Posted:
#1
Dumbass Nevada coach LMAO
Take the points then try onside kick
“It’s not a lie, if you believe it”
Lmao why no FG?
Posted:
#10
2 Things:
1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
Dude, there were over 2 minutes left
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
I don't agree at all with number one. Kick the extra point then it is a one possession game still.
You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
2 Things:
1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
You extend the game period...how the phuck are you a coach would be my question at post game...even if I get fired saying it
Posted:
#14
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.
Posted:
#15
Quote Originally Posted by thehuntman:
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
I don't agree at all with number one. Kick the extra point then it is a one possession game still.2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
That's why you are posting on Covers and a data scientist is getting paid 500k to work for NFL teams to figure these things out.
I understand your thinking. But, you need to understand that there are 2 possessions. There is no difference if you miss the 2pt conversion on the first TD or the 2nd TD.
Explain the difference and I'll listen...
Posted:
#16
Quote Originally Posted by JayDubsJr:
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.2 Things: 1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same. 2) Why go for the FG when you're inside the 10? If you even recover the onside kick, you still need to move the ball without any TOs. You are 500% more likely to get a TD on a 4th down inside the 10 than you are on a hail mary outside the 40.
And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws.
Posted:
#17
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
Total BS, there are no analytics to support this. The risk of going down two scores far outweighs getting it to 7.
Posted:
#19
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws.
And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws.
Dude, they had like 4-5 of those 20+ pass plays in the 4th. Ohio defense was gassed. You should stop while you're behind
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:
You extend the game period...how the phuck are you a coach would be my question at post game...even if I get fired saying it
He got a call from johnny in the mobb and said that if he went for the fg he would come after his family. The quarterback was told to fall back otherwise he wouldve ended up dead like micharl jordans dad. Them dudes dont play
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by Ace of Spades:
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
Total BS, there are no analytics to support this. The risk of going down two scores far outweighs getting it to 7.1) The analytics show its better to go for two when you're down 15 on the first TD, so you know where you stand in the rest of the game. If they went for the XP and then missed the 2pt later, it's the same.
It would have been 8 points, which means they still had to score a 2pt conversion. You don't even know what you're arguing about.
Posted:
#22
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.
And what? You recover the ball at your own 40, then the D is waiting for you to pass on every play. You aren't going to make any 20+ passes, but maybe some under throws.An onside recover would result in great field position with about 2 mins left. You sound just as smart as that coach looks right now.
Why even practice a 2 minute drill then? That's what they would've had, with great positioning. You can come up with whatever scenarios you want in your head but if you're a smart coach and you just watched your QB overthrow everything on the previous 3 downs, you should be able to see that you need to take the points when you can and reset for if you get another chance to win.
Why even practice a 2 minute drill then? That's what they would've had, with great positioning. You can come up with whatever scenarios you want in your head but if you're a smart coach and you just watched your QB overthrow everything on the previous 3 downs, you should be able to see that you need to take the points when you can and reset for if you get another chance to win.
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by Popo21:
That's why you are posting on Covers and a data scientist is getting paid 500k to work for NFL teams to figure these things out. I understand your thinking. But, you need to understand that there are 2 possessions. There is no difference if you miss the 2pt conversion on the first TD or the 2nd TD. Explain the difference and I'll listen...
That's why you are posting on Covers and a data scientist is getting paid 500k to work for NFL teams to figure these things out. I understand your thinking. But, you need to understand that there are 2 possessions. There is no difference if you miss the 2pt conversion on the first TD or the 2nd TD. Explain the difference and I'll listen...
The Difference is that you are down ONE possession or TWO possessions. It gives your team momentum just to know you are one touchdown away.
And NO data scientist agrees with you in this situation.
Hot Forum Topics
