There's no need to take it out on Oregon and our SUPER, DOOPER, AWESOME, FAST OFFENSE! :)
We don't need to sub EVERY play. Goodness gracious. We rotate 20 guys on defense---so when a team gives up possession, we can rotate---GENIUS IDEA! We will be fresh in the 4th, as always.
Don't take this wrong, but without people betting on sports such as yourself it would not be possible for me to supplement my income with Sports Betting so I say thank you...Best Of Luck and try not to let the outcome of this game affect your overall wellness, it' is just a game...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
I'm sorry Florida had such a down year.
There's no need to take it out on Oregon and our SUPER, DOOPER, AWESOME, FAST OFFENSE! :)
We don't need to sub EVERY play. Goodness gracious. We rotate 20 guys on defense---so when a team gives up possession, we can rotate---GENIUS IDEA! We will be fresh in the 4th, as always.
Don't take this wrong, but without people betting on sports such as yourself it would not be possible for me to supplement my income with Sports Betting so I say thank you...Best Of Luck and try not to let the outcome of this game affect your overall wellness, it' is just a game...
Don't take this wrong, but without people betting on sports such as yourself it would not be possible for me to supplement my income with Sports Betting so I say thank you...Best Of Luck and try not to let the outcome of this game affect your overall wellness, it' is just a game...
Awesome.
Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit.
Auburn isn't going to try and win the game playing Oregon's uptempo offensive game; they're going to try and pound us between the tackles, get some lateral runs, and throw in some play action pass.
Oregon is going to try and run them off the field with tempo.
It'll be a fun game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:
Don't take this wrong, but without people betting on sports such as yourself it would not be possible for me to supplement my income with Sports Betting so I say thank you...Best Of Luck and try not to let the outcome of this game affect your overall wellness, it' is just a game...
Awesome.
Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit.
Auburn isn't going to try and win the game playing Oregon's uptempo offensive game; they're going to try and pound us between the tackles, get some lateral runs, and throw in some play action pass.
Oregon is going to try and run them off the field with tempo.
Say what you want, but Auburn has one of the best overall coaching staff's in all of college football. If you think Kelly having a month to prepare is huge, wait until you get a load of what Gus Malzahn will have waiting the Ducks. I have made money off both teams this year, but it is all I can do right now to hold off a huge bet on Auburn with Malzahn, Newton, Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Adams, Zackery, Lutzinkirken, Blake and a very experienced, dominating offensive line. Throw in a hard hitting defense that will slow down the run and hit the QB and Auburn should win something like 45-31...
P.S. Oregon is as fast as there is, but so is Auburn and I would argue that Auburn has seen speed closer too Oregon then Oregon has seen when they face Auburn and will not be able to keep up...One thing I know for a fact and that is that Oregon has seen nothing like Newton who has several weapons as i said above and will beat you in a number of ways...Auburn 45...Oregon 31...
Thats not true Pryor last year . Buckeyes how did Oregon do?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:
Say what you want, but Auburn has one of the best overall coaching staff's in all of college football. If you think Kelly having a month to prepare is huge, wait until you get a load of what Gus Malzahn will have waiting the Ducks. I have made money off both teams this year, but it is all I can do right now to hold off a huge bet on Auburn with Malzahn, Newton, Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Adams, Zackery, Lutzinkirken, Blake and a very experienced, dominating offensive line. Throw in a hard hitting defense that will slow down the run and hit the QB and Auburn should win something like 45-31...
P.S. Oregon is as fast as there is, but so is Auburn and I would argue that Auburn has seen speed closer too Oregon then Oregon has seen when they face Auburn and will not be able to keep up...One thing I know for a fact and that is that Oregon has seen nothing like Newton who has several weapons as i said above and will beat you in a number of ways...Auburn 45...Oregon 31...
Thats not true Pryor last year . Buckeyes how did Oregon do?
Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit.
Auburn isn't going to try and win the game playing Oregon's uptempo offensive game; they're going to try and pound us between the tackles, get some lateral runs, and throw in some play action pass.
Oregon is going to try and run them off the field with tempo.
It'll be a fun game.
I agree that Auburn will run between the tackles as Auburn does, but very capable of finesse and has an excellent passing game. While Oregon is very fast it will not be any different then what they see in practice or even in several games for the most part. You telling me to "Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit." made my day. Here you are arguing this and that making comments about Auburn offense being good and Oregon's great and that Oregon defense will sub and be fresh. If you are going to argue something at least have a small clue about it.
