Vegas's sharpest bettors bowl bets.....

Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:

keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them

interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack

Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:

keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them

interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack

Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:

keeping in mind - even with 57% capper such as Walters after the line instantly moves a point or more the new adjusted line will affect those getting in later will have a lower winning percentage although still much better than their own. I'm only 429-332 (56.4%) (70-41 large) in three years on covers and some others hit a decent percentage as well, so the difference in percentage from covers cappers to vegas best not as much as some might think especially considering you won't get the numbers they get - would be interesting if one could post these for the entire year at the number actually wagered (vs what number they got early) and see how the percentage for season comes out, probably good similar to your results this season trailing them

interesting info and look like good picks, thanks for posting cjack

Quote Originally Posted by jimmbo:

you want to buy some swamp land in fla.  dizney is interested, but im giving you first shot.  happy new year

Quote Originally Posted by DiamondNick:

It would appear that Sports Handicapping Contest have made public information  that might have been more restricted in past years. It almost looks like a PR tool that Casinos and Books in Vegas use to promote public interest in their Gambling Houses. There Sports Radio programs on that are supported by Books in Vegas and have been for years. It is a multi billion dollar bussiness and if the US government would support it properly it would create a huge tax base to help ballance our budget. Read and compare CJ's info be responsible and enjoy the holliday's...   G L All 

Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:

Better put, this guy is one of the best and well known players in Vegas. Sports betting is his profession for years. Ride his plays and you will win in the LONG RUN.

Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:



  Why do you want sports gambling taxed?  That is the one of the worst ideas I've ever heard. 

Quote Originally Posted by bastar:

Fezzik
Wyoming +11
Mid Tenn St-Southern Miss OVER 57
Steelers -2
Panthers +10
Browns-Chiefs OVER 37
Titans -3 (2nd best bet)
Redskins +3 (Best Bet)

Lance Blankenship
Central Florida +2.5
Cowboys +7
Saints-Cowboys OVER 53.5
Packers +2
49ers +8
49ers-Eagles UNDER 42 (2nd best bet)
Raiders +14 (Best Bet)

Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

Well, if he's betting Texas as LARGE as you say, then the long run will be the only hope you have, because Texas will get trounced.  Any seasoned college football bettor knows NOT to bet against SEC teams in bowl games.  That's been a formula for disaster as long as I can remember, and will be again this year.

True, SEC teams are very good in bowl games, but remember.....this is TEXAS and they've been of a different breed when it's bowl time.  They win their bowl games.  Teams like OhioSt and OU haven't been very strong in bowl games, while teams like USC, Texas, LSU, and Florida have been killer.  So while the SEC usually does well in bowl games, especially BCS bowl games and championships......don't count out TEXAS.  They are good about showing up in big games, and they've got what it takes to give Alabama all they want.