|
|
342 |
211 |
61.7 |
2850 |
8.3 |
18 |
5 |
| Jarrett Lee | 163 | 100 | 61.3 | 1266 | 7.8 | 13 | 3 |
TW has 1500+ yards more than JL. I get that, but like I said completion % and yards per completion are pretty similar if you ask me. I guess if JL had 180 more pass attempts he could possibly have 5 more TDs, I dont know. But whats more important yards or touchdowns?
And your just another SEC homer who thinks that the SEC is the greatest thing since a slice of bread. Reality check
Your SEc can score, they can pass and they can't win games by margins that teams in the past who played on the west coast could. Only thing I see Is a strong run defense, and running game.Where Alabama struggled against a shitty Mississippi st squad, could kick field goals five attempts in a row, and you wanna call that the #3 team in America? AHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH, LSU should be jumping all over WKU it should be 70-0 but they could even score more than 1 TD in the first quarter and allowing WKU to score on them easily. 30-40 pts a game is nothing, its a TD every quarter and sometimes a TD and Field goal in each QRT. IF your defense holds on offense and has the ball 3 times per QRT they should score 2 TD and a field goal everytime. Just shows you how real you wannabe offense is. SEC is over rated. Lets look at what wil happen, LSU looses to Ark, , will the computers say that BAMA will play LSU or Okie st if they win outright? either way the BCS is flawed
the lesson here is your late on every account you posted, no doubt you obviously are some wannabe who praises the ground that your SEC teams walk on. If not playing defense is the result of your conclusion then riddle me this, why are the ducks always on the plus side of take aways in a football game? use better logic, you lost all credibility when talk about defense to me.
Lesson 3 Yes, the SEC has won 5 national championships, with the obvious talent levels dwindeling in the SEC I highly doubt that will happen next year though.On any given day any SEC team can be beat from a non-confrence opponent, Look at Shitty Boise st, they took the wind out of your beloved Georia and now georgia is whooping some ass, does this mean that Boise st woould roll all the teams georgia has played and beat? keep using the talent card, lets not forget football is a team sport, I would call the ducks a true team, the play defese and very well team played offense. As for Alabama, very little team cohesion, they ride the coat tails of trent and thats it, the QB sucks and the wide recievers are average at best.LSU has a Great Defese, no doubt, but lets put hem in another situation to play the ducks after the offenses are clicking, after we can see what kind of defensive and offensive schemes could play to the advantage of either team. I've read all the post in here, and no one has pointed out that COACHING, wins football games, if you not as talented or fast, but smart and listen you can win. Did'nt we all listen to that from our coaches playing the game? Has'nt it happened to you and your team ? Coaching wins and loses games not players, im sure if the roles were reversed and alabama had won that game instead of LSU we would be hearing more from the Tide nation on this subject, and as a factual statement, LSU is in my opinion a average team compared to teams of the past, AUburn would have scored at will on both alabama and LSu if Cam Newton were QB and the Florida gators with Tebow at QB would made your LSu tigers look silly, Boise st 2010 team would give you a hard time or out right beat both these teams, and lets not forget OhiO st and add them into the mix as a potential card to beat these two horrible teams you think are great. Next week, my money will be on arkansas, not LSU, if I lose i know full well i was on the right side and not the side that only has a defense.
Lesson 1: either your too young or to stupid to know this but , being able to win games in the first quarter is paramount, LU does'nt have the capeability or know how to do this. they let a scub WKU team hang around. they were beat on recieving routes all day long, bad coaching. coaching wins games and players adjust to that coaching to define the play, obviously, either the coaching is bad or the players are bad, not mistake looks and shows talent but does'nt listen, smaells like, and sounds likie someone else.... oh that would be you.
DAAKING-
You actually didn't sound too stupid with your last post until you said "and lets not forget OhiO st and add them into the mix as a potential card to beat these two horrible teams you think are great. Next week, my money will be on arkansas, not LSU, if I lose i know full well i was on the right side and not the side that only has a defense."