Watch a replay of Auburn/South Carolina, the same South Carolina that so many knew would beat Auburn. Watch about mid way through the 2nd quarter and the 2nd half as South Carolina employs the same method Cal did against you because they could not breathe and understand the rule that makes this possible is going to wear your defense out in the end. Auburn may get gassed, it is possible, but I have little doubt Newton and co. will run over and around your defense. over and over, hurry back so you cannot sub and wear them out as the 9 fresh bodies watch from the sidelines. Auburn defense will slow down the Oregon Offense much more effectively the the other way around...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
Awesome.
Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit.
Auburn isn't going to try and win the game playing Oregon's uptempo offensive game; they're going to try and pound us between the tackles, get some lateral runs, and throw in some play action pass.
Oregon is going to try and run them off the field with tempo.
It'll be a fun game.
I agree that Auburn will run between the tackles as Auburn does, but very capable of finesse and has an excellent passing game. While Oregon is very fast it will not be any different then what they see in practice or even in several games for the most part. You telling me to "Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit." made my day. Here you are arguing this and that making comments about Auburn offense being good and Oregon's great and that Oregon defense will sub and be fresh. If you are going to argue something at least have a small clue about it.
Watch a replay of Auburn/South Carolina, the same South Carolina that so many knew would beat Auburn. Watch about mid way through the 2nd quarter and the 2nd half as South Carolina employs the same method Cal did against you because they could not breathe and understand the rule that makes this possible is going to wear your defense out in the end. Auburn may get gassed, it is possible, but I have little doubt Newton and co. will run over and around your defense. over and over, hurry back so you cannot sub and wear them out as the 9 fresh bodies watch from the sidelines. Auburn defense will slow down the Oregon Offense much more effectively the the other way around...
I agree that Auburn will run between the tackles as Auburn does, but very capable of finesse and has an excellent passing game. While Oregon is very fast it will not be any different then what they see in practice or even in several games for the most part. You telling me to "Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit." made my day. Here you are arguing this and that making comments about Auburn offense being good and Oregon's great and that Oregon defense will sub and be fresh. If you are going to argue something at least have a small clue about it.
Watch a replay of Auburn/South Carolina, the same South Carolina that so many knew would beat Auburn. Watch about mid way through the 2nd quarter and the 2nd half as South Carolina employs the same method Cal did against you because they could not breathe and understand the rule that makes this possible is going to wear your defense out in the end. Auburn may get gassed, it is possible, but I have little doubt Newton and co. will run over and around your defense. over and over, hurry back so you cannot sub and wear them out as the 9 fresh bodies watch from the sidelines. Auburn defense will slow down the Oregon Offense much more effectively the the other way around...
I fell asleep midway through this.
Anyway, BOL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:
I agree that Auburn will run between the tackles as Auburn does, but very capable of finesse and has an excellent passing game. While Oregon is very fast it will not be any different then what they see in practice or even in several games for the most part. You telling me to "Next time you want to argue your point, aim for your team's strong suit." made my day. Here you are arguing this and that making comments about Auburn offense being good and Oregon's great and that Oregon defense will sub and be fresh. If you are going to argue something at least have a small clue about it.
Watch a replay of Auburn/South Carolina, the same South Carolina that so many knew would beat Auburn. Watch about mid way through the 2nd quarter and the 2nd half as South Carolina employs the same method Cal did against you because they could not breathe and understand the rule that makes this possible is going to wear your defense out in the end. Auburn may get gassed, it is possible, but I have little doubt Newton and co. will run over and around your defense. over and over, hurry back so you cannot sub and wear them out as the 9 fresh bodies watch from the sidelines. Auburn defense will slow down the Oregon Offense much more effectively the the other way around...
Sarah you know very little about football but then again you are a girl!
That's funny stuff... to bad it's not even close to true. I PLAYED HS and college ball and I think most of her analysis is spot on, BUT where she misses a bit is I really think she is underestimating Auburn as a team as a whole. Honestly, it almost makes me vomit in my mouth a little even saying that because I am a HUGE Ducks backer and I HATE any team from Alabama but it's true. Honestly, this is an incredibly well matched NC game... should be the best one since UT/USC a few years ago and I kinda expect the same outcome... whoever has the ball last will win. Do I think either team will score every time they have the ball? Hell no, I actually think this will go under but I do think this will be a "beat this" type of game with each team matching scores til the end. That's the biggest reason I can't pick a side here... my heart says Ducks throttle em in the end but my head says this really is a toss up.
