Posted:
#101
page fix
0
*** Week 11 NCAA Football ***
Posted:
#111
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
33/34 on XP 97%......................11/13 on FG 84.6 % FG Don't let facts confuse you troll..... You fail again  Oh I forgot, this is Boom land, TRUE, COMPLETE Facts don't count...only just enough of the facts to make your argument correct. Let's just pretend the kicker (Blewitt...bad name for a kicker) is a freshmen and there's only one year of stats that we should consider, right? But why stop there when you could make your argument SO MUCH STRONGER. Let's say anything before OT of their game this past weekend is irrelevant. Then he'd be 1/1 on FGs and 1/1 on XPs, kicking 100%. How could I argue those numbers? I suggest you quit after your next winning pick and only count that one in your record...then you'd be a 100% winning handicapper. Sort of like not counting your 2H chaser bets a couple years back huh? |
0
Posted:
#112
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
Sparty/Bucks total at 58 seems a bit high doesnt it? Both teams facing the best defense either has seen.....I really thought i would see 48.5-51.......
Sparty/Bucks total at 58 seems a bit high doesnt it? Both teams facing the best defense either has seen.....I really thought i would see 48.5-51.......
was my fist thoughts as well...
I seen it at 60.
I do lean under and may play under before it's over with
0
Posted:
#117
Quote Originally Posted by naesiy:
Oh I forgot, this is Boom land, TRUE, COMPLETE Facts don't count...only just enough of the facts to make your argument correct.
Let's just pretend the kicker (Blewitt...bad name for a kicker) is a freshmen and there's only one year of stats that we should consider, right? But why stop there when you could make your argument SO MUCH STRONGER. Let's say anything before OT of their game this past weekend is irrelevant. Then he'd be 1/1 on FGs and 1/1 on XPs, kicking 100%. How could I argue those numbers?
I suggest you quit after your next winning pick and only count that one in your record...then you'd be a 100% winning handicapper. Sort of like not counting your 2H chaser bets a couple years back huh?
Oh I forgot, this is Boom land, TRUE, COMPLETE Facts don't count...only just enough of the facts to make your argument correct.
Let's just pretend the kicker (Blewitt...bad name for a kicker) is a freshmen and there's only one year of stats that we should consider, right? But why stop there when you could make your argument SO MUCH STRONGER. Let's say anything before OT of their game this past weekend is irrelevant. Then he'd be 1/1 on FGs and 1/1 on XPs, kicking 100%. How could I argue those numbers?
I suggest you quit after your next winning pick and only count that one in your record...then you'd be a 100% winning handicapper. Sort of like not counting your 2H chaser bets a couple years back huh?
0
Posted:
#121
'Cuse is such a bold, solid pick. Then again, so was Pitt last weekend. Cutcliffe finds ways to not only win these games, but cover by the skin of teeth.
How Chris Blew-it missed that 26-yard chip shot to JUST PUSH at Heinz Field still goes down in infamy as one of my worst beats. Better yet, why Chryst called a quarterback draw to the right hash where Chris is traditionally terrible from as the last play before the potential GW FG is further over my head.
Just don't know if I can get back in the ring against these Blue Devils. 
0
Posted:
#122
Quote Originally Posted by Boom_Boom:
I should be as shamed?
You are a Old Miss fan....am I wrong?
Of course you feel that way.
Let's cry about the " unfortunate " things that have went against Old Miss....
Look...everyone in the country has " miss fortunate things that happen to them all the time... Look, Clemson has had the same things....and I understand. Believe me, I understand.
But let's stop just dismissing the facts... Old Miss LOST.
I have nothing against Old Miss....But if any poll has them in the top 15, it's ridiculous and SEC bias if they do.
No team in the country could lose back to back games and remain in the top 15....unless of course we are talking about Alabama...and that's a whole set of rules.
I should be as shamed?
You are a Old Miss fan....am I wrong?
Of course you feel that way.
Let's cry about the " unfortunate " things that have went against Old Miss....
Look...everyone in the country has " miss fortunate things that happen to them all the time... Look, Clemson has had the same things....and I understand. Believe me, I understand.
But let's stop just dismissing the facts... Old Miss LOST.
I have nothing against Old Miss....But if any poll has them in the top 15, it's ridiculous and SEC bias if they do.
No team in the country could lose back to back games and remain in the top 15....unless of course we are talking about Alabama...and that's a whole set of rules.
Ah there it is. Was waiting for the anti Bama remarks. Didn't know they lost back to back though.
0
Posted:
#123
I don't get why some folks have to prove to other folks who is right and who is wrong.We are grown men with the same universal goal....Win money doing what we love.Blowoutgun,take it down a few notches bro.U aren't a good CFB capper u are a great one so let's don't get into all this argueing.I'm guilty 
of it too....Anyhow,If there is anyone I would consult on tonight's game 0its Boom..My book has it down to Clemson
-21 & 43.5..1st half Clem-12.5& 21.5...Team Totals Clemson 32 & Wake 11....I went 9-1 Mon,but have taking beatings Tues and Wed losing Mon night's winnings.My soccer( who has been around 55 to 58% last year) guy who texts me plays went 0-3 on his totals and I played Manchester City -285 which I usually never play anything on ML over 200 unless its MMA.My only win last night was NoIlinois.I just can't get a good read on this Browns- Bengals.I want to play this Clemson game tonight.It really is a waste of time to argue about conferences and which team would beat this team when they aren't scheduled.Boom,really wanted to get your opinion on this Clemson game.I feel like I'm finding a groove with these team totals.When u play totals for both teams one team can screw the whole play out.Bro,I play NFL,NBA,MMA,NCAAB,NCAAW,CFL,WNBA( might be the easiest sport out there),MLB...I also play poker on line ,but that's usually during Summer.I'm sick as a fat dog so I'm at home.U are prob at work and won't get this until later,but I want your opinion on tonight...Respectfully request.
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.