• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    Next NCAA champion

    «First Previous 123
    jimmydafreak
    bookieassassin
    SatNightFever05
    pederson16
    thesoulpurpose
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 2036
    Posts: 73
    «First Previous 123
     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 23, 2011 - 10:38 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    Gotta FOCUS....

    Sure.....Boise doesn't deserve the equal billing they receive each year with Bama and others.....

    THAT is not the issue here.....for ONE game..what are they capable of ?

    ANSWER?....beating most any team on a given night....

    still showing obvious bias.....officials.....luck....just another lucky team with an easy schedule huh?......ROTFLMFAO

    *missing one huge point....their defense is pretty tough....easy to check....when they DO play good teams...on a big stage....what do they give up?.....compare to what the same team got vs other good D's....agree this should be a low scoring game....UNDER maybe the way to go...

      just for our entertainment .....since you think a 2-3 TD Georgia win is in the cards....You really should post....what should be a monster play on football genius Richt and his Dawgs.......   

    Is this thread not entertaining enough for you?

    We all know that just about any team can beat another in any given game.  We see it happen relatively frequently - Appalachian State/Michigan, Virginia Tech/JMU, Jacksonville State/Mississippi, Louisiana Monroe/Alabama, etc. etc. etc.  This goes without saying.  So of course Boise can beat Georgia.  That's not the issue.

    The issue is what side is more likely to cover the number.  To do that we have to seperate fact from fiction.  So quoting Boise's gaudy numbers without applying some perspective to those numbers is meaningless.  And the fact of the matter is that Boise has accumulated those numbers and win/loss record against the little sisters of the poor.  Does that mean Boise sucks?  Of course not.  It just means it shouldn't be and won't be a factor in capping this game.

    I do, however, think that even though VT's talent is not comparable to Georgia's, the Boise game against VT is the best measuring stick we have on gauging how the Georgia game will play out this year.  How Boise fared against Utah State on the smurf turf is not relevant whatsoever.

    If that is so, then we also need to put Boise's victory over VT in perspective as well.  I've watched the game about 7 or 8 times, and I have concluded that it was a victory of smoke and mirrors, not of Boise being the better team.  In fact my conclusion was that if VT had not completely shitted themselves in the 1st quarter, they would have rolled to a comfortable 2 TD+ victory.  I think they were clearly the better team.

    So applying what I've learned from the VT game to the Georgia game (and nothing else at this point), coupled with the prior opening day experience between these two teams in which Georgia won 48-13, I see no reason to believe that Georgia will not win this game comfortably.

    Although I like Georgia a lot in this game, I'm not 100% sure I will bet it.  I came out with an edict last season that I would not wager any money on the Mike Shula of the SEC East because of how undisciplined and unpredictable they are.  At this point I'll wait for the lines to come out and see what I like and what I don't.  If Boise is the favorite in the game, however, I can pretty guarantee I will have money on Georgia because then the game would fit my ideal betting situation which to bet on any underdog that I think will win outright. 

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    Gotta FOCUS....

    Sure.....Boise doesn't deserve the equal billing they receive each year with Bama and others.....

    THAT is not the issue here.....for ONE game..what are they capable of ?

    ANSWER?....beating most any team on a given night....

    still showing obvious bias.....officials.....luck....just another lucky team with an easy schedule huh?......ROTFLMFAO

    *missing one huge point....their defense is pretty tough....easy to check....when they DO play good teams...on a big stage....what do they give up?.....compare to what the same team got vs other good D's....agree this should be a low scoring game....UNDER maybe the way to go...

      just for our entertainment .....since you think a 2-3 TD Georgia win is in the cards....You really should post....what should be a monster play on football genius Richt and his Dawgs.......   

    Is this thread not entertaining enough for you?

    We all know that just about any team can beat another in any given game.  We see it happen relatively frequently - Appalachian State/Michigan, Virginia Tech/JMU, Jacksonville State/Mississippi, Louisiana Monroe/Alabama, etc. etc. etc.  This goes without saying.  So of course Boise can beat Georgia.  That's not the issue.

    The issue is what side is more likely to cover the number.  To do that we have to seperate fact from fiction.  So quoting Boise's gaudy numbers without applying some perspective to those numbers is meaningless.  And the fact of the matter is that Boise has accumulated those numbers and win/loss record against the little sisters of the poor.  Does that mean Boise sucks?  Of course not.  It just means it shouldn't be and won't be a factor in capping this game.

    I do, however, think that even though VT's talent is not comparable to Georgia's, the Boise game against VT is the best measuring stick we have on gauging how the Georgia game will play out this year.  How Boise fared against Utah State on the smurf turf is not relevant whatsoever.

