Have you ever heard of something to ridiculous.. he got that from the geniuses at the LV Hilton SB...
Not one person in this thread can give answers to these two questions:
1. What happened to provoke such a search(which obviously happened prior to the camera rolling)?
2. Did that lady perform the search according to how she was trained?
Cause I don't see anything being violated on that search whatsoever.....some of you seem to think that because it is a kid that there should be a different set of rules....that's not the way to approach it.....everyone is equal at the airport....would the search have been okay if it was a 50 year old woman?
Not one person in this thread can give answers to these two questions:
1. What happened to provoke such a search(which obviously happened prior to the camera rolling)?
2. Did that lady perform the search according to how she was trained?
Cause I don't see anything being violated on that search whatsoever.....some of you seem to think that because it is a kid that there should be a different set of rules....that's not the way to approach it.....everyone is equal at the airport....would the search have been okay if it was a 50 year old woman?
I have a right to pat anyone down coming into my place of business or property...absolutely, it happens all the time just as I mentioned above....BOB, this is the airport dude....anyone and everyone can be searched.....and are you referring to the TSA agent going into her pockets? Because if you are I would bet anything that when the little girl went through the dectector it went off and she assumed she had change in her pocket....once that detector goes off they do have probable cause.....what part of that do you not get?
CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY TWO QUESTIONS ABOVE?
ANYONE? ![]()
I have a right to pat anyone down coming into my place of business or property...absolutely, it happens all the time just as I mentioned above....BOB, this is the airport dude....anyone and everyone can be searched.....and are you referring to the TSA agent going into her pockets? Because if you are I would bet anything that when the little girl went through the dectector it went off and she assumed she had change in her pocket....once that detector goes off they do have probable cause.....what part of that do you not get?
CAN ANYONE ANSWER MY TWO QUESTIONS ABOVE?
ANYONE? ![]()
Not one person in this thread can give answers to these two questions:
1. What happened to provoke such a search(which obviously happened prior to the camera rolling)?
2. Did that lady perform the search according to how she was trained?
This is exactly what I was wondering after watching this video... I am wondering if the security got their asses chewed out or some shit prior to this happening. and they were given some kind of NO EXCEPTIONS rule or some goofy shit...
Not one person in this thread can give answers to these two questions:
1. What happened to provoke such a search(which obviously happened prior to the camera rolling)?
2. Did that lady perform the search according to how she was trained?
This is exactly what I was wondering after watching this video... I am wondering if the security got their asses chewed out or some shit prior to this happening. and they were given some kind of NO EXCEPTIONS rule or some goofy shit...
So what did you mean? Random people just wonder onto your property and then you can legally feel them up and put your hands down their pants? ![]()
So what did you mean? Random people just wonder onto your property and then you can legally feel them up and put your hands down their pants? ![]()
Quit lying you wouldnt do jack shit but stand there and take it like the bitch you are.![]()
Quit lying you wouldnt do jack shit but stand there and take it like the bitch you are.![]()
If anyone else put their hands inside the pants of a 6 year old girl and felt her like that it would be, but apparently it’s not as long as it’s done by a government employee with excuse of keeping us safe.
If anyone else put their hands inside the pants of a 6 year old girl and felt her like that it would be, but apparently it’s not as long as it’s done by a government employee with excuse of keeping us safe.
If anyone else put their hands inside the pants of a 6 year old girl and felt her like that it would be, but apparently it’s not as long as it’s done by a government employee with excuse of keeping us safe.
If anyone else put their hands inside the pants of a 6 year old girl and felt her like that it would be, but apparently it’s not as long as it’s done by a government employee with excuse of keeping us safe.
Books you dominated the entire thread and won every single argument hands down.
Rest of this blathering nonsense is clogging up GD.
Books you dominated the entire thread and won every single argument hands down.
Rest of this blathering nonsense is clogging up GD.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.