books will get 50% Oregon money at anything below 28.
Oregon is going to lose at Washington next week.
Posted:
#51
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
books will get 50% Oregon money at anything below 28.
books will get 50% Oregon money at anything below 28.
And this statement confirms my previous statement...
If Oregon was listed at (-28), casinos would get obliterated with UW money... no idea where you came up with this!
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
books will get 50% Oregon money at anything below 28.
books will get 50% Oregon money at anything below 28.
And this statement confirms my previous statement...
If Oregon was listed at (-28), casinos would get obliterated with UW money... no idea where you came up with this!
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by ceveche88:
UW has a great shot to win, but I will play it safe and take the points. Huskies are for real, they played a very sloppy game and still almost won against stanford, Home field will make the difference. Im with you motowner
UW has a great shot to win, but I will play it safe and take the points. Huskies are for real, they played a very sloppy game and still almost won against stanford, Home field will make the difference. Im with you motowner
gl sir
Quote Originally Posted by ceveche88:
UW has a great shot to win, but I will play it safe and take the points. Huskies are for real, they played a very sloppy game and still almost won against stanford, Home field will make the difference. Im with you motowner
UW has a great shot to win, but I will play it safe and take the points. Huskies are for real, they played a very sloppy game and still almost won against stanford, Home field will make the difference. Im with you motowner
gl sir
Posted:
#53
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
Last 2 weeks in Sept, a million posts for GIG and none for motowner
Then, Oct 1 to today, no posts for GIG and a million posts for motowner
And now this thread? What are the odds?
you have nothing intelligent to say, so you just troll instead?
you're pathetic.
get lost.
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
Last 2 weeks in Sept, a million posts for GIG and none for motowner
Then, Oct 1 to today, no posts for GIG and a million posts for motowner
And now this thread? What are the odds?
you have nothing intelligent to say, so you just troll instead?
you're pathetic.
get lost.
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
And this statement confirms my previous statement...
If Oregon was listed at (-28), casinos would get obliterated with UW money... no idea where you came up with this!
no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.
whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.
the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!
squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.
sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
And this statement confirms my previous statement...
If Oregon was listed at (-28), casinos would get obliterated with UW money... no idea where you came up with this!
no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.
whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.
the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!
squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.
sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
Last 2 weeks in Sept, a million posts for GIG and none for motowner
Then, Oct 1 to today, no posts for GIG and a million posts for motowner
And now this thread? What are the odds?
also, how stupid are you troll boy?
my join date was Oct 2012, not 2013..
again, GTFO troll!
Quote Originally Posted by thorpe:
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
I think motowner is a gridironguy SAF, or vice versa. This is the exact thread gridironguy would post. And, if you look at the post histories
Last 2 weeks in Sept, a million posts for GIG and none for motowner
Then, Oct 1 to today, no posts for GIG and a million posts for motowner
And now this thread? What are the odds?
also, how stupid are you troll boy?
my join date was Oct 2012, not 2013..
again, GTFO troll!
Posted:
#56
Let's all agee....take the OVER! lol Motowner does have a valid opinion. Washington outplayed Stanford but special teams doomed them. I just think it's a tough situation for a Washington team to have to play a team caliber of Oregon after a physical contest against Stanford the week before..
Let's all agee....take the OVER! lol Motowner does have a valid opinion. Washington outplayed Stanford but special teams doomed them. I just think it's a tough situation for a Washington team to have to play a team caliber of Oregon after a physical contest against Stanford the week before..
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by cherokee10:
This x 1000000
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
Quote Originally Posted by cherokee10:
This x 1000000
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
Posted:
#58
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
Gotcha, I'm 100% convinced now after that explanation.
Since you feel good about the situation, maybe create another thread about it? Maybe?
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
Gotcha, I'm 100% convinced now after that explanation.
Since you feel good about the situation, maybe create another thread about it? Maybe?
Posted:
#59
in a large group of posters, there are chances that some posters might sound similar. it's called the human condition.
people are more similar than they are different, but i don't expect you to know that.
p.s. enjoy this little streak ohio state is on because if you're lucky enough to get to the bcs title game you're gona get smacked.
4 close games vs lesser foes LY and then last night's game.
flukiest 18 gm run i've ever seen.

