anyone watch " The Bible " on the history channel?

In terms of who is going to go where, ie, Sandusky going to hell...No one knows. People throwing things at Sandusky, just remember.......

James 4:12

"There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy. But you--who are you to judge your neighbour?"

Secondly....

James 2:10

"For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it."

I know one thing,. God is perfect in his love and perfect in his justice.

Now lets turn the tables for a second. Under Atheism, what Sandusky has done is not objectively wrong, it is merely an opinion that he has done wrong but not absolutely wrong. This is no different to an opinion where one person finds Kim Kardashian more attractive than Kate Upton. That's all it is under atheism. Just one opinion over another. They aren't right or wrong, just like if I find Kate Upton more attractive than Kim Kardashian. I aint wrong, just a preference.

Also, under atheism, Sandusky is just a bag of chemicals like all of us. It just so happens to be that his chemicals in his body react in a different way to others due to external stimuli. Why is he to blame? It is just the cards evolution have dealt him. Not his fault, and to blame him for what he did as being wrong is contradictory to morality under atheism, which is subjective.

Its unfortunate that I have to use Sandusky as an example, but this example shows the double standards atheists have , the ones who have I had dialogue with. This proves their arguments have so many holes in it...

In terms of who is going to go where, ie, Sandusky going to hell...No one knows. People throwing things at Sandusky, just remember.......

James 4:12

"There is only one Lawgiver and Judge, the one who is able to save and destroy. But you--who are you to judge your neighbour?"

Secondly....

James 2:10

"For whoever keeps the whole law and yet stumbles at just one point is guilty of breaking all of it."

I know one thing,. God is perfect in his love and perfect in his justice.

Now lets turn the tables for a second. Under Atheism, what Sandusky has done is not objectively wrong, it is merely an opinion that he has done wrong but not absolutely wrong. This is no different to an opinion where one person finds Kim Kardashian more attractive than Kate Upton. That's all it is under atheism. Just one opinion over another. They aren't right or wrong, just like if I find Kate Upton more attractive than Kim Kardashian. I aint wrong, just a preference.

Also, under atheism, Sandusky is just a bag of chemicals like all of us. It just so happens to be that his chemicals in his body react in a different way to others due to external stimuli. Why is he to blame? It is just the cards evolution have dealt him. Not his fault, and to blame him for what he did as being wrong is contradictory to morality under atheism, which is subjective.

Its unfortunate that I have to use Sandusky as an example, but this example shows the double standards atheists have , the ones who have I had dialogue with. This proves their arguments have so many holes in it...

Ktrain....Im regards to your first response.....I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say.

In regards to Sandusky, under atheism, what he did was only subjectively wrong, not objectively.

I could think what he did was right, you might think he is wrong...Neither of us are right , neither of us are wrong...That's atheism.

Under Theism, I can say, independent of what he think, what he did was wrong...

Ktrain......You cannot have objective morality under atheism. Where is morality grounded under atheism? Under Atheism, morality is subjective, it is merely one persons opinion over another in terms of what is right and wrong.

Law is different. The gassing of person was the law in Nazi Germany...Because its the law, does it mean its right?

The fact that you say it is what you believe is simply an illusion. You believing what Sandusky did was wrong is no different at all to you finding Kate Upton more attractive over Kim Kardashian the other way around. It really is no different.

In regards to the little boy, 2 fronts.

Under atheism, again, it is ONLY your opinion that what the parents did is wrong, it is not objectively wrong.

In regards under Theism, I wasn't there , so I don't know, I will hold judgement.

Religion make better than Atheism? What do you mean by that? How can you even ask a question.

Ktrain, it appears that you don't even realise the implication of your atheism and what it means.

Ktrain, what those parents did is not objectively wrong under atheism. It is only an opinion that it is wrong, just an wrong. It is not objectively wrong.

Just like the bombing in Boston today, it is only an opinion if you hold it to be wrong under atheism.

Furthermore, the bible doesn't tell us not to seek medical treatment if someone is sick.

I don't know how they could get such an interpretation. There were physicians around the time of Jesus. Jesus didn't tell them to get lost because they shouldn't be treating people.

I don't know how they got that interpretation. I have plenty and plenty of Christian friends, none of them have ever been involved in anything like this.

The other day in church, a church member collapsed, the priest asked if their was a doctor in the mass, lucky there was one and he attended to it.

The priest didn't say, "ok, lets just leave this collapsed woman here and lets pray for her, forget doctors etc etc".