51-39-3
Southern Miss -11
Central Michigan -9.5
Central Michigan -9.5
This game caught my eye as well, seeing what type of line I'll get with CMU.....Akron is awful.
![]()
Central Michigan -9.5
This game caught my eye as well, seeing what type of line I'll get with CMU.....Akron is awful.
![]()
This game caught my eye as well, seeing what type of line I'll get with CMU.....Akron is awful.
![]()
Yeah, I mentioned last week that I would be fading CMU the rest of the season because of internal issues within the team but I didn't expect the line to be this low against Akron. This line is a joke. CMU has issues on defense as well as a dysfunctional team chemistry but their strength of schedule has been very strong so far this year. They've played at Kentucky, Michigan State and NC State as well as at Western Michigan and Ball State. CMU thumped N. Illinois at home. Their one bad loss came two weeks ago at home against Eastern.....or was it a bad loss? Eastern is now 5-3 after an impressive win at home against Western last week. Shit, up until now, Eastern hadn't won 5 games in the last 4 years. In fact, the only bad game Eastern has played was on the road at Toledo and they were actually in the game at half. Anyway, I don't see any reason why CMU can't put up at least 500 yds on Akron. Radcliff got off to a poor start this year but he's finally becoming consistent through the air....2184 yds, 16 td's, 12 int's....most of the int's were earlier this season. CMU does have a strong offensive line so when they don't have to play from behind, they are able to control the clock and run the ball effectively as well. In my opinion, CMU wins by at least 17 points this weekend.
This game caught my eye as well, seeing what type of line I'll get with CMU.....Akron is awful.
![]()
Yeah, I mentioned last week that I would be fading CMU the rest of the season because of internal issues within the team but I didn't expect the line to be this low against Akron. This line is a joke. CMU has issues on defense as well as a dysfunctional team chemistry but their strength of schedule has been very strong so far this year. They've played at Kentucky, Michigan State and NC State as well as at Western Michigan and Ball State. CMU thumped N. Illinois at home. Their one bad loss came two weeks ago at home against Eastern.....or was it a bad loss? Eastern is now 5-3 after an impressive win at home against Western last week. Shit, up until now, Eastern hadn't won 5 games in the last 4 years. In fact, the only bad game Eastern has played was on the road at Toledo and they were actually in the game at half. Anyway, I don't see any reason why CMU can't put up at least 500 yds on Akron. Radcliff got off to a poor start this year but he's finally becoming consistent through the air....2184 yds, 16 td's, 12 int's....most of the int's were earlier this season. CMU does have a strong offensive line so when they don't have to play from behind, they are able to control the clock and run the ball effectively as well. In my opinion, CMU wins by at least 17 points this weekend.
51-39-3
Southern Miss -11
Central Michigan -9.5
51-39-3
Southern Miss -11
Central Michigan -9.5
Lines just came out in my book....CMU is actually -10 so I made a play at that number and not 9.5. My first 4 plays of the week.....
CMU -10
Southern Miss -11
Nebraska -4
USC +9
Lines just came out in my book....CMU is actually -10 so I made a play at that number and not 9.5. My first 4 plays of the week.....
CMU -10
Southern Miss -11
Nebraska -4
USC +9
Thanks for the tip...I'll take a look at Iowa ![]()
Thanks for the tip...I'll take a look at Iowa ![]()
Lines just came out in my book....CMU is actually -10 so I made a play at that number and not 9.5. My first 4 plays of the week.....
CMU -10![]()
Southern Miss -11
Nebraska -4![]()
USC +9
Lines just came out in my book....CMU is actually -10 so I made a play at that number and not 9.5. My first 4 plays of the week.....
CMU -10![]()
Southern Miss -11
Nebraska -4![]()
USC +9
Good luck buddy...I posted a paragraph in MilfHunters thread regarding the USC/Stanford line and a few reasons why I like USC to cover.....We've got a winner ![]()
Good luck buddy...I posted a paragraph in MilfHunters thread regarding the USC/Stanford line and a few reasons why I like USC to cover.....We've got a winner ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.