Posted:
#51
Quote Originally Posted by vegasdennis:
sure I buy that
wow, im not gonna b able to sleep tonight! sure I buy that
0
Someone talk me out of taking USC -7....
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by Bonnaroo:
USC quarterback needs to impress me more. He looked good but, but he couldn't pass the ball more than 15 yards and that was several designed roll out weakside plays. OSU line will put more pressure on him forcing him to make quicker decsions. If they don't come up with a game plan to come up with more counters and other plays to keep the OSU D guessing. OSU will play a defense forcing OSU qb to beat them with the long ball. Its all about how the qb will plays. Buy a couple points for OSU and that should be enough. Feed back on this thinking please!!!
OSU has 3 defensive linemen that should get drafted in the top 4 rounds in Gibson, Heyward, and Worthington. With a healthy Wilson, they have all the tools to put pressure on any QB. This is USC though and USC has the best line in the country. This is the only mismatch the OSU def line will have all years. I hope they step up. If they do, OSU has a chance. If not, this will be a long game for Buckeye fans
0
Posted:
#53
I got nothin for ya WCT............at least nothing that hasn't already been said. Guys like godfather16 should just go to the espn mssg boards & argue his shit there. Fundamentally, USC has a better squad on both sides.........not an enormous differnce but it's real. Situationally, it doesn't get any better for osu.........for all the reasons already bantied about. The trends certainly go to USC. If the P10 was so bad compared to other confs., then how come noone has beaten USC outside the P10 since the "05 BCSCG? And it ain't because the Trojans are playing MAC teams......
0
Posted:
#54
Mr. Insight, so with tressel's game plan i really believe then that it comes down to the OSU safties. I really believe it comes down to usc quarterback being able to throw the ball. His delivey looked slow, and he can't throw the ball deep. Tressel knows this, and will play it to his advantage. I am not saying OSU will when; i just think it be close because of the talent on both sides of the field. Like i said by a couple points for OSU and watch a good game.
0
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by ValueforRent:
Come on, it's not always about who has the best team, is fastest or has the most talent. You know how these games with home dogs playing in front of a big crowd can go. They force a turnover early, recover a fumble, some fluky shit happens. Then they march down the field and score and all of the sudden the fans are going crazy, the confidence of the players has suddenly skyrocketed and the road team starts feeling it a little. Of course the inverse of this scenario can happen, but if it does pan out for the home dog in that way they can always overcome whatever obstacles there might be on paper.
Come on, it's not always about who has the best team, is fastest or has the most talent. You know how these games with home dogs playing in front of a big crowd can go. They force a turnover early, recover a fumble, some fluky shit happens. Then they march down the field and score and all of the sudden the fans are going crazy, the confidence of the players has suddenly skyrocketed and the road team starts feeling it a little. Of course the inverse of this scenario can happen, but if it does pan out for the home dog in that way they can always overcome whatever obstacles there might be on paper.
But you are talking about situational handicapping and IN FOOTBALL? Come on man. That shit is just IMPOSSIBLE to predict dude. Nooooooo way, i'd never bet on that man it's just nuts. You make no sense!. Everyone knows football games are decided by who has the better team on paper.
You're crazy.
Talent trumps situation
0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
While its easy to compare TP to VY, lets not pretend to think OSU has as much talent as Texas had that year. Texas was really fast on both sides of the ball. Very good running back, and wide receivers, and a great oline. EVerything OSU DOES NOT HAVE.
And the Texas defense wasnt too shabby.
So while its easy to compare TP to VY because he's a)Black, b) Fast, and c) can run or pass, it stops there and is null since the teams are different.
But like I said, I'm nervous about TP. Love that kid.
Don't know what relevance these games from 4 years ago have, but OSU really should have beaten this Texas team in 2005, they let it slip away. Also, they destroyed Texas the next year in Austin. They almost beat Texas last year in the BCS, and Texas was certainly a top 5 team. Seems like they were just as fast as Texas. So saying OSU is always a slow team is plain dumb.
0
Posted:
#59
Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Insight:
If any coach in this matchup is overrated it is the sweater vest. He got outcoached by Les Miles and Roon Zook for God's sake. He was lucky to have had Dantonio as a defensive coordinator or he would not have beaten Miami. So he beat Michigan and Llyod Carr for years. Lloyd Carr was a terrible coach and only one year did the sweater vest have less talent. He continues to show poor preparation and poor in-game adjustments. I have been an OSU fan for over 28 years, and he pisses me off.
And Espn was raving about his game plan against texas in the bowl game last year. It was fucking terrible. We only did well when we were so far behind that there was not gameplan besides let the players make plays... fucking sad really.
And I will agree with Garfather on this.... USC getting a bowl game at home every other year is fucking bullshit. I'm hoping they start doing a BCS game at New Yankee Stadium per the Steinbrunners desire for football and fat wallets. USC or Texas playing in the Freeze bowl, now that i would pay to see.