Ducks won't do a very good job of stopping the run in the first half til they make adjustments but I see it being a tough battle later in the game for the Auburn O. Oregon's constant subbing on D will keep them fresh in the 2nd half and with adjustments I think they keep up. I expect the Oregon O to have a "some good/some bad" first half against the Auburn D. Their run D is legit but those fat pieces of shit on the Auburn D line can't and won't keep up with the pace and intensity the whole game... first half, yes. Will be even more interesting if somebody takes out that cheating POS Fairley with a helmet to the knee early in the game (please God... he deserves it). Newton... well, he is what he is. Alabama figured out how to stop his running for the most part but he still contributed immensely to their win... hopefully the Ducks just find a way to keep him reasonable and not let him go nuts like in the Arkansas game.
I really don't know... I can see logical good arguements to every side on this game and can't pick a side. Honestly, I'm fine with that since nothing is more stupid than to bet on your team and lose but nothing hurts more to bet against them and also lose. Kind of a hard spot so I'm laying off most likely
0
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:
Sarah you know very little about football but then again you are a girl!
That's funny stuff... to bad it's not even close to true. I PLAYED HS and college ball and I think most of her analysis is spot on, BUT where she misses a bit is I really think she is underestimating Auburn as a team as a whole. Honestly, it almost makes me vomit in my mouth a little even saying that because I am a HUGE Ducks backer and I HATE any team from Alabama but it's true. Honestly, this is an incredibly well matched NC game... should be the best one since UT/USC a few years ago and I kinda expect the same outcome... whoever has the ball last will win. Do I think either team will score every time they have the ball? Hell no, I actually think this will go under but I do think this will be a "beat this" type of game with each team matching scores til the end. That's the biggest reason I can't pick a side here... my heart says Ducks throttle em in the end but my head says this really is a toss up.
Ducks won't do a very good job of stopping the run in the first half til they make adjustments but I see it being a tough battle later in the game for the Auburn O. Oregon's constant subbing on D will keep them fresh in the 2nd half and with adjustments I think they keep up. I expect the Oregon O to have a "some good/some bad" first half against the Auburn D. Their run D is legit but those fat pieces of shit on the Auburn D line can't and won't keep up with the pace and intensity the whole game... first half, yes. Will be even more interesting if somebody takes out that cheating POS Fairley with a helmet to the knee early in the game (please God... he deserves it). Newton... well, he is what he is. Alabama figured out how to stop his running for the most part but he still contributed immensely to their win... hopefully the Ducks just find a way to keep him reasonable and not let him go nuts like in the Arkansas game.
I really don't know... I can see logical good arguements to every side on this game and can't pick a side. Honestly, I'm fine with that since nothing is more stupid than to bet on your team and lose but nothing hurts more to bet against them and also lose. Kind of a hard spot so I'm laying off most likely
Thats not true Pryor last year . Buckeyes how did Oregon do?
Ohhhhh... so nothing has changed since last year at all?? I guess Texas is playing the NC game again, right? Oh wait... let me guess, that's different, right? Can someone tell me exactly why all these people use LAST YEARS Duck team as an example of this years team? Are they the same team?? Did the play the same games with the same results?? Maybe I missed it, but last time I checked this IS 2010, not 2009 so the 2009 Oregon team or their bowl game is pretty much inconsequential. Things change year to year... Oregon got better, Texas and Bama got worse. What did Auburn do in last years bowl game? Oh... they sqeaked one out against an 8-5 Northwestern team. Wow. Let me guess... "But they didn't have Cam Newton" you will cry like a child who lost his mother. Big friggin deal... that was last year. Oregon didn't have Daron Thomas (who is better than Masoli FYI, and who was a big part of the bowl loss). Anyways... point is that last year means NOTHING in relation to this year... teams get better, teams get worse... the only thing is individual players and if you can't see that Oregon's INDIVIDUAL players that played last year have gotten better then you are blind. They have gotten better as a team and so has Auburn. Using the past and using the Ohio st game is almost as logical as the team X beat team Y but lost to team Z so team Z can obviously beat team Y arguement... if it was that easy we wouldn't even need to play the games. The past is the past and unless it happened this season it's pretty much irrelevant... and last time I checked Oregon is undefeated this year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by middleman820:
Thats not true Pryor last year . Buckeyes how did Oregon do?
