All Forums | College Football

Can Oregon Stop Cam Newton In The Championship?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 19534
Posts: 305
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 6704
Posted: #176
i got oregon to win it a few weeks ago

i actually think auburn is gonna win

i've watched a handful of oregon's games and yes they come back and win it in the 2nd half but my question is,

will they be able to do it in the championship game?

also they score a lot of their touchdowns on breaking it to the sideline and heading up field, i think auburn will be able to run sideline to sideline with them unlike most pac 10 teams
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 105
Posted: #177

Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:



The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...

I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...

I don't know where he got Oregon at 40-1.  Think there's some exaggerating going on there.  Among my other picks at the beggining of the year, I took Oregon at 22-1.  I put $500 on them.

I was seriously hoping for a SC upset in the SEC championship so that Oregon would most likely play TCU.  This game is a coin flip.  I can see either team winning by DD for different reasons, but more than likely I think the team with the ball last wins.

I'm just going to enjoy the game, put $5500 on Auburn to hedge my bet, I know I win.

Best of luck to both backers!!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1450
Posted: #178
Cam Newton is going to win the heisman
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #179
Quote Originally Posted by kroch:


Gene Chizek is one of the most overrated coaches out there.  Ask Texas fans about his alleged defenses (which amazingly aren't good at Auburn either).  His failure to make halftime changes is another thing.

He got a one of a kind player in Cam---which makes Malzahn and Chizek look like a genius.






Although I am sure Chizik has some input, the Auburn defense is run by Ted Roof now. Regardless, it is obvious that you are not paying attention or just do not understand what a head coach is supposed to do. Not only has Chizik Hired one of the best coaching staff's in all of college football and more importantly gotten out of their way and let them do what he hired them for, Auburn's defense gets much better after halftime not because I say so, the numbers and outcomes do. It is irrelevant what he did at Texas or Iowa St, at Auburn he is getting it done a major scale and to suggest he is overrated simply means that you do not understand what the job of a head coach is. He is doing a great job getting people in place and letting them use their collective talents and I did not even mention the caliber of talent these guys have already and will continue to bring in as long as they are there... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #180
Quote Originally Posted by westcoastgamble:

I don't know where he got Oregon at 40-1.  Think there's some exaggerating going on there.  Among my other picks at the beggining of the year, I took Oregon at 22-1.  I put $500 on them.

I was seriously hoping for a SC upset in the SEC championship so that Oregon would most likely play TCU.  This game is a coin flip.  I can see either team winning by DD for different reasons, but more than likely I think the team with the ball last wins.

I'm just going to enjoy the game, put $5500 on Auburn to hedge my bet, I know I win.

Best of luck to both backers!!!



I was simply commenting On Sarah claiming to have made a $1000 bet on Oregon at 40-1 on another thread she started (possible this one too, not sure). Great bet and good luck...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #181

I wonder if Auburn players and Oregon players (just family members of players, coaches, staff...) lay down bets like that, $100-$1000 to win it all. Isn't that what horse owners give their jockeys, like a winning ticket on the horse he's riding, like an incentive beyond his "commission."

Question is, would it be illegal for a family member to have money on their son's team to win it all?

Is there anything illegal about a player having money on his own team to win it all?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1450
Posted: #182
cam newton 19-19 on opening drives this season!!!!! oregon is going to struggle with that.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1450
Posted: #183
told ya!!! cam newton is your heisman winner!! auburns got this!
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #184
More from the "geniusbox" called Pirates11:
 
cam newton 19-19 on opening drives this season!!!!! oregon is going to struggle with that.
 
Since when does a past event matter for the present? Are Oregon players "struggling" with that statistic? Think not.
 
And still more--
 
told ya!!! cam newton is your heisman winner!! auburns got this!
 
First of all, will you please stop trying to alter the English language? Proper nouns are capitalized, and possesive nouns carry a hyphen. These "rules" that you are IGNOR(e)-ant of make it difficult to understand you. Secondly, "no shit, Sherlock," and thanks again Nostradamus for your accurate Heisman prediction. Anyone would've guessed that, unless they were living the last 6 months in the South Pole, or had their head up your ass.
 
With corrections:
 
I told you! Cam Newton will be your Heisman winner! Auburn's got this!
 