0
Posted:
#61
WestCoast,
I bet the line at 5.5 which I feel good about, the line getting to 7 tells me that alot of early action is on the Trojans, I actually figured the early bettors would take the SLOWkeyes because of the line being a full 3 points higher than the early season line
as you know with betting, nothing is ever guaranteed, anything can happen in college sports with these youngsters playing
for Ohio State to have a chance to win this game many things must happen
USC comes out and plays terrible in all aspects
MB makes alot of mistakes in the environment
Ohio State gets a special teams touchdown
Ohio State gets a defensive touchdown
Ohio State gets every call in the game
I have always had the opinion that you can't handicap a game in hopes of something bad happening to a certain team to have a chance to cover, anyone who has watched college football over the past 4 to 5 years knows the team speed at USC and Ohio St are not on the same level
facts for the matchup
- USC has the better coach (JT struggles with the big games)
- USC has more speed
- USC has the better offense
- USC has the better defense
- USC has some key players missing for this game due to injury
- USC has a really young inexperienced QB going in the Shoe
- Ohio State has revenge and a big point to prove to themselves
- Ohio State has a great homefield advantage, the Shoe is loud
- Ohio State has a mobile QB that can make plays when necessary
it is my opinion that someone who is going to bet Ohio State is doing so to fade the public, betting the line value based off the early season line being USC - 2 to - 3, hates USC, likes the feeling of climbing a moutain in below freezing temperatures just by chance they get to the top, is willing to race their Toyota Camry against an Aston Martin
the last two were of course jokes, but you get the point
USC is the public side in this game if you want to call it that, but who would you expect people to bet, I honestly don't see how anyone could feel good about backing Ohio State in this game, but that is just me, I tend to like betting on the team with a better coach and better talent so I will not try to talk you out of your bet
if this game is played 10 teams with this situation then I think USC wins 8 of 10 so there is a chance we have the wrong side, none of us win all of our bets and anything can happen, that being said, I still like USC regardless of what everyone else thinks or likes
USC - 5.5 for me
Trojans 30
SLOWkeyes 13
.
0
Posted:
#63
The crowd at Ohio Stadium will be loud and out for blood. Barkely will not be able to audible. Combine this with the fact unless Barkley is an amazing study, he will be working with a limited playbook and it seems the Trojan offense is kneecapped coming into this game. In both cases it seems the defense holds the advantage and the result "should" be a very low scoring game. Statistically when the Trojans win, it is by 20 or more and when they lose it is by 10 or less, so a close game does not favor them. Pryor's mobile quarterback play also works against USC, who has historically struggled against running quarterbacks in the Pete Carroll era....aka VY but we all know Pryor who has 1 yr. experience under his belt vs. USC is no VY but does run a 4.4 and can be elusive in the pocket. On a last note, It is unlikely that USC will be able to replicate what they were able to do last season with the losses of their defensive end, defensive tackle and all their linebackers.
0
Posted:
#65
1. The plane could crash.
2. The bus could get lost on the way to the 'shoe'.
3. Pete could take a bribe.
4. All 3 USC QBs could get hurt.
5. All 6 RBs could get hurt.
6. Lightning!
7. They spiked the Gatorade.
8. Jim Tressel learns to coach.
9. When pryor says "hike", the Buckeyes do.
10. No one to dot the i, and the game never starts.
Letterman, don't steal these.
0
Posted:
#66
Quote Originally Posted by Bonnaroo:
Mr. Insight, so with tressel's game plan i really believe then that it comes down to the OSU safties. I really believe it comes down to usc quarterback being able to throw the ball. His delivey looked slow, and he can't throw the ball deep. Tressel knows this, and will play it to his advantage. I am not saying OSU will when; i just think it be close because of the talent on both sides of the field. Like i said by a couple points for OSU and watch a good game.
I chuckled for a good 3 minutes after reading this. You'll soon find out Barkley throws a tremendous long ball. Why didnt you see it? No reason to let OSU see him throw it. He throws 65-70 yards in the air, EASILY. Best deep ball QB they've had since Palmer, and at this same stage, it was better. Slow delivery? Come on. Thats being a little ridiculous.
0
Posted:
#67
Quote Originally Posted by Godfather16:
Don't remember OSU being behind Texas much last year. maybe by a TD. I remember having a big bet on OSU +8 or so and it was never really in doubt.
Don't remember OSU being behind Texas much last year. maybe by a TD. I remember having a big bet on OSU +8 or so and it was never really in doubt.
You're right, i looked and we weren't behind till the 3rd quarter. 17-6. When a team with the offensive weapons of last year's buckeyes scores less than 6 points in an entire half of football, I personally consider that an ass whooping. If you count 12 quarters of football last year against elite competition (Texas, USC, and Penn St.) minus the 4th quarter vs. Texas..... do you know how many points we scored....? 15..... just over a point per quarter..... 5 field goals in 11 quarters, 5 field goals. There were 6 NFL players on that offense not counting Pryor. That my friend is coaching, and absolute pathetic FAILURE. Failure to Plan and failure to execute, period. As mentioned in another thread the level of recruit is falling as tOSU, no wonder, who wants to play for a team that doesn't score in big games. I'm obviously tired of it.