Ohhhhh... so nothing has changed since last year at all?? I guess Texas is playing the NC game again, right? Oh wait... let me guess, that's different, right? Can someone tell me exactly why all these people use LAST YEARS Duck team as an example of this years team? Are they the same team?? Did the play the same games with the same results?? Maybe I missed it, but last time I checked this IS 2010, not 2009 so the 2009 Oregon team or their bowl game is pretty much inconsequential. Things change year to year... Oregon got better, Texas and Bama got worse. What did Auburn do in last years bowl game? Oh... they sqeaked one out against an 8-5 Northwestern team. Wow. Let me guess... "But they didn't have Cam Newton" you will cry like a child who lost his mother. Big friggin deal... that was last year. Oregon didn't have Daron Thomas (who is better than Masoli FYI, and who was a big part of the bowl loss). Anyways... point is that last year means NOTHING in relation to this year... teams get better, teams get worse... the only thing is individual players and if you can't see that Oregon's INDIVIDUAL players that played last year have gotten better then you are blind. They have gotten better as a team and so has Auburn. Using the past and using the Ohio st game is almost as logical as the team X beat team Y but lost to team Z so team Z can obviously beat team Y arguement... if it was that easy we wouldn't even need to play the games. The past is the past and unless it happened this season it's pretty much irrelevant... and last time I checked Oregon is undefeated this year.
If either one of these teams had a shutdown defense, I'd throw all my money on that side.
Unfortunately, this is a battle of 2 high powered offenses with opportunistic defenses. In this type of situation, anything can happen.
EGGGGGGGGGGZACKLY!!! That's pretty much my long winded point and why I think it's way too hard to pick this game. Maybe it's my heart playing in it too much but I cannot cap an honest advantage in this game good enough to make it worth betting
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
I respect Auburn. They're not invincible though.
If either one of these teams had a shutdown defense, I'd throw all my money on that side.
Unfortunately, this is a battle of 2 high powered offenses with opportunistic defenses. In this type of situation, anything can happen.
EGGGGGGGGGGZACKLY!!! That's pretty much my long winded point and why I think it's way too hard to pick this game. Maybe it's my heart playing in it too much but I cannot cap an honest advantage in this game good enough to make it worth betting
I sure have. I live in California. Ducks last good game was against USC. It is a terrible match up for Oregon. Pryor from Ohio St dominated Oregon last yr in the Rose Bowl what do you think Cam will do? Cam is much better than Pryor. Auburn has a great run defense that will slow Oregon down. Auburn's weakness is defending the pass and that passing is not Oregon's forte.
Only decent defensive line Oregon played was against Cal and they got shut down. Auburn defensive line is superior to Cal's.
This will be the largest wager in my 15 years of wagering.
biggest wager in 15 years .. ur a dumbasss
0
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:
I sure have. I live in California. Ducks last good game was against USC. It is a terrible match up for Oregon. Pryor from Ohio St dominated Oregon last yr in the Rose Bowl what do you think Cam will do? Cam is much better than Pryor. Auburn has a great run defense that will slow Oregon down. Auburn's weakness is defending the pass and that passing is not Oregon's forte.
Only decent defensive line Oregon played was against Cal and they got shut down. Auburn defensive line is superior to Cal's.
This will be the largest wager in my 15 years of wagering.
Ohhhhh... so nothing has changed since last year at all?? I guess Texas is playing the NC game again, right? Oh wait... let me guess, that's different, right? Can someone tell me exactly why all these people use LAST YEARS Duck team as an example of this years team? Are they the same team?? Did the play the same games with the same results?? Maybe I missed it, but last time I checked this IS 2010, not 2009 so the 2009 Oregon team or their bowl game is pretty much inconsequential. Things change year to year... Oregon got better, Texas and Bama got worse. What did Auburn do in last years bowl game? Oh... they sqeaked one out against an 8-5 Northwestern team. Wow. Let me guess... "But they didn't have Cam Newton" you will cry like a child who lost his mother. Big friggin deal... that was last year. Oregon didn't have Daron Thomas (who is better than Masoli FYI, and who was a big part of the bowl loss). Anyways... point is that last year means NOTHING in relation to this year... teams get better, teams get worse... the only thing is individual players and if you can't see that Oregon's INDIVIDUAL players that played last year have gotten better then you are blind. They have gotten better as a team and so has Auburn. Using the past and using the Ohio st game is almost as logical as the team X beat team Y but lost to team Z so team Z can obviously beat team Y arguement... if it was that easy we wouldn't even need to play the games. The past is the past and unless it happened this season it's pretty much irrelevant... and last time I checked Oregon is undefeated this year.
