Again, thats a flawed question. % doesnt mean anything. Being in the green is all that matters. Come on Scal....
Once again, incorrect.
If you bet all games at +101 average and go 50% you are winning. If you bet all lines at -110 and go 50% you are losing. Thats why you can be several games under .500 (especially in baseball) and still be + money....
Winning % is not a more reliable indicator "by far", its a distant second in fact. 
Again, thats a flawed question. % doesnt mean anything. Being in the green is all that matters. Come on Scal....
? The standard juice is -110. Everyone pays it unless they have a site that offers slightly less like -105 or Matchbook prices when they were around. All of this is based on the standard juice on a standard spread.
Are you dense? I said "average" That means adding up all the -110s, -130s and +150s and dividing by the total number of plays. Thats how I can be 100-117 in basball this year and still be winning.
I was being the devils advocate. I was trying to correct you ignorance on the subject matter. Maybe you should read and learn for a change.
Are you dense? I said "average" That means adding up all the -110s, -130s and +150s and dividing by the total number of plays. Thats how I can be 100-117 in basball this year and still be winning.
I was being the devils advocate. I was trying to correct you ignorance on the subject matter. Maybe you should read and learn for a change.
MLs should be played in all sports. If you are gonna take 4 or 5 points with an NBA dog, you might as well bet them @ + money on the ML. Rarely will the point spread matter....same with NFL.
He is a coward, Fact
MLs should be played in all sports. If you are gonna take 4 or 5 points with an NBA dog, you might as well bet them @ + money on the ML. Rarely will the point spread matter....same with NFL.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