0
Posted:
#68
I was at the USC/Cal game last year which they won 17-3....although Cal was in the game until very late in the 4th. USC had a superior offense and defense than what USC has this year. one thing i noticed (also in the 06 Rose Bowl that i attended as well) is that USC defenders overpursue because of their speed. this is why they don't do well against mobile qbs, and i think TP averaged like 7 yds a carry last year and they will use him more on Saturday with empty backfields to utilize this advantage---seeing TP at the Fiesta Bowl last year, he reminds me of VY as he looks to go so slow while he's mowing you down (and if OSU ran him more in the FB, they would have won). USC's new linebackers on the outside are about to get a rude awakening. that is VERY hard to understand/prepare for in practice, even if they have McKnight act as TP.
i think OSU probably has at least an equal defense than Cal and is at home....which people really underestimate the Shoe's HFA. ask any Texas fan who went there in 2005. TX averaged like 50 points a game that year and only put up 24 in the Shoe as i recall...in a game that OSU should have won. also, remember the AZ game last year where USC really played a dud of a game offensively on the road.
USC's non-conference victories in the past (Arky, Auburn, Nebraska etc.) were of nowhere near the difficulty as playing in the Shoe. Sure, PSU beat OSU last year there, but they also are used to playing there.
USC also is known for hitting hard, but they really don't play well in coverage (the dbs)....Cal caught a lot of balls, but Mays jacked them up and hence the big plays didn't materialize. not sure OSU can exploit that weakness as TP hasn't shown me he can throw on the fly tremendously well and who are OSU receivers?
USC also is without Ronald Johnson who is their best possession/playmaker receiver imo---even above Damien Williams, who only really blew up against PSU in the Rose Bowl last year. that should allow OSU to cheat a safety up at times.
i think the game hinges on OSU being able to stop the run on 1st and 2nd down...if they can keep USC to 3rd and 6 type yardage, then Barkley will be forced to make plays which will determine the outcome of the game. TOs will be huge, and McKnight has been a fumbling machine since he got to USC, so they must really stress ball security.
VY beat OSU at the Shoe with his arm, and i think TP will have to make some plays down the middle with that cannon for OSU to win as well. a lot can be said of OSU poor offensive line this past week, but Pryor's legs can protect him there.
i haven't made a decision on the game, but most likely will take OSU small and sit back and enjoy.
0
Posted:
#73
[Quote: Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan]
Thats the same song and dance that gets you in trouble. Explain to me about OSU looking ahead to USC last year when they played Ohio? How did that turn out? Look ahead crap doesnt always make sense. Its an excuse to use for lazy people like you.
Lazy....C'mon playa! I will wax u all up and down any field any day. I guarentee I work alot harder in life than you do buddy.
I get all my personal "USC" info from my brother in-law who played with the Trojans along with Carson and Troy and he too says that Ohio St will give them a good game.
by the way Mr. 'know it all"
"LOOK AHEAD PRACTICES ARE NOT A MYTH"
You obviously have never EVER played college football.
(And I don't mean on your PS3)
Shootz!
0
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastTrojan:
please. Tell me there's something more besides
a) playing at OSU
b) true freshmen playing his first road game
c) Pryor
Tell me there are other reasons. I want someone to talk me out of it. Looking for reasons NOT to hammer the -7.
I've posted this several times, and nobody has any reasons (besides what I mentioned in a, b, and c) why USC doesnt demolish them. if its just a, b, and c, then USC kills them.
I hate betting on my team, so please, give me some reasons.
a: true
b: true
c: true
the only downside to USC is there isn't a stand out wide receiver...yet! They definitly have speed and very skilled WRs but nobody stands out amongst the group...Heck maybe they are all equally good...
That is the only thing I can possibly think of. Other than that they are fricken stacked, and Pete Carroll isn't going to put the game in the QBs hands. They will run and score on defense and try to keep the pressure off Barkley. I think they play a short pass game and utilize the TEs, use their speed on screens...keep Barkley confident.
OSU wants a little redemption that is for sure and what a better place to do it, at home.
It is going to be a hard fought game...
Regardless I still like the Trojans...Quarters, Half, ML, and to cover...They are on a mission and I don't think OSU is going to knock them off, particularly a Big 10 team.
GL with whatever you do!
0
Posted:
#75
I refuse to play this game because it's the GOW for most
But ON PAPER, USC is much better
History says: Pete beats Jimmy, every time, without fail
However:
There will be Big 10 zebras in the shoe, right? If not, and, honestly, I haven't researched it yet, which conferences' zebras will call the game?
Don't you think that EVERY CALL WILL GO OSU'S WAY?
I sure do........but that might not be enough for Jimmy to beat Pete anyway
But ON PAPER, USC is much better
History says: Pete beats Jimmy, every time, without fail
However:
There will be Big 10 zebras in the shoe, right? If not, and, honestly, I haven't researched it yet, which conferences' zebras will call the game?
Don't you think that EVERY CALL WILL GO OSU'S WAY?
I sure do........but that might not be enough for Jimmy to beat Pete anyway
0
Hot Forum Topics