    If that is so, then we also need to put Boise's victory over VT in perspective as well.  I've watched the game about 7 or 8 times, and I have concluded that it was a victory of smoke and mirrors, not of Boise being the better team.  In fact my conclusion was that if VT had not completely shitted themselves in the 1st quarter, they would have rolled to a comfortable 2 TD+ victory.  I think they were clearly the better team.

    So applying what I've learned from the VT game to the Georgia game (and nothing else at this point), coupled with the prior opening day experience between these two teams in which Georgia won 48-13, I see no reason to believe that Georgia will not win this game comfortably.

    Although I like Georgia a lot in this game, I'm not 100% sure I will bet it.  I came out with an edict last season that I would not wager any money on the Mike Shula of the SEC East because of how undisciplined and unpredictable they are.  At this point I'll wait for the lines to come out and see what I like and what I don't.  If Boise is the favorite in the game, however, I can pretty guarantee I will have money on Georgia because then the game would fit my ideal betting situation which to bet on any underdog that I think will win outright. 

     

     
    bookieassassin
    bookieassassin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10313
    Posted: Jul. 23, 2011 - 10:52 PM ET #52

    Boise whipped their ass at the LOS....technically played a sloppy and stupid game....but yet won once again vs an athletically superior opponent.....> one that had a huge crowd edge......

    NOTE: at last years end....the Hokies were about 7+ pts better team than Georgia according to Vegas power ratings

    currently at 5 Dimes....

    Boise State vs Georgia - Georgia Dome - Atlanta, Georgia
     10005 Boise State  -2½ -110      
     10006 Georgia  +2½ -110  




    It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
    Reply
    Boise whipped their ass at the LOS....technically played a sloppy and stupid game....but yet won once again vs an athletically superior opponent.....> one that had a huge crowd edge......

    NOTE: at last years end....the Hokies were about 7+ pts better team than Georgia according to Vegas power ratings

    currently at 5 Dimes....

    Boise State vs Georgia - Georgia Dome - Atlanta, Georgia
     10005 Boise State  -2½ -110      
     10006 Georgia  +2½ -110  




     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 12:59 AM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    Boise whipped their ass at the LOS....technically played a sloppy and stupid game....but yet won once again vs an athletically superior opponent.....> one that had a huge crowd edge......

    NOTE: at last years end....the Hokies were about 7+ pts better team than Georgia according to Vegas power ratings

    currently at 5 Dimes....

    Boise State vs Georgia - Georgia Dome - Atlanta, Georgia
      10005 Boise State   -2½ -110          
      10006 Georgia   +2½ -110   


    Boise's d-line played very well in that game.  In fact if I were to give an MVP award for the game, they would have gotten it.

    The stupid and sloppy game was played by VT, not Boise.  The first quarter "stupids" got them in a 17-0 hole in the 1st quarter, and the "stupids" on VT's second to the last possession cost them the game.

    All Tech needed was one more first down and they could have gone into victory formation.  On 1st down they ran off tackle for 6 yards.  Boise used their second TO.  On second down Tyrod Taylor took the snap and just stood there.  He never handed the ball off, and never tried to advance the ball, and lost 5 yards.  He just took an intentional sack.  WTF kind of play call was that?  Boise then burned their fnal TO.  On 3rd and 9 VT threw a bomb down the right sideline that fell incomplete.  Brilliant!!!

    Any kind of misdirection play (like a TT bootleg) on second down would have easily picked up a first down and iced the game.  That of course was just another couple of "stupids" piled on top a shit fountain of "stupids" for VT in that game.  Again, nothing that Boise really did.  Just more self-destruction on VT's part.

    I don't think Boise's d-line will be pushing anyone around in this game.  Georgia's o-line is mammoth.

    C - 6-3, 313, G - 6-2, 312, G - 6-5, 328, T - 6-5, 342, T - 6-5, 348.

    That's an average size of 6'4" and 328 lbs.  Boise's d-line averages 6'3" and 278 lbs for a difference of 1-inch and an even 50 lbs.  The LBers and secondary for Boise are decent size.

    I don't doubt that VT was rated 7 points better than Tech last season.  That sounds about right.  That has absloutely nothing to with this game however.  I think Georgia will be a significantly improved team this year, especially on defense.  They certainly should be considering they avoid Alabama, LSU and Arkansas out of the SEC West this season.

    Bookmaker has no football lines up at all - no futures . . . nothing.  I will certainly jump on Georgia and the points if I can get them.  This game will probably be one of those Covers blood baths.

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    Boise whipped their ass at the LOS....technically played a sloppy and stupid game....but yet won once again vs an athletically superior opponent.....> one that had a huge crowd edge......

    NOTE: at last years end....the Hokies were about 7+ pts better team than Georgia according to Vegas power ratings

    currently at 5 Dimes....

    Boise State vs Georgia - Georgia Dome - Atlanta, Georgia
      10005 Boise State   -2½ -110          
      10006 Georgia   +2½ -110   


    Boise's d-line played very well in that game.  In fact if I were to give an MVP award for the game, they would have gotten it.

