The justification for this is that a white family might be using their 6 year old daughter to smuggle an explosive device aboard a plane on US soil.
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
The justification for this is that a white family might be using their 6 year old daughter to smuggle an explosive device aboard a plane on US soil.
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
The justification for this is that a white family might be using their 6 year old daughter to smuggle an explosive device aboard a plane on US soil.
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
about a month ago showed the government is doing research on how to implement similar operations on public streets.
Ski resorts will go up in hell before that ever happens shooter.
No chance...not in this country.
about a month ago showed the government is doing research on how to implement similar operations on public streets.
Ski resorts will go up in hell before that ever happens shooter.
No chance...not in this country.
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
That was just one of them. It also mentioned scanning pedestrians on public streets. And it doesn’t surprise me one bit you are in support of such Orwellian activities.
That was just one of them. It also mentioned scanning pedestrians on public streets. And it doesn’t surprise me one bit you are in support of such Orwellian activities.
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
A white family using their 6 year old daughter to smuggle explosive devices onto a plane on US soil? No, that type of thing happens all the time. ![]()
Yes. Would that suprise you if someone did that?
A white family using their 6 year old daughter to smuggle explosive devices onto a plane on US soil? No, that type of thing happens all the time. ![]()
about a month ago showed the government is doing research on how to implement similar operations on public streets.
Ski resorts will go up in hell before that ever happens shooter.
No chance...not in this country.
10 years ago a lot of people probably would have said the same thing about the shit that is going on now. Yet, here we sit.
about a month ago showed the government is doing research on how to implement similar operations on public streets.
Ski resorts will go up in hell before that ever happens shooter.
No chance...not in this country.
10 years ago a lot of people probably would have said the same thing about the shit that is going on now. Yet, here we sit.
If you ask me, some people have too many rights.
If you ask me, some people have too many rights.
So let me get this straight: you are under the impression that simply because someone is on your property you can start feeling them up from head to toe and sticking your hands in their pants?
![]()
So let me get this straight: you are under the impression that simply because someone is on your property you can start feeling them up from head to toe and sticking your hands in their pants?
![]()
Correct.
Private property.
Correct.
Private property.
That's dumb. You know what his point was.
That's dumb. You know what his point was.
That was just one of them. It also mentioned scanning pedestrians on public streets. And it doesn’t surprise me one bit you are in support of such Orwellian activities.
That was just one of them. It also mentioned scanning pedestrians on public streets. And it doesn’t surprise me one bit you are in support of such Orwellian activities.
In the US, we are afforded a reasonable expectation of privacy. Searches and seizures of our persons, papers, possessions, homes and other property, therefore, must be reasonable if they are to be legal.
A search is the examination of something that a person would normally consider private. The law enforcement officer or other official who conducts the search must have probable cause to do it.
It is not always necessary for the person conducting the search to have a warrant. If an officer makes an arrest, for example, he can search the arrestee's clothing for weapons in order to protect himself.
An illegal search occurs when a police officer does not have probable cause to conduct the search. A police officer may not conduct a search of a home because he or she has a "hunch" about what is inside. If your person or property has been illegally searched, then your constitutional rights have been violated.
When a private person obtains an item in a search and then turns it over to the police, it does not matter if the search would have been illegal if an officer had conducted it. The evidence is admissible in court as long as an officer did not influence the private person's search.
In the US, we are afforded a reasonable expectation of privacy. Searches and seizures of our persons, papers, possessions, homes and other property, therefore, must be reasonable if they are to be legal.
A search is the examination of something that a person would normally consider private. The law enforcement officer or other official who conducts the search must have probable cause to do it.
It is not always necessary for the person conducting the search to have a warrant. If an officer makes an arrest, for example, he can search the arrestee's clothing for weapons in order to protect himself.
An illegal search occurs when a police officer does not have probable cause to conduct the search. A police officer may not conduct a search of a home because he or she has a "hunch" about what is inside. If your person or property has been illegally searched, then your constitutional rights have been violated.
When a private person obtains an item in a search and then turns it over to the police, it does not matter if the search would have been illegal if an officer had conducted it. The evidence is admissible in court as long as an officer did not influence the private person's search.
So let me get this straight: you are under the impression that simply because someone is on your property you can start feeling them up from head to toe and sticking your hands in their pants?
![]()
So let me get this straight: you are under the impression that simply because someone is on your property you can start feeling them up from head to toe and sticking your hands in their pants?
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.