I stand by my statement. I offer up 18+ years of practical experience in the grocery business dealing with these slime. What do you refute that with? Nothing, nada, 0. You use "whats his names" quote to battle with. Most likely because you haven't got enough intellect to have a thought of your own. Don't lose that one last brain cell.
From the CATO institute; (look it up, if you can figure it out) FOOD STAMPS: This welfare program is a target for fraud because it is so large and comples. The govt must keep track of millions of of individuals to accurately document their eligibility while keeping tabs on the 160,000 retailers who deal in food stamps to look for illegal trafficking. In the past, the program spawned a huge black market (scum/leeches, my words) as recipents exchanged their food stamps for cash on the black market. Today, food stamps are issued on electric cards, and fraud levels have been somewhat reduced (only because they figured out a way to curb these illegal and unmoral activities). NONETHELESS, the programs improper rate is still about 6%, or 1.7 BILLION annually.
This report adds, in conlcusion, fraud and abuse is a serious shortcoming of many federal programs. It is appalling that $100 BILLION a year, OR PERHAPS MUCH MORE, of benefits a misappropriated by people NOT ENTITLED to them.
Now, what was that about generalizations? I believe if we were all HONEST, we could admit to witnessing "funny business" regarding people on govt assistance at LEAST once. I have witnessed it way too often. Work is good for the soul. Any kind of work is better than none. I honestly don't believe MOST of these folks DO not try hard enough. They believe they are entitled. I have over heard young ladies more than once discussing how to get out of their parents house, by just getting pregnant and getting your own apartment, for free. FREE??? Where the hell does that money come from???
I stand by my statement. I offer up 18+ years of practical experience in the grocery business dealing with these slime. What do you refute that with? Nothing, nada, 0. You use "whats his names" quote to battle with. Most likely because you haven't got enough intellect to have a thought of your own. Don't lose that one last brain cell.
From the CATO institute; (look it up, if you can figure it out) FOOD STAMPS: This welfare program is a target for fraud because it is so large and comples. The govt must keep track of millions of of individuals to accurately document their eligibility while keeping tabs on the 160,000 retailers who deal in food stamps to look for illegal trafficking. In the past, the program spawned a huge black market (scum/leeches, my words) as recipents exchanged their food stamps for cash on the black market. Today, food stamps are issued on electric cards, and fraud levels have been somewhat reduced (only because they figured out a way to curb these illegal and unmoral activities). NONETHELESS, the programs improper rate is still about 6%, or 1.7 BILLION annually.
This report adds, in conlcusion, fraud and abuse is a serious shortcoming of many federal programs. It is appalling that $100 BILLION a year, OR PERHAPS MUCH MORE, of benefits a misappropriated by people NOT ENTITLED to them.
Now, what was that about generalizations? I believe if we were all HONEST, we could admit to witnessing "funny business" regarding people on govt assistance at LEAST once. I have witnessed it way too often. Work is good for the soul. Any kind of work is better than none. I honestly don't believe MOST of these folks DO not try hard enough. They believe they are entitled. I have over heard young ladies more than once discussing how to get out of their parents house, by just getting pregnant and getting your own apartment, for free. FREE??? Where the hell does that money come from???
For food stamps, most improper payments are caused by food vendors and errors by government caseworkers. So instead of stopping welfare fraud by targeting those at fault, most attention is unfairly on reducing benefits for welfare recipients.
Another myth is that welfare recipients are lazy. Actually, many have jobs but still qualify for welfare because of low income. Welfare doesn't reduce the desire to work because payments are too low to cover the bare necessities of living.
For food stamps, most improper payments are caused by food vendors and errors by government caseworkers. So instead of stopping welfare fraud by targeting those at fault, most attention is unfairly on reducing benefits for welfare recipients.
Another myth is that welfare recipients are lazy. Actually, many have jobs but still qualify for welfare because of low income. Welfare doesn't reduce the desire to work because payments are too low to cover the bare necessities of living.
One myth is that alot of welfare recipients commit fraud. Actually, U.S. government estimates that for every $1 in food stamps, about 1 cent is obtained fraudulently. Less than 2% of unemployment insurance recipients commit fraud according to U.S. department of labor.