    The stupid and sloppy game was played by VT, not Boise.  The first quarter "stupids" got them in a 17-0 hole in the 1st quarter, and the "stupids" on VT's second to the last possession cost them the game.

    All Tech needed was one more first down and they could have gone into victory formation.  On 1st down they ran off tackle for 6 yards.  Boise used their second TO.  On second down Tyrod Taylor took the snap and just stood there.  He never handed the ball off, and never tried to advance the ball, and lost 5 yards.  He just took an intentional sack.  WTF kind of play call was that?  Boise then burned their fnal TO.  On 3rd and 9 VT threw a bomb down the right sideline that fell incomplete.  Brilliant!!!

    Any kind of misdirection play (like a TT bootleg) on second down would have easily picked up a first down and iced the game.  That of course was just another couple of "stupids" piled on top a shit fountain of "stupids" for VT in that game.  Again, nothing that Boise really did.  Just more self-destruction on VT's part.

    I don't think Boise's d-line will be pushing anyone around in this game.  Georgia's o-line is mammoth.

    C - 6-3, 313, G - 6-2, 312, G - 6-5, 328, T - 6-5, 342, T - 6-5, 348.

    That's an average size of 6'4" and 328 lbs.  Boise's d-line averages 6'3" and 278 lbs for a difference of 1-inch and an even 50 lbs.  The LBers and secondary for Boise are decent size.

    I don't doubt that VT was rated 7 points better than Tech last season.  That sounds about right.  That has absloutely nothing to with this game however.  I think Georgia will be a significantly improved team this year, especially on defense.  They certainly should be considering they avoid Alabama, LSU and Arkansas out of the SEC West this season.

    Bookmaker has no football lines up at all - no futures . . . nothing.  I will certainly jump on Georgia and the points if I can get them.  This game will probably be one of those Covers blood baths.

     

     
    SatNightFever05
    SatNightFever05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 3689
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 1:56 PM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Accordingly I don't think Boise will generate many points in this game - I think 14 or less.  If I'm wrong, then this will be a very tight ball game.  If I'm right, and I think I will be, Georgia should win this game by multiple TDs (just like they did the last time Boise was suppose to beat them).



    Is this just like when you predicted Alabama to beat Arkansas by 3 TDs ly?



    UGA is not that good- will be taking a big step back on offense- so even if the D improves, they are still going to have to find a way to get past that Boise D (which should be a top 5 overall D again this yr)..

    SIX points on UCF with AJ Green.. now true frosh RB, no real proven WRs and an issue with depth at the OL, but sure.. Murray will, I'm sure have a huge game..


    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Accordingly I don't think Boise will generate many points in this game - I think 14 or less.  If I'm wrong, then this will be a very tight ball game.  If I'm right, and I think I will be, Georgia should win this game by multiple TDs (just like they did the last time Boise was suppose to beat them).



    Is this just like when you predicted Alabama to beat Arkansas by 3 TDs ly?



    UGA is not that good- will be taking a big step back on offense- so even if the D improves, they are still going to have to find a way to get past that Boise D (which should be a top 5 overall D again this yr)..

    SIX points on UCF with AJ Green.. now true frosh RB, no real proven WRs and an issue with depth at the OL, but sure.. Murray will, I'm sure have a huge game..


     
    bookieassassin
    bookieassassin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10313
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 4:16 PM ET #55

    excellent comparison there Freak....
    this game to 2005,,,,,turf team Boise(9-4 that year)... was 7' pt DOG at grass team Georgia (10-3).....
    QB Zabransky ill....and had SIX 1st half turnovers.....holy shit
    hooked up to IV's at halftime > did not return

    maybe watch the game another 8-9 X...
    as mentioned...Boise had DOUBLE the penalties of VT....double the turnovers....+ missed FG and XPt....with 2 fumbles and a roughing the kicker....that lead to 3 Hokie TD's....KEY > they (almost) never do this.....sure Hokies gift wrapped a few themselves....er > Boise won stats by 70 yds .

    at games end.....1:50 left.... Hokies allowed short field.....Boise own 44...and 13 yd PF penalty....suddenly Moore sharp again > game over ......last drive by Hokies was puzzling...

    * sorry weight comparison not accurate either....
    as Georgia's numbers drastically different.....from those you see on Steele and others....most likely taken pre-spring...obviously purposely.....on the heavy side.....most 10-40 lb gain....huge though I agree..
    Boise weights same as on 2010 roster (mostly)....intentionally...on the light side....as you might expect 
     
    It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
    Reply
    excellent comparison there Freak....
    this game to 2005,,,,,turf team Boise(9-4 that year)... was 7' pt DOG at grass team Georgia (10-3).....
    QB Zabransky ill....and had SIX 1st half turnovers.....holy shit
    hooked up to IV's at halftime > did not return

    maybe watch the game another 8-9 X...
    as mentioned...Boise had DOUBLE the penalties of VT....double the turnovers....+ missed FG and XPt....with 2 fumbles and a roughing the kicker....that lead to 3 Hokie TD's....KEY > they (almost) never do this.....sure Hokies gift wrapped a few themselves....er > Boise won stats by 70 yds .

    at games end.....1:50 left.... Hokies allowed short field.....Boise own 44...and 13 yd PF penalty....suddenly Moore sharp again > game over ......last drive by Hokies was puzzling...

