Heathen is just a word to describe people who do not believe in God or another word for non-believers...certainly I can't refer to them as believers or Christians.
Lusting for females is definitely not the Christian way...why don't you open the King James and see what it says about lust. Just go to Colossians 3:5 and read it brother.
Heathen is just a word to describe people who do not believe in God or another word for non-believers...certainly I can't refer to them as believers or Christians.
When did I ever say anything about enemies and that I don't love them? I love everybody which includes the heathens. I come here hoping to make them believers because I love them and care about them. I don't hate, I just feel sorry for them right now and I certainly don't hate you but I just wish you tone down the things you say because earlier like I said I really don't know where you stand with the things you say.
When did I ever say anything about enemies and that I don't love them? I love everybody which includes the heathens. I come here hoping to make them believers because I love them and care about them. I don't hate, I just feel sorry for them right now and I certainly don't hate you but I just wish you tone down the things you say because earlier like I said I really don't know where you stand with the things you say.
Oh dear..
Some of the arguments people have on here are embarressing.
What is the story of the celestial tea pot? It is a tea pot that is orbiting the sun somewhere in space .....
Regardless of wether it is proved or disproved that a tea pot in space actually exists, the fact remains that it is testable.....As difficult as it would be to detect the tea pot, it is possible given the smallest of probabilities to physically detect it as it is within our REALM. Nevertheless, it would be PHYSICALLY possible to detect the tea pot. This is no different to me saying there are Kangaroos playing baseball in Jupiter....The point is wether my claims are true or not, the fact is, that it is POSSIBLE to test wether my claims are true or not, just like the tea pot.
The theory of God is that his realm is in the supernatural and will only be witnessed by death. Therefore he is not testable.
Is it written that God will be at your local shopping mall on Sundays? Is it written that God will appear at your local Church on Sunday visible to everyone? Is it written that God is in space like the tea pot but is very hard to detect?
That is the reason this argument is flawed, just like the common atheist claim of comparing God to Santa, the tooth fairy, etc etc.
The reality is those are testable as THEY ARE IN OUR REALM where as the theory of God is in the supernatural, is NOT testable.
Comparing the 2 is a fallacy of equivocation
You are contradicting yourself.....
On the one hand you are stating that it is the greatest book written on giving life lessons, lying being one of them, yet on the other hand, you are claiming there are lies in there?
How can an author give arguably real truths in life yet on the other hand lying out of there complete backsides.
You cant pick and chose what you want to believe in.
It is either ALL true or none of it is true.
Another contradiction.
How can you say he was a great man because of his teachings which mostly centred about him being the son of God yet on the other hand you dont believe he was the son of God?
He was either who he says he was or he was a lunatic.
You cant pick and choose what you like.
Do you know for a fact that if there was a God, the world COULD NOT be th way IT IS right now?
Do you know for a fact that if there was a God, the world COULD NOT be th way IT IS right now?
You are contradicting yourself.....
On the one hand you are stating that it is the greatest book written on giving life lessons, lying being one of them, yet on the other hand, you are claiming there are lies in there?
How can an author give arguably real truths in life yet on the other hand lying out of there complete backsides.
You cant pick and chose what you want to believe in.
It is either ALL true or none of it is true.
This is not about proofs or pre-suppositions you are making (i was brainwashed) which is an argument that has many flaws within it
On one hand you have stated that Jesus was a "great" man yet in the same sentence you stated that he wasnt who he was claiming to be.
If he is lying about that, then why should i believe anything he said?
He was either a great man and believe or he was a lunatic. There is NO evidence to suggest he was lunatic but rather who he was is true.
You just cant pick and chose whatever suits your argument.
Do you have PROOF or EMPIRICAL evidence that it was all a fairytale?
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