Such frauds are a drop in the bucket compared to burdens on taxpayers from military fraud, government waste and corporate welfare. In hard times, Americans are prejudiced against the poor.
One myth is that alot of welfare recipients commit fraud. Actually, U.S. government estimates that for every $1 in food stamps, about 1 cent is obtained fraudulently. Less than 2% of unemployment insurance recipients commit fraud according to U.S. department of labor.
Such frauds are a drop in the bucket compared to burdens on taxpayers from military fraud, government waste and corporate welfare. In hard times, Americans are prejudiced against the poor.
People have to be on welfare? That's odd. I wonder when it's gonna be my turn....
![]()
People have to be on welfare? That's odd. I wonder when it's gonna be my turn....
![]()
"There's a woman in Chicago," Reagan said, according to an article in the now-defunct Washington Star. "She has 80 names, 30 addresses, 12 Social Security cards. ... She's got Medicaid, getting food stamps and she is collecting welfare under each of her names. Her tax-free cash income alone is over $150,000."
It was a powerful story, but reporters investigating it concluded it wasn't quite true. Some said it may have been based on a then-47-year-old woman in Chicago, but that Reagan wildly exaggerated her abuses.
In time, though, it didn't matter what reporters said. People started repeating the story as true.
"It hangs together as a good story because it's consistent with people's perception of the real world," says Craig R. Smith, who was a speechwriter for former President Gerald Ford and a consulting writer with President George H.W. Bush.
"Like in any good mythology, you need heroes and villains and in the Welfare Queen, you had a villain who was taking advantage of the system."
"There's a woman in Chicago," Reagan said, according to an article in the now-defunct Washington Star. "She has 80 names, 30 addresses, 12 Social Security cards. ... She's got Medicaid, getting food stamps and she is collecting welfare under each of her names. Her tax-free cash income alone is over $150,000."
It was a powerful story, but reporters investigating it concluded it wasn't quite true. Some said it may have been based on a then-47-year-old woman in Chicago, but that Reagan wildly exaggerated her abuses.
In time, though, it didn't matter what reporters said. People started repeating the story as true.
"It hangs together as a good story because it's consistent with people's perception of the real world," says Craig R. Smith, who was a speechwriter for former President Gerald Ford and a consulting writer with President George H.W. Bush.
"Like in any good mythology, you need heroes and villains and in the Welfare Queen, you had a villain who was taking advantage of the system."
I was being sarcastic. Best believe, I'll never be on that shit. Drastic actions will be taken before I'd ever consider it, and I'll never consider it.
Maybe you noticed the big red "have" in the post that you quoted me on. I was simply quoting Scal's comment when he said that people have to be on welfare. If somebody has to do something, that means all other options have been exhausted and they must do that one thing. Nobody has to go on welfare - it's a choice.
![]()
I was being sarcastic. Best believe, I'll never be on that shit. Drastic actions will be taken before I'd ever consider it, and I'll never consider it.
Maybe you noticed the big red "have" in the post that you quoted me on. I was simply quoting Scal's comment when he said that people have to be on welfare. If somebody has to do something, that means all other options have been exhausted and they must do that one thing. Nobody has to go on welfare - it's a choice.
![]()
I was being sarcastic. Best believe, I'll never be on that shit. Drastic actions will be taken before I'd ever consider it, and I'll never consider it.
Maybe you noticed the big red "have" in the post that you quoted me on. I was simply quoting Scal's comment when he said that people have to be on welfare. If somebody has to do something, that means all other options have been exhausted and they must do that one thing. Nobody has to go on welfare - it's a choice.
![]()
I was being sarcastic. Best believe, I'll never be on that shit. Drastic actions will be taken before I'd ever consider it, and I'll never consider it.
Maybe you noticed the big red "have" in the post that you quoted me on. I was simply quoting Scal's comment when he said that people have to be on welfare. If somebody has to do something, that means all other options have been exhausted and they must do that one thing. Nobody has to go on welfare - it's a choice.
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.