    * sorry weight comparison not accurate either....
    as Georgia's numbers drastically different.....from those you see on Steele and others....most likely taken pre-spring...obviously purposely.....on the heavy side.....most 10-40 lb gain....huge though I agree..
    Boise weights same as on 2010 roster (mostly)....intentionally...on the light side....as you might expect 
     
     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 6:36 PM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:



    Is this just like when you predicted Alabama to beat Arkansas by 3 TDs ly?



    UGA is not that good- will be taking a big step back on offense- so even if the D improves, they are still going to have to find a way to get past that Boise D (which should be a top 5 overall D again this yr)..

    SIX points on UCF with AJ Green.. now true frosh RB, no real proven WRs and an issue with depth at the OL, but sure.. Murray will, I'm sure have a huge game..


    . . . and don't forget Bama lost to Utah in the Sugar Bowl 3 years ago.

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by SatNightFever05:



    Is this just like when you predicted Alabama to beat Arkansas by 3 TDs ly?



    UGA is not that good- will be taking a big step back on offense- so even if the D improves, they are still going to have to find a way to get past that Boise D (which should be a top 5 overall D again this yr)..

    SIX points on UCF with AJ Green.. now true frosh RB, no real proven WRs and an issue with depth at the OL, but sure.. Murray will, I'm sure have a huge game..


    . . . and don't forget Bama lost to Utah in the Sugar Bowl 3 years ago.

     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 6:56 PM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    excellent comparison there Freak....
    this game to 2005,,,,,turf team Boise(9-4 that year)... was 7' pt DOG at grass team Georgia (10-3).....
    QB Zabransky ill....and had SIX 1st half turnovers.....holy shit
    hooked up to IV's at halftime > did not return

    maybe watch the game another 8-9 X...
    as mentioned...Boise had DOUBLE the penalties of VT....double the turnovers....+ missed FG and XPt....with 2 fumbles and a roughing the kicker....that lead to 3 Hokie TD's....KEY > they (almost) never do this.....sure Hokies gift wrapped a few themselves....er > Boise won stats by 70 yds .

    at games end.....1:50 left.... Hokies allowed short field.....Boise own 44...and 13 yd PF penalty....suddenly Moore sharp again > game over ......last drive by Hokies was puzzling...

    * sorry weight comparison not accurate either....
    as Georgia's numbers drastically different.....from those you see on Steele and others....most likely taken pre-spring...obviously purposely.....on the heavy side.....most 10-40 lb gain....huge though I agree..
    Boise weights same as on 2010 roster (mostly)....intentionally...on the light side....as you might expect 
     

    Don't believe I've ever compared this year's game to the 2005 game, but thanks nonetheless.  You do, however, bring up a great point.  Playing in the Georgia Dome is a huge bonus for Boise.  It's very difficult for people from Idaho to get acclimated to the heat and humidity of Athens, Georgia in early September.  So playing on turf in a comfortable, climate-controlled dome is very beneficial for Boise.  No halftime IVs needed in this one.

    Of course the weights fluctuate on these guys, but I posted height and weight the teams report on their roster.  This should be very much like the matchup between Wisconsin's o-line against TCU's d-line in the Rose Bowl.

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    excellent comparison there Freak....
    this game to 2005,,,,,turf team Boise(9-4 that year)... was 7' pt DOG at grass team Georgia (10-3).....
    QB Zabransky ill....and had SIX 1st half turnovers.....holy shit
    hooked up to IV's at halftime > did not return

    maybe watch the game another 8-9 X...
    as mentioned...Boise had DOUBLE the penalties of VT....double the turnovers....+ missed FG and XPt....with 2 fumbles and a roughing the kicker....that lead to 3 Hokie TD's....KEY > they (almost) never do this.....sure Hokies gift wrapped a few themselves....er > Boise won stats by 70 yds .

    at games end.....1:50 left.... Hokies allowed short field.....Boise own 44...and 13 yd PF penalty....suddenly Moore sharp again > game over ......last drive by Hokies was puzzling...

