All Forums | College Football

Bowl thread 2010....

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 35447
Posts: 263
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #201

Quote Originally Posted by Spitfire15:



IMO the only way it impacts the game is by slowing down Navy's rushing attack... you would think Navy would be better off in the water... well NOT SO FAST my friend!

Navy is great at what they do, but the SD St defense is solid, and their offense moves the ball FAST.  Sometimes teams like Navy frustrate them by keeping the offense off the field for a long time, but I think SD St's defense will make a lot of stops, making it a very long night for the Midshipmen.

I kind of see this angle too - also - the Navy attack requires a lot of ball control with pitches and long handoffs - and with a wet ball it might have more of a negative effect on their ground attack than at first glance....

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #202

Quote Originally Posted by 1pumpchump:

Gil, nice of you to say, but your comments were fine...Non bashing...I have been around here for awhile..TRUST ME, MANSACK has heard WAY worse than this...This shit doesnt even register on his radar...THE SACK has thick skin from dealing with all the douche-bags on the site for years!

I appreciate someone calling me by my most favorite insult name - mansack.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #203

Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999:

I was all over Boise last night.  Got the cover 1st half, and a tease to the under, plus the second half.

That being said......I should have lost everything!  I never saw so many easy passes dropped by one team in one night.  Thank you UTAH for putting butter on your fingers for the game.

Both sides had lots of "coulda, shoulda, woulda" - you can count many instances where either side should have covered easily.  It was just a very strange game.  Dont forget the Boise dropped TD pass, the blocked FG etc - there were plenty......

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2288
Posted: #204
Quote Originally Posted by Jaykay9294:

Hey Cooler what are you playing tonight on the Navy+3 or SanDiego-3. I'd rather listen to you since you got last nights picks right.



only on covers.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #205

Latest news is good for the field.....

Weather looks good for tonight and the field might actually be in good shape.

I am adding a half unit at -3 to make my totals 1 unit at -4.5, 1 unit at -4, and .5 unit at -3.

GL all

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2008
Posts: 3356
Posted: #206

Field in good shape.....

 

https://voices.washingtonpost.com/early-lead/2010/12/qualcomm_stadium_ready_for_nav.html

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #207
Another positive article on the field condition
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 13407
Posted: #208


Navy always fucks me.  Let's get a turnover edge and win this thing by a few touchdowns.

Van, are you taking the Panthers tonight?  You should.  The 'Lers are a virtual lock to win, but 15 is a ton with O-line struggles and no Polamalu.  10 Panther points should be enough for an ATS win in my opinion.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #209

Quote Originally Posted by Spitfire15:



Navy always fucks me.  Let's get a turnover edge and win this thing by a few touchdowns.

Van, are you taking the Panthers tonight?  You should.  The 'Lers are a virtual lock to win, but 15 is a ton with O-line struggles and no Polamalu.  10 Panther points should be enough for an ATS win in my opinion.

I naturally lean towards any DD dog in NFL - but have a really hard time betting Carolina.

Carolina's offense is offensive.  I was leaning towards them tonight but I just cant bring myself to bet on a team that cant score, or really even come close.

Im not trying to talk you off of your bet, gun to my head I would be on Carolina too - just not interested in another Utah vs Boise game, hoping to get to 10 points.....

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 28196
Posted: #210
not touching that nfl game tonight but i do like SDSU -3.  good luck. 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 22198
Posted: #211
Quote Originally Posted by Jaykay9294:

Hey Cooler what are you playing tonight on the Navy+3 or SanDiego-3. I'd rather listen to you since you got last nights picks right.



I'm all over SDSU....simply said...if they get behind, they can catch up. Navy gets behind, there one dimentional, and will have a very difficult time compared to SDSU.  Also like them on the ML..GL on whatever you choose.  It will be a battle
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 16136
Posted: #212
I think this thread needs an updated plays list Van
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #213

Quote Originally Posted by whereismyhat:

I think this thread needs an updated plays list Van

Anything for you Hat.....

1.  BYU -11.5 (lean)
2.  Fresno ML +105 (1 unit)
3.  Troy -2 (3 units) 
4.  S Miss +3 (lean)
5.  Utah +17 (2 units) 
6.  SD St -4.5 (1 unit), -4 (1 unit) -3 (.5 unit)
7.  Hawaii -10 (lean)
8.  FIU ML +110 (lean)
9.  G Tech +3 (2 units)
10.  WVU -3 (4 units)

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #214

Record:  1-2
Units:  Even

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 57577
Posted: #215
Quote Originally Posted by Cooler999:



I'm all over SDSU....simply said...if they get behind, they can catch up. Navy gets behind, there one dimentional, and will have a very difficult time compared to SDSU.  Also like them on the ML..GL on whatever you choose.  It will be a battle
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #216

SDST can throw downfield at will.

Stop with the bullshit lateral to set up a throw, stop the screens, just run the ball or drop back and pass.  Lindley has all day, and he has wide open receivers.

Stop trying to be so cute with it. 

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #217

Lindley is 11 for 14 for 184 yards at HT.

Just drop him back and throw, and mix in the run.  We dont need gadget plays, just bang down the field.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4326
Posted: #218
They really need to blow this open in the 2nd half.  But somehow I get the feeling it will not be that easy... 


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1310
Posted: #219
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:

SDST can throw downfield at will.

Stop with the bullshit lateral to set up a throw, stop the screens, just run the ball or drop back and pass.  Lindley has all day, and he has wide open receivers.

Stop trying to be so cute with it. 

Agree. Also they gave up two long passes on 3rd and long.

Never understood being up two scores getting beat over the top.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #220

SDST playcalling is so frustrating.

First drive after HT, they are running at will, and on 2nd and 7 they try a 50 yard pass.  They dont need to do this.  Just keep running, and dropping back and throwing to 10 yard open receivers ALL NIGHT.

So frustrating.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 60107
Posted: #221

FINALLY.

28-14.

Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 12342
Posted: #222
People who can afford to gamble don't need money, and those who need money can't afford to
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 12342
Posted: #223

Vanzack - interested in your opinion on Hawaii -6.5 1st half.  I am fearing the backdoor cover on Hawaii -10, so looking more into 1st half.

Great thread - glad to see your leaning with Hawaii.

People who can afford to gamble don't need money, and those who need money can't afford to
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 2110
Posted: #224
Nice hit Van!
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1032
Posted: #225
Quote Originally Posted by dyamarik:

Vanzack - interested in your opinion on Hawaii -6.5 1st half.  I am fearing the backdoor cover on Hawaii -10, so looking more into 1st half.

Great thread - glad to see your leaning with Hawaii.


It doesn't sound like Tulsa is enjoying a vacation on the island.  Coaches like the teams preparation and they have been embracing the "us against the world" approach.  Something tells me this is the first dog to bark but Tulsa +10 has lost some value.  Hawaii is a good football team, but there should at least be a backdoor opportunity here
All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.