great 18-0 system for a very unpopular team this week !

I'm not a systems player, but nice hit on SMU and GL this weekend bro.

DFence, what u think about Toledo @ Vanderbilt getting 11.5?

sorry, i meant @ Purdue

Stil no losses on perfect systems i posted here

Dfence, do you have any pick for the popular teams? Thank in advance for the pick for the unpopular teams

You have been hot D-Fence but going against your ND pick. ND is also 0-10 against ranked opponets. Too much talent on both sides of the field for Stanford.

keep up good work my brother

good luck i m with you all your picks

18-1 now , lets see how it rolls.

 

Great play tonight bro! 

Good luck with all of your plays! 

           

Keep up the great work with the system plays and NEVER stop making money!  

 

nope. that system is now 19-0. the play i posted was smu +17.5, and actually all smu backers either or won (big majority) or pushed. i won and many won too. tcu players lost in big majority, some were lucky to get the push.

great call!

I think the double diget home dog dosn't work on the cincy at home +13 over Oklahoma. Just my 2 cents

DFence ~~

Nice call on the TCU/SMU game, abeit extremely close.

Either way -- 19-0 or 18-1 -- this system has to be taken seriously... so far.

Now, you said in your OP (Original Post):

"Home dogs of 13 points or more, winning more than 60% of their games are 18-0 ATS after two wins in which they allowed less than 50 pts combined. This system is covering the spread by almost 2 TD's on average."

I want to be more clear on this.

The home dogs of 13 pts or more -- is that they were home dogs of +13 pts or more in the previous games or the current games that they are about to play? The current home dogs that you have listed in this system mostly have less than +13, so you probably mean that they were +13 in previous games.

And "winning more than 60% of their games" -- meaning winning SU or covering their spreads?

And the "two wins" -- does this system only count the immediate two preceding games, or can it go back further in consideration of pts allowed in preceding games? It seems to me that this system looks at only the two most-immediately-preceding games.

So, for clarity, I'd like for this system to be boiled down to:

1) Previous-game home dogs of +13 or more;

2)Winning (SU or ATS?) 60% or more of their previous games;

3)The two immediate preceding games the home dogs allowing 50 pts or less in the combined pts allowed in both games.


But then if this system applies only to home dogs of +13 or more, then this would eliminate most of the current home dogs that you are favoring now for the future games, so this "+13" pt standard really cannot apply, can it? Perhaps it's just "home dogs", rather than a minimum pt level threshold?


Some clarification of the exact terms of the system would be greatly appreciated.


Even if this system would have a couple losses, or not, it's a great system, it appears, especially if this and the next weekend validates it, as we approach the minimum threshold of 32 or more sample games that are needed for statistical validity for this system.

 Great looking system you have..... All the best to ya,Sir!!

NICE

Congrats on your SMU play! Looking foward to the saturday plays as well..............GLTA

I like the record but still alittle skeptical aboult it though

4-2 week to date in cfb with one play pending

 

 

great job!

awesome

5-2 this week

good job so far... the +5 Byu didn't cover tho.. but still good job bud!!