    * sorry weight comparison not accurate either....
    as Georgia's numbers drastically different.....from those you see on Steele and others....most likely taken pre-spring...obviously purposely.....on the heavy side.....most 10-40 lb gain....huge though I agree..
    Boise weights same as on 2010 roster (mostly)....intentionally...on the light side....as you might expect 
     

    Don't believe I've ever compared this year's game to the 2005 game, but thanks nonetheless.  You do, however, bring up a great point.  Playing in the Georgia Dome is a huge bonus for Boise.  It's very difficult for people from Idaho to get acclimated to the heat and humidity of Athens, Georgia in early September.  So playing on turf in a comfortable, climate-controlled dome is very beneficial for Boise.  No halftime IVs needed in this one.

    Of course the weights fluctuate on these guys, but I posted height and weight the teams report on their roster.  This should be very much like the matchup between Wisconsin's o-line against TCU's d-line in the Rose Bowl.

     

     
    SatNightFever05
    SatNightFever05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 3689
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 8:10 PM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    This should be very much like the matchup between Wisconsin's o-line against TCU's d-line in the Rose Bowl.


    Yes, because that worked out so well for the larger and bigger team..

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    This should be very much like the matchup between Wisconsin's o-line against TCU's d-line in the Rose Bowl.


    Yes, because that worked out so well for the larger and bigger team..

     
    pederson16
    pederson16
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 7359
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 9:06 PM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Far better athletes than Boise.  UCF (located in Tampa) is situated in the heart of one of those hottest talent pools in the country.  UCF has 4 consecutive top 50 recruiting classes.  Their average ranking of their last 5 classes is 43.

    Boise has never had a top 50 recruiting class in thier history.  The average ranking of their last 5 classes is 78.

    It should be noted that UCF has wins over SEC teams.  Boise has never stayed within 4 touchdowns of one.  Big difference.

     

    uCf in tampa?

    ucf is NOT in tampa.  ucf stands for university of CENTRAL florida. tampa is NOT in CENTRAL florida. it is on the west coast a couple hours from ORLANDO, where uCf is.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Far better athletes than Boise.  UCF (located in Tampa) is situated in the heart of one of those hottest talent pools in the country.  UCF has 4 consecutive top 50 recruiting classes.  Their average ranking of their last 5 classes is 43.

    Boise has never had a top 50 recruiting class in thier history.  The average ranking of their last 5 classes is 78.

    It should be noted that UCF has wins over SEC teams.  Boise has never stayed within 4 touchdowns of one.  Big difference.

     

    uCf in tampa?

    ucf is NOT in tampa.  ucf stands for university of CENTRAL florida. tampa is NOT in CENTRAL florida. it is on the west coast a couple hours from ORLANDO, where uCf is.

     
    thesoulpurpose
    thesoulpurpose
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 1128
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 9:50 PM ET #60

    LSU has a very tough schedule, but I do beleive that they are the best team in the nation,  they  have 15 returning starters from a team that was very good last year,  also watch out for mississippi state, who I believe will surprise alot of people,  LSU  needs to watch out when they go on the road to play this team.  but in the end I do see the tigers winning it all,
    Reply
    LSU has a very tough schedule, but I do beleive that they are the best team in the nation,  they  have 15 returning starters from a team that was very good last year,  also watch out for mississippi state, who I believe will surprise alot of people,  LSU  needs to watch out when they go on the road to play this team.  but in the end I do see the tigers winning it all,
     
    tideman
    tideman
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 4810
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 11:00 PM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    . . . and don't forget Bama lost to Utah in the Sugar Bowl 3 years ago.

       You better believe he would have brought it up if you hadn't.  I am looking forward to Bama losing another one so he will have some new material.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    . . . and don't forget Bama lost to Utah in the Sugar Bowl 3 years ago.

       You better believe he would have brought it up if you hadn't.  I am looking forward to Bama losing another one so he will have some new material.
     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 24, 2011 - 11:38 PM ET #62

    Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:

    uCf in tampa?

    ucf is NOT in tampa.  ucf stands for university of CENTRAL florida. tampa is NOT in CENTRAL florida. it is on the west coast a couple hours from ORLANDO, where uCf is.

    I use to live in Tampa so I'm very well aware that USF is in Tampa, and UCF is in Orlando.  In fact I use to frequent to USF campus when I lived there (lots of chicks  ).  I recognized my mistake shortly after posting, but Covers has no edit feature so there really wasn't much I could do about it.

    Thanks for the correction.

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:

    uCf in tampa?

    ucf is NOT in tampa.  ucf stands for university of CENTRAL florida. tampa is NOT in CENTRAL florida. it is on the west coast a couple hours from ORLANDO, where uCf is.

    I use to live in Tampa so I'm very well aware that USF is in Tampa, and UCF is in Orlando.  In fact I use to frequent to USF campus when I lived there (lots of chicks  ).  I recognized my mistake shortly after posting, but Covers has no edit feature so there really wasn't much I could do about it.

    Thanks for the correction.

