Posted:
#26
0
Vegas's sharpest bettors bowl bets.....
appreciate very much.
Posted:
#29
Quote Originally Posted by rubberneck:
seems lot a lot of BS-no cred. at
all
seems lot a lot of BS-no cred. at
all Simple as you not following the picks then. I don't need to impress anybody or share these plays. I do it because of how profitable I have been the last 2 years.
If you know who Billy Walters and Fezzik are, and you don't want their picks, you aren't betting sports to make money, you are betting it just for the hell of it.....
0
Posted:
#33
Quote Originally Posted by The Garfather:
In the last day or so, A&M/UGA went from 64 to 65.5 and that pisses me off because I had the OVER capped as a pretty decent play.
You were right on that one and the info seems solid. I tend to agree with those plays. Good luck.
In the last day or so, A&M/UGA went from 64 to 65.5 and that pisses me off because I had the OVER capped as a pretty decent play.
You were right on that one and the info seems solid. I tend to agree with those plays. Good luck.
I was told by Fezzik myself as he was betting in our book that his exclusive bowl play was the Georgia/A&M over 64. He said I am guaranteeing the line moves to 66 within the next 24 hours so if you're going to bet it, do it tonight. So we all at our book pounded our offshore accounts. And today, what happened....? Fezzik pounded it at EVERY book and the line has moved. I am giving you guys inside information.... if you don't want to believe me, then please move on. For those who are interested just follow along and enjoy the profits.
0
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by Texasfan:
unfortunately, I'm not getting those lines.
unfortunately, I'm not getting those lines.
A majority of these lines are gone because the sharpest people in the sports betting industry are on them. Their action alone moves the line, not the amount they bet. Don't be scared to do bet these same sides a point off.....these are the sharpest minds in the industry.
0
Posted:
#35
Okay, I think Cjack has some credibility.
But to prove that you're heavily involved in the sportsbook biz, then tell me what happened to a particular important guy at the "M" sports and rack book back in October.
You should know what I'm talking about. Of course, you can Google it, but if you can answer shortly after this posts (it appears you're on this site now, periodically checking out your thread), then you're legit.
But to prove that you're heavily involved in the sportsbook biz, then tell me what happened to a particular important guy at the "M" sports and rack book back in October.
You should know what I'm talking about. Of course, you can Google it, but if you can answer shortly after this posts (it appears you're on this site now, periodically checking out your thread), then you're legit.
0
Posted:
#36
Cjack. It does look like you are able to find what some of these top pro gamblers are playing in the bowls. As someone mentioned, it's like getting the keys to the city, having info most bettors don't have or are even aware of. You can see from some of the comments here that some of the guys here are very excited that you will be posting this info. Those are the guys whose comments you should read.
Why waste your time trying to justify what you are posting to the couple of jerks who think they are important by questioning your intent. Just keep posting what you are getting, enjoy the winnings and the thanks from the others here who will also be making good money from your info. That's all you need to do.
You do not have to prove yourself to anyone. The proof will be the plays you share. Don't even waste your time replying to anyone who wants to feel important by questioning your intent. You are doing everyone here a favor and that's the only way they should see what you are doing. Thanks and keep them coming as you get them.
Why waste your time trying to justify what you are posting to the couple of jerks who think they are important by questioning your intent. Just keep posting what you are getting, enjoy the winnings and the thanks from the others here who will also be making good money from your info. That's all you need to do.
You do not have to prove yourself to anyone. The proof will be the plays you share. Don't even waste your time replying to anyone who wants to feel important by questioning your intent. You are doing everyone here a favor and that's the only way they should see what you are doing. Thanks and keep them coming as you get them.
0
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by Cjack:
I was already on a few of them, but there's a difference between 4.5 and 6, know what I mean? I will no play or wait.
A majority of these lines are gone because the sharpest people in the sports betting industry are on them. Their action alone moves the line, not the amount they bet. Don't be scared to do bet these same sides a point off.....these are the sharpest minds in the industry.
0
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by lemonsky:
Okay, I think Cjack has some credibility.
But to prove that you're heavily involved in the sportsbook biz, then tell me what happened to a particular important guy at the "M" sports and rack book back in October.
You should know what I'm talking about. Of course, you can Google it, but if you can answer shortly after this posts (it appears you're on this site now, periodically checking out your thread), then you're legit.
Okay, I think Cjack has some credibility.
But to prove that you're heavily involved in the sportsbook biz, then tell me what happened to a particular important guy at the "M" sports and rack book back in October.
You should know what I'm talking about. Of course, you can Google it, but if you can answer shortly after this posts (it appears you're on this site now, periodically checking out your thread), then you're legit.
I am not sure why, but I know he got fired because I was trying to bet Gio Ponti to win the Breeders Cup at the 40-1 price they had. I went in there and they said all horse futures were down because the Director got fired. I am not sure why though.
0
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by c-money:
c-jack...question, these are the no's i got from my book: cal-3.5/ tex+5/ tex &m,georgia over 65/ neb,ari over 40.5/ ohio st,ore under 50.5/ texas tech-8. as you can see all are at least 1 point off your plays no. Are they still good....thanks
c-jack...question, these are the no's i got from my book: cal-3.5/ tex+5/ tex &m,georgia over 65/ neb,ari over 40.5/ ohio st,ore under 50.5/ texas tech-8. as you can see all are at least 1 point off your plays no. Are they still good....thanks
I would play all of those. I don't have most of the numbers I posted either because they get moved immediately when these guys bet them.
0
Posted:
#49
i have followed cjack ever since i started to see him post. i can say that i've won more than i've lost. a couple weeks back he called a few college bb games like it was taking candy from a baby. lines that weren't adjusted properly as he was all over them. thanks cjack good luck and wealth always.
0
Posted:
#50
i have followed cjack ever since i started to see him post. i can say that i've won more than i've lost. a couple weeks back he called a few college bb games like it was taking candy from a baby. lines that weren't adjusted properly as he was all over them. thanks cjack good luck and wealth always.
0
Hot Forum Topics