Saying that LSU and Alabama are horrible teams just shows your ignorance. Even the people who absolutely hate the SEC know that isn't true. LSU beat Oregon 40-27. Quite crying like a little girl and get over it. LSU was without their starting QB and their best WR. Oregon was missing a starter as well. ( i know that )
Then you go on to say that you are taking Arkansas and if you lose then you know you were on the right side- WTF!!! If you lose you are on the WRONG side. You are by far the biggest TOOL on this site.
Several teams could win the NC this year but the crap that keeps coming out of your mouth is immature and ignorant. I'm not going to say Oklahoma St., Oregon, and any non-SEC teams suck. Anybody can win including an SEC team. You need to realize that instead of talking like a clown.
DAAKING-
Once again you prove your ignorance. So you are telling me that Oregon has gotten better and LSU has gotten worse? They have both improved. I might take Arkansas as well. No where did i ever say i take LSU for every game. I am a gambler with a brain, not a homer. I bet big against LSU last week. I also bet against them when they played Alabama. Do i think LSU beats Arkansas by 24.5 pts. Hell no. Arkansas is a dangerous team. I think LSU wins and as a fan that is all i care for. I probably won't even bet that game. I don't bet on LSU games just because they are playing. I look at all point spreads and play the ones i think will win. So STFU about me betting on your 24.5 pt. spread or be a clown. You still won't admit what an idiot you sounded like when you said Alabama and LSU are "horrible" teams. And you still won't admit that Oregon got beat 40-27 by LSU. LSU was more physical in the trenches and it wore down Oregon. I think the same thing would happen if they played again. Personally i would like to see a rematch between them for the NC. I think Oregon plays better defense then Ok. St. and their offense is just as good. However, that isn't going to happen unless Bama and Ok. St. loses. I think the line for the LSU/Arkansas game will be LSU -8. I probably wont bet that game. I will be at the game and if anything i will see how the first half plays out and put in a second half wager.
DAAKING:
Really? Ohio State? Really? Come on bro. Really? Ohio State? Dude. Have you lost your marbles? Seriously? Ohio State wouldn't cross the 50 yard line on either Alabama or LSU. You do realize that Ohio State is ranked 3rd to last in the country in passing right? Just above two options teams (Army & Navy). You do know that right?
Furthermore.. Coaches win games, players don't?? WHAT? Have you ever heard coach speak "it's not the x's & o's, it's the jimmy's & joe's".
Ask Bill Belichick that question. His records as a head coach before 2001; 41-55. Do you know what his record was in 2001 the first two games before Brady took over? 0-2.
Do you know what Belichick's record as a head coach has been since Tom Brady? 132-53. The guy had one winning recored IN HIS LIFE as a head coach until Tom Brady. Must just be coincidence.
By the way, ask the Colts if Coaches win games.
Players win games. End of story. Period. Done. End of discussion.
wchilde-
I am an SEC fan but betting on them just because of past results does not guarantee anything. Certainly not against the spread. If anything the spread will be inflated because of the past results. Cap the game plain and simple.
Ice4blood-
If Oregon would get 7 pts against Alabama i would pound it too. I think the line would be a pick em myself or Oregon -1. Too bad we won't get to see that matchup. That would be a great game to watch.
DAAKING:
Really? Ohio State? Really? Come on bro. Really? Ohio State? Dude. Have you lost your marbles? Seriously? Ohio State wouldn't cross the 50 yard line on either Alabama or LSU. You do realize that Ohio State is ranked 3rd to last in the country in passing right? Just above two options teams (Army & Navy). You do know that right?
Furthermore.. Coaches win games, players don't?? WHAT? Have you ever heard coach speak "it's not the x's & o's, it's the jimmy's & joe's".
Ask Bill Belichick that question. His records as a head coach before 2001; 41-55. Do you know what his record was in 2001 the first two games before Brady took over? 0-2.