     

     
    bookieassassin
    bookieassassin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10313
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 12:13 AM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Don't believe I've ever compared this year's game to the 2005 game, but thanks nonetheless.  You do, however, bring up a great point.  Playing in the Georgia Dome is a huge bonus for Boise.  It's very difficult for people from Idaho to get acclimated to the heat and humidity of Athens, Georgia in early September.  So playing on turf in a comfortable, climate-controlled dome is very beneficial for Boise.  No halftime IVs needed in this one.

    Of course the weights fluctuate on these guys, but I posted height and weight the teams report on their roster.  This should be very much like the matchup between Wisconsin's o-line against TCU's d-line in the Rose Bowl.

     



    So applying what I've learned from the VT game to the Georgia game (and nothing else at this point), coupled with the prior opening day experience between these two teams in which Georgia won 48-13, I see no reason to believe that Georgia will not win this game comfortably.


    RIGHT......

    stay DOWN Freak.....for the love of God man....Pederson stepping in and mercifully delivering the coup de grace.....kinda....


    err....not challenging the Georgia players given weight....
    the no change (or VERY small change)...in Boise players weight MUST mean they have not been updated....unless you think none of their players have gained weight......> in keeping with their preferred underdog role.....the listed weights are rumored to usually be on the light side.....> a common practice
    It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Don't believe I've ever compared this year's game to the 2005 game, but thanks nonetheless.  You do, however, bring up a great point.  Playing in the Georgia Dome is a huge bonus for Boise.  It's very difficult for people from Idaho to get acclimated to the heat and humidity of Athens, Georgia in early September.  So playing on turf in a comfortable, climate-controlled dome is very beneficial for Boise.  No halftime IVs needed in this one.

    Of course the weights fluctuate on these guys, but I posted height and weight the teams report on their roster.  This should be very much like the matchup between Wisconsin's o-line against TCU's d-line in the Rose Bowl.

     



    So applying what I've learned from the VT game to the Georgia game (and nothing else at this point), coupled with the prior opening day experience between these two teams in which Georgia won 48-13, I see no reason to believe that Georgia will not win this game comfortably.


    RIGHT......

    stay DOWN Freak.....for the love of God man....Pederson stepping in and mercifully delivering the coup de grace.....kinda....


    err....not challenging the Georgia players given weight....
    the no change (or VERY small change)...in Boise players weight MUST mean they have not been updated....unless you think none of their players have gained weight......> in keeping with their preferred underdog role.....the listed weights are rumored to usually be on the light side.....> a common practice
     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 12:21 AM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by tideman:

       You better believe he would have brought it up if you hadn't.  I am looking forward to Bama losing another one so he will have some new material.

    Well you know that because Georgia only scored 6 points against UCF in the all important Liberty Bowl, and that their offense will take a step back this year because they've lost the sevices of AJ Green, simple logic finds that they will not score more than 3 points against any foe until Georgia can recruit AJ's progeny who have not yet been concieved.  So there is nothing but dark clouds in Georgia's future as far as the eye can see.  Rumor has it that they may not even show up to play the team who hails from the blue turf.  Why bother.  After all, if they only scored 6 against UCF, the best they can hope for against the formidible Bosie Blue is negative 7.

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by tideman:

       You better believe he would have brought it up if you hadn't.  I am looking forward to Bama losing another one so he will have some new material.

    Well you know that because Georgia only scored 6 points against UCF in the all important Liberty Bowl, and that their offense will take a step back this year because they've lost the sevices of AJ Green, simple logic finds that they will not score more than 3 points against any foe until Georgia can recruit AJ's progeny who have not yet been concieved.  So there is nothing but dark clouds in Georgia's future as far as the eye can see.  Rumor has it that they may not even show up to play the team who hails from the blue turf.  Why bother.  After all, if they only scored 6 against UCF, the best they can hope for against the formidible Bosie Blue is negative 7.

     

     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 12:54 AM ET #65

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:



    So applying what I've learned from the VT game to the Georgia game (and nothing else at this point), coupled with the prior opening day experience between these two teams in which Georgia won 48-13, I see no reason to believe that Georgia will not win this game comfortably.


    RIGHT......

    I think you've got it!!!

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:



    So applying what I've learned from the VT game to the Georgia game (and nothing else at this point), coupled with the prior opening day experience between these two teams in which Georgia won 48-13, I see no reason to believe that Georgia will not win this game comfortably.


    RIGHT......

    I think you've got it!!!

     
    JazMajor
    JazMajor
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2011
    Posts: 8
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 1:09 AM ET #66

    NCAA Champions - Oklahoma Sooners 



    ------------------
    Free Sports Picks
    Reply
    NCAA Champions - Oklahoma Sooners 



    ------------------
    Free Sports Picks
     
    SatNightFever05
    SatNightFever05
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2010
    Posts: 3689
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 1:36 AM ET #67

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Well you know that because Georgia only scored 6 points against UCF in the all important Liberty Bowl, and that their offense will take a step back this year because they've lost the sevices of AJ Green, simple logic finds that they will not score more than 3 points against any foe until Georgia can recruit AJ's progeny who have not yet been concieved.  So there is nothing but dark clouds in Georgia's future as far as the eye can see.  Rumor has it that they may not even show up to play the team who hails from the blue turf.  Why bother.  After all, if they only scored 6 against UCF, the best they can hope for against the formidible Bosie Blue is negative 7.



