Posted:
#51
i agree. however, the consensus, whether all, 10% or team experts should only include those with positive bankrolls, you can still make picks but they dont count towards the consensus. dont we all want the
best picks and not these system bettors who lay 500 bets on the dogs every week. if you look at each team expert on line many if not 90% are historic and current losers. so what is the point then of having the data, if it is flawed. i dont care if the 10% only includes 10 people as long as they are winners. or how about a category instead of team experts, you just make it winning percentage overall. just a thought.
best picks and not these system bettors who lay 500 bets on the dogs every week. if you look at each team expert on line many if not 90% are historic and current losers. so what is the point then of having the data, if it is flawed. i dont care if the 10% only includes 10 people as long as they are winners. or how about a category instead of team experts, you just make it winning percentage overall. just a thought.
0
Hot Forum Topics