people are more similar than they are different, but i don't expect you to know that.
p.s. enjoy this little streak ohio state is on because if you're lucky enough to get to the bcs title game you're gona get smacked.
4 close games vs lesser foes LY and then last night's game.
flukiest 18 gm run i've ever seen.
in a large group of posters, there are chances that some posters might sound similar. it's called the human condition.
people are more similar than they are different, but i don't expect you to know that.
p.s. enjoy this little streak ohio state is on because if you're lucky enough to get to the bcs title game you're gona get smacked.
4 close games vs lesser foes LY and then last night's game.
flukiest 18 gm run i've ever seen.

people are more similar than they are different, but i don't expect you to know that.
p.s. enjoy this little streak ohio state is on because if you're lucky enough to get to the bcs title game you're gona get smacked.
4 close games vs lesser foes LY and then last night's game.
flukiest 18 gm run i've ever seen.
Posted:
#60
I'm sticking with my opinion on the game, but Gridironguy, you probably was popping off on here last year saying the same thing about Stanford not having a chance against Oregon.
I'm sticking with my opinion on the game, but Gridironguy, you probably was popping off on here last year saying the same thing about Stanford not having a chance against Oregon.
Posted:
#61
no i did not. i never said Stanford could not beat Oregon LY. Stanford is built perfectly to potentially beat Oregon, but not Wash. they played well last night but they do not have enough firepower to keep up with Oregon.
no i did not. i never said Stanford could not beat Oregon LY. Stanford is built perfectly to potentially beat Oregon, but not Wash. they played well last night but they do not have enough firepower to keep up with Oregon.
Posted:
#62
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.
all this "NO WAY Oregon loses" nonsense is the textbook definition of simpleton, lazy thinking.
there was also "NO WAY" Oregon was going to lose in any of their prior 6+ seasons and every time like clockwork they DID.
so just give it a rest already.
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
wow you really are dumb.
i'm sitting here completely disagreeing with motowner.
he is obviously an oregon duck hater.
if mariota is healthy, NO WAY washington beats them. NO WAY.
nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.
all this "NO WAY Oregon loses" nonsense is the textbook definition of simpleton, lazy thinking.
there was also "NO WAY" Oregon was going to lose in any of their prior 6+ seasons and every time like clockwork they DID.
so just give it a rest already.
Posted:
#63
i never said they would not lose the past 6 years.
you are doing the classic case of picking against a super hot team the first chance you get.
the truth is that in january 2011 i bet undefeated auburn over oregon.
it's about knowing WHEN to bet against a super hot team.
the time to bet AGAINST oregon is much more likely when they go to Stanford or if they host the pac 12 title game because it will be cold as hell in eugene that night.
just USC beat oregon in autzen in the cold of november 2011, and stanford last yr in autzen, the best time to beat oregon is when it's really cold or if you have a strong SEC team against them like Auburn was in 2010 (bcs title game jan 2011).
Wash is going to enter this track-meet without the proper horses.
you are doing the classic case of picking against a super hot team the first chance you get.
the truth is that in january 2011 i bet undefeated auburn over oregon.
it's about knowing WHEN to bet against a super hot team.
the time to bet AGAINST oregon is much more likely when they go to Stanford or if they host the pac 12 title game because it will be cold as hell in eugene that night.
just USC beat oregon in autzen in the cold of november 2011, and stanford last yr in autzen, the best time to beat oregon is when it's really cold or if you have a strong SEC team against them like Auburn was in 2010 (bcs title game jan 2011).
Wash is going to enter this track-meet without the proper horses.
i never said they would not lose the past 6 years.
you are doing the classic case of picking against a super hot team the first chance you get.
the truth is that in january 2011 i bet undefeated auburn over oregon.
it's about knowing WHEN to bet against a super hot team.
the time to bet AGAINST oregon is much more likely when they go to Stanford or if they host the pac 12 title game because it will be cold as hell in eugene that night.
just USC beat oregon in autzen in the cold of november 2011, and stanford last yr in autzen, the best time to beat oregon is when it's really cold or if you have a strong SEC team against them like Auburn was in 2010 (bcs title game jan 2011).