    Yes, and your thought process is so much better because "Georgia is more athletic"



    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    Well you know that because Georgia only scored 6 points against UCF in the all important Liberty Bowl, and that their offense will take a step back this year because they've lost the sevices of AJ Green, simple logic finds that they will not score more than 3 points against any foe until Georgia can recruit AJ's progeny who have not yet been concieved.  So there is nothing but dark clouds in Georgia's future as far as the eye can see.  Rumor has it that they may not even show up to play the team who hails from the blue turf.  Why bother.  After all, if they only scored 6 against UCF, the best they can hope for against the formidible Bosie Blue is negative 7.



    Yes, and your thought process is so much better because "Georgia is more athletic"



     
    bookieassassin
    bookieassassin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10313
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 1:39 AM ET #68

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    I think you've got it!!!



    er.....that's your post (same guy that said he never brought it up)
    It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    I think you've got it!!!



    er.....that's your post (same guy that said he never brought it up)
     
    pederson16
    pederson16
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 7359
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 2:55 AM ET #69

    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    I use to live in Tampa so I'm very well aware that USF is in Tampa, and UCF is in Orlando.  In fact I use to frequent to USF campus when I lived there (lots of chicks  ).  I recognized my mistake shortly after posting, but Covers has no edit feature so there really wasn't much I could do about it.

    Thanks for the correction.

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by jimmydafreak:

    I use to live in Tampa so I'm very well aware that USF is in Tampa, and UCF is in Orlando.  In fact I use to frequent to USF campus when I lived there (lots of chicks  ).  I recognized my mistake shortly after posting, but Covers has no edit feature so there really wasn't much I could do about it.

    Thanks for the correction.

     

     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 12:57 PM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:



    er.....that's your post (same guy that said he never brought it up)

    Didn't say I didn't bring up.  I said I never made any "comparison" between the 2005 game and this one as you asserted.

    Previous games between Georgia and Boise/Hawaii are only dispositive in that they tend to show what happens when a team with superior talent is matched against one with inferior talent.  It stands for the basic proposition that the team with the best talent usually wins, and that's what gambling is all about - playing the odds.  Past games, however, are not dispositive for "comparison" purposes.

     

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:



    er.....that's your post (same guy that said he never brought it up)

    Didn't say I didn't bring up.  I said I never made any "comparison" between the 2005 game and this one as you asserted.

    Previous games between Georgia and Boise/Hawaii are only dispositive in that they tend to show what happens when a team with superior talent is matched against one with inferior talent.  It stands for the basic proposition that the team with the best talent usually wins, and that's what gambling is all about - playing the odds.  Past games, however, are not dispositive for "comparison" purposes.

     

     
    bookieassassin
    bookieassassin
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 10313
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 2:22 PM ET #71

    what you are doing....(usually).....an effective debating tool

    is taking the argument down many directions that are not significant in any way....in an attempt to confuse/misdirect you opponents....

    * what you should have done....is focus on the ONLY fucking thing that matters here....the superior athleticism of Georgia.....compared to the (few) other top teams Boise has faced.....Va Tech....TCU....Oregon St.....Oregon....Utah ++ .....> THIS time will be different....why?
    a simple attack on Boise makes no sense and only discredits your argument......> although telling us Georgia has more fat-asses than Boise was very persuasive.....
      
    BECAUSE....although most forget....we are not a buncha drunks sitting at a sports bar arguing about OUR teams...but here to give investment advice 

    * seems like we have heard this TALENT.....reigns supreme theory before....now haven't we ??............

    * BTW.....no Boise lover here either....until further notice..most any game they play.....must be Boise or nothing as I have learned my lesson....1st game I would consider might be @ Toledo...esp off loss to Georgia  > only guy in the Peterson armor .....0-3 ATS off loss (burst bubble theory) .....
    * my recommendation here would be strong lean UNDER....slight lean Boise.....(depending on the #) ....I might play side at halftime if not too hammered....   


    It is better to be feared - than to be loved.
    Reply
    what you are doing....(usually).....an effective debating tool

    is taking the argument down many directions that are not significant in any way....in an attempt to confuse/misdirect you opponents....

    * what you should have done....is focus on the ONLY fucking thing that matters here....the superior athleticism of Georgia.....compared to the (few) other top teams Boise has faced.....Va Tech....TCU....Oregon St.....Oregon....Utah ++ .....> THIS time will be different....why?
    a simple attack on Boise makes no sense and only discredits your argument......> although telling us Georgia has more fat-asses than Boise was very persuasive.....
      
