[Quote: Originally Posted by steveshane67]
im seeing a lot of pure garbage being spewed
but why cannot one of you guys answer a few simple questions??
how do you explain carbon monoxide poisoning?
how do you explain vestigial organs?
some examples are
why do dandelions have stamen and pistols?
why does the fish Astyanax Mexicanus have eyes?
why do whales have leg bones?
why is it you guys cite all this shit that is so moronic it doesnt even qualify as pseudo science, yet when faced with actual questions that require actual science, you simply run away. scientists can answer my questions.
[/Quote
steveshane67
Vestigal organs
You have referenced examples of the animal kingdom, though at last response we looked at the spleen, so to remain organised we will remain with human disection.
We learned from educated individuals that the human embryo re-traces the history of evolution. In definition by this, it was discovered that the embryo develops slits in the neck like fish gills, it has a tail, and so on.
Any creationist was faced with an embryo that contained a yolk sac, gill slits and a tail. Medical evolutionists believed these structures to be present, only as useless left overs or "vestiges," of evolutionary ancestry. In definition, remainders of the times when our ancestors were fish and reptiles.
The concept of vestigal organs even resulted in cases of evolutionary medical ignorant practice. Young children once had their healthy and helpful, disease fighting tonsils removed because of wide spread belief that they were only useless vestiges. That idea actually slowed down scientific research for many years. What was considered to be non-vital organs that were not critical and perceived evolutionary left overs was not obserbed with further research.
A sector of scientists who didnt take that view continued with observation of organs that discovered the mystery of their unknown use.
The initial theory on the embryo was fraudulently presented when it was coined "biogenetic law" which is not taken seriously by embryologists. You can research it further, though before continuing I will present a case for one of the error's in the so called "yolk sac."
In chickens, the yolk contains much of the food that the chick depends on for growth. But human's grow attached to mothers and are nourish by them.
The case in its original format was stated that the yolk sac could be removed from the human embryo and still develop.
Yet the yolk sac is the source of the humans embryo's first blood cells, and death would result without it.
Now here is the engineering problem in the human make up at this process, and I'll keep it as simplistic as possible. In the adult, you want to have the blood cells formed inside the bone marrow. that makes good sense, because the blood cells are very sesnsitive to radiation damage and bone would offer them some protection. But you need blood in order to form the bone marrow that later on is going to form blood.
So where do you get the blood first?
Why not use a structure similar to the yolk sac in chickens?
The DNA and protein for making it are common stock building materials. And since it lies conveniently outside the embryo, it can easily be discarded after it has served its temporary but vital function.
This is exactly what we would expect as evidence as a good creative design and engineering practice.
Before presenting a conclusion and answering your vestigal organ question, please allow myself to detail the following about our tail bone that is only with us to remind us that our ancestors had a tail through theory of evolution.
The tail bone or coccyx is not useless. Allow myself to demonstrate. You would agree that in the event you land on it unintentionally, the result is that an individual cant stand up or sit down, lie down or roll over. One can hardly move without pain. This is because this so called "useless" coccyx is one of the most important bones in the whole body.
It is an important point of muscle attachment required for our distinctive upright posture and also for defecation. It is important for development and the end of the spine sticks out noticeably in a one month embryo, buts that because the muscle and limbs dont develop until stimulated by the spine. As they develop, they surround and envelop the coccyx, and it winds up inside the body.
The man who invented the erroneous idea of usless embryo parts was disowned amongst colleagues in his field. Both side of the argument agree on this, though his work can still be found in modern education books today and evolutionists.
Continued.......
The 2nd law of Thermodynamic declares that everything is breaking apart. This argues against the evolutionary progress fron non-life to life.
Brother.
if you think human existance will survive that distant into the future. Which ever way you look at it, humans are doomed by the nature of our heart. The nightmares of reality tame the horror section in Blockbuster.
Hot Forum Topics
