I agree that Under is the play. BOL
If you think NC will score less than 10 points then the parlay is the way to go. But do you realize the odds of a Division 1 football team scoring less than 10 points in a game? It's a bad bet no matter what you say.
yeah, okay... it's such a bad bet that pinnacle wouldn't even accept the parlay.... i had to use the Greek... this is a correlated play. ![]()
If you think NC will score less than 10 points then the parlay is the way to go. But do you realize the odds of a Division 1 football team scoring less than 10 points in a game? It's a bad bet no matter what you say.
yeah, okay... it's such a bad bet that pinnacle wouldn't even accept the parlay.... i had to use the Greek... this is a correlated play. ![]()
yeah, okay... it's such a bad bet that pinnacle wouldn't even accept the parlay.... i had to use the Greek... this is a correlated play. ![]()
I'm not argueing with you. In fact, I hope you win your plays. I'm just saying that by taking a parlay with VT and the under, NC would only be able to score 12 points which means they would likely score either 10 points for your cover or score 13 or more points for a loss. I made this point when the total was 42. The line has since moved so NC would now be able to score 13 for your parlay cover. How can anyone like the odds of your parlay when only 6% of D1 games end with a team scoring less than 10 points in a game.
yeah, okay... it's such a bad bet that pinnacle wouldn't even accept the parlay.... i had to use the Greek... this is a correlated play. ![]()
I'm not argueing with you. In fact, I hope you win your plays. I'm just saying that by taking a parlay with VT and the under, NC would only be able to score 12 points which means they would likely score either 10 points for your cover or score 13 or more points for a loss. I made this point when the total was 42. The line has since moved so NC would now be able to score 13 for your parlay cover. How can anyone like the odds of your parlay when only 6% of D1 games end with a team scoring less than 10 points in a game.
I'm not argueing with you. In fact, I hope you win your plays. I'm just saying that by taking a parlay with VT and the under, NC would only be able to score 12 points which means they would likely score either 10 points for your cover or score 13 or more points for a loss. I made this point when the total was 42. The line has since moved so NC would now be able to score 13 for your parlay cover. How can anyone like the odds of your parlay when only 6% of D1 games end with a team scoring less than 10 points in a game.
that is very generalized... lets look at how many teams go into Blacksburg who are dogged by 16.5 points with a total of 43... how many points do they score? can't look at all schools as an average... that is very misleading. I firmly believe that UNC will not score more than 13 points. Thus, this is the course of action that will be most profitable in the long-term
I'm not argueing with you. In fact, I hope you win your plays. I'm just saying that by taking a parlay with VT and the under, NC would only be able to score 12 points which means they would likely score either 10 points for your cover or score 13 or more points for a loss. I made this point when the total was 42. The line has since moved so NC would now be able to score 13 for your parlay cover. How can anyone like the odds of your parlay when only 6% of D1 games end with a team scoring less than 10 points in a game.
that is very generalized... lets look at how many teams go into Blacksburg who are dogged by 16.5 points with a total of 43... how many points do they score? can't look at all schools as an average... that is very misleading. I firmly believe that UNC will not score more than 13 points. Thus, this is the course of action that will be most profitable in the long-term

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.