    BECAUSE....although most forget....we are not a buncha drunks sitting at a sports bar arguing about OUR teams...but here to give investment advice 

    * seems like we have heard this TALENT.....reigns supreme theory before....now haven't we ??............

    * BTW.....no Boise lover here either....until further notice..most any game they play.....must be Boise or nothing as I have learned my lesson....1st game I would consider might be @ Toledo...esp off loss to Georgia  > only guy in the Peterson armor .....0-3 ATS off loss (burst bubble theory) .....
    * my recommendation here would be strong lean UNDER....slight lean Boise.....(depending on the #) ....I might play side at halftime if not too hammered....   


     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 4:29 PM ET #72

    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    what you are doing....(usually).....an effective debating tool

    is taking the argument down many directions that are not significant in any way....in an attempt to confuse/misdirect you opponents....

    * what you should have done....is focus on the ONLY fucking thing that matters here....the superior athleticism of Georgia.....compared to the (few) other top teams Boise has faced.....Va Tech....TCU....Oregon St.....Oregon....Utah ++ .....> THIS time will be different....why?
    a simple attack on Boise makes no sense and only discredits your argument......> although telling us Georgia has more fat-asses than Boise was very persuasive.....
      
    BECAUSE....although most forget....we are not a buncha drunks sitting at a sports bar arguing about OUR teams...but here to give investment advice 

    * seems like we have heard this TALENT.....reigns supreme theory before....now haven't we ??............

    * BTW.....no Boise lover here either....until further notice..most any game they play.....must be Boise or nothing as I have learned my lesson....1st game I would consider might be @ Toledo...esp off loss to Georgia  > only guy in the Peterson armor .....0-3 ATS off loss (burst bubble theory) .....
    * my recommendation here would be strong lean UNDER....slight lean Boise.....(depending on the #) ....I might play side at halftime if not too hammered....   


    No Boise lover???  Are you a communist or something???  Does Janet Napolitano know about this???  Do you not genuflect to the "One Bronco Nation Under God golden calf???"  You sir, are un-American!!!

         

      BA Barakus

    I formulated my argument around Saul Alinski's Rules For Radicals #8.  To paraphse, it instructs when unable to dazzle one with brilliance, baffle them with bull!!! 

    In all serious though, as I said before, I would definitely play on the Dawgs if they're getting points, and I also like UNDER 55 or better.

     . . . coming soon to a neighborhood near you!!!

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by bookieassassin:

    what you are doing....(usually).....an effective debating tool

    is taking the argument down many directions that are not significant in any way....in an attempt to confuse/misdirect you opponents....

    * what you should have done....is focus on the ONLY fucking thing that matters here....the superior athleticism of Georgia.....compared to the (few) other top teams Boise has faced.....Va Tech....TCU....Oregon St.....Oregon....Utah ++ .....> THIS time will be different....why?
    a simple attack on Boise makes no sense and only discredits your argument......> although telling us Georgia has more fat-asses than Boise was very persuasive.....
      
    BECAUSE....although most forget....we are not a buncha drunks sitting at a sports bar arguing about OUR teams...but here to give investment advice 

    * seems like we have heard this TALENT.....reigns supreme theory before....now haven't we ??............

    * BTW.....no Boise lover here either....until further notice..most any game they play.....must be Boise or nothing as I have learned my lesson....1st game I would consider might be @ Toledo...esp off loss to Georgia  > only guy in the Peterson armor .....0-3 ATS off loss (burst bubble theory) .....
    * my recommendation here would be strong lean UNDER....slight lean Boise.....(depending on the #) ....I might play side at halftime if not too hammered....   


    No Boise lover???  Are you a communist or something???  Does Janet Napolitano know about this???  Do you not genuflect to the "One Bronco Nation Under God golden calf???"  You sir, are un-American!!!

         

      BA Barakus

    I formulated my argument around Saul Alinski's Rules For Radicals #8.  To paraphse, it instructs when unable to dazzle one with brilliance, baffle them with bull!!! 

    In all serious though, as I said before, I would definitely play on the Dawgs if they're getting points, and I also like UNDER 55 or better.

     . . . coming soon to a neighborhood near you!!!

     

     
     
    jimmydafreak
    jimmydafreak
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 13951
    Posted: Jul. 25, 2011 - 5:09 PM ET #73

    Is it time to start talking about Auburn bagmen yet? 

     

    Reply

    Is it time to start talking about Auburn bagmen yet? 

     

    All Forums | College Football
    «First Previous 123

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,608
    • Sunday 09/27/2026 464
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,087
    • PART DEUX 206
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 101,729
    • Sunday 2,270
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 8,662
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,468
    • Chargers/Bills 3,327
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 15,346

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.