Wash is going to enter this track-meet without the proper horses.
you are doing the classic case of picking against a super hot team the first chance you get.
the truth is that in january 2011 i bet undefeated auburn over oregon.
it's about knowing WHEN to bet against a super hot team.
the time to bet AGAINST oregon is much more likely when they go to Stanford or if they host the pac 12 title game because it will be cold as hell in eugene that night.
just USC beat oregon in autzen in the cold of november 2011, and stanford last yr in autzen, the best time to beat oregon is when it's really cold or if you have a strong SEC team against them like Auburn was in 2010 (bcs title game jan 2011).
Wash is going to enter this track-meet without the proper horses.
Posted:
#64
Gridironguy, if you knew me, you would know that I have said in the past that Ohio State has a pathetic schedule and any SEC team or Oregon with one loss deserves to be considered in BCS title game over an undefeated Ohio State. Osu has to schedule one or two top tier non-conference games plus win them to be in that top tier, along with the rest of the Big 10. As of for the next few years, they are stuck playing these pathetic schedules due to they are agreed upon 5 years in advance. Hopefully it will be a wake up call for OSU and the rest of the Big 10 atheletic directors, etc....
Gridironguy, if you knew me, you would know that I have said in the past that Ohio State has a pathetic schedule and any SEC team or Oregon with one loss deserves to be considered in BCS title game over an undefeated Ohio State. Osu has to schedule one or two top tier non-conference games plus win them to be in that top tier, along with the rest of the Big 10. As of for the next few years, they are stuck playing these pathetic schedules due to they are agreed upon 5 years in advance. Hopefully it will be a wake up call for OSU and the rest of the Big 10 atheletic directors, etc....
Posted:
#65
go ahead and bet Wash ML if you want, and then go watch your money get pisssed down the drain.
Wash 'might' cover 14, but they are not winning this game unless Mariota gets hurt and taken out of the game.
you wana place your bets based on chances of injury?
be my guest and go lose then.
Wash 'might' cover 14, but they are not winning this game unless Mariota gets hurt and taken out of the game.
you wana place your bets based on chances of injury?
be my guest and go lose then.
go ahead and bet Wash ML if you want, and then go watch your money get pisssed down the drain.
Wash 'might' cover 14, but they are not winning this game unless Mariota gets hurt and taken out of the game.
you wana place your bets based on chances of injury?
be my guest and go lose then.
Wash 'might' cover 14, but they are not winning this game unless Mariota gets hurt and taken out of the game.
you wana place your bets based on chances of injury?
be my guest and go lose then.
Posted:
#66
Gridironguy, go to sleep. It's past your bedtime. Motowner has a valid point in what he's saying but your only comeback is attacking him and me. Mama is calling, go to bed before mama takes away your TV time and then you will not be able to watch Oregon-Washington at all.
Gridironguy, go to sleep. It's past your bedtime. Motowner has a valid point in what he's saying but your only comeback is attacking him and me. Mama is calling, go to bed before mama takes away your TV time and then you will not be able to watch Oregon-Washington at all.
Posted:
#67
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
Posted:
#69
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.
whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.
the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!
squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.
sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.
no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.
whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.
the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!
squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.
sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.
First, you are a little friggin kid! I have literally been gambling on college football since you were sperm!!!
Second, I have made no wager on this game, and have not made any claim that I would... so don't friggin presume your stupid behind has the first friggin clue what I would do!
Thirdly, the fact that the statement in RED was correct, has absolutely no correlation to the veracity of the statement in BLUE... which is, regardless of anything that happens with THIS line... a bunch of BULLSHIT!
You don't have a friggin clue... you're just another friggin mouth on this website whose biggest claim to game (BY FAR) is that it is home to the stupidest population of human beings on the planet!
Would you like to run for President, fool!?
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.
whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.
the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!
squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.
sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.
no they wouldn't, they'd still get 50% money on oregon at that number. you literally clueless.
whatsmore, i was 100% correct about my predicted spread range and corresponding money movements.
the line opened at -12 and was immediately SLAMMED up to -14!
squares were salivating at the opener and books have not got ANY washington money so far.
sharps will slam washington late knowing that squares like you will continue to feast on oregon at anything below 21.
First, you are a little friggin kid! I have literally been gambling on college football since you were sperm!!!
Second, I have made no wager on this game, and have not made any claim that I would... so don't friggin presume your stupid behind has the first friggin clue what I would do!
Thirdly, the fact that the statement in RED was correct, has absolutely no correlation to the veracity of the statement in BLUE... which is, regardless of anything that happens with THIS line... a bunch of BULLSHIT!