 [Does "this" refer to the Heisman or the NC game? I assume you were referring to the outcome of the game.]
 
Oregon (and the whole nation) is congratulating Cam Newton on his award. He won several others as well. He has been a remarkable player this season. He overcame a lot of adversity and he played with tremendous poise. He is quite a force at quarterback. I hope he plays and he does well.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 6533
Posted: #185
I HOPE OREGON BEATS THE EVER LOVIN' DOG SHIT OUT OF AUBURN AND "CAM THE CREEP"
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #186

Quote Originally Posted by Hank55:

I HOPE OREGON BEATS THE EVER LOVIN' DOG SHIT OUT OF AUBURN AND "CAM THE CREEP"

Tell us how you really feel about it.

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1450
Posted: #187
19-19 even against teams in the big east thats when it matters
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 6533
Posted: #188
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

Tell us how you really feel about it.

 




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1114
Posted: #189

Quote Originally Posted by Hank55:

I HOPE OREGON BEATS THE EVER LOVIN' DOG SHIT OUT OF AUBURN AND "CAM THE CREEP"

Ur def  person!!!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 113
Posted: #190
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:



The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...

I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...



I've read all the posts by you & Sarah up to now.  First, Sarah is clearly not clueless.  Second, you have already made at least a few comments that exposed you.  I'm not going to write a book here but I don't believe for a second that "supplement" you income from this. Neither do any of the knowledgable people on here if they read what enough of your posts.  You pat yourself on the back for your Ohio St & Stanford teaser.  You tease college games like that?  Very impressive.  lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 113
Posted: #191
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:



Don't take this wrong, but without people betting on sports such as yourself it would not be possible for me to supplement my income with Sports Betting so I say thank you...Best Of Luck and try not to let the outcome of this game affect your overall wellness, it' is just a game...


lol lol lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 113
Posted: #192
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:



The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...

I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...



Time to look in the mirror buddy
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 151
Posted: #193
Quote Originally Posted by Quantum_Leap:

More from the "geniusbox" called Pirates11:
 
cam newton 19-19 on opening drives this season!!!!! oregon is going to struggle with that.
 
Since when does a past event matter for the present? Are Oregon players "struggling" with that statistic? Think not.
 
And still more--
 
told ya!!! cam newton is your heisman winner!! auburns got this!
 
First of all, will you please stop trying to alter the English language? Proper nouns are capitalized, and possesive nouns carry a hyphen. These "rules" that you are IGNOR(e)-ant of make it difficult to understand you. Secondly, "no shit, Sherlock," and thanks again Nostradamus for your accurate Heisman prediction. Anyone would've guessed that, unless they were living the last 6 months in the South Pole, or had their head up your ass.
 
With corrections:
 
I told you! Cam Newton will be your Heisman winner! Auburn's got this!
 
 [Does "this" refer to the Heisman or the NC game? I assume you were referring to the outcome of the game.]
 
Oregon (and the whole nation) is congratulating Cam Newton on his award. He won several others as well. He has been a remarkable player this season. He overcame a lot of adversity and he played with tremendous poise. He is quite a force at quarterback. I hope he plays and he does well.
 


Not trying to stir the pot but I fail to see the aforementioned hyphen inserted in to this sentence. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #194

Quote Originally Posted by TomasW1979:



Not trying to stir the pot but I fail to see the aforementioned hyphen inserted in to this sentence. 

True. I knew educated people were on this forum

Let's ask the student: Is the sentence even correct?:

 "Auburn's got this."

-- Or, is it a grammatical error? "Auburn has got this" which is not shortened by any apostrophe?

There are so many mistakes when he writes, I'm beginning to believe Americans like Pirates11 learn their writing from cell phone texting more than literature.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #195

Quote Originally Posted by pirates11:

19-19 even against teams in the big east thats when it matters

First of all, let me waste another two minutes correcting this frosh's grammatical errors to make his pointed musings somewhat more comprehensible:

The Auburn Tigers are 19 for their last 19 on opening drives, even against teams from the Big East Conference--now that's when it matters most.