Do you know what Belichick's record as a head coach has been since Tom Brady? 132-53. The guy had one winning recored IN HIS LIFE as a head coach until Tom Brady. Must just be coincidence.
By the way, ask the Colts if Coaches win games.
Players win games. End of story. Period. Done. End of discussion.
Um, You need to read the thread again bro, it specificly states teams of the past, and not the current teams.
Um, You need to read the thread again bro, it specificly states teams of the past, and not the current teams.
To rebuttle your other sad post about coaches and players, I'm sure thats the reason why MArk Sanchez is going to be traded, carson palmer is horrible and most of the league needs a coach right? LOL there are instances when a player is above the game and above the coach, your right. But he did'nt get there without being coached, period!! Whatya think he was born that way and just happen to be a winner in the NFL due to talent. He was mentored to become the tom Brady we know with coaching and no one, I mean no one can say otherwise.
DAAKING-
Once again you prove your ignorance. So you are telling me that Oregon has gotten better and LSU has gotten worse? They have both improved. I might take Arkansas as well. No where did i ever say i take LSU for every game. I am a gambler with a brain, not a homer. I bet big against LSU last week. I also bet against them when they played Alabama. Do i think LSU beats Arkansas by 24.5 pts. Hell no. Arkansas is a dangerous team. I think LSU wins and as a fan that is all i care for. I probably won't even bet that game. I don't bet on LSU games just because they are playing. I look at all point spreads and play the ones i think will win. So STFU about me betting on your 24.5 pt. spread or be a clown. You still won't admit what an idiot you sounded like when you said Alabama and LSU are "horrible" teams. And you still won't admit that Oregon got beat 40-27 by LSU. LSU was more physical in the trenches and it wore down Oregon. I think the same thing would happen if they played again. Personally i would like to see a rematch between them for the NC. I think Oregon plays better defense then Ok. St. and their offense is just as good. However, that isn't going to happen unless Bama and Ok. St. loses. I think the line for the LSU/Arkansas game will be LSU -8. I probably wont bet that game. I will be at the game and if anything i will see how the first half plays out and put in a second half wager.
If you put together a list of compairable teams that LSU has played and will play Oregon would smash WKY right away, they would also beat the shit out of Arkasas, I also think it would be a good game against USC and arkansas or stanford and arkansas, or Stanford and Arkansas or Stanford and Alabama. Just because LSU beat Oregon in the beginning of the year does'nt mean they get beat again by the spread, or win at all. this is a true fact and no one would want to say otherwise with a full roster of oregon players who have played 10 games with one loss in the beginning of the year. Can the same be said of Oklahoma when they play Okie st? doesnt Oklahjoma have a loss? If oklahoma beats Okie st will oklahoma be in the national championship game? Personally, no other team put more points on the board than Oregon, they played far from home and have crushed their opponents ,including Oregon easily, and consistantly. If Okie st loses, Oregon should play LSU again, not Alabama. Albama shows no consistancy, no creativity with no chance of winning a NCG. If you dont think that traveling 2,500 miles affects your body to adjust, then your an idiot, have respect for the teams and the kids, they showed heart and also they showed no fear in playing that game because they believed they were the better team. If traveling is any indication of why teams lose then look at hawaii. worst traveling team in the country, they travel the most, knowing they will lose. lets see if LSU would do the same, let them travel to Oregon or Hawaii for that matter and play with one days rest. not gonna perform the same my man, no one does.
wchilde-
I am an SEC fan but betting on them just because of past results does not guarantee anything. Certainly not against the spread. If anything the spread will be inflated because of the past results. Cap the game plain and simple.
so by you own admission you think the line would be -1 that would indicate Oregon has gotten better on defense and offense, that line would sink down to a pickem.You keep contradicting yourself.
your quote:
They would have beaten LSU had Saban played field position. Kind of hard to say what kind of team they would be with Weeden or Jones. Bama's Offensive Coordinator is just too conservative. I just want to see a good National Championship game and i think Oklahoma St. vs LSU would give us a good match up. 
