All Forums | College Football

Navy at Rutgers (09/07/2007)

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6233
Posts: 145
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 23333
Posted: #76
Quote Originally Posted by charlielo55:

Quote Originally Posted by 3rd_and_Long:

Failed to mention that I also had Indy, didn't see you on a side.

Suggestion from a veteran, make your plays, earn some respect and do it without bashing others. I wish you much success this season. By all means though, fade me if you think that's a good idea.

I earned my respect in here by picking winners but more importantly by the way I carry myself in these forums.

I wasn't on a side, just leaned into the total bet. your reputation proceeds, you, and I mean that in a good way. Thanks for the sound advise. Take a look at this thread, everyone is on Rutgers, even Phancard.....ha ha. GL to all. Navy+16

 Just don't like to see anybody get called out, nor would I do it to anyone else. GL

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1805
Posted: #77
thinking under here too Bigeiii seems like number is to high for this game
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 5870
Posted: #78
Added RU w/ the longest TD Prop. RU to score 1st as well.

GLA!
bigeiii
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 17
Posted: #79
Navy is the play here with a possible back door cover
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 105
Posted: #80

I can't see Navy putting up too many points tonight. RU D is stronger than last year. Gotta go with the UNDER.

GLA

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 476
Posted: #81
Bodog SUCKS!
 
I want tease rut -10 with Under 56 but bodog has the total circled.....they're a bunch of pussies and their payout time lags badly...although thy make it real easy to deposit...just had to vent 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 105
Posted: #82
3RD and LONG,  Didn't see the Owls last week.  Thanks for the info. Taken RU straight up as well as the UNDER.  Good Luck!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 130
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by jdawg07:

Bodog SUCKS!
 
I want tease rut -10 with Under 56 but bodog has the total circled.....they're a bunch of pussies and their payout time lags badly...although thy make it real easy to deposit...just had to vent 

I agree with that shiz.  As for the game, I was liking RU but havn't been able to pull the trigger.  Not sure what it is.  Under is looking better than a side.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 711
Posted: #84
Rutgers will win with all backups in this game!!!
 
Rutgers 47
 
Navy  2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 105
Posted: #85
Navy 2!   interesting
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1203
Posted: #86
I took Rutgers and the over 49. Why? I dont know. Bet against myself. So hopefully the final score is 37-20
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 8330
Posted: #87
I'm trying to discipline myself from not touching this game and staying away from this thread to stop my temptation.
 
I keep on peeking in from time to time to see if there is some info to make me change my mind and play this game...
 
bigeiii  your under looks good I assume that you will buy up a few points? My line is at 49.5. but still thinking.............
 
I should put up a prop wager with my friends on whether or not I'll touch anything on this game.
 
What's a good line for that prop?
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 87
Posted: #88
I'm on Rutgers and the under. Got it at -16 and 48. I think Rutgers will run all over Navy but the clock will tick, tick, tick as both teams try to get it done all the ground all night.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1805
Posted: #89
Bets are in
Rutgers 1st half -9 1/2
Rutgers Game -16 1/2

GL to all
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1937
Posted: #90
In last years 34-0 beating.  I believe the starting quarterback for navy was out....they had a hard time running the ball without him.
 
Didnt watch the temple navy game.....but i think navy can score on rutgers....I still believe rutgers will win and probably cover.
 
I think playing at home will give rutgers a big lift.....enough to cover
as for the over under....that can go either way...it depends on what rutgers wants to do after a big lead. My gut says the under..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1805
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddyhpd:

I'm trying to discipline myself from not touching this game and staying away from this thread to stop my temptation.
 
I keep on peeking in from time to time to see if there is some info to make me change my mind and play this game...
 
bigeiii  your under looks good I assume that you will buy up a few points? My line is at 49.5. but still thinking.............
 
I should put up a prop wager with my friends on whether or not I'll touch anything on this game.
 
What's a good line for that prop?

I got 8 1/2-2 u will gamble
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 3124
Posted: #92
RUTGERS
minus nine
first half
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 1
Posted: #93
Hi fellas -
 
New to this forum, but really enjoy hearing your thoughts.  Looking forward to a big year.  Started the football season well.  Looking for a big win from Rutgers -17.  Navy is no match and I think last nights college game will make Rutgers realize not to take this game lightly.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 42
Posted: #94

Stupid game last night... Well I'm jumping on the bandwagon and going with RUTGERS tonight too.... I agree that navy's running game is good. But Rutgers' rush defense is better.

Rutgers

Rutgers + Over

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 80
Posted: #95
man i really hate going with the favorite, but i did it last night with indy so i guess i'll go against my gut and go rutgers -16.5.
 
i can't possibly see how navy is going to score on rutgers.  everyone and their mother knows navy is running the ball, stack 8 in the box and make em pass.
 
they only threw 7 times against temple. SEVEN!!!
 
i'm gonna go with the under here as well, i just don't see how navy can score.....but then again i am a BC fan and they made it damn close last yr in the bowl game against my boys....i hate this game GL ALL
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1373
Posted: #96
RUTGERS BIG  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 116
Posted: #97

I think Rutgers will need 1Q to 2 to adjust to the option:

NAVY +3.5 1st Quarter

NAVY +9.5 First Half

OVER 24 Ist Half

But Rutgers will be too much for Navy in the second half.

RUTGERS -17 Full Game

 

GL All.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 1805
Posted: #98
Quote Originally Posted by Jets29:

I think Rutgers will need 1Q to 2 to adjust to the option:

NAVY +3.5 1st Quarter

NAVY +9.5 First Half

OVER 24 Ist Half

But Rutgers will be too much for Navy in the second half.

RUTGERS -17 Full Game

 

GL All.


This same Defense held Navy to 113 yds on ground last year no adjustment needed. Just got to hope for clean game no turnovers or bad penalties and Rutgers will cover 1st half also they are hyping  Rice for Heisman and this is National TV

But Ive been wrong before IE last nite lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 233
Posted: #99
I got Rutgers in the 1st quarter -4 and the game -16 POD 4 ME
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 233
Posted: #100
Rutgers comes out with a purpose
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.