0
Quote Originally Posted by firefitr5287:
Ohhhhh... so nothing has changed since last year at all?? I guess Texas is playing the NC game again, right? Oh wait... let me guess, that's different, right? Can someone tell me exactly why all these people use LAST YEARS Duck team as an example of this years team? Are they the same team?? Did the play the same games with the same results?? Maybe I missed it, but last time I checked this IS 2010, not 2009 so the 2009 Oregon team or their bowl game is pretty much inconsequential. Things change year to year... Oregon got better, Texas and Bama got worse. What did Auburn do in last years bowl game? Oh... they sqeaked one out against an 8-5 Northwestern team. Wow. Let me guess... "But they didn't have Cam Newton" you will cry like a child who lost his mother. Big friggin deal... that was last year. Oregon didn't have Daron Thomas (who is better than Masoli FYI, and who was a big part of the bowl loss). Anyways... point is that last year means NOTHING in relation to this year... teams get better, teams get worse... the only thing is individual players and if you can't see that Oregon's INDIVIDUAL players that played last year have gotten better then you are blind. They have gotten better as a team and so has Auburn. Using the past and using the Ohio st game is almost as logical as the team X beat team Y but lost to team Z so team Z can obviously beat team Y arguement... if it was that easy we wouldn't even need to play the games. The past is the past and unless it happened this season it's pretty much irrelevant... and last time I checked Oregon is undefeated this year.
You've gotta be joking. Cam Newton is your offense, you could atleast admit that much.
What was their record last year without him? 8-5? And I'm sure they played a few token SEC 2A opponents, too, to bump up their record.
The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...
I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...
0
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:
You've gotta be joking. Cam Newton is your offense, you could atleast admit that much.
What was their record last year without him? 8-5? And I'm sure they played a few token SEC 2A opponents, too, to bump up their record.
The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...
I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...
The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...
I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:
The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...
I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...
The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...
I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...
*Yawn*
0
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:
The more you talk the more you establish the fact that at the very least you know nothing about Auburn (yet you continue to talk as if you do) and at the most have no college football knowledge outside of Oregon. By saying Cam Newton is Auburn's offense makes about the 5th comment (and that's being nice) you have made on this thread that is so far off base you look stupid...
I have a friend who has a saying that goes like this...There is nothing wrong with a moron so long as they realize that they are a moron brcause they will not try things that get them or others hurt. On the other hand, a moron who thinks he/she is intelligent is not only a danger to themselves but others around them because they will attempt things they have no clue about. What is their record last year without him 8-5...Really? Seriously? what on gods green earth does that have to do with this team...NOTHING...Dyer, McCalebb, Fanin, Burns, Zackery, Adams, Blake and Lutzenkirken make Auburn much more then a one trick pony, but only someone who actually pays attention would know this...I seen where you said that you placed A large wager on Oregon at 40-1 before the season started and doubted you but not now. It would have took someone with your great knowledge to place that bet after losing your QB. As hard as it is to believe, you make ApocalypseLater look like a genius...You really are clueless...
Because that is all you can do considering your posted picks here and ridiculous comments...
Just looked at your profile that displays your awful betting picks.
You have some nerve calling me unintelligent when you clearly have very little knowledge and even worse betting talent. I have no reason to respond to you any longer until you start making correct picks.
BOL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Droxside:
Because that is all you can do considering your posted picks here and ridiculous comments...
Just looked at your profile that displays your awful betting picks.
You have some nerve calling me unintelligent when you clearly have very little knowledge and even worse betting talent. I have no reason to respond to you any longer until you start making correct picks.
Just looked at your profile that displays your awful betting picks.
You have some nerve calling me unintelligent when you clearly have very little knowledge and even worse betting talent. I have no reason to respond to you any longer until you start making correct picks.
Just looked at your profile that displays your awful betting picks.
You have some nerve calling me unintelligent when you clearly have very little knowledge and even worse betting talent. I have no reason to respond to you any longer until you start making correct picks.
Hot Forum Topics
