS might be disappointing.
Tonight's game is a primo example. A coin-flipper. 50/50 chance either team, although a very slight edge to Seattle. Maybe. But still, give us 100 games where the odds of winning are roughly 50/50 but we're getting PLUS $$$ payout on HALF those.....TYVM!!!!
My "value bets" have been doing particularly well so far, hitting 66% (luck involved). But that presents a problem going forward: likely regression So don't be surprised if/when this loses. It's a coin-flip.
2
MONDAY, May 18:
CWS +142 @pinn "value bet" ...I have Seattle for a thin +0.2 run edge
NOTES: My "value bets" are specific only to matchups which are either 50/50 or damn close while the dog is getting *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$. The theory is, if I am reasonably accurate at identifying 50/50 matchups then, over the season, I should anticipate at or very close to half wins and half losers --> but because ALL the bets are for *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$ then logically I should be up decent profit!
In theory.
But remember, I do expect to loseclose to HALF of all my "value bets." If you're looking for winners, my "value bets" are NOT the place to start. Yes, profit is anticipated over the season but the actual WIN/LOSS might be disappointing.
Tonight's game is a primo example. A coin-flipper. 50/50 chance either team, although a very slight edge to Seattle. Maybe. But still, give us 100 games where the odds of winning are roughly 50/50 but we're getting PLUS $$$ payout on HALF those.....TYVM!!!!
My "value bets" have been doing particularly well so far, hitting 66% (luck involved). But that presents a problem going forward: likely regression So don't be surprised if/when this loses. It's a coin-flip.
Tampa -1.5 +143 @pinn ... 10 - 5 to win at home by 2+ past month Tampa -158 @pinn 1st 5 inn Tampa TT over 2.5 -257 @pinn ... 13 - 2 in May at least 3 runs scored; 8 - 1 at home
2
Tampa -138 @pinn *BB
Tampa -1.5 +143 @pinn ... 10 - 5 to win at home by 2+ past month Tampa -158 @pinn 1st 5 inn Tampa TT over 2.5 -257 @pinn ... 13 - 2 in May at least 3 runs scored; 8 - 1 at home
I have Philly rateds with a shaky +0.6 run edge over Cinci, but it's shaky because LODOLO for Cinci is a BIG questionmark. Formerly VERY GOOD starter, struggles in first 2 outings this season....How to evaluate??? If he performs like the first two outings then Philly has a solid edge to win but if he gets his form back, CINCI likely wins....
0
I have Philly rateds with a shaky +0.6 run edge over Cinci, but it's shaky because LODOLO for Cinci is a BIG questionmark. Formerly VERY GOOD starter, struggles in first 2 outings this season....How to evaluate??? If he performs like the first two outings then Philly has a solid edge to win but if he gets his form back, CINCI likely wins....
What a good post, showing the quality of your insight not only data based but also analytical thinking put in. Not overly complicated, instead they are simple but sharp and logical.
0
@fubah2
What a good post, showing the quality of your insight not only data based but also analytical thinking put in. Not overly complicated, instead they are simple but sharp and logical.
Well, sorta. I'm retired (widower) and currently not coordinating any further projects for my local Vets Association so I have waaaay too much free time on my hands. My trusty but aging "BatMobile" is on it's last legs and new cars are VERY expensive so I need to keep building my "New BatMobile fund" - thus my handicapping hobby has more or less morphed into a PT labor of love type job I guess. LOL.
But truth is I would be doing this just as much anyway as I enjoy the challenge for its own sake. Plus the camaraderie I share with my 4 [occasional/if I'm winning] followers!
4
Quote Originally Posted by NetProfit2023:
@fubah2 Do you do this full time?
@NetProfit2023
Well, sorta. I'm retired (widower) and currently not coordinating any further projects for my local Vets Association so I have waaaay too much free time on my hands. My trusty but aging "BatMobile" is on it's last legs and new cars are VERY expensive so I need to keep building my "New BatMobile fund" - thus my handicapping hobby has more or less morphed into a PT labor of love type job I guess. LOL.
But truth is I would be doing this just as much anyway as I enjoy the challenge for its own sake. Plus the camaraderie I share with my 4 [occasional/if I'm winning] followers!
MONDAY, May 18: CWS +142 @pinn "value bet" ...I have Seattle for a thin +0.2 run edge NOTES: My "value bets" are specific only to matchups which are either 50/50 or damn close while the dog is getting *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$. The theory is, if I am reasonably accurate at identifying 50/50 matchups then, over the season, I should anticipate at or very close to half wins and half losers --> but because ALL the bets are for *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$ then logically I should be up decent profit! In theory. But remember, I do expect to lose close to HALF of all my "value bets." If you're looking for winners, my "value bets" are NOT the place to start. Yes, profit is anticipated over the season but the actual WIN/LOSS might be disappointing. Tonight's game is a primo example. A coin-flipper. 50/50 chance either team, although a very slight edge to Seattle. Maybe. But still, give us 100 games where the odds of winning are roughly 50/50 but we're getting PLUS $$$ payout on HALF those.....TYVM!!!! My "value bets" have been doing particularly well so far, hitting 66% (luck involved). But that presents a problem going forward: likely regression So don't be surprised if/when this loses. It's a coin-flip.