Secondly, The Big East has been a pathetic joke the last fivr years, and many are questioning whether they even deserve an automatic BCS berth. Their Conference Champion this year is UCONN, and they are not even ranked in the Top 25. In fact, there is no team from the Big East currently in the Top 20 (W. Virginia is #21). Yet the WAC has three teams ranked in the Top 25, and have no automatic bid. Please don't even bother explaining what caused you to fart out your statement about the one lone win over West Virginia as something that has anything even remotely linked to the NC game. The QB wasn't even Cam Newton, it was Chris Todd, and the Mountaineer QB threw 4 INTs.

Included in your 19-19 stat are some significant losses at the end of the 2009 season:

 

  Sat, Oct 31Sat, Nov 7Sat, Nov 14 
Sat, Oct 10 at Arkansas L 23-44 --
Sat, Oct 17 Kentucky L 14-21 --
Sat, Oct 24 at (9) LSU L 10-31 --
(24) Mississippi W 33-20 --
Furman W 63-31 --
at Georgia L 24-31 --
Fri, Nov 27 (2) Alabama L 21-26

 

Can you please change allegiances and root for Oregon? You are singlehandedly JINXING the Auburn Tigers with your stupidity. Just STFU.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 151
Posted: #196
I have OR ML and on a late placed futures bet at 11-1.  I also went to U of O for grad school so you could say Im somewhat biased!  Ive seen Oregon play and practice this year, there is definetely something special about this team as compared to previous years.  It really comes down to the level of conditioning expected of them in practice.  They aim to wear down opponents and dominate the second half, specifically the fourth quarter, which they have done quite effectively.  Oregon wins a close one here, though I do not think it will be as high scoring as some are expecting.

As for the grammatical issues, I dont expect perfect sentence structure or grammar when perusing the forums.  I view the forums as a more colloquial form of discussion, similar to if one were chatting in person.  I would, however, expect proper structuring in a formal piece such as a blog entry or published article. 

Just my 2c.  BOL


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 1371
Posted: #197
Quote Originally Posted by brownbull:




Time to look in the mirror buddy


Fair enough. You are correct about one thing and that is posting shit like I have posted here is meaningless and a waste of time. It is easy to post shit on a forum and talk about what we do and sometimes one post leads to several more and we have wasted weeks of our time.

 I thank you, Quantum Leap, Apocalypse now and Sarah for opening my eyes, but mostly you for finally waking me up so I can get my ass back to more constructive things with my time besides playing in a gambling forum on the internet. And as a parting thought, your opinions of me are irrelevant, you are but a name on a computer screen. I do not make a living betting on sports by a long shot but do supplement my income rather consistently for the most part and will soon be making money off moron's like you through affiliate sells...Best of luck...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 14521
Posted: #198

I also could care less about grammar--grammar rules change over time, and many of them are lame to begin with. OK. But some of these idiots are just grandstanding and offer "facts" that are just biased opinions and ignore facts that work against their selection. When they do that and at the same time make gross, ignorant errors in writing, I simply feel it's almost a duty to harpoon the and do us all a favor.

I'm starting to believe Auburn is the wrong side in this one, simply because of the lame asses that are so arrogantly stupid coming into a post of the other side (Oregon) solely to try and piss off someone else (because they pretend to not listen). They are obviously betting small amounts of money and this is just a kind of charade. I think they belong on yahoo, not a betting forum.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #199
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:



Fair enough. You are correct about one thing and that is posting shit like I have posted here is meaningless and a waste of time. It is easy to post shit on a forum and talk about what we do and sometimes one post leads to several more and we have wasted weeks of our time.

 I thank you, Quantum Leap, Apocalypse now and Sarah for opening my eyes, but mostly you for finally waking me up so I can get my ass back to more constructive things with my time besides playing in a gambling forum on the internet. And as a parting thought, your opinions of me are irrelevant, you are but a name on a computer screen. I do not make a living betting on sports by a long shot but do supplement my income rather consistently for the most part and will soon be making money off moron's like you through affiliate sells...Best of luck...


You can't "make money off morons like you" in the United States; an affiliate is 15 years in jail in Oregon, and I'm sure Florida law isn't much different.

The bookmaker is the illegal party in online gambling, and if you choose to take make money with them, you are jointly liable.

An affiliate is the same as owning the book in United States law.
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #200
I hope the championship has as much passion as the members on this thread.

I hope we see a Texas/USC type shootout! :)
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.