Ice4blood-
who's better Okie st or Oregon, maybe we see this matchup if Oklahoma beats Okie st and the BCS bullshitters decide to allow ALAbama vs LSU 2 to happen. either way Alabama should not be ahead of Oregon in the polls.
If Oregon would get 7 pts against Alabama i would pound it too. I think the line would be a pick em myself or Oregon -1. Too bad we won't get to see that matchup. That would be a great game to watch.
the lesson here is your late on every account you posted, no doubt you obviously are some wannabe who praises the ground that your SEC teams walk on. If not playing defense is the result of your conclusion then riddle me this, why are the ducks always on the plus side of take aways in a football game? use better logic, you lost all credibility when talk about defense to me.
Lesson 3 Yes, the SEC has won 5 national championships, with the obvious talent levels dwindeling in the SEC I highly doubt that will happen next year though.On any given day any SEC team can be beat from a non-confrence opponent, Look at Shitty Boise st, they took the wind out of your beloved Georia and now georgia is whooping some ass, does this mean that Boise st woould roll all the teams georgia has played and beat? keep using the talent card, lets not forget football is a team sport, I would call the ducks a true team, the play defese and very well team played offense. As for Alabama, very little team cohesion, they ride the coat tails of trent and thats it, the QB sucks and the wide recievers are average at best.LSU has a Great Defese, no doubt, but lets put hem in another situation to play the ducks after the offenses are clicking, after we can see what kind of defensive and offensive schemes could play to the advantage of either team. I've read all the post in here, and no one has pointed out that COACHING, wins football games, if you not as talented or fast, but smart and listen you can win. Did'nt we all listen to that from our coaches playing the game? Has'nt it happened to you and your team ? Coaching wins and loses games not players, im sure if the roles were reversed and alabama had won that game instead of LSU we would be hearing more from the Tide nation on this subject, and as a factual statement, LSU is in my opinion a average team compared to teams of the past, AUburn would have scored at will on both alabama and LSu if Cam Newton were QB and the Florida gators with Tebow at QB would made your LSu tigers look silly, Boise st 2010 team would give you a hard time or out right beat both these teams, and lets not forget OhiO st and add them into the mix as a potential card to beat these two horrible teams you think are great. Next week, my money will be on arkansas, not LSU, if I lose i know full well i was on the right side and not the side that only has a defense.
Lesson 1: either your too young or to stupid to know this but , being able to win games in the first quarter is paramount, LU does'nt have the capeability or know how to do this. they let a scub WKU team hang around. they were beat on recieving routes all day long, bad coaching. coaching wins games and players adjust to that coaching to define the play, obviously, either the coaching is bad or the players are bad, not mistake looks and shows talent but does'nt listen, smaells like, and sounds likie someone else.... oh that would be you.
You have to be the dumbest teenager on this forum....
Clearly I am a TEXAS Alum and Fan and last I checked, Texas was not in the SEC.
The last time I saw your Ducks play an SEC team, they got beat pretty good by the LSU team that you continue to say is no good. Oh and the time before that when your Ducks played an SEC team, they got beat in the National Championship game. I am not saying that Oregon is a bad team, they are good, but they only play offense and that offense isnt good enough to score enough on an SEC defense. Period. They have had 2 chances to do it and they failed both times.
Coaches win games?!?! That has to be the dumbest thing I have seen you post and you post a lot of dumb shit.
Its comical that you continue to point to the WKU game which LSU WON 42-9, as your means of proving that LSU is bad.
You are a complete moron and should not be allowed access to
the internet.
Winner of SEC championship will play Okla/Okie St winner for the title. Two best conferences will have their champs play, it is that simple.
BTW the loss by Okla to TTech will not even be mentioned any more if they beat the undefeated #2 team in the country in their own backyard. Some people are having a hard time with this and I understand but pollsters live in the now when putting teams in the NC game; just look at recent history.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