Rockies +130 @pinn "value bet" ...likewise I have the fav Rangers for only a hair of an edge
Of course, I am hoping for at least a split on my two "value bets" tonight (CWS and Colo) That would be dandy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
MONDAY, May 18: CWS +142 @pinn "value bet" ...I have Seattle for a thin +0.2 run edge NOTES: My "value bets" are specific only to matchups which are either 50/50 or damn close while the dog is getting *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$. The theory is, if I am reasonably accurate at identifying 50/50 matchups then, over the season, I should anticipate at or very close to half wins and half losers --> but because ALL the bets are for *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$ then logically I should be up decent profit! In theory. But remember, I do expect to lose close to HALF of all my "value bets." If you're looking for winners, my "value bets" are NOT the place to start. Yes, profit is anticipated over the season but the actual WIN/LOSS might be disappointing. Tonight's game is a primo example. A coin-flipper. 50/50 chance either team, although a very slight edge to Seattle. Maybe. But still, give us 100 games where the odds of winning are roughly 50/50 but we're getting PLUS $$$ payout on HALF those.....TYVM!!!! My "value bets" have been doing particularly well so far, hitting 66% (luck involved). But that presents a problem going forward: likely regression So don't be surprised if/when this loses. It's a coin-flip.
Rockies +130 @pinn "value bet" ...likewise I have the fav Rangers for only a hair of an edge
Of course, I am hoping for at least a split on my two "value bets" tonight (CWS and Colo) That would be dandy.
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: MONDAY, May 18: CWS +142 @pinn "value bet" ...I have Seattle for a thin +0.2 run edge NOTES: My "value bets" are specific only to matchups which are either 50/50 or damn close while the dog is getting *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$. The theory is, if I am reasonably accurate at identifying 50/50 matchups then, over the season, I should anticipate at or very close to half wins and half losers --> but because ALL the bets are for *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$ then logically I should be up decent profit! In theory. But remember, I do expect to lose close to HALF of all my "value bets." If you're looking for winners, my "value bets" are NOT the place to start. Yes, profit is anticipated over the season but the actual WIN/LOSS might be disappointing. Tonight's game is a primo example. A coin-flipper. 50/50 chance either team, although a very slight edge to Seattle. Maybe. But still, give us 100 games where the odds of winning are roughly 50/50 but we're getting PLUS $$$ payout on HALF those.....TYVM!!!! My "value bets" have been doing particularly well so far, hitting 66% (luck involved). But that presents a problem going forward: likely regression So don't be surprised if/when this loses.
It's a coin-flip.
Rockies +130 @pinn "value bet"
...likewise I have the fav Rangers for only a hair of an edge Of course, I am hoping for at least a split on my two "value bets" tonight (CWS and Colo) That would be dandy.
Athletics -127 @pinn NOT a *BB ...just made the cut for a bet; a plausible +1.1 run edge
URENA has improved big time the past few games and may be the stronger starter tonight even though Ginn is also performing fairly well. BUT....the Angels offense is sorely lacking for one, and when it gets into the bullpens, well, Angels are struggling mightily.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2: MONDAY, May 18: CWS +142 @pinn "value bet" ...I have Seattle for a thin +0.2 run edge NOTES: My "value bets" are specific only to matchups which are either 50/50 or damn close while the dog is getting *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$. The theory is, if I am reasonably accurate at identifying 50/50 matchups then, over the season, I should anticipate at or very close to half wins and half losers --> but because ALL the bets are for *SIGNIFICANT* plus $$$ then logically I should be up decent profit! In theory. But remember, I do expect to lose close to HALF of all my "value bets." If you're looking for winners, my "value bets" are NOT the place to start. Yes, profit is anticipated over the season but the actual WIN/LOSS might be disappointing. Tonight's game is a primo example. A coin-flipper. 50/50 chance either team, although a very slight edge to Seattle. Maybe. But still, give us 100 games where the odds of winning are roughly 50/50 but we're getting PLUS $$$ payout on HALF those.....TYVM!!!! My "value bets" have been doing particularly well so far, hitting 66% (luck involved). But that presents a problem going forward: likely regression So don't be surprised if/when this loses.
It's a coin-flip.
Rockies +130 @pinn "value bet"
...likewise I have the fav Rangers for only a hair of an edge Of course, I am hoping for at least a split on my two "value bets" tonight (CWS and Colo) That would be dandy.
Athletics -127 @pinn NOT a *BB ...just made the cut for a bet; a plausible +1.1 run edge
URENA has improved big time the past few games and may be the stronger starter tonight even though Ginn is also performing fairly well. BUT....the Angels offense is sorely lacking for one, and when it gets into the bullpens, well, Angels are struggling mightily.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.