Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YTD: 144 - 107
O/U: 39 - 19
[ 17 - 5 overs! ]
@Zeus4par
TY The roller-coaster has brought me back into black ink again
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YTD: 144 - 107
O/U: 39 - 19
[ 17 - 5 overs! ]
@Zeus4par
TY The roller-coaster has brought me back into black ink again
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
YTD: 144 - 107
O/U: 39 - 19
[ 17 - 5 overs! ]
@Zeus4par
TY The roller-coaster has brought me back into black ink again
@JJWoods
Without question! Two would be better
@JJWoods
Without question! Two would be better
good work
TY, Kelly
good work
TY, Kelly
may the w.sox lose EVERY gm the 2h of the season (ok at least lose most of there games)
@fubah2 ........ hope to have eyes on your thread 2h ... such a nice comeback you had 1h i think
may the w.sox lose EVERY gm the 2h of the season (ok at least lose most of there games)
@fubah2 ........ hope to have eyes on your thread 2h ... such a nice comeback you had 1h i think
@Moose6836
Well I certainly agree they should win AT LEAST 2 in Denver.
Rockies offense is among the worst vs righthanders...
But I have to wonder how the break affects all the teams. Will it help revitalize/refocus/make improvements/fresh start for MOST of them, including the weak teams like Colorado? Or does the break have zero effect on most teams?
@Moose6836
Well I certainly agree they should win AT LEAST 2 in Denver.
Rockies offense is among the worst vs righthanders...
But I have to wonder how the break affects all the teams. Will it help revitalize/refocus/make improvements/fresh start for MOST of them, including the weak teams like Colorado? Or does the break have zero effect on most teams?
Now I have decided.
My capping suggests 4.3 runs each team is the focal point of standard deviation curve. Suggesting no significant edge either team. I have factored in: Starters, team offfense vs righties, bullpens, offense over past 30 days, team records at the venue, the typical enhanced performance expected when a team RETURNS HOME where they have a SOLID winning record (Cubbies) ...or vice-versa where teams were winning AT HOME but now take to the road where they usually perform WORSE (BoSox), and most recent batting performance. BoSox have the better starter for sure - but will he remain consistent today??
What I can't factor in is how the break will affect teams. Malaise or rejuvenation??
Certainly one would EXPECT that all pitchers should gain somewhat from 4 extra days rest, including bullpens, and managerial decisions, suggesting slightly BETTER overall pitching performances....
*Although in a coin-flipper there may be small value taking the plus money...
PASS
Now I have decided.
My capping suggests 4.3 runs each team is the focal point of standard deviation curve. Suggesting no significant edge either team. I have factored in: Starters, team offfense vs righties, bullpens, offense over past 30 days, team records at the venue, the typical enhanced performance expected when a team RETURNS HOME where they have a SOLID winning record (Cubbies) ...or vice-versa where teams were winning AT HOME but now take to the road where they usually perform WORSE (BoSox), and most recent batting performance. BoSox have the better starter for sure - but will he remain consistent today??
What I can't factor in is how the break will affect teams. Malaise or rejuvenation??
Certainly one would EXPECT that all pitchers should gain somewhat from 4 extra days rest, including bullpens, and managerial decisions, suggesting slightly BETTER overall pitching performances....
*Although in a coin-flipper there may be small value taking the plus money...
PASS
LEAN for ingame play ONLY, is possible, for an OVER, **MAYBE** since I have the game pegged at 8.6 runs net. But won't bet it yet. Gotta see how the game looks. Wind is in, and all pitchers are very well rested after the break, so an over is maybe too risky....unsure....
LEAN for ingame play ONLY, is possible, for an OVER, **MAYBE** since I have the game pegged at 8.6 runs net. But won't bet it yet. Gotta see how the game looks. Wind is in, and all pitchers are very well rested after the break, so an over is maybe too risky....unsure....
Two games where I have just handicapped small edges AND they are getting GOOD PLUS MONEY ta boot! Normally I might call them "value" bets given the closeness or coin-flipper status....but I make +0.4 and +0.5 edges respectively on these teams to win.
Cool thing is, even if I split these I still profit!
CWS +140 @pinn
NATS +128 @pinn
Two games where I have just handicapped small edges AND they are getting GOOD PLUS MONEY ta boot! Normally I might call them "value" bets given the closeness or coin-flipper status....but I make +0.4 and +0.5 edges respectively on these teams to win.
Cool thing is, even if I split these I still profit!
CWS +140 @pinn
NATS +128 @pinn
Toronto -146 @pinn *BB
Better team, better venues record (by far) better starter (esp. in Toronto) ...BUT this might well be another one-run game!
Toronto -146 @pinn *BB
Better team, better venues record (by far) better starter (esp. in Toronto) ...BUT this might well be another one-run game!
Who knows if I have this game capped accurately (notwithstanding possible effects of 4 days off) but basically it boils down to 2 weak batting teams, with 2 better than average starters on the mound and fresh arms in the bullpens..... so all told I make the CWS/Pitts game tabbed at around 7.4 runs total.
UN 9 -131 alt-line *BB .....under 8.5 is less juice but more risky
Who knows if I have this game capped accurately (notwithstanding possible effects of 4 days off) but basically it boils down to 2 weak batting teams, with 2 better than average starters on the mound and fresh arms in the bullpens..... so all told I make the CWS/Pitts game tabbed at around 7.4 runs total.
UN 9 -131 alt-line *BB .....under 8.5 is less juice but more risky
. Friday, JULY 18
HOT STREAK WARNING!
LUGO, KC
This STARTER is riding a tenuous 7-game HOT STREAK,
WITHOUT a BAD outing in that streak .....YET!
...but this should be anticipated to end at anytime!!!
Make no mistake, this dude and others I will identify in the future are GOOD starters - some of them exceptional! HOWEVER, probability says "consecutive streaks won't last long"...All GOOD pitchers will have an "off" day and get roughed up - sometimes mauled - before they resume their stellar pitching performances again. It happens to the best of them. Just CAN NOT be avoided.
CAVEAT: even if the starter has a "bad outing" doesn't mean his team loses! It just seriously weakens their chances! But his team's bats could come thru with a lot of runs to save the day..... maybe
. Friday, JULY 18
HOT STREAK WARNING!
LUGO, KC
This STARTER is riding a tenuous 7-game HOT STREAK,
WITHOUT a BAD outing in that streak .....YET!
...but this should be anticipated to end at anytime!!!
Make no mistake, this dude and others I will identify in the future are GOOD starters - some of them exceptional! HOWEVER, probability says "consecutive streaks won't last long"...All GOOD pitchers will have an "off" day and get roughed up - sometimes mauled - before they resume their stellar pitching performances again. It happens to the best of them. Just CAN NOT be avoided.
CAVEAT: even if the starter has a "bad outing" doesn't mean his team loses! It just seriously weakens their chances! But his team's bats could come thru with a lot of runs to save the day..... maybe
Curious stat.....
when Chris PADDACK starts for the Twinkies (19)
his team has gone on to win only 5 and lose 14
His numbers have been quite disappointing the past 5 weeks....
Will the break help him turn it around against the FEARSOME ROCKIES?
Curious stat.....
when Chris PADDACK starts for the Twinkies (19)
his team has gone on to win only 5 and lose 14
His numbers have been quite disappointing the past 5 weeks....
Will the break help him turn it around against the FEARSOME ROCKIES?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.