You don't have a friggin clue... you're just another friggin mouth on this website whose biggest claim to game (BY FAR) is that it is home to the stupidest population of human beings on the planet!
Would you like to run for President, fool!?
Posted:
#70
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
do you know how dumb that sounds? not only is that not true, but if there truly were a "zillion" people thinking oregon will lose this week.. then where are they? and why aren't they voting that way with their wallets at the windows?
instead, the reality is.. there are a "bagillion gazillion quatrillion" amount of people who think oregon not only wins this week, but covers the pointspread.
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
Wash has no advantage anywhere on the field and collectively the Oregon speed and scheme is too much for them.
14 point underdogs do not win straight up when the favorite is aware how good they are and it is a huge rivarly.
14 pt underdogs win when no one is talking about them. obviously people like motowner are talking about washington so they are no secret. he is one of a zillion fans thinking this is the week oregon will lose.
well, again, as long as marioti is not knocked out of the game, oregon will roll.
do you know how dumb that sounds? not only is that not true, but if there truly were a "zillion" people thinking oregon will lose this week.. then where are they? and why aren't they voting that way with their wallets at the windows?
instead, the reality is.. there are a "bagillion gazillion quatrillion" amount of people who think oregon not only wins this week, but covers the pointspread.
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.
nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.
This coming from the idiot who substitutes the term "SQUARE" in place of anything remotely substantive...
Congrats on somehow managing to expose your complete idiocy in only 3 pages of this thread!
Quote Originally Posted by motowner:
nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.
nothing intelligent to say, so just call the person a 'hater' instead. it's amazing how lazy you are.
This coming from the idiot who substitutes the term "SQUARE" in place of anything remotely substantive...
Congrats on somehow managing to expose your complete idiocy in only 3 pages of this thread!
Posted:
#72
Be very clear!
I am not bashing your play... I am bashing (1) your bullshit claims about the line... (2) your bullshit rhetoric in which you call anyone who presents any line of reasoning that opposes yours, a "SQUARE"... (3) and your general dipshit attitude!
Be very clear!
I am not bashing your play... I am bashing (1) your bullshit claims about the line... (2) your bullshit rhetoric in which you call anyone who presents any line of reasoning that opposes yours, a "SQUARE"... (3) and your general dipshit attitude!
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
First, you are a little friggin kid! I have literally been gambling on college football since you were sperm!!!
Second, I have made no wager on this game, and have not made any claim that I would... so don't friggin presume your stupid behind has the first friggin clue what I would do!
Thirdly, the fact that the statement in RED was correct, has absolutely no correlation to the veracity of the statement in BLUE... which is, regardless of anything that happens with THIS line... a bunch of BULLSHIT!
You don't have a friggin clue... you're just another friggin mouth on this website whose biggest claim to game (BY FAR) is that it is home to the stupidest population of human beings on the planet!
Would you like to run for President, fool!?
oh the tough talk! son, you're a typical square with a big mouth and have been proven wrong countless times already. far worse, you offer nothing analytical to this discussion and are wasting my time. i'm done making you look like a fool, now run along.
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
First, you are a little friggin kid! I have literally been gambling on college football since you were sperm!!!
Second, I have made no wager on this game, and have not made any claim that I would... so don't friggin presume your stupid behind has the first friggin clue what I would do!
Thirdly, the fact that the statement in RED was correct, has absolutely no correlation to the veracity of the statement in BLUE... which is, regardless of anything that happens with THIS line... a bunch of BULLSHIT!
You don't have a friggin clue... you're just another friggin mouth on this website whose biggest claim to game (BY FAR) is that it is home to the stupidest population of human beings on the planet!
Would you like to run for President, fool!?
oh the tough talk! son, you're a typical square with a big mouth and have been proven wrong countless times already. far worse, you offer nothing analytical to this discussion and are wasting my time. i'm done making you look like a fool, now run along.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 264,976
- Saturday 09/26/2026 514
- All About streak Survivor! 5,909
- POY: Clemson +1 at Cal 6,376
- NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,234
- Saturday Football 11,266
- ***Macwesties * Sat. Sept. 26, 2026 * Week #4 * NCAAF College Football Plays*** 5,286
- **$$$ MD Saturday 9/26 $$$** 6,472
- Tenn Sucks so bad 518
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 16,543
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
