Posted:
#126
Driskel has been named the starter, total should drop to 25.5.
0
*** Week 7 NCAA Football ***
Posted:
#131
Quote Originally Posted by CarterSECpicks:
Chicken I totally agree with you. If any other QB for an undefeated 3 rd ranked team in the country who had just lead his team from 14 down in the 4th quarter over the number 1 ranked team in the nation, he would be getting a lot of positive pub and surly would be a heisman candidate.
Bo Wallace gets an unfair shake from these liberal reporters. If all these people that put down Bo would actually watch this guy play the game instead of reading what these idiots write they would stop their criticism
liberal reporters with their jackboots on the necks of the working quarterbacks.
0
Posted:
#134
Quote Originally Posted by packers1992:
Boom 1st i want 2 apologize that i have to do this in your thread but warcam is pissed for whatever reason at me. And with all due respect to boom and anyone here i bet my own plays good bad ugly or indifferent. Never once have i told anyone to bet a game i bet
Warcam idk why you're pissed but try to get over it buddy
No Sweat Buddie..We know your active and been around for awhile with us. Just keep plugging away and bringing your great College football Knowledge
Bet with your wallet,not your heart
0
Posted:
#136
Quote Originally Posted by Cover34:
funny that you are answering for Boom....or is this Boom who forgot which account he was logged in on? lol..... I see you both struggle with the same...there, their, and they're No Sweat Buddie..We know your active and been around for awhile with us. Just keep plugging away and bringing your great College football Knowledge
0
Posted:
#137
Quote Originally Posted by tideman:
funny that you are answering for Boom....or is this Boom who forgot which account he was logged in on? lol..... I see you both struggle with the same...there, their, and they're
funny that you are answering for Boom....or is this Boom who forgot which account he was logged in on? lol..... I see you both struggle with the same...there, their, and they're
EastBound & Down Type deal. I'm Kenny Powers, opps I mean Boom's Assistant...hahahaha
Bet with your wallet,not your heart
0
Posted:
#138
Quote Originally Posted by Sabanade:
You are a homer, so no one should take you seriously. Those 4 teams are mediocre at best. Don't even bring up LaTech and LSU without embarrassing yourself. Arkansas is improved, but still 0-fer and the worst team in the SECW. At K St. was their only real battle and AUBURN SHOULD HAVE LOST if not for missed FG's and a fluke azz INT from the 1 yard line when it bounced off a WIDE OPEN receiver in the end zone.
People like you try to prove your BS to make yourself feel better because you know your team is not as potent as they were last year.... and it's not even close. It doesn't matter, because AUB will lose at least two games. Take care and fkk off 
YOU'RE calling ME a homer???
I've lived on the West Coast my entire life, and I have never even been an SEC homer let alone and Auburn homer!
I am as objective as it is possible for a CFB fan to be, because I am a fan of NOT team! You got a lot of nerve calling someone else a homer!
Auburn will not lose 2 games this year... they could lose to A&M because A&M will be targeting that as a revenge game and they are pass-happy enough to get Auburn into a shootout, and could even get a come-from-behind win... but Miss St and Alabama do not pose a serious threat to Auburn...
K St was beaten by Auburn statistically in every category! You idiots who try to blame a few missed FGs by a terrible FG kicker, are too simple-minded to take seriously!
Auburn won:
- First downs
- Time of possession
- Total Yards
- Rushing Yards
- Yards per Pass
- Yards per Rush
- Turnovers
They surrendered a meaningless TD late in the game to make it look closer than it was, while playing a prevent defense, and they ended the game by running out the last 2 minutes by taking 3 straight knees, deep in K St territory... meaning they could have scored more if they really needed to!
You're clueless... I'm not... end of story!
0
Posted:
#139
Shark, you too busy huffing Malzahn's and Marshall's jocks to be objective. Auburn is not as strong as last year, and will lose at least two games. We will find out about them this weekend at Miss St. They win convincingly, and I will start agreeing with you. But beating up on these mediocre teams so far hasn't impressed me much.
0
Posted:
#140
So which team has done something "impressive" if Auburn's wins against LSU, K St and Arkansas don't mean anything to you?
And to say Auburn isn't as good as last year makes no sense... their defense (as I've already shown you) is significantly better, and this year they've added a potent passing game to their offense... why are they "not as strong as last year?"
You say a lot of things but you never have anything to support it... and even after Auburn beats Miss St, you still won't give them credit, so let's not entertain that delusion.
0
Posted:
#142
Quote Originally Posted by Shark_Attack:
So which team has done something "impressive" if Auburn's wins against LSU, K St and Arkansas don't mean anything to you?
So which team has done something "impressive" if Auburn's wins against LSU, K St and Arkansas don't mean anything to you?
And to say Auburn isn't as good as last year makes no sense... their defense (as I've already shown you) is significantly better, and this year they've added a potent passing game to their offense... why are they "not as strong as last year?"
You say a lot of things but you never have anything to support it... and even after Auburn beats Miss St, you still won't give them credit, so let's not entertain that delusion.
Auburn had the #1 rushing O in the nation last year at 328/gm. So far this year, they are #18 at 268/gm. Yea, they have made up for it by throwing for 50 more yards a game (from #100 passing offense in 2013 to #77 this year). The problem is if Auburn has to depend on Marshall throwing the ball to win big games this year, they will lose a couple. It seems as if teams have caught on to Malzahn's O, and forcing Marshall to throw is the way to beat them. Good luck Saturday. I think Miss St. shuts them down, very much like they did last year.
0
Posted:
#143
Quote Originally Posted by Sabanade:
Auburn had the #1 rushing O in the nation last year at 328/gm. So far this year, they are #18 at 268/gm. Yea, they have made up for it by throwing for 50 more yards a game (from #100 passing offense in 2013 to #77 this year). The problem is if Auburn has to depend on Marshall throwing the ball to win big games this year, they will lose a couple. It seems as if teams have caught on to Malzahn's O, and forcing Marshall to throw is the way to beat them. Good luck Saturday. I think Miss St. shuts them down, very much like they did last year.
I haven't figured out yet who I'm taking but Aub won 24-20 last year at Auburn. They are both great teams and I think it will be a close game, but right now I'm slightly leaning toward Miss St. although have a lotta respect for Auburn. May flip a coin LMAO!
0
Posted:
#148
Quote Originally Posted by GoooIRISH:
Hi BOOM,
Hi BOOM,
How confident are you in your Clemson -11.5 pick? I see now the line has moved down to -10 and has been pretty steady there. Is this more of a pick for your team or are you very confident the Tigers will cover the spread here?
Thanks,
IRISH
Statically Louisville is the best defense in the country. Too bad I don't believe that. Only 2 players from that defense could start at Clemson. But with that said I think Louisville is a good team led by a good head coach....not a good guy, but a good coach.
Overall I don't think Louisville can move the ball with much success in this game. Clemson is now playing at a high level. ( just wish Watson started from day 1 ).... I think we are looking at a Clemson win.
31 - 10
0
Hot Forum Topics
